Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Conversível Acer Aspire Switch 12 Alpha SA5-271-56HM
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM (Aspire Switch Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-6200U 2 x 2.3 - 2.8 GHz, Skylake, Dois núcleos TPM 15 W
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 520, Análises do: 400 MHz, Memoría: 930 MHz, 20.19.15.4454
Memória
4 GB
, DDR3L
Pantalha
12.00 polegadas 16:9, 2160 x 1440 pixel 216 PPI, capacitiva, multitouch, native pen support, Panasonic VVX12T041N00, IPS, Brilhante: sim, detachable screen
placa mãe
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2, 256 GB
, 128 GB SATA 3.1
peso
1.29 kg, Suprimento de energia: 330 g
Preço
800 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panasonic VVX12T041N00 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 345 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 328 cd/m² Minimum: 18 cd/m²iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 345 cd/m²
Contraste: 908:1 (Preto: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96% sRGB (Calman 2D)
62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.63
| Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe | Microsoft Surface Pro 3 HD Graphics 4400, 4300U, Hynix HFS128G3MNM | Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -4% | -20% | -0% | -4% | 3% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.5 | 62.4 -5% | 53.8 -18% | 65 -1% | 63.6 -3% | 68.1 4% |
| sRGB Coverage | 96.1 | 93 -3% | 73.7 -23% | 96.5 0% | 88.8 -8% | 97.4 1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.9 | 63.9 -4% | 53.8 -20% | 67 0% | 65.6 -2% | 70.2 5% |
| Response Times | -24% | -17% | -72% | -26% | ||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 20 ? | 28.4 ? -42% | 33.2 ? -66% | 46 ? -130% | 30 ? -50% | |
| Response Time Black / White * | 34 ? | 17.6 ? 48% | 22.8 ? 33% | 31.2 ? 8% | 16 ? 53% | |
| PWM Frequency | 1000 ? | 222.2 ? -78% | 50 ? -95% | 200 ? -80% | ||
| Screen | -15% | -6% | 17% | 3% | -7% | |
| Brightness middle | 345 | 342.4 -1% | 322 -7% | 413 20% | 355.3 3% | 341 -1% |
| Brightness | 328 | 315 -4% | 319 -3% | 396 21% | 338 3% | 318 -3% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 85 -7% | 97 7% | 87 -4% | 91 0% | 87 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.38 | 0.744 -96% | 0.42 -11% | 0.36 5% | 0.33 13% | 0.36 5% |
| Contrast | 908 | 460 -49% | 767 -16% | 1147 26% | 1077 19% | 947 4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 8.4 | 5.33 37% | 6.02 28% | 3.09 63% | 4.72 44% | 6 29% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.9 | 9.25 22% | 10.06 15% | |||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.3 | 5.36 -25% | 6.29 -46% | 3.92 9% | 6.53 -52% | 8.12 -89% |
| Gamma | 2.63 84% | 2.12 104% | 2.4 92% | 2.3 96% | 2.17 101% | 2.23 99% |
| CCT | 7368 88% | 7671 85% | 7712 84% | 7333 89% | 6707 97% | 7011 93% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62 | 57 -8% | 47.8 -23% | 61 -2% | 59.37 -4% | 63.4 2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 93 | 73.2 | 97 | 97.4 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -14% /
-14% | -14% /
-11% | -18% /
-6% | -1% /
1% | -10% /
-9% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise |   |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |   |
| ↘ 15 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1000 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |   |
The display backlight flickers at 1000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3281 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3996 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G | HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006 | Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 25% | 15% | 6% | -17% | -0% | |
| Score Read | 460 | 645 40% | 450 -2% | 351 -24% | 333 -28% | 459 0% |
| Score Write | 228 | 239 5% | 316 39% | 338 48% | 223 -2% | 227 0% |
| Score Total | 918 | 1190 30% | 997 9% | 864 -6% | 722 -21% | 913 -1% |
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 9% | 10% | 15% | 0% | 5% | |
| Read Seq | 518 | 666 29% | 420.3 -19% | 501 -3% | 410.1 -21% | 497.9 -4% |
| Write Seq | 199.9 | 154.2 -23% | 305.6 53% | 297.2 49% | 316 58% | 153.5 -23% |
| Read 4k | 29.3 | 28.51 -3% | 32.36 10% | 28.31 -3% | 27.4 -6% | 36.2 24% |
| Write 4k | 76.8 | 101.5 32% | 73.6 -4% | 90.3 18% | 53.5 -30% | 95.5 24% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 17% /
16% | 13% /
12% | 11% /
11% | -9% /
-7% | 3% /
3% |
Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
Sequential Read:
518 MB/s
Sequential Write:
199.9 MB/s
512K Read:
374.9 MB/s
512K Write:
201 MB/s
4K Read:
29.3 MB/s
4K Write:
76.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
272 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
197.1 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1585 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5608 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 54.4 | 28.6 | 24.2 | 6.9 |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 45.8 | 31.4 | 19.7 | 6 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 17 | 10.8 | 6.1 |
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.7 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 44.4 °C / 111.9 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-16.3 °C / -29.3 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.7 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 44.4 °C / 111.9 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-16.3 °C / -29.3 F).
| Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G | Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2 | HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 20% | 27% | 20% | 14% | 26% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 7.3 | 4.4 40% | 5.87 20% | 3.7 49% | 4 45% | 4.5 38% |
| Idle Average * | 10 | 9 10% | 6.05 39% | 6.8 32% | 8.6 14% | 7.7 23% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.15 | 10.7 -5% | 6.13 40% | 7.6 25% | 9.3 8% | 8.3 18% |
| Load Average * | 25.2 | 19.6 22% | 21.27 16% | 22.5 11% | 18.6 26% | 19.8 21% |
| Load Maximum * | 29.3 | 19.9 32% | 23.03 21% | 34.5 -18% | 36.3 -24% | 20.6 30% |
* ... smaller is better
Consumo de energia
| desligado |   0.3 / 0.4 Watt |
| Ocioso |  7.3 / 10 / 10.15 Watt |
| Carga |
25.2 / 29.3 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G | HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006 | Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | ||||||
| WiFi Websurfing | 321 | 427 33% | 300 -7% | 443 38% | 361 12% | 440 37% |
| Battery Runtime | 20% | 2% | 7% | 49% | 24% | |
| Reader / Idle | 640 | 899 40% | 628 -2% | 732 14% | 954 49% | 861 35% |
| H.264 | 468 | 432 -8% | 450 -4% | |||
| Load | 112 | 111 -1% | 118 5% | 130 16% | 166 48% | 157 40% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 27% /
24% | -3% /
-1% | 23% /
15% | 31% /
36% | 31% /
27% |
Pro
+ Preparado para alto desempenho
+ Resfriamento sem ventoinha
+ Bons dispositivos de entrada
+ Construção sólida
Contra
- Alto falantes ruins
- Duração da bateria
Uma história silenciosa que deixa um forte eco: O Acer Switch Alpha 12 não apenas apresenta um desafio com o seu preço de entrada de 800 Euros (~$883) incluindo dock de teclado, mas também com o seu pacote geral bem concebido com uma tecnologia de resfriamento inovadora. O conversível de 12-polegadas está alojado em uma carcaça bem construído, e dificilmente fica atrás de alguns rivais que podem ser o dobro de caros.
Um pouco pesado demais: O tablet poderia ser mais leve para o uso diário. Seus dispositivos de entrada estão quase no mesmo nível dos oponentes mais caros da Microsoft. A tela no novo conversível da Acer também é impressionante. Naturalmente, o desempenho possível sem uma ventoinha ativa é de interesse particular. Apesar de seu poderoso processador Intel Core i5, ele não tem nada que esconder dos rivais sem ventoinha. Com este design de resfriamento, o fabricante possivelmente criou uma tecnologia nova para portáteis e tablets finos. A concorrência terá dificuldades se a Acer melhora a duração da bateria e a reprodução do áudio no futuro.
Nós começamos a gostar do novo Switch Alpha 12 da Acer. Com um preço de 800 Euros (~$883) não é apenas uma alternativa acessível, mas também é melhor em alguns aspectos: O perturbante barulho da ventoinha é coisa do passado.
os usuários que não puderem aceitar a duração da bateria certamente deveriam dar uma olhada nos oponentes do Surface e no Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700. Ao comparar produtos da HP, como o HP Spectre x2, também é recomendado.
Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
-
08/22/2016 v5.1 (old)
Nino Ricchizzi
Convertible - Médio equilibrado