Breve Análise do Conversível Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
| Networking | |
| iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
| Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2013-10 | |
| Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE (jseb) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T | |
| Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T | |
| Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D (jseb) | |
| Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 (jseb) | |
| HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET (jseb) | |
| iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
| Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D (jseb) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T | |
| Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2013-10 (Hinum) | |
| Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE (jseb) | |
| Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 (jseb) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T (jseb) | |
| HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET (jseb) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 72 %
iluminação com acumulador: 332 cd/m²
Contraste: 1323:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 12.65 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 12.95 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.33
| Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D AUO B140HAN03.2 / AUO323D, , 1920x1080, 14" | Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T AU Optronics AOU272D / B133HAN02.7, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx Chi Mei CMN1367, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 Samsung ATNA40JU01-0, , 2560x1440, 14" | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Panasonic VVX12T041N00, , 2160x1440, 12" | Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE Unknown, , 1920x1200, 12.2" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 5% | 4% | 7% | 4% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 61.5 | 64.8 5% | 65.4 6% | 65.5 7% | 64.5 5% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 89.1 | 93.1 4% | 90.4 1% | 96.1 8% | 92 3% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 62.9 | 66 5% | 65.8 5% | 66.9 6% | 65.5 4% | |
| Response Times | 35% | 14% | 97% | 15% | 24% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 51 ? | 29 ? 43% | 33.2 ? 35% | 1 ? 98% | 20 ? 61% | 33 ? 35% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 26 ? | 19 ? 27% | 28 ? -8% | 1 ? 96% | 34 ? -31% | 23 ? 12% |
| PWM Frequency | 50 ? | 240 ? | 1000 ? | 125 ? | ||
| Screen | 18% | 10% | 32% | 11% | 6% | |
| Brightness middle | 344 | 344 0% | 334.6 -3% | 279 -19% | 345 0% | 327 -5% |
| Brightness | 292 | 326 12% | 319 9% | 277 -5% | 328 12% | 324 11% |
| Brightness Distribution | 72 | 86 19% | 90 25% | 91 26% | 91 26% | 88 22% |
| Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.27 -4% | 0.336 -29% | 0.38 -46% | 0.35 -35% | |
| Contrast | 1323 | 1274 -4% | 996 -25% | 908 -31% | 934 -29% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 12.65 | 5.53 56% | 6.21 51% | 5.15 59% | 8.4 34% | 6.54 48% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 17.8 | 10.01 44% | 12 33% | 8.28 53% | 11.9 33% | 15.59 12% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 12.95 | 6.67 48% | 7.71 40% | 5.44 58% | 4.3 67% | 9.52 26% |
| Gamma | 1.33 165% | 2.43 91% | 2.36 93% | 2.28 96% | 2.63 84% | 2.35 94% |
| CCT | 6441 101% | 7012 93% | 6458 101% | 5686 114% | 7368 88% | 8802 74% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58 | 60 3% | 58.6 1% | 98 69% | 62 7% | 59 2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 89 | 93 4% | 90 1% | 100 12% | 92 3% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 19% /
17% | 9% /
9% | 65% /
45% | 11% /
11% | 11% /
8% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise | |
| ↘ 20 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 51 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise | |
| ↘ 38 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 86 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | ||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx | |
| Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T | |
| Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE | |
| Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM | |
| Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D | |
| Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 | |
| HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 | |
| Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM | |
| Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE | |
| Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 | |
| HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng | |
| Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T | |
| Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM | |
| Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE | |
| Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D | |
| Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T | |
| Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE | |
| Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D | |
| Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM | |
| Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2979 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4076 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG | Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) | HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512 | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZSLW1T0) | Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -5% | 73% | -17% | 84% | 59% | |
| Read Seq | 472.6 | 452.1 -4% | 1376 191% | 518 10% | 1510 220% | 1168 147% |
| Write Seq | 407.7 | 421.3 3% | 571 40% | 199.9 -51% | 1193 193% | 329 -19% |
| Read 512 | 309.5 | 288.6 -7% | 679 119% | 374.9 21% | 1015 228% | |
| Write 512 | 368.5 | 310.7 -16% | 571 55% | 201 -45% | 307 -17% | |
| Read 4k | 37.57 | 28.52 -24% | 42.66 14% | 29.3 -22% | 37 -2% | 33 -12% |
| Write 4k | 75.5 | 72.1 -5% | 137.9 83% | 76.8 2% | 126 67% | 132 75% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 324.8 | 389.6 20% | 535 65% | 272 -16% | 404 24% | 525 62% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 307.4 | 285.3 -7% | 361.2 18% | 197.1 -36% | 319 4% | 325 6% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx | |
| Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 | |
| Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM | |
| Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE | |
| HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng | |
| Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D | |
| Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx | |
| Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 | |
| Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM | |
| Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE | |
| HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng | |
| Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 | |
| Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 | |
| HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng | |
| 3DMark 06 1280x768 Score | 6524 pontos | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 4123 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1141 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 37865 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 4050 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitman: Absolution (2012) | 21.9 | 14 | 7.6 | |
| Crysis 3 (2013) | 21 | 12.7 | ||
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 51.8 | 23.6 | 16 | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 32 | 19.3 | 16.1 | |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 22.3 | 16 | 11 | |
| Thief (2014) | 13.9 | 9.2 | ||
| Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014) | 23.5 | 13.7 | 6.8 | |
| Alien: Isolation (2014) | 26.3 | 19 | 9.7 | |
| Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014) | 17.6 | 12.2 | ||
| Battlefield Hardline (2015) | 19.7 | 15.5 | ||
| Dirt Rally (2015) | 71.6 | 16.26 | ||
| Metal Gear Solid V (2015) | 23.4 | 20.8 | 7.6 | |
| Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 (2015) | 8 severe graphical problems (no menue) | |||
| Fallout 4 (2015) | 10.1 | |||
| Star Wars Battlefront (2015) | 19.8 | 11.5 | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 11 | |||
| Doom (2016) | 12.9 | 10.1 | ||
| Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 9.1 | |||
| FIFA 17 (2016) | 36 small graphical problems (slow down in game) | 29 small graphical problems (slow down in game) | ||
| Battlefield 1 (2016) | 13 | 9.1 |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.5 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.6 °C / 81.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+0.7 °C / 1.2 F).
