Breve Análise do Conversível Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T

Name: Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
Brand: Asus

Concorrente sério do Surface? Os conversíveis com forte desempenho sempre são os favoritos de uma multidão. A Asus coloca um processador Skylake i7 em uma carcaça plana e espera o melhor, mas existem alguns problemas. Em nossa análise, vamos falar sobre o Transformer 3 Pro e a sua posição no competitivo mercado de conversíveis.

Sebastian Bade, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 01/18/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Convertible / 2-in-1 Laptop / Notebook Skylake Tablet Touchscreen Windows

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T (Transformer Pad Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-6500U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Skylake

Placa gráfica

Intel HD Graphics 520 - shared Memory MB VRAM, Análises do: 933 MHz, Memoría: 933 MHz, 21.20.16.4534

Memória

16 GB

, LPDDR3 1866MHz SDRAM Onboard Memory

Pantalha

12.60 polegadas 16:9, 2880 x 1920 pixel 275 PPI, Multi-Touch, native pen support, BOE BOE06AC (NV126A1M-N51), IPS, 60Hz, 85% NTSC, Support ASUS Splendid Technology, Brilhante: sim, detachable screen

placa mãe

Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH

Disco rígido

SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND), 512 GB

, 512GB SSD (SATA, M.2), 421 GB livre

Placa de Som

Realtek High Definition Audio

Conexões

1 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, Conexões Audio: Combo 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Multi-format, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, TPM

Funcionamento em rede

Intel Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.35 x 298.8 x 210.1

Bateria

39 Wh Lítio-Polímero, Duração da bateria (de acordo com o fabricante): 9 h

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alta falantes estéreo de 2W, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Adaptador de força, dock de teclado, ASUS Pen Active Stylus, 24 Meses Garantia, Keyboard-Dock: 340g, ASUS Pen Active Stylus: 22g

peso

1.13 kg, Suprimento de energia: 200 g

Preço

1599 Euro

Links

Asus página inicial
Asus Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 HP Elite x2 1012 G1 Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 DIN A4 ❌

Right: USB-C 3.1 (Thunderbolt 3), HDMI, USB 3.0

Networking
iperf3 receive AX12
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) Broadcom BCM15700A2 802.11ac	950 MBit/s +70%
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	676 MBit/s +21%
MSI GT73VR 6RF Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	654 MBit/s +17%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T Intel Wireless-AC 7265	560 MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) Broadcom BCM15700A2 802.11ac	949 MBit/s +39%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T Intel Wireless-AC 7265	685 MBit/s
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	680 MBit/s -1%
MSI GT73VR 6RF Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	660 MBit/s -4%


301 cd/m²	317 cd/m²	316 cd/m²
314 cd/m²	316 cd/m²	317 cd/m²
293 cd/m²	300 cd/m²	289 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

BOE BOE06AC (NV126A1M-N51) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 317 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 307 cd/m² Minimum: 17.5 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 316 cd/m²
Contraste: 1090:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.91 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 5.37 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
72% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
82.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
81.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.36

