Breve Análise do Conversível Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370UA (i5, 256 GB, FHD)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 289 cd/m²
Contraste: 1336:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.24 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.92 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.68
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 AUO B133HAN04.2, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 Samsung SDCA029, , 2160x1440, 12" | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 LG Display LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1824, 12.3" | Fujitsu Lifebook P727 LP125WF4-SPH1, , 1920x1080, 12.5" | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB AUO B120YAN01 / AUO106F, , 2880x1920, 12" | Dell Latitude 5289 BOE NV12N51, , 1920x1080, 12.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 17% | 7% | 6% | 2% | -31% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 64 | 77.3 21% | 67.6 6% | 67.2 5% | 65.2 2% | 42.79 -33% |
| sRGB Coverage | 90 | 92.8 3% | 99 10% | 97.5 8% | 91 1% | 64.3 -29% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 64.9 | 83.1 28% | 69.1 6% | 69.1 6% | 66.1 2% | 44.21 -32% |
| Response Times | 61% | 3% | 5% | 8% | -1% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44 ? | 4 ? 91% | 42 ? 5% | 44 ? -0% | 45 ? -2% | 42 ? 5% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 29 ? | 20 ? 31% | 29 ? -0% | 26 ? 10% | 24 ? 17% | 31 ? -7% |
| PWM Frequency | 250 ? | 21000 | 531 ? | |||
| Screen | 100% | 11% | -18% | -13% | -7% | |
| Brightness middle | 334 | 376 13% | 417 25% | 303 -9% | 406 22% | 336 1% |
| Brightness | 321 | 378 18% | 401 25% | 272 -15% | 396 23% | 320 0% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 91 6% | 88 2% | 79 -8% | 88 2% | 90 5% |
| Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.03 88% | 0.29 -16% | 0.46 -84% | 0.3 -20% | 0.34 -36% |
| Contrast | 1336 | 12533 838% | 1438 8% | 659 -51% | 1353 1% | 988 -26% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.24 | 4.1 3% | 3.63 14% | 3.94 7% | 5.28 -25% | 3.45 19% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.03 | 6.45 -7% | 6.74 -12% | 6.57 -9% | 9.83 -63% | 7.95 -32% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.92 | 3.64 7% | 2.18 44% | 5.14 -31% | 6.71 -71% | 1.68 57% |
| Gamma | 2.68 82% | 2.58 85% | 3.09 71% | 2.31 95% | 2.29 96% | 2.49 88% |
| CCT | 6758 96% | 7113 91% | 6767 96% | 6521 100% | 6532 100% | 6782 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58 | 74 28% | 63 9% | 63 9% | 59 2% | 41 -29% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 90 | 93 3% | 99 10% | 98 9% | 91 1% | 64 -29% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 59% /
78% | 7% /
9% | -2% /
-10% | -1% /
-7% | -13% /
-11% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | ||
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook P727 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB | |
| Dell Latitude 5289 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 | |
| Dell Latitude 5289 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook P727 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Dell Latitude 5289 | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook P727 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 | |
| Productivity | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 | |
| Score | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3521 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4364 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4559 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3125 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002 | Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 Samsung PM971 KUS030202M | Fujitsu Lifebook P727 Samsung CM871A MZNTN512HDJH | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Dell Latitude 5289 SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 28% | 60% | 25% | 227% | -18% | |
| Read Seq | 455.9 | 511 12% | 723 59% | 513 13% | 2408 428% | 423.7 -7% |
| Write Seq | 432.5 | 473.7 10% | 853 97% | 467.7 8% | 1702 294% | 406.4 -6% |
| Read 512 | 315.7 | 443.7 41% | 225 -29% | 379.8 20% | 1301 312% | 260.8 -17% |
| Write 512 | 291.5 | 395.4 36% | 445 53% | 399.1 37% | 1288 342% | 255.6 -12% |
| Read 4k | 29.7 | 40.46 36% | 46 55% | 38.74 30% | 53.6 80% | 22.73 -23% |
| Write 4k | 57 | 91.9 61% | 125 119% | 89.8 58% | 162.2 185% | 27.92 -51% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 385.4 | 289.1 -25% | 423 10% | 337.1 -13% | 504 31% | 306.2 -21% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 170.8 | 260.7 53% | 373 118% | 254.2 49% | 420.8 146% | 158.8 -7% |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 | |
| Dell Latitude 5289 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook P727 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Dell Latitude 5289 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook P727 | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Dell Latitude 5289 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook P727 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1743 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 66764 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6475 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 963 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 435 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 380 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 57.7 | 31.4 | 26.3 | 8.15 |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 41.2 | 27.9 | 18.4 | 6.3 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 20.8 | 12.3 | 7.1 | 4.6 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.5 / 30.5 / 30.5 dB |
| Carga |
| 34.2 / 32.5 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A) | ||
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002 | Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M | Fujitsu Lifebook P727 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung CM871A MZNTN512HDJH | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Dell Latitude 5289 HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 3% | 4% | -5% | -2% | ||
| off / environment * | 30.5 | 30.3 1% | 30 2% | 30.4 -0% | 30.5 -0% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.5 | 30 2% | 30.4 -0% | 30.5 -0% | ||
| Idle Average * | 30.5 | 30.3 1% | 30 2% | 32.4 -6% | 30.5 -0% | |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.5 | 30 2% | 32.4 -6% | 30.5 -0% | ||
| Load Average * | 34.2 | 31.7 7% | 30.8 10% | 36 -5% | 36 -5% | |
| Load Maximum * | 32.5 | 31.7 2% | 30.8 5% | 36.3 -12% | 34.6 -6% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.5 °C / 86.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-2.5 °C / -4.5 F).
