Breve Análise do Conversível Asus Transformer Book T302CA-FL010T
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
maximum SDCardreader Maximum Transfer Rate | |
average SDCardreader Average Transfer Rate |
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T | |
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 | |
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T | |
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 | |
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng |
|
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 379 cd/m²
Contraste: 1184:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.78 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.27 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
65% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
45.38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
43.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.34
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T AU Optronics AUO106D B125HANO1.0, , 1920x1080, 12.5" | HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng LG Philips LGD04A5, , 1920x1280, 12" | HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng LGD04A5, , 1920x1280, 12" | Acer Aspire Switch 12S SW7-272-M3A0 AU Optronics B125HAN01.0, , 1920x1080, 12.5" | Asus Transformer Book T300 Chi Sharp, ID: SHP142C, Monitor name: LQ125T1JX03, , 2560x1440, 12.5" | Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 TMA 1200 Unknown Vendor, , 2160x1440, 12" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 16% | 15% | -2% | 64% | 48% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 43.9 | 53.2 21% | 52.9 21% | 43.2 -2% | 77.4 76% | 65.8 50% |
sRGB Coverage | 65.7 | 72.4 10% | 71.8 9% | 64 -3% | 97.5 48% | 96.2 46% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 45.38 | 52.9 17% | 52.6 16% | 44.63 -2% | 75.8 67% | 66.8 47% |
Response Times | -39% | -57% | 8% | 11% | ||
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 28 ? | 38 ? -36% | 51 ? -82% | 25 ? 11% | 25 ? 11% | |
Response Time Black / White * | 19 ? | 27 ? -42% | 25 ? -32% | 18 ? 5% | 17 ? 11% | |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | -20% | -15% | 2% | 5% | -21% | |
Brightness middle | 379 | 314 -17% | 353 -7% | 383 1% | 368.1 -3% | 451 19% |
Brightness | 364 | 308 -15% | 347 -5% | 378 4% | 375 3% | 425 17% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 93 6% | 91 3% | 92 5% | 92 5% | 80 -9% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.48 -50% | 0.44 -38% | 0.34 -6% | 0.458 -43% | 0.37 -16% |
Contrast | 1184 | 654 -45% | 802 -32% | 1126 -5% | 804 -32% | 1219 3% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.78 | 6.12 -28% | 6.09 -27% | 4.8 -0% | 4.36 9% | 11.04 -131% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.28 | 10.92 -32% | 8.77 -6% | 14.92 -80% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.27 | 6.1 -43% | 6.24 -46% | 2.8 34% | 2.63 38% | 10.45 -145% |
Gamma | 2.34 94% | 2.35 94% | 2.41 91% | 2.25 98% | 2.08 106% | 2 110% |
CCT | 7376 88% | 7391 88% | 7238 90% | 6676 97% | 6743 96% | 8849 73% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 42 | 46.81 11% | 46 10% | 41 -2% | 66.94 59% | 74 76% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 65 | 71.74 10% | 71 9% | 64 -2% | 100 54% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -14% /
-16% | -19% /
-14% | 3% /
2% | 35% /
21% | 13% /
-3% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
19 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9 ms rise | |
↘ 19 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2767 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3149 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3699 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP | HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G | Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027 | HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng Liteon L8H-256V2G | Acer Aspire Switch 12S SW7-272-M3A0 Lite-On CV1-8B128 | Asus Transformer Book T300 Chi SanDisk SSD i110 128GB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 219% | 326% | 293% | 130% | -5% | |
Read Seq | 428 | 477.3 12% | 512 20% | 517 21% | 445.2 4% | 453.6 6% |
Write Seq | 124.2 | 184.3 48% | 462.1 272% | 270.1 117% | 179.9 45% | 217.3 75% |
Read 512 | 283.9 | 226.2 -20% | 376 32% | 369.2 30% | 330.6 16% | 245.2 -14% |
Write 512 | 41.49 | 176.2 325% | 295.2 611% | 264.6 538% | 181.6 338% | 25.57 -38% |
Read 4k | 15.95 | 21.12 32% | 31.83 100% | 23.48 47% | 12.17 -24% | 12.35 -23% |
Write 4k | 14.67 | 57.9 295% | 64.5 340% | 57.4 291% | 19.09 30% | 16.23 11% |
Read 4k QD32 | 98.9 | 136.4 38% | 269.6 173% | 223.4 126% | 137.9 39% | 32.06 -68% |
Write 4k QD32 | 15.41 | 173.2 1024% | 178.2 1056% | 195.8 1171% | 106.5 591% | 16.83 9% |
3DMark - 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 | |
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T | |
Acer Aspire Switch 12S SW7-272-M3A0 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1084 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 3923 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Tomb Raider | |
1024x768 Low Preset | |
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T | |
Acer Aspire Switch 12S SW7-272-M3A0 | |
1366x768 Normal Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T | |
Acer Aspire Switch 12S SW7-272-M3A0 |
BioShock Infinite | |
1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng | |
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T | |
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 | |
Acer Aspire Switch 12S SW7-272-M3A0 | |
1366x768 Medium Preset | |
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng | |
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 | |
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T | |
Acer Aspire Switch 12S SW7-272-M3A0 |
Battlefield 4 | |
1024x768 Low Preset | |
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng | |
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T | |
Acer Aspire Switch 12S SW7-272-M3A0 | |
1366x768 Medium Preset | |
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng | |
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T | |
Acer Aspire Switch 12S SW7-272-M3A0 |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tomb Raider (2013) | 49.4 | 26 | 17.8 | 7.4 |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 38.9 | 20 | 15.9 | 4.9 |
Battlefield 4 (2013) | 26.4 | 16 | 8.4 | 2.9 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 31.6 / 31.6 / 31.6 dB |
Carga |
| 31.6 / 31.6 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 31.6 dB(A) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.4 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39.4 °C / 102.9 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-11.3 °C / -20.3 F).
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.42 / 0.89 Watt |
Ocioso | 3.7 / 7.4 / 8.2 Watt |
Carga |
17 / 18.6 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5" | HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G, IPS, 1920x1280, 12" | Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027, IPS, 2160x1440, 12" | HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Liteon L8H-256V2G, IPS, 1920x1280, 12" | Acer Aspire Switch 12S SW7-272-M3A0 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Lite-On CV1-8B128, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5" | Asus Transformer Book T300 Chi 5Y71, HD Graphics 5300, SanDisk SSD i110 128GB, IPS, 2560x1440, 12.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -20% | -40% | -29% | -32% | ||
Idle Minimum * | 3.7 | 5.3 -43% | 7.4 -100% | 6 -62% | 6.3 -70% | |
Idle Average * | 7.4 | 8.2 -11% | 11.6 -57% | 8 -8% | 9.4 -27% | |
Idle Maximum * | 8.2 | 9 -10% | 11.6 -41% | 10.6 -29% | 12.3 -50% | |
Load Average * | 17 | 20.7 -22% | 16.8 1% | 21.5 -26% | 18.6 -9% | |
Load Maximum * | 18.6 | 21.4 -15% | 19.1 -3% | 22 -18% | 19 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 38 Wh | HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 33 Wh | Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 33 Wh | HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 43 Wh | Acer Aspire Switch 12S SW7-272-M3A0 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 34 Wh | Asus Transformer Book T300 Chi 5Y71, HD Graphics 5300, 32 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -62% | -64% | -49% | -55% | -54% | |
Reader / Idle | 1072 | 474 -56% | 478 -55% | 681 -36% | 530 -51% | 722 -33% |
H.264 | 696 | 311 -55% | 337 -52% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 805 | 285 -65% | 263 -67% | 364 -55% | 343 -57% | 236 -71% |
Load | 362 | 109 -70% | 106 -71% | 161 -56% | 145 -60% | 150 -59% |
Pro
Contra
A Asus atualiza a sua série Transformer com o novo Transformer Book T302CA. O foco é na geração Skylake da Intel e a nova bateria no dock de teclado.
Não muito mudou em termos de visual: A carcaça de alumínio deixa uma impressão de alta qualidade. Infelizmente, é bastante suscetível às digitais e a dobradiça tem muito movimento. Os dispositivos de entrada instalados são suficientes para o trabalho de escritório casual. Gostaríamos de uma melhoria no tamanho do touchpad. Uma tela brilhante para usar o aparelho em ambientes brilhantes é particularmente importante. A brilhante tela IPS não contraria este compromisso. Como com muito tablets modernos que estão equipados com equipamento similar, uma ventoinha para expulsar o calor não está instalada. Portanto, o modelo de teste nunca consegue utilizar o seu potencial pleno de forma consistente. No entanto, estas limitações do desempenho ocorrem raramente ou apenas temporariamente fora dos benchmarks e jogos. A segunda bateria no dock de teclado é particularmente útil. Ela aumenta a duração de forma considerável. No entanto, a duração da bateria do modelo de teste pode competir com os aparelhos de comparação. Inclusive sem o dock de teclado.
A Asus apresenta um conversível que é um companheiro adequado graças à escolha de materiais de alta qualidade, e à duração da bateria.
Também é um aparelho interessante para a universidade e a escola, graças ao stylus e a seu preço. Os rivais como o HP Pavilion x2 são um pouco mais econômicos e igual de bons. Os compradores deveriam dar uma olhada em conversíveis com um kickstand quando o conversível é utilizado frequentemente no modo tablet. O HP Spectre x2 12 testado com sucesso é um bom representante aqui.
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
- 11/04/2016 v5.1 (old)
Nino Ricchizzi