Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Conversível Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T

21 horas. O elegante alumínio se encontra com uma dobradiça de 360 graus. Será que o modelo de 650 Euros (~$725) uma ameaça para seus rivais mais caros? Por que será que ele dura 21 horas durante o modo inativo, mas nem sequer 5 horas navegando na Internet?
Asus  VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T (VivoBook Flip TP301 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i3-6100U 2 x 2.3 GHz, Skylake
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 520, Análises do: 950 MHz, Memoría: 798 MHz
Memória
8 GB 
, single-channel, DDR3L 1600 MHz SDRAM, memória integrada de 4 GB , DIMM até 8 G
Pantalha
13.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, Capacitiva 10-dedos, BOE HB133WX1-402, TN, FHD IPS opcional (1920x1080), Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Samsung CM871 MZ7LF128HCHP, 128 GB 
, SATA 2.5-inch, 50 GB livre
Placa de Som
Intel Skylake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, Conexões Audio: linha de saída + microfone, Card Reader: SD/​SDHC/​SDXC, Sensores: giroscópio
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 19.9 x 323 x 227
Bateria
55 Wh Lítio-Ion, 3 células, Duração da bateria (de acordo com o fabricante): 10 h
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 0,9 MP 640x480
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo com Tecnologia SonicMaster Lite, Teclado: chiclet, Fonte de alimentação de 45-watt, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
1.658 kg, Suprimento de energia: 172 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

343.8 mm 230.4 mm 17.9 mm 1.5 kg324.8 mm 224.4 mm 20.4 mm 1.6 kg323 mm 227 mm 19.9 mm 1.7 kg325 mm 218 mm 16 mm 1.5 kg323 mm 220 mm 13.9 mm 1.3 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Headphone/microphone, USB 3.1 Gen 1 (Type-C), 2x USB 3.0, HDMI, power-in
Headphone/microphone, USB 3.1 Gen 1 (Type-C), 2x USB 3.0, HDMI, power-in
USB 2.0, card reader, volume control, power button
USB 2.0, card reader, volume control, power button
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
 
31 MB/s
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
 
27.9 MB/s -10%
Dell Inspiron 13 5368
 
20.4 MB/s -34%
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
 
14.3 MB/s -54%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
 
38.7 MB/s
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
 
37.17 MB/s -4%
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
 
25.2 MB/s -35%
Dell Inspiron 13 5368
 
24.73 MB/s -36%
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng
Intel Wireless-AC 7265
439 MBit/s +89%
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (Seb)
232 MBit/s
Dell Inspiron 13 5368
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (Seb)
134 MBit/s -42%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (Seb)
457 MBit/s
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng
Intel Wireless-AC 7265
323 MBit/s -29%
Dell Inspiron 13 5368
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (Seb)
281 MBit/s -39%
170
cd/m²
174
cd/m²
173
cd/m²
156
cd/m²
166
cd/m²
158
cd/m²
158
cd/m²
162
cd/m²
164
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
BOE HB133WX1-402 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 174 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 164.6 cd/m² Minimum: 9 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 166 cd/m²
Contraste: 377:1 (Preto: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.07 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.99 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
63% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
43.02% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.63% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.49
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
BOE HB133WX1-402, , 1920x1080, 13.3"
Dell Inspiron 13 5368
AUO B133HAB, , 1920x1080, 13.3"
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
Sharp LQ133T1JW02, , 2560x1440, 13.3"
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
LG Philips LGD0000, , 2560x1440, 13.3"
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
AUO B133HAN02.7, , 1920x1080, 13.3"
Display
-7%
63%
55%
53%
Display P3 Coverage
41.63
38.88
-7%
69.6
67%
66.8
60%
65.1
56%
sRGB Coverage
62.6
57.7
-8%
98
57%
92.8
48%
93
49%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
43.02
40.17
-7%
70.7
64%
67.3
56%
66.5
55%
Response Times
-130%
557%
-37%
55%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
38 ?(19, 19)
44 ?(20, 24)
-16%
36 ?(12, 24)
5%
24 ?(11, 36)
37%
29 ?(15, 14)
24%
Response Time Black / White *
9 ?(4, 5)
31 ?(15, 16)
-244%
30 ?(8, 22)
-233%
19 ?(10, 28)
-111%
22 ?(5, 17)
-144%
PWM Frequency
50 ?(90)
1000 ?(10)
1900%
192 ?(30)
284%
Screen
21%
72%
49%
35%
Brightness middle
166
240
45%
320
93%
324
95%
302
82%
Brightness
165
229
39%
308
87%
324
96%
298
81%
Brightness Distribution
90
92
2%
91
1%
90
0%
90
0%
Black Level *
0.44
0.24
45%
0.17
61%
0.34
23%
0.21
52%
Contrast
377
1000
165%
1882
399%
953
153%
1438
281%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.07
4.75
-17%
3.18
22%
4.36
-7%
6.33
-56%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.38
9.09
-42%
9.91
-55%
11.89
-86%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.99
4.3
-8%
4.13
-4%
4.62
-16%
8.13
-104%
Gamma
2.49 88%
2.5 88%
2.03 108%
2.18 101%
2.52 87%
CCT
7491 87%
5893 110%
6752 96%
6857 95%
6811 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
40
36.79
-8%
65
63%
60
50%
60
50%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
63
57.39
-9%
98
56%
93
48%
93
48%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-39% / -5%
231% / 161%
22% / 38%
48% / 42%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 50 Hz ≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 50 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 50 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

System info: CPU-Z CPU
System info: CPU-Z Cache
System info: CPU-Z Mainboard
System info: CPU-Z Memory
System info: Latency Checker OK
System info: GPU-Z HD 520
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Inspiron 13 5368
Intel Core i7-6500U
130 Points +37%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
Intel Core i5-6200U
113 Points +19%
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
Intel Core i7-6500U
104 Points +9%
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
Intel Core i3-6100U
95 Points
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
Intel Core m3-6Y30
85 Points -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
Intel Core i7-6500U
321 Points +32%
Dell Inspiron 13 5368
Intel Core i7-6500U
312 Points +28%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
Intel Core i5-6200U
284 Points +16%
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
Intel Core i3-6100U
244 Points
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
Intel Core m3-6Y30
208 Points -15%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
30.5 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
244 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
95 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell Inspiron 13 5368
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
3699 Points +25%
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256
3161 Points +7%
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF128HCHP
2960 Points
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128
2727 Points -8%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell Inspiron 13 5368
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
4577 Points +11%
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF128HCHP
4121 Points
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256
3971 Points -4%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128
3496 Points -15%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2960 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4121 pontos
Ajuda
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
Samsung CM871 MZ7LF128HCHP
Dell Inspiron 13 5368
Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
Lite-On CV1-8B256
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
Lite-On CV1-8B128
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
610%
761%
389%
406%
Read Seq
396
479
21%
507
28%
491.8
24%

491.8
24%

497
26%
Write Seq
133.5
270.1
102%
354.4
165%
264.5
98%

264.5
98%

182.9
37%
Read 512
259.5
428.3
65%
355.3
37%
396.2
53%

396.2
53%

353
36%
Write 512
23.86
267.9
1023%
353.9
1383%
264.5
1009%

264.5
1009%

144.1
504%
Read 4k
5.783
23.77
311%
32.66
465%
30.88
434%

30.88
434%

31.89
451%
Write 4k
8.507
81.4
857%
81.6
859%
75.6
789%

75.6
789%

62
629%
Read 4k QD32
97.5
333.6
242%
277.6
185%
31.85
-67%

31.85
-67%

207.7
113%
Write 4k QD32
8.515
200.9
2259%
261.2
2968%
73.9
768%

73.9
768%

131.8
1448%
Samsung CM871 MZ7LF128HCHP
Sequential Read: 396 MB/s
Sequential Write: 133.5 MB/s
512K Read: 259.5 MB/s
512K Write: 23.86 MB/s
4K Read: 5.783 MB/s
4K Write: 8.507 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 97.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 8.515 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Dell Inspiron 13 5368
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
1490 Points +41%
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
1415 Points +33%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1326 Points +25%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1326 Points +25%
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6100U
1060 Points
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
714 Points -33%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell Inspiron 13 5368
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
7945 Points +68%
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
7843 Points +66%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
7439 Points +57%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
7439 Points +57%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
5510 Points +17%
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6100U
4724 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
911 Points
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
853 Points
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
853 Points
3DMark 11 Performance
1141 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
3915 pontos
Ajuda
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1024x768 Lowest Preset
Dell Inspiron 13 5368
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
17.3 fps +24%
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF128HCHP
14 fps
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128
8.4 fps -40%
BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 Medium Preset
Dell Inspiron 13 5368
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
32.2 fps +33%
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256
29.6 fps +22%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
27.3 fps +12%
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF128HCHP
24.3 fps
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128
20.2 fps -17%
Thief - 1024x768 Very Low Preset
Dell Inspiron 13 5368
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
24.3 fps +83%
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF128HCHP
13.3 fps
baixomédiaaltoultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 43 24.3 18.4
Thief (2014) 13.3 8.6
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 14 9

Barulho

Ocioso
31.3 / 31.3 / 32.9 dB
Carga
35 / 34.9 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 31 dB(A)
Inatividade
 24.3 °C24.5 °C25.1 °C 
 24.2 °C25.7 °C25.4 °C 
 24.2 °C24.5 °C25 °C 
Máximo: 25.7 °C
Médio: 24.8 °C
25.1 °C25.4 °C25.1 °C
25.9 °C26.6 °C25.5 °C
24.9 °C24.7 °C24.7 °C
Máximo: 26.6 °C
Médio: 25.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  28 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.2 °C / 81 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (+0.8 °C / 1.4 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.929.537.92537.933.637.93138.834.338.84032.830.632.85030.932.430.96333.228.933.28030.728.430.71003726.43712544.126.544.116046.424.546.420042.824.442.825048.823.148.831553.522.653.540054.421.254.450049.220.449.263052.519.652.580061.219.461.2100065.41965.4125066.118.566.1160069.318.269.3200071.918.671.9250069.818.569.831507218.672400073.318.873.3500074.218.874.2630068.418.868.4800065.918.965.91000064.918.864.91250059.218.759.21600046.918.646.9SPL81.831.281.8N47.21.647.2median 61.2median 18.9median 61.2Delta10.31.410.339.136.833.739.137.936.337.137.936.237.735.836.233.633.833.633.631.932.832.431.930.831.229.830.828.429.328.528.428.530.433.428.531.835.439.331.835.439.14235.441.14547.841.1505458.45054.359.263.254.358.263.467.858.258.163.667.358.160.665.870.260.669.374.277.669.364.169.67364.159.564.868.459.554.6606454.656.161.665.556.155.260.564.355.254.159.363.254.153.258.562.853.248.553.956.148.543.748.952.543.744.249.553.144.245.851.355.545.855.56165.255.552.357.762.152.371.676.780.371.623.732.741.323.7median 54.1median 59.2median 63.2median 54.17.17.17.37.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006TAcer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.26 / 0.4 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 2.95 / 5.6 / 7.7 Watt
Carga midlight 22.6 / 23.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
6100U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF128HCHP, TN, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Dell Inspiron 13 5368
6500U, HD Graphics 520, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
6500U, HD Graphics 520, Lite-On CV1-8B256, IPS, 2560x1440, 13.3"
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
6200U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP, IPS, 2560x1440, 13.3"
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Lite-On CV1-8B128, IPS with 72% NTSC, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Power Consumption
-22%
-67%
-25%
-2%
Idle Minimum *
2.95
4.4
-49%
6.2
-110%
3.9
-32%
3.4
-15%
Idle Average *
5.6
6.1
-9%
8
-43%
7.4
-32%
7
-25%
Idle Maximum *
7.7
6.8
12%
11.6
-51%
9.2
-19%
7.6
1%
Load Average *
22.6
29
-28%
40
-77%
28.1
-24%
19
16%
Load Maximum *
23.5
31.9
-36%
36.6
-56%
27.6
-17%
20.1
14%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
21h 00min
WiFi Websurfing
4h 50min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 13min
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
6100U, HD Graphics 520, 55 Wh
Dell Inspiron 13 5368
6500U, HD Graphics 520, 42 Wh
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
6500U, HD Graphics 520, 49 Wh
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 56 Wh
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 54 Wh
Battery Runtime
-40%
-24%
72%
13%
Reader / Idle
1260
674
-47%
669
-47%
1027
-18%
WiFi v1.3
290
240
-17%
382
32%
500
72%
386
33%
Load
193
86
-55%
85
-56%
239
24%
H.264
393

Pro

+ Construção sólida e de alta qualidade.
+ Fácil manutenção
+ Muito silencioso e frio
+ Baixo consumo de energia

Contra

- Duração da bateria comparativamente pobre
- Sensação esponjosa do teclado
- Painel TN escuro
- PWM @ 50 Hz começa abaixo do 90% do brilho
- SSD SATA lento
- HD 520 lento
In review: Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T. Test model courtesy of Cyberport.de
In review: Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T. Test model courtesy of Cyberport.de

A Asus faz um bom trabalho em muitos aspectos, mas também comete alguns erros graves. O VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T poderia ter sido um conversível interessante, principalmente na faixa de preços mais baixa. 650 Euros (~$725) por uma sólida carcaça de alumínio, resolução Full HD, suficientes interfaces, manutenção simples, desempenho do portátil com SSD, e boas durações, parecem ser atraentes à primeira vista.

No entanto, a Asus incorpora que, em parte, se devem à configuração de gama baixa. O maior ponto fraco é o painel HD baseado na tecnologia TN - ângulos de visão instáveis, são simplesmente inapropriados em um tablet. O teclado levemente esponjoso e as dobradiças não apropriadamente firmes, pioram as coisas. Por este motivo, não podemos recomendar o modelo de teste, mas podemos recomendar os modelos IPS com a mesma resolução. Eles custam, pelo menos 999 Euros (~$1115) mas não sofrem de ângulo de visão fracos. O cargo extra também inclui uma GeForce 920M e SSD de 256 GB. O lento SSD SATA provavelmente também seja instalado na versão mais cara, mas deve ser de maior capacidade.

Os compradores que desejam muitas interfaces devem optar pelo Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T e, se for assim, aceitam as dimensões maiores. O Aspire R13 R7-372TSpectre x360 13-4104ng, e Zenbook UX360CA têm duas  vantagens sobre o VivoBook Flip: Os SSDs M.2 com taxas de dados mais velozes e telas IPS superiores. O Spectre x360 13-4104ng oferece uma carcaça de alta qualidade, sei isso for important. Aqui também encontramos a maior resolução, assim como no Aspire R13 R7.

Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T - 08/30/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sebastian Jentsch

Acabamento
87 / 98 → 89%
Teclado
71%
Mouse
86%
Conectividade
46 / 80 → 57%
Peso
67 / 35-78 → 74%
Bateria
80%
Pantalha
74%
Desempenho do jogos
54 / 68 → 79%
Desempenho da aplicação
76 / 87 → 87%
Temperatura
96%
Ruído
90%
Audio
59 / 91 → 65%
Camera
23 / 85 → 27%
Médio
70%
78%
Convertible - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Conversível Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
Sebastian Jentsch, 2016-09-16 (Update: 2016-09-22)