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.48 / 0.7 Watt |
| Ocioso |  4.3 / 7.4 / 8 Watt |
| Carga |
22.1 / 21.7 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T 6500U, HD Graphics 520, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND), IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 6600U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZSLW1T0), OLED, 2560x1440, 14" | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2, IPS, 2160x1440, 12" | Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1200, 12.2" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -29% | -24% | -49% | -36% | -33% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.3 | 6.9 -60% | 5.5 -28% | 4.7 -9% | 7.3 -70% | 4.2 2% |
| Idle Average * | 7.4 | 7.9 -7% | 6.7 9% | 8.6 -16% | 10 -35% | 11.5 -55% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8 | 8.3 -4% | 7.1 11% | 12.2 -53% | 10.15 -27% | 11.7 -46% |
| Load Average * | 22.1 | 30.1 -36% | 33.1 -50% | 29.7 -34% | 25.2 -14% | 31 -40% |
| Load Maximum * | 21.7 | 29.6 -36% | 35.2 -62% | 50.5 -133% | 29.3 -35% | 27.4 -26% |
* ... smaller is better
| Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 42 Wh | Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 57 Wh | HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 57.8 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 6600U, HD Graphics 520, 56 Wh | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 37 Wh | Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 50 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 36% | 27% | -9% | -21% | -19% | |
| Reader / Idle | 748 | 1165 56% | 1233 65% | 824 10% | 640 -14% | 696 -7% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 391 | 581 49% | 558 43% | 315 -19% | 321 -18% | 322 -18% |
| Load | 163 | 169 4% | 121 -26% | 132 -19% | 112 -31% | 111 -32% |
| H.264 | 520 | 468 |
Pro
Contra
É um conceito ambicioso, mas as falhas estão nos detalhes. O Acer Spin 7 (sem "Aspire") é uma nova série que consiste de conversíveis ultrafinos de 360 graus. Analisamos o modelo de 14-polegadas SP714-51-M09D, que teve um início um pouco agitado com a CPU Y Kaby Lake (TDP de 4,5 Watts) em termos de desempenho da CPU e de aplicativos: O predecessor Skylake, algumas vezes é mais veloz. Gostamos do chassi compacto e leve, mas o fino painel inferior e a falta de estabilidade do chassi afetaram a boa impressão visual.
O fino chassi oferece um bom visual, mas falta um pouco de estabilidade. A boa tela sofre de grandes desvios de cores de fábrica, mas uma calibração pode ajudar.
O bom e grande ClickPad com a resposta distintiva é estragado por um teclado com deslocamento curto e limitado. A tela é basicamente refletiva, mas também convence com razões de alto contraste. Infelizmente, as cores não são muito precisas de fábrica. Uma calibração pode mudar isso, mas qual cliente tem um espectrofotômetro em casa? Você pode mudar a situação com o o perfil de cores vinculado na caixa, embora os resultados não serão tão bons, em comparação com a calibração manual.
A fácil manutenção através do grande painel inferior é exemplar. Então restam apenas a webcam ruim e o som fino.
O ULV Kaby Lake não consegue nos convencer; o SoC frequentemente está na parte inferior do ranking, inclusive quando comparado com o anterior Core m5.
O sistema de 14 polegadas SP714-51-M09D atualmente é vendido por altos 1200 Euros (~$1336). O rival da Acer, ZenBook UX360UA-C4159T com SSD de 512 GB e Core i7-6500U mais poderoso, custa 1130 Euros (~$1258), e também consegue durações de bateria mais longas e cores mais precisas, de fábrica (perfil de fábrica da Asus). Se a Asus consertaria a dobradiça balançante, o Asus UX360UA seria nitidamente a melhor recomendação.
Portanto, será o HP Spectre x360 13 uma alternativa melhor? A versão Kaby Lake ainda não está disponível em qualquer lugar, mas o predecessor já está a partir de 1000 Euros (~$1114). Este modelo está equipado com o 6200U mais veloz, um SSD de 256 GB e um teclado melhor. As durações da bateria também são muito mais longas em comparação com as do Spin 7. Exceto pela manutenção e ao conceito sem ventoinha, não existem muitos argumentos para o Acer Spin 7. Simplesmente é caro demais atualmente; deveria ter um preço de cerca de 1000 Euros (~$1114).
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
- 10/24/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sebastian Jentsch
Price comparison
