Breve Análise do Conversível Acer Nitro 5 Spin NP515 (i7-8550U, GTX 1050)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 Spin NP515-51-86CX (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 Spin NP515-51-86CX (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 345 cd/m²
Contraste: 1232:1 (Preto: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.85 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 8.11 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.48
| Acer Nitro 5 Spin NP515-51-86CX Chi Mei CMN15D7, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 AUO, B156HAN06.1, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD B156ZAN03.1, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 BOE06C3, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 BOEhydis NV156FHM-N61, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 LP140QH2-SPB1, , 2560x1440, 14" | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) 2880x1800, 15.4" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -39% | 30% | -2% | 8% | |||
| Display P3 Coverage | 64.9 | 38.73 -40% | 86.6 33% | 66.6 3% | 71.4 10% | ||
| sRGB Coverage | 92.6 | 58.3 -37% | 100 8% | 86.9 -6% | 96.6 4% | ||
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.3 | 40.02 -40% | 99.5 50% | 63.5 -4% | 72.1 9% | ||
| Response Times | -15% | -28% | -14% | -4% | -13% | ||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 36 ? | 42 ? -17% | 52 ? -44% | 41.2 ? -14% | 36 ? -0% | 42.4 ? -18% | |
| Response Time Black / White * | 26 ? | 29 ? -12% | 29 ? -12% | 29.6 ? -14% | 28 ? -8% | 28 ? -8% | |
| PWM Frequency | 1000 | ||||||
| Screen | 9% | 20% | 7% | 7% | 9% | 37% | |
| Brightness middle | 345 | 221 -36% | 380 10% | 338.7 -2% | 317 -8% | 311 -10% | 534 55% |
| Brightness | 332 | 224 -33% | 371 12% | 325 -2% | 302 -9% | 502 51% | |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 89 -3% | 87 -5% | 91 -1% | 91 -1% | 86 -7% | |
| Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.12 57% | 0.28 -0% | 0.28 -0% | 0.352 -26% | 0.36 -29% | 0.31 -11% |
| Contrast | 1232 | 1842 50% | 1357 10% | 1210 -2% | 901 -27% | 864 -30% | 1723 40% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.85 | 4.12 30% | 4.38 25% | 4.9 16% | 4.5 23% | 3 49% | 1.8 69% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.87 | 6.41 46% | 7.59 36% | 8.7 27% | 9 24% | 6.1 49% | 3.8 68% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.11 | 3.4 58% | 3.6 56% | 5.5 32% | 3.8 53% | 4 51% | 2.4 70% |
| Gamma | 2.48 89% | 2.54 87% | 2.32 95% | 2.08 106% | 2.17 101% | 2.17 101% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 6741 96% | 6893 94% | 6860 95% | 7498 87% | 6961 93% | 6563 99% | |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | 37 -38% | 88 47% | 63.5 6% | 66.7 11% | 77.92 30% | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 93 | 58 -38% | 100 8% | 86.92 -7% | 96.7 4% | 99.94 7% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.7 | ||||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -15% /
-4% | 7% /
16% | -3% /
2% | 7% /
7% | 4% /
7% | 12% /
29% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 7 Score | 6029 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3975 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5112 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5202 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3835 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Acer Nitro 5 Spin NP515-51-86CX Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Average Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 73% | -3% | 159% | 138% | 265% | -6% | |
| Read Seq | 484 | 1187 145% | 476.3 -2% | 1248 158% | 1444 198% | 2588 435% | 465 ? -4% |
| Write Seq | 408.5 | 599 47% | 394.4 -3% | 1476 261% | 1173 187% | 1858 355% | 379 ? -7% |
| Read 512 | 339.8 | 935 175% | 291.9 -14% | 849 150% | 816 140% | 1799 429% | 315 ? -7% |
| Write 512 | 381.8 | 609 60% | 291.4 -24% | 1118 193% | 851 123% | 1863 388% | 315 ? -17% |
| Read 4k | 28.26 | 35.61 26% | 27.54 -3% | 58.8 108% | 61.5 118% | 62.7 122% | 24.6 ? -13% |
| Write 4k | 87.3 | 134.4 54% | 92.7 6% | 155.2 78% | 171.9 97% | 146.8 68% | 80.8 ? -7% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 247.6 | 289.3 17% | 247.5 0% | 645 161% | 568 129% | 446.6 80% | 227 ? -8% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 205.9 | 331.1 61% | 247 20% | 547 166% | 436.4 112% | 706 243% | 233 ? 13% |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 15510 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 6446 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 14974 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4746 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Call of Duty WWII | |
| 1920x1080 Extra / On AA:Filmic T2X SM | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile (34 - 38.1, n=2) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 Spin NP515-51-86CX | |
| 1920x1080 High / On AA:Filmic 1X SM | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile (45 - 49.7, n=2) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 Spin NP515-51-86CX | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 | |
| 1920x1080 Normal / Off | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile (72 - 108, n=2) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 Spin NP515-51-86CX | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 | |
| 1280x720 Low / Off | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile (74 - 167, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 Spin NP515-51-86CX | |
| Rainbow Six Siege | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile (52 - 75.9, n=4) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 Spin NP515-51-86CX | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:4x | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile (57 - 88.7, n=4) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 Spin NP515-51-86CX | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset AA:T AF:2x | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile (60 - 139.7, n=4) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 Spin NP515-51-86CX | |
| 1024x768 Low Preset AA:T AF:Linear | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile (60 - 209, n=4) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 Spin NP515-51-86CX | |
| For Honor | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile (34 - 43, n=6) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 Spin NP515-51-86CX | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:8x | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile (42 - 57, n=6) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 Spin NP515-51-86CX | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:4x | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile (44 - 60.1, n=6) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 Spin NP515-51-86CX | |
| 1280x720 Low Preset | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile (60 - 147.9, n=4) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 Spin NP515-51-86CX | |
| Ghost Recon Wildlands | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile (4.1 - 26.2, n=6) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 Spin NP515-51-86CX | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:4x | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile (28 - 37.5, n=6) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 Spin NP515-51-86CX | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:FX | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile (28 - 39.5, n=6) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 Spin NP515-51-86CX | |
| 1280x720 Low Preset | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile (57 - 90.8, n=6) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 Spin NP515-51-86CX | |
| F1 2017 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile (27 - 36, n=4) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 Spin NP515-51-86CX | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:8x | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile (35 - 59, n=4) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 Spin NP515-51-86CX | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset AF:4x | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile (43 - 67, n=3) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 Spin NP515-51-86CX | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 | |
| 1280x720 Ultra Low Preset | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile (59 - 133, n=3) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 Spin NP515-51-86CX | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rainbow Six Siege (2015) | 60 | 60 | 57 | 52 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 79 | 49 | 35 | 30 |
| For Honor (2017) | 60 | 44 | 42 | 34 |
| Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 57 | 28 | 28 | 14 |
| F1 2017 (2017) | 59 | 43 | 35 | 27 |
| Call of Duty WWII (2017) | 74 | 72 | 45 | 34 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 41 | 27 | 18 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.9 / 30.9 / 30.9 dB |
| Carga |
| 42.6 / 45 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.4 dB(A) | ||
| Acer Nitro 5 Spin NP515-51-86CX i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620 | Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKBRN 81BG001KGE i5-8250U, GeForce MX150 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 1% | 5% | 15% | 6% | |
| off / environment * | 30.4 | 30.2 1% | 30.4 -0% | 28.2 7% | 29.9 2% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.9 | 30.2 2% | 31.3 -1% | 28.2 9% | 29.9 3% |
| Idle Average * | 30.9 | 30.2 2% | 31.3 -1% | 28.2 9% | 29.9 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.9 | 30.9 -0% | 31.3 -1% | 28.2 9% | 32.2 -4% |
| Load Average * | 42.6 | 42.4 -0% | 36.4 15% | 30.7 28% | 34.6 19% |
| Load Maximum * | 45 | 44.8 -0% | 37.1 18% | 32.9 27% | 40.2 11% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 40.2 |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.1 °C / 88 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2.3 °C / -4.2 F).
