Breve Análise do Asus ROG Strix Hero III G731GW - um portátil colorido com compromissos
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 (Strix Hero III G731 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-9750H 6 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1440 MHz, Memoría: 14000 MHz, GDDR5, GeForce Game Ready Driver 430.86, NVIDIA Optimus
Memória
32 GB
, DDR4, 1333.3 MHz (DDR4-2666 / PC4-21300)
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, Sem tela táctil, AU Optronics AUO409D, IPS, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, 1024 GB
, SSD de 1 GB Intel 660P PCIe NVMe + HD de 1 GB Toshiba MQ04ABF100 5400 RPM, 1883 GB livre
peso
2.858 kg, Suprimento de energia: 776 g
Preço
2325 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics AUO409D tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 343.9 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 305.7 cd/m² Minimum: 17.1 cd/m²iluminação: 80 %
iluminação com acumulador: 297.4 cd/m²
Contraste: 959:1 (Preto: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.08 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 4
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.259
| Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 AU Optronics AUO409D, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Acer Predator Triton 500 AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Alienware m17 P37E AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160 | HP Omen 15-dc1303ng LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Aorus 15 X9 LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | MSI GE75 8SF Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Eurocom Nightsky RX17 BOE NV173FHM-N44, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 5% | 38% | 5% | 7% | 5% | 7% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 61.9 | 64.2 4% | 86.4 40% | 63.8 3% | 64.9 5% | 63.1 2% | 66.1 7% |
| sRGB Coverage | 86.3 | 92.6 7% | 99.9 16% | 93.4 8% | 95.6 11% | 94.4 9% | 93.1 8% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 62.9 | 65.7 4% | 99.1 58% | 65 3% | 66.3 5% | 65.2 4% | 67.2 7% |
| Response Times | -4% | -268% | -45% | -59% | -12% | -59% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 7.2 ? | 8 ? -11% | 35.6 ? -394% | 14 ? -94% | 15.2 ? -111% | 9.6 ? -33% | 16.4 ? -128% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 11.6 ? | 11.2 ? 3% | 28 ? -141% | 11 ? 5% | 12.4 ? -7% | 10.4 ? 10% | 10.4 ? 10% |
| PWM Frequency | 25770 ? | 990 ? | |||||
| Screen | 2% | -4% | 11% | 15% | 33% | 9% | |
| Brightness middle | 297.4 | 304 2% | 357.9 20% | 316 6% | 305.1 3% | 370.4 25% | 298.4 0% |
| Brightness | 306 | 299 -2% | 347 13% | 295 -4% | 295 -4% | 348 14% | 287 -6% |
| Brightness Distribution | 80 | 89 11% | 94 18% | 84 5% | 78 -2% | 89 11% | 90 13% |
| Black Level * | 0.31 | 0.27 13% | 0.33 -6% | 0.42 -35% | 0.33 -6% | 0.29 6% | 0.3 3% |
| Contrast | 959 | 1126 17% | 1085 13% | 752 -22% | 925 -4% | 1277 33% | 995 4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.08 | 4.66 -14% | 6.57 -61% | 2.7 34% | 2.58 37% | 1.26 69% | 3.58 12% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.88 | 9.65 -40% | 9.86 -43% | 5.65 18% | 4.32 37% | 3.02 56% | 6.29 9% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4 | 1.72 57% | 6.74 -69% | 1.58 60% | 1.33 67% | 1.21 70% | 2.82 29% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4 | 5.53 -38% | 4.3 -8% | 2.35 41% | 3.4 15% | 1.4 65% | 3.1 22% |
| Gamma | 2.259 97% | 2.5 88% | 2.6 85% | 2.41 91% | 2.28 96% | 2.2 100% | 2.24 98% |
| CCT | 7205 90% | 8028 81% | 6403 102% | 6904 94% | 6374 102% | 6747 96% | 7064 92% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 56 | 60 7% | 88.4 58% | 60 7% | 60.7 8% | 59.7 7% | 60.2 8% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 86 | 93 8% | 100 16% | 93 8% | 95.2 11% | 94.4 10% | 92.7 8% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1% /
2% | -78% /
-29% | -10% /
3% | -12% /
4% | 9% /
22% | -14% /
0% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1088 (1069.72-1208.75)
Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø980 (961.82-1019.05)
Alienware m17 P37E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1206 (1178.9-1238.2)
MSI GE75 8SF GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø918 (910.89-1045.5)
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1137 (1123.56-1298.49)
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (32456 - 112749, n=18, last 2 years) | |
| Dell G5 15 5590 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H (28251 - 36304, n=13) | |
| Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (5719 - 15819, n=18, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H (6659 - 7214, n=13) | |
| Dell G5 15 5590 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4460 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5764 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5834 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Acer Predator Triton 500 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0) | Alienware m17 P37E SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) | HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Aorus 15 X9 Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | MSI GE75 8SF Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 | Eurocom Nightsky RX17 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0) | Average Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 67% | 1% | 48% | 23% | -27% | 67% | 9% | |
| Seq Read | 1427 | 2913 104% | 1835 29% | 2485 74% | 1912 34% | 949 -33% | 2297 61% | 1456 ? 2% |
| Seq Write | 1610 | 2492 55% | 1121 -30% | 1575 -2% | 1553 -4% | 823 -49% | 2860 78% | 1404 ? -13% |
| 4K Read | 25.63 | 38.7 51% | 23.98 -6% | 53.4 108% | 56.5 120% | 25.36 -1% | 52.2 104% | 48.7 ? 90% |
| 4K Write | 84.2 | 107.2 27% | 100 19% | 113.5 35% | 119.6 42% | 67.1 -20% | 125.8 49% | 131.6 ? 56% |
| 4K-64 Read | 588 | 1228 109% | 687 17% | 725 23% | 869 48% | 748 27% | 1412 140% | 586 ? 0% |
| 4K-64 Write | 732 | 1079 47% | 776 6% | 1371 87% | 584 -20% | 650 -11% | 1228 68% | 788 ? 8% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.054 | 0.047 13% | 0.059 -9% | 0.049 9% | 0.173 -220% | 0.04 26% | 0.07236 ? -34% | |
| Access Time Write * | 0.071 | 0.035 51% | 0.053 25% | 0.032 55% | 0.031 56% | 0.059 17% | 0.09 -27% | 0.07731 ? -9% |
| Score Read | 756 | 1558 106% | 895 18% | 1027 36% | 1116 48% | 869 15% | 1694 124% | 780 ? 3% |
| Score Write | 978 | 1435 47% | 988 1% | 1642 68% | 859 -12% | 799 -18% | 1640 68% | 1060 ? 8% |
| Score Total | 2134 | 3770 77% | 2306 8% | 3163 48% | 2544 19% | 2109 -1% | 4235 98% | 2252 ? 6% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1489 | 773 -48% | 1329 -11% | 1121 -25% | 2514 69% | 1469 ? -1% | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 514 | 493 -4% | 404.3 -21% | 532 4% | 592 15% | 484 ? -6% | ||
| Copy Game MB/s | 893 | 647 -28% | 1071 20% | 380.5 -57% | 1494 67% | 997 ? 12% | ||
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 3% | -6% | -6% | 16% | -39% | 38% | -4% | |
| Write 4K | 130.1 | 93.6 -28% | 120.2 -8% | 50.2 -61% | 147.2 13% | 73.3 -44% | 133 2% | 144.5 ? 11% |
| Read 4K | 56 | 38.82 -31% | 44.3 -21% | 35.32 -37% | 63.7 14% | 33.35 -40% | 61.6 10% | 54.1 ? -3% |
| Write Seq | 2455 | 1278 | 991 | 1573 | 849 | 2935 | 1445 ? | |
| Read Seq | 2107 | 1389 | 1526 | 2602 | 964 | 3118 | 1446 ? | |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 465.7 | 298.7 -36% | 436.2 -6% | 445.1 -4% | 531 14% | 236.2 -49% | 571 23% | 427 ? -8% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 547 | 338.7 -38% | 515 -6% | 526 -4% | 598 9% | 384.7 -30% | 654 20% | 456 ? -17% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1766 | 2902 64% | 1157 -34% | 1647 -7% | 1592 -10% | 867 -51% | 3296 87% | 1650 ? -7% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 1922 | 3536 84% | 2671 39% | 3427 78% | 2981 55% | 1586 -17% | 3560 85% | 1728 ? -10% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 860 | 880 ? 2% | ||||||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 628 | 629 ? 0% | ||||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 35% /
43% | -3% /
-1% | 21% /
29% | 20% /
21% | -33% /
-30% | 53% /
58% | 3% /
4% |
* ... smaller is better
Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
1922 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
1766 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
547 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
465.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
56 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
130.1 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8:
860 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8:
628 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (23335 - 27298, n=21) | |
| Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 | |
| MSI WS75 9TL-636 | |
| Medion Erazer X15805 | |
| MSI GE65 Raider 9SE | |
| Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.9 GHz, Vega 20) | |
| Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| Average of class Gaming (1251 - 26759, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| MSI WS75 9TL-636 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74 | |
| Medion Erazer X15805 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (8716 - 16364, n=21) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
| MSI GE65 Raider 9SE | |
| Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.9 GHz, Vega 20) | |
| Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 19495 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 118130 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 34236 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 16924 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 8686 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 7261 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 | |
| Alienware m17 P37E | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (64 - 82.1, n=21) | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX17 | |
| Aorus 15 X9 | |
| MSI GE75 8SF | |
| Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 | |
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8: Ø64 (59-70)
Alienware m17 P37E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG): Ø73.4 (67-80)
MSI GE75 8SF GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1: Ø70.8 (55-76)
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0): Ø72 (65-79)
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 64 | |||
| Fortnite (2018) | 236 | 190 | 140 | 132 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 158 | 100 | 77 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 105 | 97 | 93 | 85 |
| F1 2019 (2019) | 198 | 168 | 139 | 95 |
| Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0) | Alienware m17 P37E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) | HP Omen 15-dc1303ng GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Aorus 15 X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | MSI GE75 8SF GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 | Eurocom Nightsky RX17 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 2% | 2% | -3% | -4% | -3% | 2% | |
| off / environment * | 28.2 | 29 -3% | 28.2 -0% | 30.5 -8% | 28.2 -0% | 28.3 -0% | 28 1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.2 | 30 -6% | 28.2 -0% | 32.8 -16% | 32.6 -16% | 33.5 -19% | 28 1% |
| Idle Average * | 28.5 | 32 -12% | 28.2 1% | 32.8 -15% | 32.7 -15% | 33.6 -18% | 28.4 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30 | 34 -13% | 31 -3% | 32.8 -9% | 32.7 -9% | 35 -17% | 32.9 -10% |
| Load Average * | 51.5 | 44 15% | 50.8 1% | 42.5 17% | 38.9 24% | 38 26% | 45 13% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 55.3 | 46 17% | 50.8 8% | 51.8 6% | 50 10% | 53.2 4% | |
| Load Maximum * | 55.3 | 47 15% | 50.8 8% | 47.5 14% | 64.1 -16% | 56.9 -3% | 53.2 4% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.2 / 28.5 / 30 dB |
| Carga |
| 51.5 / 55.3 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A) | ||
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.8 °C / 80.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+2.1 °C / 3.8 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.8 °C / 80.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+2.1 °C / 3.8 F).
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI GE75 8SF audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Alienware m17 P37E audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 1.03 / 2.05 Watt |
| Ocioso | 18.2 / 23 / 33.1 Watt |
| Carga |
124.8 / 263 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Predator Triton 500 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Alienware m17 P37E i9-8950HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | HP Omen 15-dc1303ng i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Aorus 15 X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GE75 8SF i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Eurocom Nightsky RX17 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 17% | -6% | 30% | -7% | 11% | 11% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 18.2 | 16 12% | 21.2 -16% | 14.7 19% | 26 -43% | 16.4 10% | 18.6 -2% |
| Idle Average * | 23 | 22 4% | 29.6 -29% | 18.6 19% | 30.8 -34% | 21.9 5% | 22.6 2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 33.1 | 32 3% | 34 -3% | 22.6 32% | 34.9 -5% | 25.4 23% | 23 31% |
| Load Average * | 124.8 | 89 29% | 130.9 -5% | 90 28% | 90.7 27% | 90.7 27% | 93.4 25% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 180.8 | 147 19% | 177.5 2% | 175 3% | 203.3 -12% | 186.4 -3% | |
| Load Maximum * | 263 | 173 34% | 219.7 16% | 120 54% | 241.2 8% | 222.9 15% | 233.6 11% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 66 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 500 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 82 Wh | Alienware m17 P37E i9-8950HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 90 Wh | HP Omen 15-dc1303ng i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 70 Wh | Aorus 15 X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 62 Wh | MSI GE75 8SF i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 65 Wh | Eurocom Nightsky RX17 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 62 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 4% | 34% | -5% | -48% | -10% | -22% | |
| Reader / Idle | 249 | 335 35% | 543 118% | 301 21% | 105 -58% | 251 1% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 236 | 190 -19% | 296 25% | 197 -17% | 95 -60% | 212 -10% | 120 -49% |
| Load | 84 | 81 -4% | 49 -42% | 69 -18% | 61 -27% | 69 -18% |
Pro
+ Tela rápida de 144 Hz
+ Boa qualidade de construção
+ Excelente desempenho dos jogos
+ Teclado confortável e responsivo
+ Excelente trackpad
+ O aquecimento é bem gerenciado
+ Áudio bem balanceado e claro
+ Muito recursos no software ROG
+ Muita iluminação RGB...
Contra
- ...que pode ser fastidiosa às vezes
- As ventoinhas se tornam muito barulhentas
- Duração média da bateria
- Sem leitor de cartões SD
- O layout das portas poderia ser melhorado
- Poucas opções de telas externas
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
- A manutenção é complicada devido aos cabos de fita da iluminação RGB
O velho ditado diz que a beleza é apenas superficial. A Asus adicionou muito talento ao exterior do G731GW, mas parece ter esquecido alguns fatores que tornam um portátil para jogos ótimo. Em particular, o posicionamento estranho das portas e o processo de manutenção irritante deixam um gosto ruim após um prato delicioso.
O G731GW faz muitas coisas bem. Sua tela de 144 Hz é uma das melhores que já vimos em portáteis para jogos, e seu teclado é excelente e oferece uma resposta rápida. Da mesma forma, o desempenho em jogos é ótimo; a maioria dos jogos rodará fluentemente na tela de alta taxa de atualização graças às poderosas GeForce RTX 2070 e Core i7-9750H.
No entanto, existem muitos pequenos aborrecimentos que os potenciais compradores devem considerar. O logotipo RGB e a faixa RGB inferior não podem ser desativadas sem desativar a luz de fundo do teclado. Todas as portas USB estão no lado esquerdo da máquina, o que dificulta o roteamento de um cabo de mouse. Os cabos de fita RGB tornam a abertura do dispositivo para atualizações, uma lição de cautela. Por fim, o desempenho geral é um problema por trás dos portáteis concorrentes, Eurocom Nightsky RX17.
Tudo dito, o Asus G731GW flerta com a grandeza, mas é retido por uma soma de pequenas falhas. No entanto, considerando o preço relativamente baixo em comparação com outros portáteis de jogos de gama alta ($2000, ~ $2325 conforme configurado), estes pequenos aborrecimentos podem valer a pena.
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74
- 09/20/2019 v7 (old)
Sam Medley
Gaming - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
