Breve Análise do Conversível Acer Switch 5 (7500U, 512 GB)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
|
iluminação: 75 %
iluminação com acumulador: 369 cd/m²
Contraste: 802:1 (Preto: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.52 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.95 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
88% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.58
Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 WST KL.1200w.004, , 2160x1440, 12" | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 LG Display LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1824, 12.3" | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 LG Philips, , 1920x1280, 12.1" | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 BOE06DC, , 1920x1280, 12.3" | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB AUO B120YAN01 / AUO106F, , 2880x1920, 12" | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-70EQ WST KL.1200W.002 WST2216, , 2160x1440, 12" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 14% | -12% | 7% | 8% | -5% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 58.8 | 67.6 15% | 53.8 -9% | 62.8 7% | 65.2 11% | 55.7 -5% |
sRGB Coverage | 87.5 | 99 13% | 73.7 -16% | 94 7% | 91 4% | 82.7 -5% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 60.6 | 69.1 14% | 53.8 -11% | 64.7 7% | 66.1 9% | 56.9 -6% |
Response Times | -13% | 11% | -17% | -7% | 18% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 37 ? | 42 ? -14% | 33.2 ? 10% | 42.4 ? -15% | 45 ? -22% | 21 ? 43% |
Response Time Black / White * | 26 ? | 29 ? -12% | 22.8 ? 12% | 30.8 ? -18% | 24 ? 8% | 28 ? -8% |
PWM Frequency | 21000 | 210.1 ? | 50 ? | |||
Screen | 32% | -2% | 26% | 16% | -9% | |
Brightness middle | 369 | 417 13% | 322 -13% | 523.2 42% | 406 10% | 391 6% |
Brightness | 331 | 401 21% | 319 -4% | 522 58% | 396 20% | 367 11% |
Brightness Distribution | 75 | 88 17% | 97 29% | 88 17% | 88 17% | 87 16% |
Black Level * | 0.46 | 0.29 37% | 0.42 9% | 0.42 9% | 0.3 35% | 0.56 -22% |
Contrast | 802 | 1438 79% | 767 -4% | 1246 55% | 1353 69% | 698 -13% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.52 | 3.63 34% | 6.02 -9% | 4 28% | 5.28 4% | 6.96 -26% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.29 | 6.74 27% | 10.06 -8% | 8.6 7% | 9.83 -6% | 13.43 -45% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.95 | 2.18 69% | 6.29 9% | 5.5 21% | 6.71 3% | 7.44 -7% |
Gamma | 2.58 85% | 3.09 71% | 2.4 92% | 2.16 102% | 2.29 96% | 2.41 91% |
CCT | 7009 93% | 6767 96% | 7712 84% | 7546 86% | 6532 100% | 8126 80% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 56 | 63 13% | 47.8 -15% | 64.86 16% | 59 5% | 53 -5% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 88 | 99 13% | 73.2 -17% | 93.97 7% | 91 3% | 83 -6% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 11% /
23% | -1% /
-2% | 5% /
17% | 6% /
11% | 1% /
-5% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise | |
↘ 12 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise | |
↘ 18 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3556 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4585 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3448 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 Samsung PM971 KUS030202M | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 Liteon L8H-256V2G | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-70EQ Lite-On CV1-8B512 M.2 512 GB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -8% | -40% | -1% | 80% | -35% | |
Read Seq | 1066 | 723 -32% | 501 -53% | 1294 21% | 2408 126% | 496.6 -53% |
Write Seq | 593 | 853 44% | 297.2 -50% | 865 46% | 1702 187% | 415.3 -30% |
Read 512 | 653 | 225 -66% | 351.7 -46% | 406 -38% | 1301 99% | 335.9 -49% |
Write 512 | 535 | 445 -17% | 295.7 -45% | 589 10% | 1288 141% | 384 -28% |
Read 4k | 35.92 | 46 28% | 28.31 -21% | 31.75 -12% | 53.6 49% | 32.38 -10% |
Write 4k | 128.3 | 125 -3% | 90.3 -30% | 72.2 -44% | 162.2 26% | 81.8 -36% |
Read 4k QD32 | 460.6 | 423 -8% | 285 -38% | 493.3 7% | 504 9% | 296.3 -36% |
Write 4k QD32 | 425.4 | 373 -12% | 268.4 -37% | 434.5 2% | 420.8 -1% | 260.3 -39% |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 | |
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-70EQ | |
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1778 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6743 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 944 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
1024x768 Lowest Preset | |
Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 | |
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB | |
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-70EQ | |
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 | |
1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x | |
Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 | |
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB | |
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 | |
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-70EQ |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 60.4 | 31.59 | 27.95 | 8.51 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 18.45 | 11.78 | 6.25 | 4.4 |
Rocket League (2017) | 56.8 | 27.48 | 18.35 |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.5 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 44.7 °C / 112.5 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-16.7 °C / -30.1 F).
Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -1% | 8% | 5% | -4% | -1% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 44.7 | 39.2 12% | 39 13% | 38.2 15% | 42 6% | 46.7 -4% |
Maximum Bottom * | 47.5 | 40.3 15% | 41.2 13% | 48.6 -2% | 43.6 8% | 51 -7% |
Idle Upper Side * | 29.7 | 37 -25% | 29.5 1% | 29.6 -0% | 32.8 -10% | 29.5 1% |
Idle Bottom * | 30.7 | 32.3 -5% | 29.8 3% | 28.8 6% | 36.4 -19% | 28.6 7% |
* ... smaller is better
Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (69 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high
desligado | 0.28 / 0.42 Watt |
Ocioso | 3.86 / 6.4 / 7.17 Watt |
Carga |
30.5 / 32.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7, IPS, 2160x1440, 12" | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, Liteon L8H-256V2G, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.1" | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.3" | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS, 2880x1920, 12" | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2, IPS, 2160x1440, 12" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 0% | 2% | 0% | -1% | -32% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.86 | 3.6 7% | 3.7 4% | 2.85 26% | 3.5 9% | 7.3 -89% |
Idle Average * | 6.4 | 8.1 -27% | 6.8 -6% | 6.76 -6% | 7.2 -13% | 10 -56% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.17 | 8.7 -21% | 7.6 -6% | 6.91 4% | 7.9 -10% | 10.15 -42% |
Load Average * | 30.5 | 25.5 16% | 22.5 26% | 32.88 -8% | 29.6 3% | 25.2 17% |
Load Maximum * | 32.4 | 23.5 27% | 34.5 -6% | 37.41 -15% | 30.8 5% | 29.3 10% |
* ... smaller is better
Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 37 Wh | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 41 Wh | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 37 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 78% | 22% | 33% | 5% | -1% | |
Reader / Idle | 711 | 1054 48% | 732 3% | 1075 51% | 713 0% | 640 -10% |
WiFi v1.3 | 355 | 744 110% | 443 25% | 486 37% | 345 -3% | 321 -10% |
Load | 95 | 168 77% | 130 37% | 105 11% | 111 17% | 112 18% |
H.264 | 432 | 468 |
Pro
Contra
O novo Switch 5 d Acer desafia o Surface Pro com alto desempenho dos aplicativos e um preço baixo. Ambos são bem sucedido, mas também têm desvantagens decisivas:
O hardware de alto desempenho e o desempenho gráfico e de aplicativos comparativamente forte são à custa de uma duração curta da bateria e, sobretudo, altas temperaturas que aquecem o conversível significativamente. O baixo preço é notado principalmente na tela. Embora seja decente, nem se aproxima do painel no Surface Pro.
Além do desempenho puro, gostamos principalmente do fato da Acer incluir a base do teclado e o stylus. Esses devem ser adicionados ao alto preço da Surface Pro. Os dispositivos de entrada apresentam uma boa qualidade, e isso também é verdade para a função táctil da tela. Um leitor de digitais está presente e o teclado agora tem retro iluminação.
O Acer Switch 5 ganha pontos com seu alto desempenho e bons dispositivos de entrada, sendo relativamente acessível.
Alternativas
Por um preço atual de 1299 euros ($1000) pelo modelo top e cerca de 1116 Euros ($800) pela configuração menor, o comprador entra nas regiões de preços onde outros dispositivos 2-em-1 são encontrados. O aparelho de comparação do Dell Latitude 12 5285 oferece um desempenho bom similar, mas possui a melhor tela. Apesar da menor resolução, o brilho, o contraste, a iluminação e a cobertura do espaço de cores são convincentes. No entanto, o aparelho da Dell também esquenta muito.
Se o valor for colocado na tela, na duração da bateria e em um aparelho bastante frio, o comprador pode querer dar uma olhada em um dos modelos Surface Pro. Ele tem um preço semelhante com configurações mais baixas, mas não vem com uma caneta ou base de teclado. Assim, em última análise, custa mais, mas o pacote total é decente.
Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819
- 10/05/2017 v6 (old)
Christian Hintze