Acer Nitro 5 Spin NP515-51-86CX audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.22 / 0.5 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.1 / 7.4 / 8.6 Watt |
| Carga |
66 / 87 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer Nitro 5 Spin NP515-51-86CX i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, a-Si TFT-LCD, LCM, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 2% | -43% | -65% | 22% | 4% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.1 | 3.9 5% | 5.4 -32% | 11.6 -183% | 3.4 17% | 4.3 -5% |
| Idle Average * | 7.4 | 6.7 9% | 10.8 -46% | 13.8 -86% | 6.1 18% | 7.9 -7% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.6 | 8.7 -1% | 13.9 -62% | 14.2 -65% | 7.7 10% | 8.3 3% |
| Load Average * | 66 | 74 -12% | 94 -42% | 67.9 -3% | 44.2 33% | |
| Load Maximum * | 87 | 79 9% | 116.6 -34% | 76.9 12% | 60.3 31% | 65.7 24% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 59 | 37.6 | 43.2 |
* ... smaller is better
| Acer Nitro 5 Spin NP515-51-86CX i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 48 Wh | Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 48 Wh | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 52 Wh | HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 79.2 Wh | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 60 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 57 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 36 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -10% | -26% | 25% | 32% | 33% | -14% | 56% | |
| Reader / Idle | 750 | 759 1% | 558 -26% | 934 25% | 1366 82% | 736 -2% | 1168 ? 56% | |
| H.264 | 371 | 331 -11% | 261 -30% | 600 62% | 550 48% | 346 -7% | 821 ? 121% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 397 | 373 -6% | 311 -22% | 511 29% | 516 30% | 530 34% | 344 -13% | 626 ? 58% |
| Load | 113 | 88 -22% | 84 -26% | 136 20% | 119 5% | 76 -33% | 73 -35% | 97.8 ? -13% |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 94 | 76.3 ? |
Pro
Contra
Após a Spin 5, a Acer produziu outro conversível - e este é destinado a jogadores ocasionais. No entanto, além do design ligeiramente modificado que agora apresenta elementos vermelhos, não fica imediatamente claro se outras mudanças foram feitas na versão para jogos. Como já mencionamos na análise, existem duas grandes diferenças entre o interior do Acer Spin 5 e do Acer Nitro 5 Spin. A tela Chi Mei no Nitro é cerca de 100 cd/m² mais brilhante, tem um tempo de resposta mais rápido e oferece maior cobertura de espaço de cor, mas também possui um menor contraste e valor de preto do que a tela do Spin 5. Além disso, a Acer escolheu um SSD Micron para o Nitro 5, enquanto o Spin 5 está equipado com um SSD Intel significativamente mais rápido.
Os compradores não devem tomar sua decisão com base apenas na cor da carcaça. Quais características da tela são mais importantes para você? Você está disposto a abrir mão do SSD mais rápido? Como vimos nos testes, o Nitro oferece um desempenho de sistema similar ao do Spin 5. Os resultados de benchmark de "Tomb Raider", que pudemos comparar diretamente, são bons para um conversível, graças à GeForce GTX 1050. Você não deveria ter dificuldades em jogar jogos atuais neste dispositivo 2-em-1.
Nós esperaríamos um pouco mais do que um teclado "WASD" vermelho de uma versão para jogos. A Acer poderia ter feito mudanças mais significativas entre o Nitro 5 e o Spin 5 normal, como adicionar uma porta Ethernet ou melhorar o sistema de resfriamento.
Uma alternativa de alto desempenho pode ser o Asus ZenBook Flip 15, que também é equipado com uma Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050, embora ela tenha apenas 2 GB de VRAM disponíveis. Como vimos do benchmark Tomb Raider, oferece o mesmo desempenho que o Acer Nitro. Seu desempenho do sistema é muito pior do que o do Nitro, apesar dos excelentes resultados do Cinebench. E a tela 4K significa que o modelo Asus requer significativamente mais energia e oferece 25% menos tempo de duração de bateria do que o nosso dispositivo da Acer. Dependendo do preço atual dos dispositivos, os usuários terão que decidir por si mesmos qual modelo oferece o melhor valor pelo seu dinheiro.
Acer Nitro 5 Spin NP515-51-86CX
- 04/11/2018 v6 (old)
Daniel Puschina
Price comparison