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002 | Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M | Fujitsu Lifebook P727 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung CM871A MZNTN512HDJH | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Dell Latitude 5289 HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -35% | -23% | -2% | -27% | -19% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 39.5 | 52.5 -33% | 39.2 1% | 42.2 -7% | 42 -6% | 49 -24% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 41.5 | 56.3 -36% | 40.3 3% | 43.1 -4% | 43.6 -5% | 44.4 -7% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 23.1 | 31.4 -36% | 37 -60% | 22.5 3% | 32.8 -42% | 28.6 -24% |
| Idle Bottom * | 23.6 | 32.2 -36% | 32.3 -37% | 23.3 1% | 36.4 -54% | 28.3 -20% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.68 / 2.2 Watt |
| Ocioso | 2.6 / 5.3 / 8.5 Watt |
| Carga |
29 / 27 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002, a-Si TFT-LCD, WLED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ, Super AMOLED, 2160x1440, 12" | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | Fujitsu Lifebook P727 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung CM871A MZNTN512HDJH, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 12.5" | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS, 2880x1920, 12" | Dell Latitude 5289 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G), IPS LED, 1920x1080, 12.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -31% | -14% | -10% | -16% | -2% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.6 | 3.9 -50% | 3.6 -38% | 3.9 -50% | 3.5 -35% | 2.7 -4% |
| Idle Average * | 5.3 | 9 -70% | 8.1 -53% | 6.6 -25% | 7.2 -36% | 5.1 4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.5 | 11.9 -40% | 8.7 -2% | 6.9 19% | 7.9 7% | 7.6 11% |
| Load Average * | 29 | 27.3 6% | 25.5 12% | 27 7% | 29.6 -2% | 33 -14% |
| Load Maximum * | 27 | 27.9 -3% | 23.5 13% | 27.1 -0% | 30.8 -14% | 29 -7% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 39 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 39 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Fujitsu Lifebook P727 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 41 Wh | Dell Latitude 5289 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 4% | 27% | -5% | -26% | 41% | |
| Reader / Idle | 937 | 1031 10% | 1054 12% | 941 0% | 713 -24% | 1728 84% |
| H.264 | 421 | 409 -3% | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 483 | 744 54% | 353 -27% | 345 -29% | 708 47% | |
| Load | 147 | 168 14% | 164 12% | 111 -24% | 136 -7% |
Pro
Contra
O Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370UA é um conversível inteligente que pode marcar vários pontos com sua escolha de materiais de alta qualidade. No interior, no entanto, nem muito é novo. O Intel Core i5-7200U tornou-se bastante obsoleto e a próxima geração está esperando nas asas. No entanto, o SoC Kaby-Lake pode lidar com nossos testes bastante bem, embora o alvo de temperatura conservador limite bastante o desempenho do processador. Nos EUA, o Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370UA está disponível por $1.400 na configuração com 16 GB de RAM, o processador Intel i7 e um SSD de 512 GB. Por esse preço, os compradores receberão um conversível perfeitamente construído, que é um verdadeiro looker na combinação de cores azul e dourado.
O Asus ZenBook Flip S UX 370UA tem uma construção perfeita e é um bom companheiro de viagem devido ao seu peso leve. Os escritores prolíficos terão prazer em saber sobre o bom teclado.
Uma desvantagem, no entanto, é o sistema de resfriamento bastante pequeno, o que faz com que o processador perca 14% de seu possível desempenho sob carga constante. Também é uma pena que o aparelho não esteja equipado com um slot de cartão de memória, o que seria uma ótima alternativa para a transferência de dados e também funcionaria como expansão de armazenamento. A exibição nos deu sinais ambíguos. A superfície reflexiva pode ser irritante em ambientes brilhantes, mas, por outro lado, a cobertura do espaço de cores é bastante útil para o processamento semi-profissional de imagens. Em suma, podemos dizer que o Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370UA pode definitivamente acompanhar a concorrência na configuração testada. Mas, como sempre, você terá que decidir por si mesmo qual aparelho é o melhor para você.
Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370
- 10/03/2017 v6 (old)
Sebastian Bade
Price comparison
