Breve Análise do Conversível Asus ZenBook UX360UA

Name: Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
Brand: Asus

Candidato instável. O conversível basicamente bom e muito duradouro da gama premium tropeça - entre outras coisas - com suas dobradiças redesenhadas. O fabricante terá que rever este recurso, dado que uma tela que se balança atrapalha o uso no modo portátil. Isso é tudo o que deve ser criticado, dado que o novo ZenBook tem muito o que oferecer.

Sven Kloevekorn, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 10/30/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Convertible / 2-in-1 Skylake Tablet Touchscreen Windows

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T

Processador

Intel Core i7-6500U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Skylake

Placa gráfica

Intel HD Graphics 520, Análises do: 1050 MHz, Memoría: 1600 MHz, memória compartilhada, 20.19.15.4416

Memória

8 GB

, DDR3, 1600 MHz, dual-channel, soldada, sem bancos de memória livres

Pantalha

13.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, 10-pontos, AU Optronics AOU272D / B133HAN02.7, IPS, Brilhante: sim

placa mãe

Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH

Disco rígido

SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND), 512 GB

Placa de Som

Intel Skylake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Conexões

3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, Conexões Audio: Conector de entrada/saída de áudio combinado de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Brightness Sensor

Funcionamento em rede

Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 13.9 x 321 x 219

Bateria

57 Wh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo, lado inferior, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim

peso

1.2 kg

Preço

1200 EUR

Links

Asus página inicial
Asus Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N Dell Inspiron 13 5368 Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGE Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T DIN A4 ❌

Right: SD-card, audio in/out, USB 3.1 Typ C, HDMI, USB 3.0, power-in

Left: USB 3.0, vent, volume control, power button

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T	31 MB/s
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N	14.3 MB/s -54%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T	37 MB/s
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N	25.2 MB/s -32%

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	505 MBit/s
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng Intel Wireless-AC 7265	439 MBit/s -13%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	526 MBit/s
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng Intel Wireless-AC 7265	323 MBit/s -39%


314 cd/m²	331 cd/m²	342 cd/m²
296 cd/m²	344 cd/m²	341 cd/m²
298 cd/m²	337 cd/m²	327 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

AU Optronics AOU272D / B133HAN02.7 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 344 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 325.6 cd/m² Minimum: 10 cd/m²
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 344 cd/m²
Contraste: 1274:1 (Preto: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.53 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 6.67 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.43

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T AU Optronics AOU272D / B133HAN02.7, , 1920x1080, 13.3"	Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N Sharp LQ133T1JW02, , 2560x1440, 13.3"	HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng LGD04A5, , 1920x1280, 12"	Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE LEN40E6 N125HCE-GN1, , 1920x1080, 12.5"
Display		6%	-20%	-33%
Display P3 Coverage	64.8	69.6 7%	52.9 -18%	42.98 -34%
sRGB Coverage	93.1	98 5%	71.8 -23%	62.8 -33%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	66	70.7 7%	52.6 -20%	44.55 -32%
Response Times		606%	-54%	-90%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	29 ?(11, 18)	36 ?(12, 24) -24%	51 ?(19, 32) -76%	64 ?(30, 34) -121%
Response Time Black / White *	19 ?(7, 12)	30 ?(8, 22) -58%	25 ?(4, 21) -32%	30 ?(5, 25, Nano Seconds ns) -58%
PWM Frequency	50 ?(40)	1000 ?(10) 1900%
Screen		17%	-15%	-26%
Brightness middle	344	320 -7%	353 3%	371 8%
Brightness	326	308 -6%	347 6%	335 3%
Brightness Distribution	86	91 6%	91 6%	84 -2%
Black Level *	0.27	0.17 37%	0.44 -63%	0.29 -7%
Contrast	1274	1882 48%	802 -37%	1279 0%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.53	3.18 42%	6.09 -10%	8.51 -54%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.01	9.91 1%		20.43 -104%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.67	4.13 38%	6.24 6%	9.23 -38%
Gamma	2.43 ^91%	2.03 ^108%	2.41 ^91%	2.24 ^98%
CCT	7012 ^93%	6752 ^96%	7238 ^90%	6759 ^96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	60	65 8%	46 -23%	41 -32%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	93	98 5%	71 -24%	62 -33%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		210% / 126%	-30% / -22%	-50% / -36%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
19 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
19 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11 ms rise
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