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T BOE BOE06AC (NV126A1M-N51), , 2880x1920, 12.6"	Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Samsung SDC3853, , 2736x1824, 12.3"	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 Samsung ATNA40JU01-0, , 2560x1440, 14"	HP Elite x2 1012 G1 LG Philips, , 1920x1280, 12.1"	Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Panasonic VVX12T041N00, , 2160x1440, 12"
Display		-12%		-31%	-14%
Display P3 Coverage	81.8	67.5 -17%		53.8 -34%	65.5 -20%
sRGB Coverage	98.3	96.6 -2%		73.7 -25%	96.1 -2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	82.2	69 -16%		53.8 -35%	66.9 -19%
Response Times		-45%	71%	5%	139%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	30 ?(14, 16)	46 ?(17.2, 28.8) -53%	1 ?(0.5, 0.5) 97%	33.2 ?(15.2, 18) -11%	20 ?(5, 15, detail 5 schraffiert) 33%
Response Time Black / White *	29 ?(8, 21)	31 ?(6, 25.2) -7%	1 ?(0.5, 0.5) 97%	22.8 ?(10.4, 12.4) 21%	34 ?(15, 19, PWM@100% mit/ohne PSU) -17%
PWM Frequency	200 ?(90)	50 ?(50) -75%	240 ?(100) 20%		1000 ?(100) 400%
Screen		13%	-3%	-22%	-21%
Brightness middle	316	389.2 23%	279 -12%	322 2%	345 9%
Brightness	307	392 28%	277 -10%	319 4%	328 7%
Brightness Distribution	91	92 1%	91 0%	97 7%	91 0%
Black Level *	0.29	0.27 7%		0.42 -45%	0.38 -31%
Contrast	1090	1441 32%		767 -30%	908 -17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.91	3.61 8%	5.15 -32%	6.02 -54%	8.4 -115%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.9		8.28 -5%	10.06 -27%	11.9 -51%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.37	3.8 29%	5.44 -1%	6.29 -17%	4.3 20%
Gamma	2.36 ^93%	2.16 ^102%	2.28 ^96%	2.4 ^92%	2.63 ^84%
CCT	7812 ^83%	5969 ^109%	5686 ^114%	7712 ^84%	7368 ^88%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	72	63 -12%	98 36%	47.8 -34%	62 -14%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	98	97 -1%	100 2%	73.2 -25%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-15% / -4%	34% / 17%	-16% / -20%	35% / 12%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 8 ms rise
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14 ms rise
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

200 Hz

≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 Intel Core i7-6600U	135 Points +15%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T Intel Core i7-6500U	117 Points
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Intel Core i5-6200U	114 Points -3%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 Intel Core m5-6Y54	111 Points -5%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	88 Points -25%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 Intel Core i7-6600U	305 Points +38%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Intel Core i5-6200U	289 Points +31%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 Intel Core m5-6Y54	255 Points +15%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T Intel Core i7-6500U	221 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	206 Points -7%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 Intel Core i7-6600U	1.51 Points +17%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T Intel Core i7-6500U	1.29 Points
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 Intel Core m5-6Y54	1.26 Points -2%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	0.98 Points -24%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 Intel Core i7-6600U	3.32 Points +36%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 Intel Core m5-6Y54	2.7 Points +11%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T Intel Core i7-6500U	2.44 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	2.27 Points -7%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T Intel Core i7-6500U	7220 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	4297 Points -40%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T Intel Core i7-6500U	9374 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	8886 Points -5%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T Intel Core i7-6500U	196.2 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 Intel Core i7-6600U	187.7 Points -4%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 Intel Core m5-6Y54	184.4 Points -6%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Intel Core i5-6200U	133.3 Points -32%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 Intel Core i7-6600U	30759 Points +11%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T Intel Core i7-6500U	27663 Points
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 Intel Core m5-6Y54	26727 Points -3%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Intel Core i5-6200U	23339 Points -16%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	1556 ms * -23%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Intel Core i5-6200U	1445 ms * -15%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 Intel Core m5-6Y54	1306 ms * -4%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T Intel Core i7-6500U	1260 ms *
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 Intel Core i7-6600U	1202 ms * +5%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

4559

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

7308

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

7350

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

5842 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

9374 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

7220 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

2.44 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

26.53 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.29 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

221 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

117 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.7 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

37.41 fps

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8 | PCMark 7

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZSLW1T0)	3489 Points +17%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2	3281 Points +10%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)	2985 Points
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G	2983 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	2426 Points -19%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZSLW1T0)	4410 Points +15%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2	3996 Points +4%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G	3932 Points +3%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)	3830 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	3186 Points -17%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)	4043 Points
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G	3423 Points -15%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	2968 Points -27%

PCMark 7
Score
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)	5152 Points
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G	4808 Points -7%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	4274 Points -17%
Productivity
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G	2361 Points +2%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)	2315 Points

PCMark Vantage Result		13886 pontos
PCMark 7 Score		5152 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		2985 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		4043 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		3830 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

	Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)	Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZSLW1T0)	HP Elite x2 1012 G1 Liteon L8H-256V2G	Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-7%	121%	12%	0%
Read Seq	398.9	663 66%	1510 279%	501 26%	518 30%
Write Seq	402	158.2 -61%	1193 197%	297.2 -26%	199.9 -50%
Read 512	303.1	313.1 3%		351.7 16%	374.9 24%
Write 512	320.3	158.2 -51%		295.7 -8%	201 -37%
Read 4k	26.11	30.14 15%	37 42%	28.31 8%	29.3 12%
Write 4k	57.7	68 18%	126 118%	90.3 56%	76.8 33%
Read 4k QD32	245.8	243.7 -1%	404 64%	285 16%	272 11%
Write 4k QD32	253.8	149.2 -41%	319 26%	268.4 6%	197.1 -22%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)

Sequential Read: 398.9 MB/s

Sequential Write: 402 MB/s

512K Read: 303.1 MB/s

512K Write: 320.3 MB/s

4K Read: 26.11 MB/s

4K Write: 57.7 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 245.8 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 253.8 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark 06

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6600U	7572 Points +23%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	7307 Points +19%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	6597 Points +7%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54	6308 Points +3%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	6137 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6600U	931 Points +24%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	810 Points +8%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54	797 Points +6%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	753 Points
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54	47242 Points +34%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	42046 Points +19%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	35293 Points

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6600U	1458 Points +15%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	1428 Points +12%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	1271 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	1206 Points -5%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54	1200 Points -6%
1280x720 Performance
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6600U	1614 Points +17%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	1585 Points +15%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	1381 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	1344 Points -3%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54	1334 Points -3%

3DMark 06 - 1280x1024 Standard Score AA:0x AF:0x
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54	7912 Points +6%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	7733 Points +4%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	7464 Points

3DMark 03 Standard		20325 pontos
3DMark 05 Standard		9082 pontos
3DMark 06 Standard Score		7464 pontos
3DMark Vantage P Result		4650 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance		1381 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		35293 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		4401 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		676 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		309 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		297 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	45.2	26.9	22.5	6.6
Battlefield 4 (2013)	31.3	23.2	15.9
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	20	11	9

	Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)	Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 Iris Graphics 540, 6650U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZSLW1T0)	Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) Iris Graphics 550, 6267U, Apple SSD AP0256	Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
Noise		-0%	4%	4%	1%
off / environment *	30.7		28.9 6%	30.2 2%	30.3 1%
Idle Minimum *	30.7	28.4 7%	28.9 6%	30.2 2%	30.6 -0%
Idle Average *	30.7	28.6 7%	28.9 6%	30.2 2%	30.6 -0%
Idle Maximum *	30.7	28.7 7%	28.9 6%	30.2 2%	32.2 -5%
Load Average *	37	40.8 -10%	35.3 5%	33 11%	32.2 13%
Load Maximum *	37.1	41.4 -12%	38.9 -5%	36.2 2%	38.5 -4%

* ... smaller is better

Barulho

Ocioso		30.7 / 30.7 / 30.7 dB
Carga		37 / 37.1 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.7 dB(A)

	Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)	Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZSLW1T0)	HP Elite x2 1012 G1 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G	Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
Heat		-8%	-12%	1%	-11%
Maximum Upper Side *	34.9	43.6 -25%	45.5 -30%	39 -12%	46.7 -34%
Maximum Bottom *	36.7	45.2 -23%	47.1 -28%	41.2 -12%	51 -39%
Idle Upper Side *	35.8	32.4 9%	31.1 13%	29.5 18%	29.5 18%
Idle Bottom *	32.4	29.6 9%	33.1 -2%	29.8 8%	28.6 12%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


32 °C	34.9 °C	31.4 °C
26 °C	28.9 °C	27.5 °C
25 °C	28.8 °C	26.3 °C

Máximo: 34.9 °C
Médio: 29 °C


31.4 °C	36.7 °C	33.9 °C
28.7 °C	32.4 °C	29.8 °C
26.5 °C	26.9 °C	25.9 °C

Máximo: 36.7 °C
Médio: 30.2 °C

alimentação elétrica 44.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.8 °C / 96.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-7.7 °C / -13.8 F).

Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.14 / 0.85 Watt
Ocioso	6.7 / 10.3 / 13.5 Watt
Carga	26 / 28.8 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T 6500U, HD Graphics 520, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND), IPS, 2880x1920, 12.6"	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 6600U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZSLW1T0), OLED, 2560x1440, 14"	HP Elite x2 1012 G1 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, Liteon L8H-256V2G, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.1"	Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2, IPS, 2160x1440, 12"	Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) 6267U, Iris Graphics 550, Apple SSD AP0256, , 2560x1600, 13.3"	Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, , 3200x1800, 13.3"
Power Consumption		-6%	23%	4%	-18%	22%
Idle Minimum *	6.7	4.7 30%	3.7 45%	7.3 -9%	2.1 69%	3.7 45%
Idle Average *	10.3	8.6 17%	6.8 34%	10 3%	7.6 26%	6.1 41%
Idle Maximum *	13.5	12.2 10%	7.6 44%	10.15 25%	8.2 39%	6.5 52%
Load Average *	26	29.7 -14%	22.5 13%	25.2 3%	56.4 -117%	29.5 -13%
Load Maximum *	28.8	50.5 -75%	34.5 -20%	29.3 -2%	59.8 -108%	33 -15%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		7h 06min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge: 38.14393.0.0)		3h 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		3h 26min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 42min

	Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 39 Wh	Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 38 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 6600U, HD Graphics 520, 56 Wh	HP Elite x2 1012 G1 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 37 Wh	Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 37 Wh
Battery Runtime		80%	79%	77%	58%
Reader / Idle	426	791 86%	824 93%	732 72%	640 50%
H.264	206		520 152%	432 110%	468 127%
WiFi v1.3	223	488 119%	315 41%	443 99%	321 44%
Load	102	138 35%	132 29%	130 27%	112 10%

Pro

+ Muito bom acabamento

+ carcaça sólida com um kickstand

+ Design elegante

+ Tela 3K com ângulos de visão estáveis

+ Boa cobertura de cores

+ Dock de teclado e Active Stylus inclusos

+ Reconhecimento facial

+ Teclado iluminado

+ Tela táctil confortável para usar

Contra

- A CPU não consegue entregar todo o seu desempenho

- Curta duração da bateria

- Sem opções de atualização

- Touchpad ruim

- Apenas uma porta USB-C 3.1

In review: Asus Transformer 3 Pro. Test model provided by Asus Germany

A Asus decidiu fazer muito para competir com o Microsoft Surface. O Asus Transformer 3 Pro é um passo para frente: um processador mais veloz, muita RAM e um grande SSD em um conversível. O dock de teclado transforma esta pacote em um portátil completo. No momento do teste o preço do conversível era de 1.599 Euros (~$ 1668). O comprador receberá um aparelho confiável com suficiente desempenho para as tarefas do dia a dia. Infelizmente, o modelo de teste nunca foi capaz de liberar todo o seu desempenho. É por isso que não podemos considera-lo como um concorrente real do Microsoft Surface Pro 4.

A brecha entre o desempenho potencial e real pode espantar muitos compradores potenciais. No entanto, o Asus Transformer 3 Pro é um conversível elegante com acabamento perfeito. A ótima tela oferece extensa cobertura do espaço de cores e é adequada para o uso profissional.

Um processador mais veloz seria sempre melhor. Mas qual o sentido disso quando o fabricante o afoga até o fundo? Um Intel Core i5-7Y54 pode ser resfriado passivamente, mesmo assim oferece desempenho similar ao do Intel Core i7-6500U do nosso modelo de teste. A conectividade do modelo da Asus é típico, mas gostaríamos de ver duas portas USB 3.1 (ambas com suporte para Thunderbolt 3) no futuro assim o usuário pode usar um para carregar e o outro para adaptadores para estender a conectividade.

Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T - 2016-12-21 12/21/2016 v6 ^(old)
Sebastian Bade

Acabamento

91 / 98 → 93%

Teclado

82%

Mouse

81%

Conectividade

55 / 80 → 69%

Peso

78 / 35-78 → 100%

Bateria

72%

Pantalha

87%

Desempenho do jogos

55 / 68 → 81%

Desempenho da aplicação

77 / 87 → 89%

Temperatura

92%

Ruído

91%

Audio

73 / 91 → 80%

Camera

62 / 85 → 72%

Médio

77%

86%

Convertible - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Conversível Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T

Sebastian Bade, 2017-01-18 (Update: 2017-02- 4)