Breve Análise do Conversível Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
|
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 316 cd/m²
Contraste: 1090:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.91 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.37 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
72% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
82.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
81.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.36
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T BOE BOE06AC (NV126A1M-N51), , 2880x1920, 12.6" | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Samsung SDC3853, , 2736x1824, 12.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 Samsung ATNA40JU01-0, , 2560x1440, 14" | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 LG Philips, , 1920x1280, 12.1" | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Panasonic VVX12T041N00, , 2160x1440, 12" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -12% | -31% | -14% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 81.8 | 67.5 -17% | 53.8 -34% | 65.5 -20% | |
sRGB Coverage | 98.3 | 96.6 -2% | 73.7 -25% | 96.1 -2% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 82.2 | 69 -16% | 53.8 -35% | 66.9 -19% | |
Response Times | -45% | 71% | 5% | 139% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 30 ? | 46 ? -53% | 1 ? 97% | 33.2 ? -11% | 20 ? 33% |
Response Time Black / White * | 29 ? | 31 ? -7% | 1 ? 97% | 22.8 ? 21% | 34 ? -17% |
PWM Frequency | 200 ? | 50 ? -75% | 240 ? 20% | 1000 ? 400% | |
Screen | 13% | -3% | -22% | -21% | |
Brightness middle | 316 | 389.2 23% | 279 -12% | 322 2% | 345 9% |
Brightness | 307 | 392 28% | 277 -10% | 319 4% | 328 7% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 92 1% | 91 0% | 97 7% | 91 0% |
Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.27 7% | 0.42 -45% | 0.38 -31% | |
Contrast | 1090 | 1441 32% | 767 -30% | 908 -17% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.91 | 3.61 8% | 5.15 -32% | 6.02 -54% | 8.4 -115% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.9 | 8.28 -5% | 10.06 -27% | 11.9 -51% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.37 | 3.8 29% | 5.44 -1% | 6.29 -17% | 4.3 20% |
Gamma | 2.36 93% | 2.16 102% | 2.28 96% | 2.4 92% | 2.63 84% |
CCT | 7812 83% | 5969 109% | 5686 114% | 7712 84% | 7368 88% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 72 | 63 -12% | 98 36% | 47.8 -34% | 62 -14% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98 | 97 -1% | 100 2% | 73.2 -25% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -15% /
-4% | 34% /
17% | -16% /
-20% | 35% /
12% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8 ms rise | |
↘ 21 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise | |
↘ 16 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 200 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 | |
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T | |
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 | |
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 | |
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 | |
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 | |
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM | |
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 | |
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 |
PCMark 7 | |
Score | |
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
Productivity | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T |
PCMark Vantage Result | 13886 pontos | |
PCMark 7 Score | 5152 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2985 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4043 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3830 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZSLW1T0) | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 Liteon L8H-256V2G | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -7% | 121% | 12% | 0% | |
Read Seq | 398.9 | 663 66% | 1510 279% | 501 26% | 518 30% |
Write Seq | 402 | 158.2 -61% | 1193 197% | 297.2 -26% | 199.9 -50% |
Read 512 | 303.1 | 313.1 3% | 351.7 16% | 374.9 24% | |
Write 512 | 320.3 | 158.2 -51% | 295.7 -8% | 201 -37% | |
Read 4k | 26.11 | 30.14 15% | 37 42% | 28.31 8% | 29.3 12% |
Write 4k | 57.7 | 68 18% | 126 118% | 90.3 56% | 76.8 33% |
Read 4k QD32 | 245.8 | 243.7 -1% | 404 64% | 285 16% | 272 11% |
Write 4k QD32 | 253.8 | 149.2 -41% | 319 26% | 268.4 6% | 197.1 -22% |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 | |
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T | |
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T |
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 | |
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM | |
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
1280x720 Performance | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 | |
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM | |
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 |
3DMark 06 - 1280x1024 Standard Score AA:0x AF:0x | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T |
3DMark 03 Standard | 20325 pontos | |
3DMark 05 Standard | 9082 pontos | |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 7464 pontos | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 4650 pontos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1381 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 35293 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 4401 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 676 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 309 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 297 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 45.2 | 26.9 | 22.5 | 6.6 |
Battlefield 4 (2013) | 31.3 | 23.2 | 15.9 | |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 20 | 11 | 9 |
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) | Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 Iris Graphics 540, 6650U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZSLW1T0) | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) Iris Graphics 550, 6267U, Apple SSD AP0256 | Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -0% | 4% | 4% | 1% | |
off / environment * | 30.7 | 28.9 6% | 30.2 2% | 30.3 1% | |
Idle Minimum * | 30.7 | 28.4 7% | 28.9 6% | 30.2 2% | 30.6 -0% |
Idle Average * | 30.7 | 28.6 7% | 28.9 6% | 30.2 2% | 30.6 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 30.7 | 28.7 7% | 28.9 6% | 30.2 2% | 32.2 -5% |
Load Average * | 37 | 40.8 -10% | 35.3 5% | 33 11% | 32.2 13% |
Load Maximum * | 37.1 | 41.4 -12% | 38.9 -5% | 36.2 2% | 38.5 -4% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 30.7 / 30.7 / 30.7 dB |
Carga |
| 37 / 37.1 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.7 dB(A) |
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZSLW1T0) | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -8% | -12% | 1% | -11% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 34.9 | 43.6 -25% | 45.5 -30% | 39 -12% | 46.7 -34% |
Maximum Bottom * | 36.7 | 45.2 -23% | 47.1 -28% | 41.2 -12% | 51 -39% |
Idle Upper Side * | 35.8 | 32.4 9% | 31.1 13% | 29.5 18% | 29.5 18% |
Idle Bottom * | 32.4 | 29.6 9% | 33.1 -2% | 29.8 8% | 28.6 12% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.8 °C / 96.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-7.7 °C / -13.8 F).
