Breve Análise do Conversível Asus ZenBook Flip 15 (i7-8550U, GTX 1050, 4K, SSD, HDD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Average of class Convertible (17.7 - 209, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Average of class Convertible (22.6 - 263, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 383 cd/m²
Contraste: 1357:1 (Preto: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.38 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
88% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
99.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.32
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD B156ZAN03.1, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 AUO, B156HAN06.1, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng Chi Mei CM15E9, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 Chi Mei CMN N156HCE-EN1, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng Chi Mei (CMN1376), 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 LEN4140, 2560x1440, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -52% | -49% | -23% | -17% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 86.6 | 38.73 -55% | 41.36 -52% | 65 -25% | 68.1 -21% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 58.3 -42% | 62.2 -38% | 90.8 -9% | 99.5 0% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 99.5 | 40.02 -60% | 42.74 -57% | 65.8 -34% | 70.2 -29% | |
| Response Times | 10% | 17% | 26% | 19% | 91% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 52 ? | 42 ? 19% | 40 ? 23% | 29.6 ? 43% | 36 ? 31% | 3.6 ? 93% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 29 ? | 29 ? -0% | 26 ? 10% | 26.4 ? 9% | 27 ? 7% | 3.2 ? 89% |
| PWM Frequency | 25000 ? | 25510 ? | 25000 ? | 240.4 ? | ||
| Screen | -6% | -8% | -22% | -9% | -13% | |
| Brightness middle | 380 | 221 -42% | 221 -42% | 300.9 -21% | 311 -18% | 243 -36% |
| Brightness | 371 | 224 -40% | 207 -44% | 285 -23% | 278 -25% | 240 -35% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 89 2% | 87 0% | 92 6% | 82 -6% | 95 9% |
| Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.12 57% | 0.15 46% | 0.24 14% | 0.2 29% | |
| Contrast | 1357 | 1842 36% | 1473 9% | 1254 -8% | 1555 15% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.38 | 4.12 6% | 4.35 1% | 5 -14% | 3.98 9% | 5.3 -21% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.59 | 6.41 16% | 8.98 -18% | 10.2 -34% | 8.48 -12% | 8.9 -17% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.6 | 3.4 6% | 3.09 14% | 7 -94% | 5.57 -55% | 3.7 -3% |
| Gamma | 2.32 95% | 2.54 87% | 2.23 99% | 2.34 94% | 2.51 88% | 1.78 124% |
| CCT | 6860 95% | 6893 94% | 6068 107% | 6578 99% | 7810 83% | 6202 105% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 88 | 37 -58% | 56 -36% | 59 -33% | 64 -27% | 84.8 -4% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 58 -42% | 86 -14% | 90 -10% | 99 -1% | 100 0% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -16% /
-13% | -13% /
-13% | -6% /
-16% | -2% /
-7% | 39% /
8% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 25 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 27 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3614 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4401 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4249 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng Toshiba NVMe THNSN51T02DUK | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 82% | 113% | 165% | 89% | 215% | |
| Read Seq | 476.3 | 1187 149% | 1487 212% | 2046 330% | 919 93% | 2004 321% |
| Write Seq | 394.4 | 599 52% | 1241 215% | 1213 208% | 776 97% | 1693 329% |
| Read 512 | 291.9 | 935 220% | 923 216% | 1242 325% | 620 112% | 1040 256% |
| Write 512 | 291.4 | 609 109% | 797 174% | 799 174% | 575 97% | 1292 343% |
| Read 4k | 27.54 | 35.61 29% | 49.38 79% | 58.1 111% | 45.99 67% | 58.2 111% |
| Write 4k | 92.7 | 134.4 45% | 97.3 5% | 146.2 58% | 138.1 49% | 182.2 97% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 247.5 | 289.3 17% | 295 19% | 415.1 68% | 542 119% | 632 155% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 247 | 331.1 34% | 212.5 -14% | 369.2 49% | 437.3 77% | 507 105% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 7350 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 18360 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 13101 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4900 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 2512 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 205.6 | 144.8 | 128.9 | 55.5 | |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 167.1 | 121.4 | 96.2 | 43.4 | 19.5 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 91.9 | 56.9 | 34.2 | 30.3 | 12.7 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 31.3 / 31.3 / 31.3 dB |
| Carga |
| 36.4 / 37.1 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.4 dB(A) | ||
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng Vega 8, R5 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN51T02DUK | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -5% | 0% | 1% | 5% | 2% | |
| off / environment * | 30.4 | 30.2 1% | 30.13 1% | 28.2 7% | 30.13 1% | 29.3 4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 31.3 | 30.2 4% | 30.13 4% | 28.2 10% | 30.13 4% | 29.3 6% |
| Idle Average * | 31.3 | 30.2 4% | 30.13 4% | 28.2 10% | 30 4% | 31.1 1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31.3 | 30.9 1% | 30.13 4% | 28.2 10% | 30.13 4% | 33.3 -6% |
| Load Average * | 36.4 | 42.4 -16% | 38.8 -7% | 39 -7% | 33.4 8% | 33.3 9% |
| Load Maximum * | 37.1 | 44.8 -21% | 38.8 -5% | 46.3 -25% | 33 11% | 38.9 -5% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.9 °C / 89.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-3.9 °C / -7 F).
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng Vega 8, R5 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN51T02DUK | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -8% | -10% | -9% | -12% | -2% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 41.9 | 50.9 -21% | 38 9% | 42.8 -2% | 46.5 -11% | 47.5 -13% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 40.6 | 44.2 -9% | 37.1 9% | 49.6 -22% | 46.5 -15% | 44.8 -10% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 26.6 | 26.3 1% | 38.6 -45% | 27.2 -2% | 29.6 -11% | 23.7 11% |
| Idle Bottom * | 26 | 27.1 -4% | 29.2 -12% | 28.6 -10% | 28.4 -9% | 24.6 5% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.33 / 0.38 Watt |
| Ocioso | 5.4 / 10.8 / 13.9 Watt |
| Carga |
94 / 116.6 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, a-Si TFT-LCD, LCM, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng R5 2500U, Vega 8, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN51T02DUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), OLED, 2560x1440, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 31% | 39% | 1% | 51% | 33% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5.4 | 3.9 28% | 4.8 11% | 8.3 -54% | 3.2 41% | 4.9 9% |
| Idle Average * | 10.8 | 6.7 38% | 7 35% | 10.2 6% | 6 44% | 7.6 30% |
| Idle Maximum * | 13.9 | 8.7 37% | 9.5 32% | 10.4 25% | 9.2 34% | 13.8 1% |
| Load Average * | 94 | 74 21% | 40.8 57% | 67.5 28% | 29.5 69% | 33.4 64% |
| Load Maximum * | 116.6 | 79 32% | 44.3 62% | 117.2 -1% | 35.6 69% | 46.5 60% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 96.5 |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 52 Wh | Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 48 Wh | HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng R5 2500U, Vega 8, 55.8 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 72 Wh | HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 56 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 22% | 37% | 54% | 159% | 40% | |
| Reader / Idle | 558 | 759 36% | 1066 91% | 784 41% | ||
| H.264 | 261 | 331 27% | 1070 310% | 408 56% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 311 | 373 20% | 426 37% | 484 56% | 527 69% | 368 18% |
| Load | 84 | 88 5% | 96 14% | 166 98% | 120 43% |
Pro
Contra
O Asus ZenBook Flip 15 é um elegante conversível de 15 polegadas. A robusta base de alumínio contem um Intel Core i7-8550U junto com 16 GB de RAM DDR4 e amplo espaço de armazenamento. Um total de 2,2 TB dividido entre um SSD de 256 GB e um HD de 2 TB oferece muitas possibilidades para o usuário, especialmente porque o conversível também é adequado para jogos graças à Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050. A Asus equipou o ZenBook Flip 15 com uma excelente tela 4K IPS, o que foi realmente convincente em nosso teste devido ao seu bom brilho e excelente cobertura de espaço de cores. A caneta incluída e a elegante bolsa para portátil são ativos adicionais. O conversível nesta configuração tem um preço de compra de 1.799 Euros, o que é apropriado considerando o desempenho e o hardware instalado.
O Asus ZenBook Flip 15 foi muito convincente em nosso teste, graças ao seu bom hardware e qualidade de construção impecável. Trabalhar na tela táctil 4K é divertido e o elegante conversível pode rodar jogos exigentes.
No entanto, a eficiência energética do Asus ZenBook Flip 15 não foi nada convincente, resultando em durações de bateria inferiores. Os usuários que procuram comprar um conversível rápido também adequado para a sessão de jogos ocasional estarão contentes com o Asus ZenBook Flip 15. Os artistas gráficos também estarão satisfeitos com o aparelho, graças a sua muito boa tela 4K.
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD
- 03/30/2018 v6 (old)
Sebastian Bade
Price comparison
