Breve Análise do Asus ZenBook 13 UX325JA: Subportátil de 1100-gramas com excelente duração da bateria
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
87.5 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Asus ZenBook 13 UX325JA i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.1 kg | 13.9 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
83.8 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Samsung Galaxy Book Ion 13.3 i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | 970 g | 12.9 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
85.1 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel i5-L16G7, UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | 940 g | 11.8 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
87 % v7 (old) | 02/2020 | Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.2 kg | 16.6 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 | |
88 % v7 (old) | 04/2020 | Apple MacBook Air 2020 i5 i5-1030NG7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.3 kg | 16.1 mm | 13.30" | 2560x1600 | |
84 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | Huawei MateBook 13 2020 AMD R5 3500U, Vega 8 | 1.3 kg | 14.9 mm | 13.00" | 2160x1440 | |
85.5 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr R5 4500U, Vega 6 | 1.3 kg | 16.4 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion 13.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325JA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=14, last 2 years) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion 13.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325JA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=14, last 2 years) |
|
iluminação: 83 %
iluminação com acumulador: 435 cd/m²
Contraste: 770:1 (Preto: 0.565 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.66 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.19
ΔE Greyscale 3.65 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.34
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325JA Sharp LQ133M1JW40, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Samsung Galaxy Book Ion 13.3 BOE087A, IPS (QLED), 1920x1080, 13.3" | Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel BOE07E7, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 BOE, NE135FBM-N41, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Apple MacBook Air 2020 i5 APPA042, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Huawei MateBook 13 2020 AMD Chi Mei CMN8201 P130ZFA-BA1, IPS, 2160x1440, 13" | HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 8% | 9% | 8% | 3% | |||
Display P3 Coverage | 63.8 | 70 10% | 70.1 10% | 70.4 10% | 65.9 3% | ||
sRGB Coverage | 94.5 | 97.2 3% | 99.8 6% | 97.7 3% | 97.4 3% | ||
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 64.9 | 71.3 10% | 71.2 10% | 71.7 10% | 67.8 4% | ||
Response Times | -19% | -27% | -27% | 15558% | 7806% | 3282% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 47 ? | 47 ? -0% | 51.2 ? -9% | 55 ? -17% | 38.7 ? 18% | 40.8 ? 13% | 47.6 ? -1% |
Response Time Black / White * | 21 ? | 29 ? -38% | 30.4 ? -45% | 31 ? -48% | 30.44 ? -45% | 25.6 ? -22% | 32.4 ? -54% |
PWM Frequency | 250 ? | 208 ? -17% | 117000 ? 46700% | 58820 ? 23428% | 25000 ? 9900% | ||
Screen | 7% | -7% | 4% | 19% | -17% | 20% | |
Brightness middle | 435 | 467 7% | 385 -11% | 474 9% | 430 -1% | 374 -14% | 452.6 4% |
Brightness | 404 | 437 8% | 354 -12% | 426 5% | 405 0% | 364 -10% | 438 8% |
Brightness Distribution | 83 | 88 6% | 88 6% | 82 -1% | 89 7% | 94 13% | 93 12% |
Black Level * | 0.565 | 0.29 49% | 0.3 47% | 0.29 49% | 0.32 43% | 0.6 -6% | 0.29 49% |
Contrast | 770 | 1610 109% | 1283 67% | 1634 112% | 1344 75% | 623 -19% | 1561 103% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.66 | 4.73 -78% | 3.8 -43% | 2.38 11% | 1.8 32% | 2.9 -9% | 2.67 -0% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.73 | 6.07 -28% | 6.4 -35% | 5.88 -24% | 4.6 3% | 7.4 -56% | 4.11 13% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.19 | 2.2 -85% | 2.69 -126% | 1.6 -34% | 1.36 -14% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.65 | 4.33 -19% | 4.6 -26% | 3.75 -3% | 1.1 70% | 4.8 -32% | 2.1 42% |
Gamma | 2.34 94% | 2.34 94% | 2.2 100% | 2.37 93% | 2.16 102% | 2.01 109% | |
