Breve Análise do Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS: Portátil para jogos exclusivo com muito desempenho sob o capô
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84.5 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | 2.5 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
v (old) | 04/2020 | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.8 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | 2.2 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
85.8 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | 2.2 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
|
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 398 cd/m²
Contraste: 1421:1 (Preto: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.53 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 0.77
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
100% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
99.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO7A8C), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO328E), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Samsung SDCA029, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -16% | -16% | 4% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 87 | 70.3 -19% | 69.5 -20% | 99.9 15% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.5 0% | 99.6 0% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 99.9 | 72.2 -28% | 70.8 -29% | 98.2 -2% |
Response Times | 66% | 68% | 95% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 56.4 ? | 14.4 ? 74% | 14 ? 75% | 2.2 ? 96% |
Response Time Black / White * | 24.4 ? | 10.4 ? 57% | 9.6 ? 61% | 1.8 ? 93% |
PWM Frequency | 60 ? | |||
Screen | -48% | -31% | -30% | |
Brightness middle | 398 | 320 -20% | 316 -21% | 385 -3% |
Brightness | 385 | 318 -17% | 311 -19% | 390 1% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 88 -2% | 92 2% | 93 3% |
Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.24 14% | 0.21 25% | |
Contrast | 1421 | 1333 -6% | 1505 6% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.53 | 4.03 -163% | 3.03 -98% | 2.46 -61% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.69 | 8.43 -128% | 7.32 -98% | 4.01 -9% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.77 | 0.98 -27% | 1.1 -43% | 2.6 -238% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 5.94 -148% | 3.9 -63% | 1.39 42% |
Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.42 91% | 2.42 91% | 2.31 95% |
CCT | 6996 93% | 6751 96% | 7439 87% | 6395 102% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 100 | 66 -34% | 65 -35% | 98 -2% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 99 -1% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1% /
-28% | 7% /
-16% | 23% /
-5% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
24.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise | |
↘ 14.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
56.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26.4 ms rise | |
↘ 30 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS (Turbo) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (198 - 219, n=15) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=200, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS (Turbo) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (1606 - 1862, n=15) | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS (Turbo) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (239 - 299, n=13) | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=188, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 | |
7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Gaming (4168 - 7581, n=192, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (5081 - 5542, n=13) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS (Turbo) | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
7z b 4 | |
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=192, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (43786 - 49275, n=13) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS (Turbo) | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=192, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (12 - 14.6, n=13) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS (Turbo) | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (44 - 89, n=13) | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS (Turbo) | |
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=189, last 2 years) |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS (Turbo) | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (0.561 - 0.596, n=13) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=193, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3821 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4210 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4762 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5277 pontos | |
Ajuda |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP |
* ... smaller is better
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0) | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | Average 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -8% | -13% | -4% | 23% | |
Write 4K | 127.6 | 131.7 3% | 131.3 3% | 127.4 0% | 175.9 ? 38% |
Read 4K | 48.4 | 47.34 -2% | 45.84 -5% | 147.5 205% | 49.7 ? 3% |
Write Seq | 2958 | 2884 -3% | 2370 -20% | 485.9 -84% | 4078 ? 38% |
Read Seq | 2984 | 2303 -23% | 1509 -49% | 1352 -55% | 3653 ? 22% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 472.7 | 423.9 -10% | 481.5 2% | 476.5 1% | 540 ? 14% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 529 | 487.7 -8% | 560 6% | 531 0% | 456 ? -14% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 3431 | 2822 -18% | 2392 -30% | 1061 -69% | 4457 ? 30% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3536 | 3478 -2% | 3232 -9% | 2552 -28% | 5307 ? 50% |
AS SSD | 2% | -1% | -36% | 9% | |
Seq Read | 2981 | 2767 -7% | 1065 -64% | 1200 -60% | 3515 ? 18% |
Seq Write | 2783 | 2613 -6% | 2360 -15% | 836 -70% | 2878 ? 3% |
4K Read | 43.98 | 47.55 8% | 48.09 9% | 65.8 50% | 48.4 ? 10% |
4K Write | 113.9 | 98.9 -13% | 110.7 -3% | 103.8 -9% | 165.6 ? 45% |
4K-64 Read | 1519 | 1205 -21% | 1635 8% | 789 -48% | 1419 ? -7% |
4K-64 Write | 1296 | 2007 55% | 1829 41% | 929 -28% | 1348 ? 4% |
Access Time Read * | 0.062 | 0.065 -5% | 0.071 -15% | 0.103 -66% | 0.0455 ? 27% |
Access Time Write * | 0.033 | 0.038 -15% | 0.034 -3% | 0.045 -36% | 0.04375 ? -33% |
Score Read | 1861 | 1529 -18% | 1790 -4% | 975 -48% | 1818 ? -2% |
Score Write | 1688 | 2367 40% | 2176 29% | 1117 -34% | 1801 ? 7% |
Score Total | 4492 | 4677 4% | 4950 10% | 2594 -42% | 4521 ? 1% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 2438 | 2919 ? 20% | |||
Copy Program MB/s | 604 | 706 ? 17% | |||
Copy Game MB/s | 1404 | 1560 ? 11% | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -3% /
-2% | -7% /
-6% | -20% /
-22% | 16% /
14% |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous read performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 11 Performance | 23526 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 44534 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 17714 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 7780 pontos | |
Ajuda |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=188, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS (Turbo) | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (26292 - 32995, n=10) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=198, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS (Turbo) | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (19655 - 23649, n=10) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=193, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS (Turbo) | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (7372 - 8979, n=11) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=170, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS (Turbo) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (74.3 - 96, n=11) | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS |
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS (Turbo) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (170.2 - 181.1, n=4) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS |
Doom Eternal - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (160.9 - 179, n=2, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS (Turbo) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (140 - 177.7, n=8) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS |
Red Dead Redemption 2 - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (40.6 - 45, n=5) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP |
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings AA:T2X Filmic SM | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (91.2 - 107, n=4) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS |
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Average of class Gaming (34 - 218, n=103, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (91 - 110, n=4) |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
Average of class Gaming (27 - 271, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (89 - 106, n=10) | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS (Turbo) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 425.1 | 349.2 | 324.2 | 173.1 | ||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 330.5 | 237 | 143.4 | 75.8 | 53.5 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 143 | 115 | 108 | 102 | 77 | 42 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 103 | 95 | 93 | 89 | 67 | 36 |
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 245.5 | 136.4 | 86.5 | 62.5 | 39.9 | 19.6 |
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) | 128 | 93 | 87 | 65 | 49 | 29 |
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) | 172.3 | 123.6 | 104.3 | 91.2 | 64.7 | 36.3 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) | 131.4 | 99.7 | 68.3 | 44.9 | 36.2 | 23.5 |
Doom Eternal (2020) | 205 | 168.3 | 154 | 152.1 | 116.7 | 64 |
Gears Tactics (2020) | 210.4 | 161.2 | 110.6 | 89.7 | 57.9 | 30.3 |
F1 2020 (2020) | 253 | 167 | 149 | 118 | 89 | 51 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 33 / 34 / 35 dB |
Carga |
| 48 / 49 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 0% | -4% | -5% | 4% | 13% | |
off / environment * | 30 | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 27.9 ? 7% | 24 ? 20% |
Idle Minimum * | 33 | 30 9% | 32 3% | 34 -3% | 29.7 ? 10% | 25.4 ? 23% |
Idle Average * | 34 | 33 3% | 34 -0% | 36 -6% | 30.8 ? 9% | 27.1 ? 20% |
Idle Maximum * | 35 | 36 -3% | 39 -11% | 41 -17% | 35.4 ? -1% | 30.1 ? 14% |
Load Average * | 48 | 50 -4% | 53 -10% | 48 -0% | 47.2 ? 2% | 42.4 ? 12% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 48 | 48 -0% | 48 -0% | 48 -0% | ||
Load Maximum * | 49 | 50 -2% | 53 -8% | 54 -10% | 49.6 ? -1% | 53.4 ? -9% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 44 °C / 111.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-15.1 °C / -27.2 F).
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 3% | -2% | -2% | -1% | -0% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 43 | 44 -2% | 53 -23% | 49 -14% | 47.9 ? -11% | 46.2 ? -7% |
Maximum Bottom * | 53 | 50 6% | 55 -4% | 61 -15% | 51.9 ? 2% | 49.2 ? 7% |
Idle Upper Side * | 32 | 29 9% | 28 12% | 27 16% | 30 ? 6% | 31.1 ? 3% |
Idle Bottom * | 31 | 31 -0% | 29 6% | 29 6% | 31 ? -0% | 32.2 ? -4% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.4 / 2.1 Watt |
Ocioso | 23 / 30 / 39 Watt |
Carga |
156 / 208 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 31% | 23% | 10% | 28% | 24% | |
Idle Minimum * | 23 | 11 52% | 13 43% | 18 22% | 12.9 ? 44% | 13.5 ? 41% |
Idle Average * | 30 | 15 50% | 16 47% | 21 30% | 17.3 ? 42% | 19 ? 37% |
Idle Maximum * | 39 | 25 36% | 27 31% | 38 3% | 26.9 ? 31% | 26.7 ? 32% |
Load Average * | 156 | 95 39% | 109 30% | 113 28% | 123.9 ? 21% | 106.7 ? 32% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 152 | 140 8% | 155 -2% | 149 2% | ||
Load Maximum * | 208 | 211 -1% | 236 -13% | 256 -23% | 205 ? 1% | 251 ? -21% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 90 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 84 Wh | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 99.99 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 94.2 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 38% | 48% | 79% | 41% | |
Reader / Idle | 480 | 495 3% | 505 5% | 518 8% | 565 ? 18% |
H.264 | 325 | 408 ? 26% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 185 | 378 104% | 364 97% | 364 97% | 375 ? 103% |
Load | 72 | 78 8% | 102 42% | 166 131% | 85.3 ? 18% |
Pro
Contra
Com este dispositivo Zephyrus e seu Screenpad Plus, a Asus está tentando fornecer valor adicional ao grupo-alvo de jogadores, streamers e criadores de conteúdo. No geral, a Screenpad tende a ser útil de uma maneira ou de outra. No entanto, isso tem um custo: Comparado a outros portáteis para jogos sem tela secundária, o peso e as dimensões do Zephyrus são maiores.
Graças à CPU octa-core Core i9-10980HK e à GPU GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, o portátil não apresenta falta de desempenho. Os núcleos de processamento são acompanhados por 32 GB de RAM (no modo de canal duplo), composto por um módulo de 16 GB e 16 GB de memória soldada. São possíveis atualizações de até 48 GB. Os dois SSDs NVMe em RAID 0 oferecem altas velocidades de transferência e muito armazenamento (2 TB).
Todos os jogos mais recentes funcionam sem problemas no Asus Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS.
A tela IPS 4K habilitada para G-Sync oferece alto brilho, uma boa taxa de contraste, bons ângulos de visão e - graças à validação Pantone - ótimas cores. Além disso, abrange todo o espaço de cores AdobeRGB. Os tempos de resposta são medíocres. Para melhores tempos de resposta, também está disponível uma opção alternativa de tela Full HD de 300 Hz.
A seleção de portas generosa inclui notavelmente uma porta Thunderbolt 3. Pode ser usada para conectar docks ricos em recursos ou GPUs externas. Além disso, a porta pode ser usada para alimentar o dispositivo com um nível de desempenho reduzido, por exemplo, ao viajar, com o segundo adaptador de CA incluído (65 watts).
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
-
07/22/2020 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck