Breve Análise do Conversível Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX461UA (i5-8250U, SSD, FHD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Convertible (17.7 - 209, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX461UA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Dell Inspiron 13-5379-9573 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Average of class Convertible (22.6 - 263, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX461UA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Dell Inspiron 13-5379-9573 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 302 cd/m²
Contraste: 530:1 (Preto: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.17 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.26 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
85% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
84.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.45
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX461UA IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell Inspiron 13-5379-9573 IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 IPS, 1920x1080, 13.9" | Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 13% | -31% | 3% | -34% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 64.4 | 68.1 6% | 41.2 -36% | 62.5 -3% | 39.76 -38% |
| sRGB Coverage | 84.6 | 99.5 18% | 61.7 -27% | 91.7 8% | 59.3 -30% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 61.8 | 70.2 14% | 42.6 -31% | 64.1 4% | 41.08 -34% |
| Response Times | 4145% | -2% | -1% | 21% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44 ? | 36 ? 18% | 45 ? -2% | 46 ? -5% | 47 ? -7% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 33 ? | 27 ? 18% | 33 ? -0% | 31.6 ? 4% | 34 ? -3% |
| PWM Frequency | 200 ? | 25000 ? 12400% | 192 ? -4% | 347 ? 74% | |
| Screen | 22% | -10% | -9% | 12% | |
| Brightness middle | 302 | 311 3% | 274 -9% | 297.9 -1% | 255 -16% |
| Brightness | 288 | 278 -3% | 272 -6% | 278 -3% | 247 -14% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 82 -9% | 81 -10% | 81 -10% | 83 -8% |
| Black Level * | 0.57 | 0.2 65% | 0.32 44% | 0.44 23% | 0.21 63% |
| Contrast | 530 | 1555 193% | 856 62% | 677 28% | 1214 129% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.17 | 3.98 23% | 5.57 -8% | 5.1 1% | 4.5 13% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.68 | 8.48 -10% | 13.48 -76% | 11 -43% | 7.21 6% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.26 | 5.57 -71% | 4.66 -43% | 6.7 -106% | 2.96 9% |
| Gamma | 2.45 90% | 2.51 88% | 2.53 87% | 2.9 76% | 2.3 96% |
| CCT | 7142 91% | 7810 83% | 7010 93% | 6839 95% | 6965 93% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 55 | 64 16% | 39 -29% | 64.1 17% | 38 -31% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 85 | 99 16% | 61 -28% | 91.7 8% | 59 -31% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1393% /
794% | -14% /
-13% | -2% /
-5% | -0% /
5% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 200 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (10893 - 13553, n=18) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX461UA | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX461UA | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (3148 - 3503, n=18) | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (10751 - 13486, n=19) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX461UA | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX461UA | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (3924 - 4243, n=19) | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Average of class Convertible (3462 - 30452, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (11269 - 14228, n=25) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX461UA | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX461UA | |
| Average of class Convertible (1989 - 6092, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (3453 - 4330, n=25) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Convertible (393 - 443, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 (40.15063.674.0) | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX461UA (Edge 41) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (151.5 - 256, n=78) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE (Edge) | |
| Dell Inspiron 13-5379-9573 | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 5667 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3660 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4666 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4700 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3473 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX461UA SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002 | HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng Toshiba NVMe THNSN51T02DUK | Dell Inspiron 13-5379-9573 Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | Average SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 108% | -19% | 200% | 90% | 4% | |
| Read Seq | 414.1 | 919 122% | 447.9 8% | 2070 400% | 1171 183% | 457 ? 10% |
| Write Seq | 435.6 | 776 78% | 304.8 -30% | 1125 158% | 605 39% | 438 ? 1% |
| Read 512 | 290.2 | 620 114% | 293.7 1% | 1252 331% | 720 148% | 301 ? 4% |
| Write 512 | 302.7 | 575 90% | 157 -48% | 832 175% | 472.8 56% | 308 ? 2% |
| Read 4k | 28.74 | 45.99 60% | 14.03 -51% | 56.2 96% | 35.92 25% | 28.2 ? -2% |
| Write 4k | 52.5 | 138.1 163% | 63.3 21% | 142.4 171% | 132.5 152% | 53 ? 1% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 285.7 | 542 90% | 165.9 -42% | 432.9 52% | 290.1 2% | 318 ? 11% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 179.6 | 437.3 143% | 155.1 -14% | 573 219% | 389.6 117% | 189.3 ? 5% |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 10737 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1973 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 67355 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8245 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1088 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 419 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 89.9 | 45.6 | 30.5 | 13.5 |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 60.3 | 31.2 | 27.1 | 9.8 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 17.9 | 10.9 | 6.1 | 3 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.4 / 30.4 / 32 dB |
| Carga |
| 31.7 / 35.9 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.4 dB(A) | ||
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX461UA i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620 | HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620 | Dell Inspiron 13-5379-9573 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620 | Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620 | Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 2% | 1% | 4% | -2% | |
| off / environment * | 30.4 | 30.13 1% | 30.1 1% | 28 8% | 30.3 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.4 | 30.13 1% | 30.1 1% | 28 8% | 30.3 -0% |
| Idle Average * | 30.4 | 30 1% | 30.1 1% | 28.8 5% | 30.3 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 32 | 30.13 6% | 30.1 6% | 30.3 5% | 30.3 5% |
| Load Average * | 31.7 | 33.4 -5% | 33 -4% | 34.5 -9% | 37.2 -17% |
| Load Maximum * | 35.9 | 33 8% | 35 3% | 34.3 4% | 35.2 2% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.6 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.4 °C / 86.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-2.4 °C / -4.3 F).
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX461UA i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620 | HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620 | Dell Inspiron 13-5379-9573 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620 | Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620 | Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -18% | -35% | -1% | -3% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 39 | 46.5 -19% | 43.2 -11% | 44.4 -14% | 35 10% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 45.6 | 46.5 -2% | 57.8 -27% | 42.8 6% | 29.6 35% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 23.3 | 29.6 -27% | 35.7 -53% | 22.2 5% | 28.9 -24% |
| Idle Bottom * | 23.1 | 28.4 -23% | 34.6 -50% | 23.4 -1% | 30.5 -32% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX461UA audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (61.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.34 / 1 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.3 / 6.3 / 11 Watt |
| Carga |
30 / 35.4 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX461UA i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620 | HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620 | Dell Inspiron 13-5379-9573 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620 | Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620 | Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 5% | 1% | 4% | 9% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.3 | 3.2 3% | 3.2 3% | 3.1 6% | 3.5 -6% |
| Idle Average * | 6.3 | 6 5% | 5.9 6% | 6.6 -5% | 6.2 2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 11 | 9.2 16% | 8.8 20% | 7 36% | 7.4 33% |
| Load Average * | 30 | 29.5 2% | 31.2 -4% | 35.2 -17% | 32.2 -7% |
| Load Maximum * | 35.4 | 35.6 -1% | 42.2 -19% | 34.6 2% | 26.4 25% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX461UA i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Dell Inspiron 13-5379-9573 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 70 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 53 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 45% | -28% | 26% | 6% | 16% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1131 | 918 -19% | 1655 46% | 887 -22% | 1330 ? 18% | |
| H.264 | 513 | 1070 109% | 602 17% | 770 ? 50% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 566 | 527 -7% | 324 -43% | 685 21% | 500 -12% | 599 ? 6% |
| Load | 125 | 166 33% | 98 -22% | 140 12% | 175 40% | 113.1 ? -10% |
Pro
Contra
Com o ZenBook Flip 14, a Asus tem um conversível em suas ofertas, cuja tela de 14 polegadas foi montada em uma carcaça com dimensões de um portátil de 13,3 polegadas. Portanto, é um dispositivo fino e compacto. O computador é impulsionado por um processador quad-core ULV que oferece poder de processamento mais do que suficiente para aplicativos do escritório ou áreas da Internet.
Um disco de estado sólido garante um bom funcionamento do sistema. Ele pode ser substituído por um modelo NVMe, se necessário. No entanto, para fazer isso, você precisa abrir a carcaça do portátil.
Apesar de seu preço de quase 1.000 Euros (~$1240), o ZenBook Flip 14 ainda deixa espaço para melhorias.
A duração da bateria resultou muito boa. Isto é acompanhado por um teclado decente, que preenche as exigências do uso doméstico. A iluminação do teclado também é positiva. A tela não desencadeia uma tempestade de entusiasmo. O brilho e particularmente o contraste precisariam ser mais altos - o nível de preço do conversível exige isso.
Nós vemos a conexão Type-C USB 3.1 Gen-1 como inadequada, já que ela só pode ser usada para transferência de dados. Teríamos, pelo menos, esperado que a bateria do portátil pudesse ser carregada via USB Type-C. Afinal, este é um dispositivo móvel. Em princípio, a Asus deveria ter colocado uma conexão Thunderbolt-3. Além disso, a Asus apenas equipou o ZenBook Flip com um leitor de cartões microSD que faz seu trabalho de forma bastante tranquila.
Finalmente, devemos mencionar o ruído eletrônico de nossa unidade de teste, que é produzida pelo conversível em intensidade variada. Isso também não deveria acontecer em um dispositivo desta faixa de preços.
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX461UA
- 03/26/2018 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Price comparison