CCT | 7109 91% | 6954 93% | 7424 88% | 6466 101% | 6644 98% | 6631 98% | 6505 100% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | 65.3 9% | 65 8% | 64.2 7% | 62.2 4% | ||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 95 | 97.2 2% | 100 5% | 97.6 3% | 97.6 3% | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -6% /
2% | -9% /
-7% | -5% /
-1% | 5195% /
2759% | 3895% /
2117% | 1102% /
593% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
21 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise | |
↘ 5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise | |
↘ 25 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 250 Hz | ≤ 30 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 30 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3751 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4155 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 2802 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4309 pontos | |
Ajuda |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i5 | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325JA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel | |
HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion 13.3 | |
Huawei MateBook 13 2020 AMD |
* ... smaller is better
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325JA Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Samsung Galaxy Book Ion 13.3 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ | Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Apple MacBook Air 2020 i5 Apple SSD AP0512 | Huawei MateBook 13 2020 AMD WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G | Average Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 35% | -61% | 22% | 9% | -29% | 5% | ||
Write 4K | 139.7 | 159.6 14% | 37.71 -73% | 187.4 34% | 143.9 3% | 94.8 -32% | 144.5 ? 3% | |
Read 4K | 56.4 | 48.22 -15% | 11 -80% | 63.8 13% | 45.91 -19% | 45.5 -19% | 54.1 ? -4% | |
Write Seq | 1265 | 2343 85% | 403.1 -68% | 1776 40% | 1307 3% | 732 -42% | 1445 ? 14% | |
Read Seq | 1492 | 2184 46% | 769 -48% | 1693 13% | 1435 -4% | 959 -36% | 1446 ? -3% | |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 402.5 | 342.2 -15% | 155.9 -61% | 492.3 22% | 237.1 -41% | 224.6 -44% | 427 ? 6% | |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 329.3 | 485.4 47% | 195.6 -41% | 539 64% | 332.7 1% | 365.2 11% | 456 ? 38% | |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1786 | 2354 32% | 407.9 -77% | 1770 -1% | 2698 51% | 864 -52% | 1650 ? -8% | |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 1923 | 3555 85% | 1102 -43% | 1715 -11% | 3394 76% | 1580 -18% | 1728 ? -10% | |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 899 | 880 ? | ||||||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 630 | 629 ? | ||||||
AS SSD | 19% | -78% | 20% | -59% | 42% | -124% | 9% | |
Seq Read | 1587 | 2980 88% | 945 -40% | 1703 7% | 1153 -27% | 2844 79% | 1135 -28% | 1456 ? -8% |
Seq Write | 938 | 2175 132% | 349 -63% | 1373 46% | 1367 46% | 2316 147% | 628 -33% | 1404 ? 50% |
4K Read | 51 | 52.8 4% | 17.79 -65% | 56.8 11% | 12.95 -75% | 40.76 -20% | 42.49 -17% | 48.7 ? -5% |
4K Write | 141.9 | 147.8 4% | 25.69 -82% | 164.4 16% | 24.52 -83% | 96.9 -32% | 96.9 -32% | 131.6 ? -7% |
4K-64 Read | 576 | 542 -6% | 373.5 -35% | 584 1% | 665 15% | 1275 121% | 614 7% | 586 ? 2% |
4K-64 Write | 584 | 282.4 -52% | 245.4 -58% | 783 34% | 159.5 -73% | 1156 98% | 256.4 -56% | 788 ? 35% |
Access Time Read * | 0.083 | 0.077 7% | 0.232 -180% | 0.044 47% | 0.295 -255% | 0.074 11% | 0.162 -95% | 0.07236 ? 13% |
Access Time Write * | 0.04 | 0.025 37% | 0.144 -260% | 0.038 5% | 0.163 -308% | 0.039 2% | 0.592 -1380% | 0.07731 ? -93% |
Score Read | 785 | 893 14% | 486 -38% | 811 3% | 793 1% | 1600 104% | 770 -2% | 780 ? -1% |
Score Write | 820 | 648 -21% | 306 -63% | 1085 32% | 321 -61% | 1485 81% | 416 -49% | 1060 ? 29% |
Score Total | 1990 | 1974 -1% | 1014 -49% | 2313 16% | 1528 -23% | 3879 95% | 1567 -21% | 2252 ? 13% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1311 | 368.9 -72% | 1401 7% | 1433 9% | 433.2 -67% | 843 -36% | 1469 ? 12% | |
Copy Program MB/s | 310.3 | 190 -39% | 480.4 55% | 363 17% | 266.4 -14% | 367.9 19% | 484 ? 56% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 801 | 366.6 -54% | 820 2% | 725 -9% | 620 -23% | 727 -9% | 997 ? 24% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 27% /
26% | -70% /
-72% | 21% /
21% | -59% /
-59% | 26% /
30% | -77% /
