Breve Análise do Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L: Portátil compacto para jogos com reservas de Turbo
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L (ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-10750H 6 x 2.6 - 5 GHz, 70 W PL2 / Short Burst, 135 W PL1 / Sustained, Comet Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1125 MHz, Memoría: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, 256bit, 27.21.14.5638 (Nvidia 456.38), Optimus
Memória
16 GB
, DDR4-3200, Dual Channel, um banco de memória (ocupado), 8 GB soldados
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, Brilhante: não, 60 Hz
placa mãe
Intel HM470
Disco rígido
2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0), 1024 GB
, 2x M.2 (RAID 0), 903 GB livre
peso
2 kg, Suprimento de energia: 795 g
Preço
2499 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82.5 % v7 (old) | 10/2020 | Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2 kg | 18.9 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
| 84.5 % v7 (old) | 09/2020 | SCHENKER Key 15 Comet Lake i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | 2 kg | 19.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.9 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 17.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 85.8 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | 2.2 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
v (old) | 04/2020 | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | MSI GS66 10SGS i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | 2.2 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 400 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 376.9 cd/m² Minimum: 20 cd/m²iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 387 cd/m²
Contraste: 1683:1 (Preto: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.7
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
99% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
70.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.178
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 AU Optronics B156HAN08.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER Key 15 Comet Lake Panda LM156LF-1F02, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Samsung SDCA029, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO7A8C), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GS66 10SGS AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -6% | -3% | 0% | 28% | 1% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 69.4 | 66.5 -4% | 67.2 -3% | 69.4 0% | 99.9 44% | 70.3 1% | 69.9 1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99 | 90.8 -8% | 96.2 -3% | 98.8 0% | 100 1% | 99.5 1% | 99.1 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 70.5 | 66.5 -6% | 68.7 -3% | 70.5 0% | 98.2 39% | 72.2 2% | 71.1 1% |
| Response Times | 78% | 74% | 82% | 95% | 68% | 71% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 60 ? | 6.4 ? 89% | 10 ? 83% | 3.2 ? 95% | 2.2 ? 96% | 14.4 ? 76% | 11.2 ? 81% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 25.6 ? | 8.8 ? 66% | 9.2 ? 64% | 8 ? 69% | 1.8 ? 93% | 10.4 ? 59% | 10 ? 61% |
| PWM Frequency | 60 ? | ||||||
| Screen | -64% | -92% | -43% | -28% | -43% | -14% | |
| Brightness middle | 387 | 297.7 -23% | 300 -22% | 345.4 -11% | 385 -1% | 320 -17% | 339.4 -12% |
| Brightness | 377 | 280 -26% | 281 -25% | 342 -9% | 390 3% | 318 -16% | 331 -12% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 84 -7% | 80 -11% | 90 0% | 93 3% | 88 -2% | 92 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.23 | 0.43 -87% | 0.29 -26% | 0.34 -48% | 0.24 -4% | 0.24 -4% | |
| Contrast | 1683 | 692 -59% | 1034 -39% | 1016 -40% | 1333 -21% | 1414 -16% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 3.13 -74% | 5.39 -199% | 3.18 -77% | 2.46 -37% | 4.03 -124% | 1.58 12% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.94 | 7.1 -80% | 14.35 -264% | 6.57 -67% | 4.01 -2% | 8.43 -114% | 3.8 4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.7 | 3.06 -337% | 1.73 -147% | 1.77 -153% | 2.6 -271% | 0.98 -40% | 1.47 -110% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 1.9 34% | 9.8 -238% | 3.8 -31% | 1.39 52% | 5.94 -105% | 2.3 21% |
| Gamma | 2.178 101% | 2.23 99% | 2.019 109% | 2.15 102% | 2.31 95% | 2.42 91% | 2.24 98% |
| CCT | 6992 93% | 6325 103% | 8174 80% | 7109 91% | 6395 102% | 6751 96% | 6952 93% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 99 | 59.2 -40% | 69 -30% | 64.3 -35% | 98 -1% | 66 -33% | 64.8 -35% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99 | 90.5 -9% | 92 -7% | 99 0% | 100 1% | 99 0% | 99.4 0% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 3% /
-36% | -7% /
-54% | 13% /
-19% | 32% /
1% | 9% /
-21% | 19% /
