Breve Análise do Conversível Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| HP Omen 17-w100ng | |
| Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| HP Omen 17-w100ng | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 | |
| Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 245 cd/m²
Contraste: 1167:1 (Preto: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.94 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
59% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.32% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.99% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.66
| Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 B133HAB01.0, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 Samsung SDC864D / 133HL [Dell P/N: PVFF5], , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB BOE0637 / BOE DT NV140FHM-N41, , 1920x1080, 14" | HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng LG Philips, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D AUO B140HAN03.2 / AUO323D, , 1920x1080, 14" | HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx Chi Mei CMN1367, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | 5% | -1% | 52% | 58% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 39.99 | 40.31 1% | 41.78 4% | 39.43 -1% | 61.5 54% | 65.4 64% |
| sRGB Coverage | 59.5 | 60.5 2% | 62.9 6% | 59.1 -1% | 89.1 50% | 90.4 52% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.32 | 41.65 1% | 43.17 4% | 40.76 -1% | 62.9 52% | 65.8 59% |
| Response Times | 13% | -20% | 20% | 7% | 19% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 56 ? | 38 ? 32% | 53 ? 5% | 38 ? 32% | 51 ? 9% | 33.2 ? 41% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 27 ? | 29 ? -7% | 39 ? -44% | 25 ? 7% | 26 ? 4% | 28 ? -4% |
| PWM Frequency | 350 ? | |||||
| Screen | -31% | -13% | -15% | -39% | -7% | |
| Brightness middle | 245 | 253 3% | 243 -1% | 277 13% | 344 40% | 334.6 37% |
| Brightness | 233 | 232 0% | 248 6% | 263 13% | 292 25% | 319 37% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 83 -5% | 91 5% | 88 1% | 72 -17% | 90 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.28 -33% | 0.32 -52% | 0.31 -48% | 0.26 -24% | 0.336 -60% |
| Contrast | 1167 | 904 -23% | 759 -35% | 894 -23% | 1323 13% | 996 -15% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.2 | 6.36 -51% | 5.44 -30% | 5.57 -33% | 12.65 -201% | 6.21 -48% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.75 | 12.72 -45% | 9.73 -11% | 13.6 -55% | 17.8 -103% | 12 -37% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.94 | 10.26 -160% | 4.74 -20% | 4.56 -16% | 12.95 -229% | 7.71 -96% |
| Gamma | 2.66 83% | 2.28 96% | 2.38 92% | 2.28 96% | 1.33 165% | 2.36 93% |
| CCT | 6096 107% | 6500 100% | 7799 83% | 6648 98% | 6441 101% | 6458 101% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38 | 38 0% | 39.6 4% | 38 0% | 58 53% | 58.6 54% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59 | 60 2% | 62.5 6% | 59 0% | 89 51% | 90 53% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -6% /
-19% | -9% /
-10% | 1% /
-7% | 7% /
-15% | 23% /
9% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 38 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | ||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3224 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4121 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 Hynix HFS128G39TND | Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG | Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 Liteonit LCH-256V2S | HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512 | Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 62% | 43% | 218% | 168% | |
| Seq Read | 503 | 433.2 -14% | 506 1% | 1455 189% | 1389 176% |
| Seq Write | 115.7 | 361.5 212% | 270.3 134% | 548 374% | 560 384% |
| 4K Read | 24.45 | 41.2 69% | 24.79 1% | 37.75 54% | 39.92 63% |
| 4K Write | 57.2 | 66.6 16% | 72.7 27% | 129.7 127% | 132.9 132% |
| 4K-64 Read | 333.8 | 345.6 4% | 290.8 -13% | 1420 325% | 671 101% |
| 4K-64 Write | 91.3 | 270.7 196% | 206.1 126% | 501 449% | 422.2 362% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.098 | 0.099 -1% | 0.082 16% | 0.042 57% | 0.034 65% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.269 | 0.169 37% | 0.051 81% | 0.03 89% | 0.028 90% |
| Score Total | 766 | 1036 35% | 856 12% | 3064 300% | 1865 143% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB | |
| Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE | |
| HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 | |
| Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 | |
| Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE | |
| HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
| Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 | |
| Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB | |
| HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
| Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1321 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 4819 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 709 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 42.77 | 24.3 | 20.21 | 6.33 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 16.8 | |||
| Civilization VI (2016) | 27.9 | 10 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.5 / 30.5 / 30.6 dB |
| Carga |
| 31 / 36.8 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24 °C / 75.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (+4 °C / 7.2 F).