-89% | 7% /
7% |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 11 Performance | 4380 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 70684 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 12855 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2587 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 885 pontos | |
Ajuda |
BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 High Preset | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (21.1 - 61.5, n=18) | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325JA | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i5 |
Tomb Raider - 1366x768 High Preset AA:FX AF:8x | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325JA | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (41.4 - 49.4, n=2) |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tomb Raider (2013) | 141.7 | 77.2 | 49.4 | 27.4 |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 99.6 | 58.3 | 49 | 18.5 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 77.8 | 50.2 | 30.7 | 28 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 34.3 | 18.9 | 17.6 | |
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 43.4 | 12 | 7.5 | 5.6 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) | 21 | 10.6 | ||
Escape from Tarkov (2020) | 29.3 | 18.5 | 17.6 | |
Hunt Showdown (2020) | 30.7 | 13.4 | 9.9 | |
Doom Eternal (2020) | 22.8 | 12.3 | 12.1 | |
Gears Tactics (2020) | 56.2 | 19.6 | 12.1 | 8.3 |
F1 2020 (2020) | 45 | 24 | 17 | 11 |
Death Stranding (2020) | 25.7 | 16.2 | 14.4 | 11.1 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 30.1 / 30.1 / 30.1 dB |
Carga |
| 32.7 / 38.5 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.1 dB(A) |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325JA i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Samsung Galaxy Book Ion 13.3 i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Apple MacBook Air 2020 i5 i5-1030NG7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Huawei MateBook 13 2020 AMD R5 3500U, Vega 8 | HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr R5 4500U, Vega 6 | Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -1% | 2% | -10% | 7% | -2% | 3% | 9% | |
off / environment * | 30.1 | 30.7 -2% | 30.3 -1% | 30 -0% | 27.2 10% | 28 7% | 28.4 ? 6% | 24.3 ? 19% |
Idle Minimum * | 30.1 | 30.7 -2% | 30.3 -1% | 30 -0% | 27.2 10% | 28 7% | 28.6 ? 5% | 24.4 ? 19% |
Idle Average * | 30.1 | 30.7 -2% | 30.3 -1% | 30 -0% | 27.2 10% | 28 7% | 28.7 ? 5% | 24.7 ? 18% |
Idle Maximum * | 30.1 | 30.7 -2% | 30.3 -1% | 30 -0% | 27.2 10% | 28.5 5% | 29 ? 4% | 26.1 ? 13% |
Load Average * | 32.7 | 36.6 -12% | 31.7 3% | 45.5 -39% | 31.8 3% | 41.1 -26% | 33.4 ? -2% | 35 ? -7% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 38.6 | 35.8 7% | ||||||
Load Maximum * | 38.5 | 36.3 6% | 32.7 15% | 45.8 -19% | 38.3 1% | 43.5 -13% | 37.9 ? 2% | 41.6 ? -8% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.3 °C / 86.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-2 °C / -3.6 F).
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325JA i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Samsung Galaxy Book Ion 13.3 i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel i5-L16G7, UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Apple MacBook Air 2020 i5 i5-1030NG7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Huawei MateBook 13 2020 AMD R5 3500U, Vega 8 | HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr R5 4500U, Vega 6 | Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -0% | 8% | 13% | -10% | -3% | -5% | -3% | -3% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 39.7 | 41.8 -5% | 38.1 4% | 33.5 16% | 48 -21% | 39.3 1% | 44.8 -13% | 41.1 ? -4% | 42.2 ? -6% |
Maximum Bottom * | 39.9 | 43 -8% | 40 -0% | 35.6 11% | 40 -0% | 40.2 -1% | 43.8 -10% | 42.5 ? -7% | 44.6 ? -12% |
Idle Upper Side * | 28.7 | 26.6 7% | 24.8 14% | 24.9 13% | 33 -15% | 30.3 -6% | 27 6% | 27.9 ? 3% | 27.4 ? 5% |
Idle Bottom * | 28.5 | 27.2 5% | 24.8 13% | 25.4 11% | 30 -5% | 30.5 -7% | 29.2 -2% | 29.1 ? -2% | 27.9 ? 2% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325JA audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (64.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.6 / 0.6 Watt |
Ocioso | 2.4 / 4.6 / 9 Watt |
Carga |
