Breve Análise do Conversível Acer Spin 5 SP513-51

Name: Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
Brand: Acer

Spinning (girando). Todos os grandes fabricantes oferecem aparelhos no competitivo segmento de conversíveis mainstream. A Acer deseja atrair clientes com o Acer Spin 5. Como o conversível de 360 graus se desempenha?

Benjamin Herzig, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 03/06/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Convertible / 2-in-1 Skylake Ultrabook Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Acer Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 (Spin 5 SP513 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i3-6100U 2 x 2.3 GHz, Skylake

Placa gráfica

Intel HD Graphics 520

Memória

4 GB

, DDR4-2133, 1/1 slot em uso

Pantalha

13.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, Tela táctil de 10-pontos, B133HAB01.0, IPS LED, 360° Hinges, Brilhante: sim

placa mãe

Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH

Disco rígido

Hynix HFS128G39TND, 128 GB

, 2280 M.2 SATA III SSD

Placa de Som

Intel Skylake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Conexões

2 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector estéreo de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: SD-Kartenleser

Funcionamento em rede

Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 20 x 328 x 229

Bateria

45 Wh Lítio-Polímero

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto falantes estéreo, Teclado: chiclet de 6 filas, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

1.7 kg, Suprimento de energia: 284 g

Links

Acer página inicial
Acer Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D DIN A4 ❌

Left side: HDMI, USB 3.0, 2x USB 2.0, 3.5 mm stereo jack

Right side: MicroSD-card slot, volume rocker, power button, AC power, Kensington Lock

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
HP Omen 17-w100ng Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	524 MBit/s +50%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	349 MBit/s
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	319 MBit/s -9%
iperf3 receive AX12
HP Omen 17-w100ng Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	674 MBit/s +94%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	350 MBit/s +1%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	347 MBit/s


248 cd/m²	233 cd/m²	238 cd/m²
241 cd/m²	245 cd/m²	233 cd/m²
215 cd/m²	223 cd/m²	218 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

B133HAB01.0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 248 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 232.7 cd/m² Minimum: 18 cd/m²
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 245 cd/m²
Contraste: 1167:1 (Preto: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 3.94 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
59% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.32% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.99% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.66

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 B133HAB01.0, , 1920x1080, 13.3"	Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 Samsung SDC864D / 133HL [Dell P/N: PVFF5], , 1920x1080, 13.3"	Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB BOE0637 / BOE DT NV140FHM-N41, , 1920x1080, 14"	HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng LG Philips, , 1920x1080, 13.3"	Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D AUO B140HAN03.2 / AUO323D, , 1920x1080, 14"	HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx Chi Mei CMN1367, , 1920x1080, 13.3"
Display		1%	5%	-1%	52%	58%
Display P3 Coverage	39.99	40.31 1%	41.78 4%	39.43 -1%	61.5 54%	65.4 64%
sRGB Coverage	59.5	60.5 2%	62.9 6%	59.1 -1%	89.1 50%	90.4 52%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	41.32	41.65 1%	43.17 4%	40.76 -1%	62.9 52%	65.8 59%
Response Times		13%	-20%	20%	7%	19%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	56 ?(18, 38)	38 ?(19, 19) 32%	53 ?(20, 33) 5%	38 ?(14, 24) 32%	51 ?(13, 38) 9%	33.2 ?(16, 17.2) 41%
Response Time Black / White *	27 ?(8, 19)	29 ?(6, 23) -7%	39 ?(12, 27) -44%	25 ?(6, 19) 7%	26 ?(6, 20) 4%	28 ?(5.6, 22.4) -4%
PWM Frequency			350 ?(60)
Screen		-31%	-13%	-15%	-39%	-7%
Brightness middle	245	253 3%	243 -1%	277 13%	344 40%	334.6 37%
Brightness	233	232 0%	248 6%	263 13%	292 25%	319 37%
Brightness Distribution	87	83 -5%	91 5%	88 1%	72 -17%	90 3%
Black Level *	0.21	0.28 -33%	0.32 -52%	0.31 -48%	0.26 -24%	0.336 -60%
Contrast	1167	904 -23%	759 -35%	894 -23%	1323 13%	996 -15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.2	6.36 -51%	5.44 -30%	5.57 -33%	12.65 -201%	6.21 -48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.75	12.72 -45%	9.73 -11%	13.6 -55%	17.8 -103%	12 -37%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.94	10.26 -160%	4.74 -20%	4.56 -16%	12.95 -229%	7.71 -96%
Gamma	2.66 ^83%	2.28 ^96%	2.38 ^92%	2.28 ^96%	1.33 ^165%	2.36 ^93%
CCT	6096 ^107%	6500 ^100%	7799 ^83%	6648 ^98%	6441 ^101%	6458 ^101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	38	38 0%	39.6 4%	38 0%	58 53%	58.6 54%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	59	60 2%	62.5 6%	59 0%	89 51%	90 53%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-6% / -19%	-9% / -10%	1% / -7%	7% / -15%	23% / 9%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 8 ms rise
27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18 ms rise
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 38 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB Intel Core i5-7200U	130 Points +35%
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx Intel Core i7-7500U	126 Points +31%
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng Intel Core i5-7200U	126 Points +31%
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 Intel Core i7-6500U	120 Points +25%
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D Intel Core i5-7Y54	111 Points +16%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 Intel Core i3-6100U	96 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB Intel Core i5-7200U	332 Points +38%
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng Intel Core i5-7200U	328 Points +37%
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx Intel Core i7-7500U	314 Points +31%
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 Intel Core i7-6500U	310 Points +29%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 Intel Core i3-6100U	240 Points
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D Intel Core i5-7Y54	205 Points -15%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

96 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

240 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

35.13 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.7 %

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	3795 Points +18%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB Radeon R5 M430, i5-7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP	3550 Points +10%
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A7E630	3274 Points +2%
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Liteonit LCH-256V2S	3224 Points 0%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Hynix HFS128G39TND	3224 Points
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG	2979 Points -8%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	4910 Points +19%
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Liteonit LCH-256V2S	4207 Points +2%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Hynix HFS128G39TND	4121 Points
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG	4076 Points -1%
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A7E630	4050 Points -2%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3224 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4121 pontos
Ajuda

	Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 Hynix HFS128G39TND	Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG	Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 Liteonit LCH-256V2S	HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
AS SSD		62%	43%	218%	168%
Seq Read	503	433.2 -14%	506 1%	1455 189%	1389 176%
Seq Write	115.7	361.5 212%	270.3 134%	548 374%	560 384%
4K Read	24.45	41.2 69%	24.79 1%	37.75 54%	39.92 63%
4K Write	57.2	66.6 16%	72.7 27%	129.7 127%	132.9 132%
4K-64 Read	333.8	345.6 4%	290.8 -13%	1420 325%	671 101%
4K-64 Write	91.3	270.7 196%	206.1 126%	501 449%	422.2 362%
Access Time Read *	0.098	0.099 -1%	0.082 16%	0.042 57%	0.034 65%
Access Time Write *	0.269	0.169 37%	0.051 81%	0.03 89%	0.028 90%
Score Total	766	1036 35%	856 12%	3064 300%	1865 143%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Hynix HFS128G39TND

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 555 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 130.8 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 195.5 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 130.4 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 503 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 131.1 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 26.95 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 73.5 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB AMD Radeon R5 M430, Intel Core i5-7200U	1643 Points +35%
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	1623 Points +34%
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1390 Points +15%
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	1268 Points +5%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6100U	1213 Points
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54	1032 Points -15%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	9060 Points +45%
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	6799 Points +9%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6100U	6249 Points
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	5896 Points -6%
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54	5478 Points -12%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB AMD Radeon R5 M430, Intel Core i5-7200U	5249 Points -16%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	1045 Points +39%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB AMD Radeon R5 M430, Intel Core i5-7200U	989 Points +32%
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	762 Points +1%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6100U	752 Points

3DMark 11 Performance		1321 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		4819 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		709 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	42.77	24.3	20.21	6.33
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	16.8
Civilization VI (2016)	27.9	10

Barulho

Ocioso		30.5 / 30.5 / 30.6 dB
Carga		31 / 36.8 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


33.6 °C	38.3 °C	35.8 °C
28.1 °C	33.9 °C	25.6 °C
24 °C	22.8 °C	23 °C

Máximo: 38.3 °C
Médio: 29.5 °C


29.5 °C	42.5 °C	34.9 °C
24.1 °C	37.6 °C	30.2 °C
22.5 °C	23.4 °C	23.8 °C

Máximo: 42.5 °C
Médio: 29.8 °C

alimentação elétrica 45 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24 °C / 75.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+4.1 °C / 7.4 F).

Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.4 / 0.72 Watt
Ocioso	4.1 / 6.8 / 7.9 Watt
Carga	20.4 / 26.8 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 6100U, HD Graphics 520, Hynix HFS128G39TND, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"	Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 6500U, HD Graphics 520, Liteonit LCH-256V2S, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB i5-7200U, Radeon R5 M430, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"	HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A7E630, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Power Consumption		-1%	-4%	-34%	-15%
Idle Minimum *	4.1	4.3 -5%	4 2%	3.9 5%	4.7 -15%
Idle Average *	6.8	7.4 -9%	4.8 29%	7.1 -4%	7.2 -6%
Idle Maximum *	7.9	8 -1%	7.6 4%	7.7 3%	7.9 -0%
Load Average *	20.4	22.1 -8%	30 -47%	33.4 -64%	30 -47%
Load Maximum *	26.8	21.7 19%	29.3 -9%	55.9 -109%	29 -8%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		12h 29min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge)		7h 43min
Carga (máximo brilho)		2h 13min

	Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 6100U, HD Graphics 520, 45 Wh	Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 42 Wh	Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 44 Wh	Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB i5-7200U, Radeon R5 M430, 35 Wh	HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 41 Wh	Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 78 Wh
Battery Runtime		2%	2%	-16%	-30%	38%
Reader / Idle	749	748 0%	886 18%	722 -4%	560 -25%	1069 43%
WiFi v1.3	463	391 -16%	486 5%	373 -19%	322 -30%	644 39%
Load	133	163 23%	109 -18%	100 -25%	86 -35%	174 31%
H.264					320

Pro

+ Touchpad preciso

+ Frio e silencioso

+ Preço baixo

+ Boa tela

+ Duração comparativamente longa da bateria

Contra

- Teclado apertado

- CPU antiga

- Longos tempos de carga

- Leitor de microSD em vez de cartão SD

- Sem USB Tipo C

O Acer Spin 5 é um grande sucesso. O modelo de teste convence com a ventoinha silenciosa, o bom desempenho de resfriamento, bem como o touchpad preciso, em particular. O chassi, a tela, e as durações da bateria são todas médias e não revelam falhas sérias.

O teclado merece um pouco de críticas, porque a experiência de digitação não é satisfatória e o layout bastante apertado, o que pode resultar em erros de digitação. Depois estão as portas: Uma moderna porta USB Type-C está faltando, assim como um leitor de cartões SD de tamanho normal (apenas leitor microSD). O longo tempo de carga da bateria também é um pouco irritante.

Podemos recomendar o Acer Spin 5. Existem muito aspectos positivos, apenas o teclado não atinge o nível desejado. As maiores vantagens são as emissões com a ventoinha silenciosa e as baixas temperaturas.

Em resumo, o Acer Spin 5 ainda merece uma recomendação. É um aparelho econômico para navegar pela web e para aplicativos de escritório, onde funciona bem. O Core i3 não é particularmente poderoso, mas, em compensação, o portátil está sempre frio e silencioso.

No entanto, a concorrência consegue melhores razões de preço-desempenho: O Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB com um Core i3-7100U, SSD de 128 GB e 4 GB de RAM é 50 Euros mais barato. O HP Pavilion x360 13 custa igual que o Acer Spin 5, mas está equipado com o novo Core i5-7200U e 8 GB de RAM, mas um HD de 1 TB em vez do SSD de 128 GB, portanto, você deve decidir entre desempenho e capacidade. Depois, obviamente, também está o ruído adicional do HD.

Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 - 2017-01-23 01/23/2017 v6 ^(old)
Benjamin Herzig

Acabamento

71 / 98 → 72%

Teclado

70%

Mouse

92%

Conectividade

39 / 80 → 49%

Peso

67 / 35-78 → 73%

Bateria

90%

Pantalha

81%

Desempenho do jogos

55 / 68 → 80%

Desempenho da aplicação

76 / 87 → 88%

Temperatura

94%

Ruído

93%

Audio

56 / 91 → 62%

Camera

32 / 85 → 37%

Médio

71%

80%

Convertible - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1692 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Conversível Acer Spin 5 SP513-51

Benjamin Herzig, 2017-03- 6 (Update: 2017-03- 7)