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.4 / 0.72 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.1 / 6.8 / 7.9 Watt |
| Carga |
20.4 / 26.8 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 6100U, HD Graphics 520, Hynix HFS128G39TND, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 6500U, HD Graphics 520, Liteonit LCH-256V2S, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB i5-7200U, Radeon R5 M430, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A7E630, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -1% | -4% | -34% | -15% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.1 | 4.3 -5% | 4 2% | 3.9 5% | 4.7 -15% |
| Idle Average * | 6.8 | 7.4 -9% | 4.8 29% | 7.1 -4% | 7.2 -6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.9 | 8 -1% | 7.6 4% | 7.7 3% | 7.9 -0% |
| Load Average * | 20.4 | 22.1 -8% | 30 -47% | 33.4 -64% | 30 -47% |
| Load Maximum * | 26.8 | 21.7 19% | 29.3 -9% | 55.9 -109% | 29 -8% |
* ... smaller is better
| Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 6100U, HD Graphics 520, 45 Wh | Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 42 Wh | Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 44 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB i5-7200U, Radeon R5 M430, 35 Wh | HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 41 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 78 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 2% | 2% | -16% | -30% | 38% | |
| Reader / Idle | 749 | 748 0% | 886 18% | 722 -4% | 560 -25% | 1069 43% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 463 | 391 -16% | 486 5% | 373 -19% | 322 -30% | 644 39% |
| Load | 133 | 163 23% | 109 -18% | 100 -25% | 86 -35% | 174 31% |
| H.264 | 320 |
Pro
Contra
O Acer Spin 5 é um grande sucesso. O modelo de teste convence com a ventoinha silenciosa, o bom desempenho de resfriamento, bem como o touchpad preciso, em particular. O chassi, a tela, e as durações da bateria são todas médias e não revelam falhas sérias.
O teclado merece um pouco de críticas, porque a experiência de digitação não é satisfatória e o layout bastante apertado, o que pode resultar em erros de digitação. Depois estão as portas: Uma moderna porta USB Type-C está faltando, assim como um leitor de cartões SD de tamanho normal (apenas leitor microSD). O longo tempo de carga da bateria também é um pouco irritante.
Podemos recomendar o Acer Spin 5. Existem muito aspectos positivos, apenas o teclado não atinge o nível desejado. As maiores vantagens são as emissões com a ventoinha silenciosa e as baixas temperaturas.
Em resumo, o Acer Spin 5 ainda merece uma recomendação. É um aparelho econômico para navegar pela web e para aplicativos de escritório, onde funciona bem. O Core i3 não é particularmente poderoso, mas, em compensação, o portátil está sempre frio e silencioso.
No entanto, a concorrência consegue melhores razões de preço-desempenho: O Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB com um Core i3-7100U, SSD de 128 GB e 4 GB de RAM é 50 Euros mais barato. O HP Pavilion x360 13 custa igual que o Acer Spin 5, mas está equipado com o novo Core i5-7200U e 8 GB de RAM, mas um HD de 1 TB em vez do SSD de 128 GB, portanto, você deve decidir entre desempenho e capacidade. Depois, obviamente, também está o ruído adicional do HD.
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
- 01/23/2017 v6 (old)
Benjamin Herzig
Price comparison