-0% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 60 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 29.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 30.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1226 (1200.59-1340.53)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H; Turbo: Ø1314 (1300.81-1356.25)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1248 (1233.43-1260.16)
SCHENKER Key 15 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1289 (1270.12-1436.11)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1366 (1323.8-1373.01)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1573 (1544.4-1818.6)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1213 (1201.27-1287.87)
MSI GS66 10SGS Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1219 (1209.12-1272.47)
Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Cinebench R20 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3409 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4848 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4396 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5208 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L | |
| MSI GS66 10SGS | |
| SCHENKER Key 15 Comet Lake | |
* ... smaller is better
2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
2812 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
1794 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
550 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
450.4 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
2440 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
1698 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
52.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
123 MB/s
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0) | Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | SCHENKER Key 15 Comet Lake Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | MSI GS66 10SGS Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -18% | 36% | 15% | 3% | 16% | 0% | |
| Write 4K | 123 | 156 27% | 193 57% | 139.8 14% | 127.4 4% | 131.7 7% | 132.5 8% |
| Read 4K | 52.5 | 60.7 16% | 54.3 3% | 48.62 -7% | 147.5 181% | 47.34 -10% | 45.03 -14% |
| Write Seq | 1698 | 968 -43% | 2988 76% | 2260 33% | 485.9 -71% | 2884 70% | 1987 17% |
| Read Seq | 2440 | 1619 -34% | 2633 8% | 2135 -12% | 1352 -45% | 2303 -6% | 1434 -41% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 450.4 | 485 8% | 540 20% | 499.3 11% | 476.5 6% | 423.9 -6% | 467.5 4% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 550 | 337.3 -39% | 620 13% | 552 0% | 531 -3% | 487.7 -11% | 536 -3% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1794 | 969 -46% | 3284 83% | 2960 65% | 1061 -41% | 2822 57% | 2003 12% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 2812 | 1825 -35% | 3564 27% | 3269 16% | 2552 -9% | 3478 24% | 3306 18% |
| AS SSD | -44% | 128% | 27% | -11% | 42% | 24% | |
| Seq Read | 2523 | 1221 -52% | 2928 16% | 1957 -22% | 1200 -52% | 2767 10% | 1086 -57% |
| Seq Write | 1578 | 911 -42% | 2733 73% | 2092 33% | 836 -47% | 2613 66% | 1901 20% |
| 4K Read | 50.4 | 48.24 -4% | 51.6 2% | 50.2 0% | 65.8 31% | 47.55 -6% | 51 1% |
| 4K Write | 115.6 | 99.2 -14% | 129.8 12% | 96.5 -17% | 103.8 -10% | 98.9 -14% | 117.3 1% |
| 4K-64 Read | 634 | 321.4 -49% | 1838 190% | 1594 151% | 789 24% | 1205 90% | 1503 137% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1114 | 744 -33% | 2291 106% | 2005 80% | 929 -17% | 2007 80% | 1721 54% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.095 | 0.071 25% | 0.062 35% | 0.057 40% | 0.103 -8% | 0.065 32% | 0.059 38% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.038 | 0.139 -266% | 0.029 24% | 0.112 -195% | 0.045 -18% | 0.038 -0% | 0.1 -163% |
| Score Read | 936 | 492 -47% | 2183 133% | 1840 97% | 975 4% | 1529 63% | 1662 78% |
| Score Write | 1388 | 934 -33% | 2694 94% | 2310 66% | 1117 -20% | 2367 71% | 2029 46% |
| Score Total | 2770 | 1681 -39% | 5984 116% | 5103 84% | 2594 -6% | 4677 69% | 4588 66% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 2106 | 906 -57% | 2183 4% | 1793 -15% | 2155 2% | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 549 | 486.6 -11% | 2694 391% | 573 4% | 715 30% | ||
| Copy Game MB/s | 854 | 952 11% | 5984 601% | 1418 66% | 1506 76% | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -31% /
-34% | 82% /
95% | 21% /
22% | -4% /
-5% | 29% /
31% | 12% /
15% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
No graph data
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 19044 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 39844 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 15573 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 6604 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
The Witcher 3 | F1 2020 | Horizon Zero Dawn | Doom Eternal | Death Stranding | Flight Simulator 2020
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Key 15 Comet Lake | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L (Turbo) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
| MSI GS66 10SGS | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (56 - 83.8, n=31) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 | |
| F1 2020 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Average of class Gaming (12.4 - 305, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L (Turbo) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (101 - 109, n=2) | |
| SCHENKER Key 15 Comet Lake | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn - 1920x1080 Ultimate Quality | |
| Average of class Gaming (101 - 163, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Key 15 Comet Lake | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L (Turbo) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (60 - 68, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L | |
| Doom Eternal - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (160.9 - 179, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Key 15 Comet Lake | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
| MSI GS66 10SGS | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L (Turbo) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (125.6 - 137.9, n=4) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L | |
| Death Stranding - 1920x1080 Very High Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (128.8 - 163, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Key 15 Comet Lake | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L (Turbo) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (81.3 - 97.9, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L | |
| Flight Simulator 2020 - 1920x1080 Ultra AA:TAA AF:16x | |
| Average of class Gaming (24.7 - 74, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L (Turbo) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (32 - 35.5, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0): Ø72.2 (67-77)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0); Turbo: Ø83.8 (72-90)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8: Ø48.4 (18-51)
SCHENKER Key 15 Comet Lake GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB: Ø80.9 (70-85)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ: Ø75.9 (70-84)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H): Ø80.3 (75-84)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ: Ø84.4 (72-91)
MSI GS66 10SGS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ: Ø69.3 (64-75)
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 376.4 | 318.1 | 296.9 | 152.6 | ||
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 291.2 | 212 | 127.4 | 70.7 | 46.7 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 87 | 82 | 80 | 75 | 55 | 29 |
| Doom Eternal (2020) | 205.6 | 140.4 | 127.8 | 125.6 | 95.2 | 53.2 |
| Gears Tactics (2020) | 210.9 | 157.7 | 100.8 | 100.8 | 72.4 | 38.2 |
| F1 2020 (2020) | 225 | 146 | 129 | 101 | 75 | 43 |
| Death Stranding (2020) | 99.6 | 96.5 | 89 | 81.3 | 61.1 | 36.6 |
| Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | 125 | 92 | 77 | 60 | 47 | 27 |
| Flight Simulator 2020 (2020) | 54.7 | 45.2 | 38.9 | 32 | 24.6 | 16 |
| Serious Sam 4 (2020) | 127 | 84.3 | 75.3 | 59.9 | 48.2 | 31 |
| Mafia Definitive Edition (2020) | 126.4 | 83.8 | 77.5 | 52.2 | 27.2 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 31 / 32 / 36 dB |
| Carga |
| 55 / 57 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 25 dB(A) | ||
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | SCHENKER Key 15 Comet Lake i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | MSI GS66 10SGS i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 5% | 4% | 10% | -4% | 1% | 6% | 14% | |
| off / environment * | 25 | 28.2 -13% | 25 -0% | 27 -8% | 30 -20% | 30 -20% | 28.5 -14% | 24 ? 4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 31 | 28.7 7% | 26 16% | 27 13% | 34 -10% | 30 3% | 30 3% | 25.5 ? 18% |
| Idle Average * | 32 | 30.5 5% | 27 16% | 27 16% | 36 -13% | 33 -3% | 30 6% | 27.2 ? 15% |
| Idle Maximum * | 36 | 31 14% | 44 -22% | 27 25% | 41 -14% | 36 -0% | 30.9 14% | 30.3 ? 16% |
| Load Average * | 55 | 39 29% | 53 4% | 44.7 19% | 48 13% | 50 9% | 39.5 28% | 42.5 ? 23% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 53 | 54.2 -2% | 51 4% | 51.2 3% | 48 9% | 48 9% | 48 9% | |
| Load Maximum * | 57 | 59.6 -5% | 53 7% | 54 5% | 54 5% | 50 12% | 59.4 -4% | 53.4 ? 6% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 47.4 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 63 °C / 145 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39 °C / 102.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-10.1 °C / -18.2 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 63 °C / 145 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39 °C / 102.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-10.1 °C / -18.2 F).
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | SCHENKER Key 15 Comet Lake i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | MSI GS66 10SGS i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -11% | -8% | -17% | 1% | 5% | 1% | 1% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 54 | 49.8 8% | 52 4% | 50 7% | 49 9% | 44 19% | 47.8 11% | 46.1 ? 15% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 63 | 63.2 -0% | 62 2% | 52.2 17% | 61 3% | 50 21% | 54.4 14% | 49.2 ? 22% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 27 | 32 -19% | 31 -15% | 37.2 -38% | 27 -0% | 29 -7% | 27.4 -1% | 31.2 ? -16% |
| Idle Bottom * | 27 | 36.2 -34% | 33 -22% | 41.4 -53% | 29 -7% | 31 -15% | 32 -19% | 32.2 ? -19% |
* ... smaller is better
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.6 / 1.5 Watt |
| Ocioso | 10 / 13 / 23 Watt |
| Carga |
137 / 222 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | SCHENKER Key 15 Comet Lake i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | MSI GS66 10SGS i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -46% | 7% | -28% | -35% | 0% | -13% | -17% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 10 | 17.6 -76% | 10 -0% | 14.3 -43% | 18 -80% | 11 -10% | 14.9 -49% | 13.5 ? -35% |
| Idle Average * | 13 | 24.7 -90% | 14 -8% | 22.3 -72% | 21 -62% | 15 -15% | 17.5 -35% | 18.9 ? -45% |
| Idle Maximum * | 23 | 56.3 -145% | 18 22% | 36.9 -60% | 38 -65% | 25 -9% | 29.5 -28% | 26.8 ? -17% |
| Load Average * | 137 | 111.1 19% | 106 23% | 118.4 14% | 113 18% | 95 31% | 94.8 31% | 106.7 ? 22% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 140 | 149 -6% | 142 -1% | 153.7 -10% | 149 -6% | 140 -0% | 146.1 -4% | |
| Load Maximum * | 222 | 170 23% | 210 5% | 220.8 1% | 256 -15% | 211 5% | 210.9 5% | 249 ? -12% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 76 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 76 Wh | SCHENKER Key 15 Comet Lake i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 73 Wh | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 80 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 94.2 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 84 Wh | MSI GS66 10SGS i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 99.99 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -8% | -12% | 15% | 31% | -1% | 16% | 8% | |
| Reader / Idle | 516 | 424 -18% | 418 -19% | 518 0% | 495 -4% | 614 19% | 565 ? 9% | |
| H.264 | 360 | 344 -4% | 408 ? 13% | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 331 | 268 -19% | 289 -13% | 380 15% | 364 10% | 378 14% | 413 25% | 375 ? 13% |
| Load | 90 | 101 12% | 80 -11% | 166 84% | 78 -13% | 94 4% | 85.4 ? -5% |
Pro
+ Tela IPS 4K brilhante e de alto-contraste
+ Certificação Pantone
+ Boa reprodução de cores
+ Chassi compacto
+ Leve (2 kg)
+ RAID-0 (1 TB)
+ Iluminação de teclado RGB ajustável individualmente
+ Excelentes taxas de transferência WLAN
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ O portátil pode ser alimentado com energia via TB3
+ Uma segunda fonte de alimentação para viagens (65 Watts, tipo C-USB) está incluída
Contra
- Apenas um banco de memória
- Barulhento e quente sob uso intenso
- Sem leitor de cartões de memória
- Sem webcam
Com o Zephyrus M15, a Asus oferece um portátil fino e compacto de 15,6 polegadas que pode rodar todos os jogos atuais na tela. O processador Core i7-10750H e GPU GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q tornam isto possível.
O Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L oferece muito desempenho em jogos, apesar de suas dimensões compactas.
O sistema de armazenamento ainda oferece espaço para melhorias. Como parte da RAM (8 GB de um total de 16 GB; modo de canal duplo) está soldada e há apenas um banco de memória, a capacidade máxima pode ser expandida para 38 GB. Muitos concorrentes permitem até 64 GB. O grupo RAID-0 (1 TB) é muito rápido, mas não atinge as taxas de transferência dos principais SSDs de outros fabricantes em uma operação única.
A tela IPS 4k pontua com um acabamento mate, alto brilho, bom contraste, ângulos de visão estáveis e - graças à certificação Pantone - ótima reprodução de cores. A cobertura do espaço de cores também é impressionante. A duração da bateria é boa para um portátil para jogos. O teclado (iluminação RGB) provou sua adequação para o uso diário.
O slot Thunderbolt 3 do GU502L permite a conexão de uma estação docking ou GPU externa. Suporte para DisplayPort via USB-C e para Power Delivery. Este último permite que o portátil seja alimentado através da fonte de alimentação USB (65 watts) - com poder de computação reduzido. A Asus inclui um adaptador de força correspondente.
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L
- 09/30/2020 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Gaming - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