50 Hz

≤ 40 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 50 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 40 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 50 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE Intel Core i7-6500U	128 Points +4%
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T Intel Core i7-6500U	123 Points
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N Intel Core i7-6500U	104 Points -15%
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng Intel Core m3-6Y30	62 Points -50%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N Intel Core i7-6500U	321 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T Intel Core i7-6500U	317 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE Intel Core i7-6500U	264 Points -17%
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng Intel Core m3-6Y30	172 Points -46%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

123 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

317 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)	3435 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP	3263 Points -5%
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256	3161 Points -8%
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Liteon L8H-256V2G	2116 Points -38%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP	4368 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)	4315 Points
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256	3971 Points -8%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3435 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4315 pontos
Ajuda

	Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)	Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N Lite-On CV1-8B256	HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng Liteon L8H-256V2G	Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		3%	-15%	-1%
Read Seq	452.1	507 12%	517 14%	468.9 4%
Write Seq	421.3	354.4 -16%	270.1 -36%	297.3 -29%
Read 512	288.6	355.3 23%	369.2 28%	397.9 38%
Write 512	310.7	353.9 14%	264.6 -15%	297.1 -4%
Read 4k	28.52	32.66 15%	23.48 -18%	33.11 16%
Write 4k	72.1	81.6 13%	57.4 -20%	85.1 18%
Read 4k QD32	389.6	277.6 -29%	223.4 -43%	398.3 2%
Write 4k QD32	285.3	261.2 -8%	195.8 -31%	136.6 -52%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)

Sequential Read: 452.1 MB/s

Sequential Write: 421.3 MB/s

512K Read: 288.6 MB/s

512K Write: 310.7 MB/s

4K Read: 28.52 MB/s

4K Write: 72.1 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 389.6 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 285.3 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	1489 Points
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	1415 Points -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	1197 Points -20%

3DMark - 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	7917 Points
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	7843 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	6759 Points -15%

3DMark 11 Performance		1651 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		65139 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		5832 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

	baixo	média	alto
BioShock Infinite (2013)	49.5	29.2	24.5
Battlefield 4 (2013)	32.2	24.8
The Witcher 3 (2015)	13.6

Barulho

Ocioso		30.5 / 32.1 / 32.3 dB
HDD		32 dB
DVD		37.6 / dB
Carga		36.1 / 36.1 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


23.6 °C	24.6 °C	24.6 °C
23.4 °C	24.1 °C	24.2 °C
23.3 °C	23.2 °C	24.8 °C

Máximo: 24.8 °C
Médio: 24 °C


25 °C	24.7 °C	24.6 °C
24.5 °C	24.4 °C	23.7 °C
24.1 °C	23.8 °C	23.4 °C

Máximo: 25 °C
Médio: 24.2 °C

alimentação elétrica 27.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.3 °C / 79.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+1.8 °C / 3.3 F).

Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (34.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.22 / 0.24 Watt
Ocioso	6.9 / 7.9 / 8.3 Watt
Carga	30.1 / 29.6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T 6500U, HD Graphics 520, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND), IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N 6500U, HD Graphics 520, Lite-On CV1-8B256, IPS, 2560x1440, 13.3"	HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Liteon L8H-256V2G, IPS, 1920x1280, 12"	Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE 6500U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5"
Power Consumption		-18%	8%	22%
Idle Minimum *	6.9	6.2 10%	6 13%	3.6 48%
Idle Average *	7.9	8 -1%	8 -1%	6.3 20%
Idle Maximum *	8.3	11.6 -40%	10.6 -28%	7.6 8%
Load Average *	30.1	40 -33%	21.5 29%	27.2 10%
Load Maximum *	29.6	36.6 -24%	22 26%	22.8 23%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		19h 25min
WiFi Websurfing		9h 41min
Carga (máximo brilho)		2h 49min

	Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 57 Wh	Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 49 Wh	HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 43 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 44 Wh
Battery Runtime		-42%	-28%	-35%
Reader / Idle	1165	669 -43%	681 -42%	943 -19%
WiFi v1.3	581	382 -34%	364 -37%	346 -40%
Load	169	85 -50%	161 -5%	92 -46%
H.264		393

Pro

+ Diversas configurações disponíveis

+ Especialmente compacto, leve e fino

+ Carcaça sólida com visual de alta qualidade

+ Belas superfícies

+ Bom desempenho do WiFi

+ Tela brilhante com alto contraste e ângulos de visão estáveis

+ Muito silencioso e frio

+ Excelente duração da bateria

Contra

- Dobradiças não suficientemente fortes para o modo portátil

- Moderadamente sensível às impressões digitais

- O usuário não pode fazer manutenção sem desmontar

- Poucas interfaces

- Lento leitor de cartões

- Asus FlipLock defeituoso

- Propriedades de deslizamento menos que ideais do ClickPad

- Adequação limitada para exteriores

In review: Asus ZenBook UX360UA. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

Nossos testes avaliam aquilo que recebemos - neste caso, um novo aparelho da loja online. Infelizmente, o conversível é degradado até tal grau, devido a suas dobradiças. É quase inútil no modo portátil ou em ambientes agitados como no carro ou no trem. Além disso, a tela normalmente também não consegue manter o ângulo no uso estacionário. As deduções afetaram a avaliação final de forma considerável. Solicitamos à Asus a comentar isto. O relatório será atualizado sobre este assunto. Nossos testes avaliam aquilo que recebemos - neste caso, um novo aparelho da loja online. Infelizmente, o conversível é degradado até tal grau, devido a suas dobradiças. É quase inútil no modo portátil ou em ambientes agitados como no carro ou no trem. Inclusive durante o uso estacionário, a tela frequentemente não consegue manter o ângulo. As deduções afetaram a avaliação final de forma considerável. Solicitamos à Asus a comentar isto. O relatório será atualizado sobre este assunto.

Perto, mas não conseguiu. Suas dobradiças, às vezes, inúteis não permitem que outorguemos uma recomendação de compra para o Asus ZenBook Flip UX360UA leve e fino, apesar do seu desempenho convincente.

Fora isso, não há muitos motivos para reclamar. Achamos que a ausência de uma opção para a manutenção, piora as coisas, mas isto também é típico nesta categoria. Permanece inconcebível por que os parafusos Torx tinham de ser usados. A velocidade do leitor de cartões é inadequada, considerando o preço. E o testador teve uma quantidade incomum de problemas com as propriedades de deslizamento do touchpad.

A carcaça elegante, sólida e muito leve, definitivamente é um ponto positivo. Isto também é verdade para a tela, o ruído e a temperatura baixa do sistema, e, sobretudo, a excelente duração da bateria.

Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T - 2016-10-17 10/17/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Sven Kloevekorn

Acabamento

66 / 98 → 67%

Teclado

81%

Mouse

69%

Conectividade

47 / 80 → 59%

Peso

73 / 35-78 → 88%

Bateria

92%

Pantalha

82%

Desempenho do jogos

56 / 68 → 82%

Desempenho da aplicação

85 / 87 → 97%

Temperatura

96%

Ruído

90%

Audio

65 / 91 → 71%

Camera

61 / 85 → 71%

Médio

74%

82%

Convertible - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Conversível Asus ZenBook UX360UA

Sven Kloevekorn, 2016-10-30 (Update: 2016-11- 4)