36 / 36 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325JA i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Samsung Galaxy Book Ion 13.3 i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel i5-L16G7, UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Apple MacBook Air 2020 i5 i5-1030NG7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Huawei MateBook 13 2020 AMD R5 3500U, Vega 8 | HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr R5 4500U, Vega 6 | Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -6% | 26% | 21% | -2% | -43% | -22% | -34% | -55% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.4 | 2.2 8% | 2.5 -4% | 1.8 25% | 2.4 -0% | 4.71 -96% | 3.9 -63% | 3.91 ? -63% | 4.47 ? -86% |
Idle Average * | 4.6 | 5.9 -28% | 4.8 -4% | 4.6 -0% | 6.8 -48% | 8.65 -88% | 5.8 -26% | 7.33 ? -59% | 7.6 ? -65% |
Idle Maximum * | 9 | 8.9 1% | 6 33% | 6.1 32% | 10.5 -17% | 9.42 -5% | 6 33% | 9.16 ? -2% | 9.51 ? -6% |
Load Average * | 36 | 46 -28% | 14.9 59% | 27.4 24% | 25.7 29% | 34.23 5% | 41.5 -15% | 39.2 ? -9% | 46.2 ? -28% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 27 | 25.5 6% | 24.5 9% | ||||||
Load Maximum * | 36 | 34 6% | 20.1 44% | 27 25% | 30.4 16% | 47.1 -31% | 50.4 -40% | 49.8 ? -38% | 68.4 ? -90% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325JA i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 67 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book Ion 13.3 i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 66.9 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel i5-L16G7, UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU), 42 Wh | Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 54.5 Wh | Apple MacBook Air 2020 i5 i5-1030NG7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 49.9 Wh | Huawei MateBook 13 2020 AMD R5 3500U, Vega 8, 41.7 Wh | HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr R5 4500U, Vega 6, 51 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -11% | -10% | -27% | -22% | -52% | -10% | -12% | |
Reader / Idle | 1597 | 1890 18% | 1281 -20% | 1916 20% | 1750 ? 10% | |||
H.264 | 992 | 718 -28% | 627 -37% | 640 -35% | 527 -47% | 911 ? -8% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 827 | 568 -31% | 591 -29% | 620 -25% | 618 -25% | 319 -61% | 708 -14% | 726 ? -12% |
Load | 184 | 146 -21% | 233 27% | 139 -24% | 173 -6% | 96 -48% | 116 -37% | 115.1 ? -37% |
Pro
Contra
A mobilidade é claramente o foco do ZenBook 13. A bateria de 67 Wh instalada permite durações reais de cerca de 13 a 16 horas. Graças à sua construção leve, o portátil pesa apenas cerca de 1,1 kg (~ 2,43 lbs). Como resultado, no entanto, o chassi de metal fino e compacto carece um pouco em termos de rigidez.
O Asus ZenBook UX325JA é um companheiro móvel de longa duração.
A omissão de um conector de CA proprietário reforça ainda mais o aspecto de mobilidade do portátil. Em vez disso, o sistema pode ser recarregado via Thunderbolt 3 com um carregador USB Tipo C. Portanto, a maioria dos carregadores USB comuns são adequados para uso como fonte de energia. De acordo com a Asus, a bateria pode ser carregada entre 5 e 20 volts.
No interior do sistema, há um processador Ice Lake Core i7 com desempenho mais do que suficiente para aplicativos de escritório e web, enquanto um desempenho gráfico mais rápido pode ser alcançado com uma GPU externa. Como a Asus incluiu duas portas TB3, uma GPU externa - ou, alternativamente, uma estação docking - pode ser conectado ao mesmo tempo que o carregador.
Apesar de sua construção compacta, o sistema desenvolve apenas uma quantidade moderada de calor. Da mesma forma, o nível de ruído é bastante baixo - pelo menos durante a o modo inativo ou sob cargas baixas. Enquanto isso, a tela IPS Full HD brilha com bons ângulos de visão, excelente precisão de cores, uma boa cobertura do espaço de cores e um brilho máximo alto. Dito isso, a relação de contraste é um pouco baixa.
O SSD NVMe instalado oferece muito espaço de armazenamento (1 TB) e taxas de transferência rápidas. Embora seja possível trocar o SSD, será preciso abrir a carcaça. Como não há slots de RAM e a memória do sistema é soldada (16 GB, modo de canal duplo), ela não pode ser atualizada. O teclado retroiluminado provou ser adequado para o uso diário.
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325JA
- 08/17/2020 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck