Breve Análise do Conversível Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T | |
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5368 | |
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T | |
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T | |
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5368 |
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng | |
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T (Seb) | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5368 (Seb) | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T (Seb) | |
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5368 (Seb) |
|
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 166 cd/m²
Contraste: 377:1 (Preto: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.07 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.99 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
63% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
43.02% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.63% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.49
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T BOE HB133WX1-402, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell Inspiron 13 5368 AUO B133HAB, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N Sharp LQ133T1JW02, , 2560x1440, 13.3" | HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng LG Philips LGD0000, , 2560x1440, 13.3" | Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T AUO B133HAN02.7, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -7% | 63% | 55% | 53% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 41.63 | 38.88 -7% | 69.6 67% | 66.8 60% | 65.1 56% |
sRGB Coverage | 62.6 | 57.7 -8% | 98 57% | 92.8 48% | 93 49% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 43.02 | 40.17 -7% | 70.7 64% | 67.3 56% | 66.5 55% |
Response Times | -130% | 557% | -37% | 55% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 38 ? | 44 ? -16% | 36 ? 5% | 24 ? 37% | 29 ? 24% |
Response Time Black / White * | 9 ? | 31 ? -244% | 30 ? -233% | 19 ? -111% | 22 ? -144% |
PWM Frequency | 50 ? | 1000 ? 1900% | 192 ? 284% | ||
Screen | 21% | 72% | 49% | 35% | |
Brightness middle | 166 | 240 45% | 320 93% | 324 95% | 302 82% |
Brightness | 165 | 229 39% | 308 87% | 324 96% | 298 81% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 92 2% | 91 1% | 90 0% | 90 0% |
Black Level * | 0.44 | 0.24 45% | 0.17 61% | 0.34 23% | 0.21 52% |
Contrast | 377 | 1000 165% | 1882 399% | 953 153% | 1438 281% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.07 | 4.75 -17% | 3.18 22% | 4.36 -7% | 6.33 -56% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.38 | 9.09 -42% | 9.91 -55% | 11.89 -86% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.99 | 4.3 -8% | 4.13 -4% | 4.62 -16% | 8.13 -104% |
Gamma | 2.49 88% | 2.5 88% | 2.03 108% | 2.18 101% | 2.52 87% |
CCT | 7491 87% | 5893 110% | 6752 96% | 6857 95% | 6811 95% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 40 | 36.79 -8% | 65 63% | 60 50% | 60 50% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 63 | 57.39 -9% | 98 56% | 93 48% | 93 48% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -39% /
-5% | 231% /
161% | 22% /
38% | 48% /
42% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4 ms rise | |
↘ 5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise | |
↘ 19 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 50 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 50 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 50 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5368 | |
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng | |
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N | |
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T | |
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5368 | |
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng | |
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T | |
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5368 | |
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N | |
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T | |
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5368 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T | |
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N | |
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2960 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4121 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T Samsung CM871 MZ7LF128HCHP | Dell Inspiron 13 5368 Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8 | Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N Lite-On CV1-8B256 | HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP | Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T Lite-On CV1-8B128 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 610% | 761% | 389% | 406% | |
Read Seq | 396 | 479 21% | 507 28% | 491.8 24% 491.8 24% | 497 26% |
Write Seq | 133.5 | 270.1 102% | 354.4 165% | 264.5 98% 264.5 98% | 182.9 37% |
Read 512 | 259.5 | 428.3 65% | 355.3 37% | 396.2 53% 396.2 53% | 353 36% |
Write 512 | 23.86 | 267.9 1023% | 353.9 1383% | 264.5 1009% 264.5 1009% | 144.1 504% |
Read 4k | 5.783 | 23.77 311% | 32.66 465% | 30.88 434% 30.88 434% | 31.89 451% |
Write 4k | 8.507 | 81.4 857% | 81.6 859% | 75.6 789% 75.6 789% | 62 629% |
Read 4k QD32 | 97.5 | 333.6 242% | 277.6 185% | 31.85 -67% 31.85 -67% | 207.7 113% |
Write 4k QD32 | 8.515 | 200.9 2259% | 261.2 2968% | 73.9 768% 73.9 768% | 131.8 1448% |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5368 | |
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N | |
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng | |
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng | |
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T | |
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5368 | |
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N | |
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng | |
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng | |
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T | |
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N | |
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng | |
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1141 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 3915 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1024x768 Lowest Preset | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5368 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T | |
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T |
BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 Medium Preset | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5368 | |
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N | |
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng | |
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T | |
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T |
Thief - 1024x768 Very Low Preset | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5368 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 43 | 24.3 | 18.4 | |
Thief (2014) | 13.3 | 8.6 | ||
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 14 | 9 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 31.3 / 31.3 / 32.9 dB |
Carga |
| 35 / 34.9 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 31 dB(A) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.2 °C / 81 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+0.9 °C / 1.6 F).
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high
desligado | 0.26 / 0.4 Watt |
Ocioso | 2.95 / 5.6 / 7.7 Watt |
Carga |
22.6 / 23.5 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T 6100U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF128HCHP, TN, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell Inspiron 13 5368 6500U, HD Graphics 520, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N 6500U, HD Graphics 520, Lite-On CV1-8B256, IPS, 2560x1440, 13.3" | HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP, IPS, 2560x1440, 13.3" | Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Lite-On CV1-8B128, IPS with 72% NTSC, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -22% | -67% | -25% | -2% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.95 | 4.4 -49% | 6.2 -110% | 3.9 -32% | 3.4 -15% |
Idle Average * | 5.6 | 6.1 -9% | 8 -43% | 7.4 -32% | 7 -25% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.7 | 6.8 12% | 11.6 -51% | 9.2 -19% | 7.6 1% |
Load Average * | 22.6 | 29 -28% | 40 -77% | 28.1 -24% | 19 16% |
Load Maximum * | 23.5 | 31.9 -36% | 36.6 -56% | 27.6 -17% | 20.1 14% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T 6100U, HD Graphics 520, 55 Wh | Dell Inspiron 13 5368 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 42 Wh | Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 49 Wh | HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 56 Wh | Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 54 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -40% | -24% | 72% | 13% | |
Reader / Idle | 1260 | 674 -47% | 669 -47% | 1027 -18% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 290 | 240 -17% | 382 32% | 500 72% | 386 33% |
Load | 193 | 86 -55% | 85 -56% | 239 24% | |
H.264 | 393 |
Pro
Contra
A Asus faz um bom trabalho em muitos aspectos, mas também comete alguns erros graves. O VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T poderia ter sido um conversível interessante, principalmente na faixa de preços mais baixa. 650 Euros (~$725) por uma sólida carcaça de alumínio, resolução Full HD, suficientes interfaces, manutenção simples, desempenho do portátil com SSD, e boas durações, parecem ser atraentes à primeira vista.
No entanto, a Asus incorpora que, em parte, se devem à configuração de gama baixa. O maior ponto fraco é o painel HD baseado na tecnologia TN - ângulos de visão instáveis, são simplesmente inapropriados em um tablet. O teclado levemente esponjoso e as dobradiças não apropriadamente firmes, pioram as coisas. Por este motivo, não podemos recomendar o modelo de teste, mas podemos recomendar os modelos IPS com a mesma resolução. Eles custam, pelo menos 999 Euros (~$1115) mas não sofrem de ângulo de visão fracos. O cargo extra também inclui uma GeForce 920M e SSD de 256 GB. O lento SSD SATA provavelmente também seja instalado na versão mais cara, mas deve ser de maior capacidade.
Os compradores que desejam muitas interfaces devem optar pelo Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T e, se for assim, aceitam as dimensões maiores. O Aspire R13 R7-372T, Spectre x360 13-4104ng, e Zenbook UX360CA têm duas vantagens sobre o VivoBook Flip: Os SSDs M.2 com taxas de dados mais velozes e telas IPS superiores. O Spectre x360 13-4104ng oferece uma carcaça de alta qualidade, sei isso for important. Aqui também encontramos a maior resolução, assim como no Aspire R13 R7.
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
- 08/30/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sebastian Jentsch