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.14 / 0.85 Watt |
Ocioso | 6.7 / 10.3 / 13.5 Watt |
Carga |
26 / 28.8 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T 6500U, HD Graphics 520, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND), IPS, 2880x1920, 12.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 6600U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZSLW1T0), OLED, 2560x1440, 14" | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, Liteon L8H-256V2G, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.1" | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2, IPS, 2160x1440, 12" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) 6267U, Iris Graphics 550, Apple SSD AP0256, , 2560x1600, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, , 3200x1800, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -6% | 23% | 4% | -18% | 22% | |
Idle Minimum * | 6.7 | 4.7 30% | 3.7 45% | 7.3 -9% | 2.1 69% | 3.7 45% |
Idle Average * | 10.3 | 8.6 17% | 6.8 34% | 10 3% | 7.6 26% | 6.1 41% |
Idle Maximum * | 13.5 | 12.2 10% | 7.6 44% | 10.15 25% | 8.2 39% | 6.5 52% |
Load Average * | 26 | 29.7 -14% | 22.5 13% | 25.2 3% | 56.4 -117% | 29.5 -13% |
Load Maximum * | 28.8 | 50.5 -75% | 34.5 -20% | 29.3 -2% | 59.8 -108% | 33 -15% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 39 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 38 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 6600U, HD Graphics 520, 56 Wh | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 37 Wh | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 37 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 80% | 79% | 77% | 58% | |
Reader / Idle | 426 | 791 86% | 824 93% | 732 72% | 640 50% |
H.264 | 206 | 520 152% | 432 110% | 468 127% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 223 | 488 119% | 315 41% | 443 99% | 321 44% |
Load | 102 | 138 35% | 132 29% | 130 27% | 112 10% |
Pro
Contra
A Asus decidiu fazer muito para competir com o Microsoft Surface. O Asus Transformer 3 Pro é um passo para frente: um processador mais veloz, muita RAM e um grande SSD em um conversível. O dock de teclado transforma esta pacote em um portátil completo. No momento do teste o preço do conversível era de 1.599 Euros (~$ 1668). O comprador receberá um aparelho confiável com suficiente desempenho para as tarefas do dia a dia. Infelizmente, o modelo de teste nunca foi capaz de liberar todo o seu desempenho. É por isso que não podemos considera-lo como um concorrente real do Microsoft Surface Pro 4.
A brecha entre o desempenho potencial e real pode espantar muitos compradores potenciais. No entanto, o Asus Transformer 3 Pro é um conversível elegante com acabamento perfeito. A ótima tela oferece extensa cobertura do espaço de cores e é adequada para o uso profissional.
Um processador mais veloz seria sempre melhor. Mas qual o sentido disso quando o fabricante o afoga até o fundo? Um Intel Core i5-7Y54 pode ser resfriado passivamente, mesmo assim oferece desempenho similar ao do Intel Core i7-6500U do nosso modelo de teste. A conectividade do modelo da Asus é típico, mas gostaríamos de ver duas portas USB 3.1 (ambas com suporte para Thunderbolt 3) no futuro assim o usuário pode usar um para carregar e o outro para adaptadores para estender a conectividade.
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
- 12/21/2016 v6 (old)
Sebastian Bade