Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Apple iPhone SE 2020 - Telefone pequeno com um coração que bate rápido

Um clássico atualizado.

Com a segunda geração do iPhone SE, a Apple recriou visualmente o iPhone 8. Embora isto tenha resultado em um smartphone relativamente compacto - para os padrões atuais - com algumas características de gama alta, a relação tela/corpo é bastante pobre. Enquanto isso, o baixo preço base é outra vantagem para o iPhone SE 2.
Apple iOS iPhone Smartphone Touchscreen
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Processador
Apple A13 Bionic 6 x - 2.7 GHz, Lightning and Thunder
Placa gráfica
Apple A13 Bionic GPU
Memória
3 GB 
Pantalha
4.70 polegadas 16:9, 1334 x 750 pixel 326 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, Retina HD, IPS, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz
Disco rígido
128 GB NVMe, 128 GB 
, 119.3 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Lightning, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, sensor de proximidade e giroscópio de 3 eixos, barômetro, bússola digital, iBeacon micro-location, Porta Lightning
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800 e 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1700/2100, 1900 e 2100 MHz), LTE (bandas 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48 e 66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.3 x 138.4 x 67.3
Bateria
6.96 Wh, 1822 mAh Lítio-Ion, 3.82 V
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Apple iOS 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (f/1.8, 5x digital zoom, OIS, UHD video)
Secondary Camera: 7 MPix (f/2.2, Full HD video)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Dois alto-falantes, Teclado: onscreen, Carregador, cabo Lightning, adesivo, fones, documentação, 12 Meses Garantia, IP67, head SAR: 0,98 W/kg, fanless, waterproof
Released
03/01/2020
peso
148 g, Suprimento de energia: 45 g
Preço
529 Euro
Links
Apple página inicial
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Competing Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
85.2 %
v7 (old)
05/2020
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU		148 g128 GB NVMe4.70"1334x750
85.7 %
v7 (old)
12/2019
Google Pixel 4
SD 855, Adreno 640		162 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash5.70"2280x1080
86.5 %
v7 (old)
09/2019
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU		194 g64 GB SSD6.10"1792x828
82.9 %
v7 (old)
10/2017
Apple iPhone 8
A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU		148 gApple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)4.70"1334x750
86 %
v7 (old)
03/2020
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
SD 855, Adreno 640		186 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.70"2400x1080
83.8 %
v7 (old)
01/2020
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
SD 730G, Adreno 618		208 g256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.47"2340x1080

Size Comparison

❌
162.5 mm 75.6 mm 8.1 mm 186 g157.8 mm 74.2 mm 9.7 mm 208 g150.9 mm 75.7 mm 8.3 mm 194 g147.1 mm 68.8 mm 8.2 mm 162 g138.4 mm 67.3 mm 7.3 mm 148 g138.4 mm 67.3 mm 7.3 mm 148 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
818 (400min - 892max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
591 (564min - 609max) MBit/s -28%
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
529 (204min - 603max) MBit/s -35%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
327 (155min - 377max) MBit/s -60%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
313 (306min - 319max) MBit/s -62%
iperf3 receive AX12
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
618 (321min - 653max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
612 (473min - 652max) MBit/s -1%
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
563 (490min - 597max) MBit/s -9%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
526 (413min - 655max) MBit/s -15%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
329 (284min - 350max) MBit/s -47%
04590135180225270315360405450495540585630675720765810855Tooltip
Apple iPhone SE 2020; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø608 (321-653)
Apple iPhone SE 2020; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø804 (400-892)
Apple iPhone SE (2020) - Overview
Apple iPhone SE (2020) - Overview
Apple iPhone SE (2020) - Bridge underpass
Apple iPhone SE (2020) - Bridge underpass
Apple iPhone SE (2020) - Lake
Apple iPhone SE (2020) - Lake
Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
Garmin Edge 500 - Bridge underpass
Garmin Edge 500 - Bridge underpass
Garmin Edge 500 - Lake
Garmin Edge 500 - Lake

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3Scene 4
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
19.8 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
14 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
8 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
11 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPhone SE 2020: 10.45 ∆E min: 2.9 - max: 22.06 ∆E
ColorChecker
23.7 ∆E
40.1 ∆E
31 ∆E
27.4 ∆E
34.5 ∆E
48 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
25.4 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
46.8 ∆E
47.4 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
33.6 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
31.3 ∆E
32.7 ∆E
41.6 ∆E
43 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
30.8 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPhone SE 2020: 33.05 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 48 ∆E
630
cd/m²		672
cd/m²		677
cd/m²
647
cd/m²		688
cd/m²		676
cd/m²
633
cd/m²		636
cd/m²		675
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
Retina HD tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 688 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 659.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.84 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 688 cd/m²
Contraste: 2457:1 (Preto: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Apple iPhone SE 2020
IPS, 1334x750, 4.7"		Apple iPhone 8
IPS True Tone, 1334x750, 4.7"		Apple iPhone 11
IPS, 1792x828, 6.1"		Google Pixel 4
OLED, 2280x1080, 5.7"		Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Super AMOLED Plus, 2400x1080, 6.7"		Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5"
Screen
-18%
-19%
8%
-71%
-132%
Brightness middle
688
604
-12%
679
-1%
554
-19%
622
-10%
579
-16%
Brightness
659
580
-12%
671
2%
550
-17%
630
-4%
576
-13%
Brightness Distribution
92
91
-1%
93
1%
94
2%
96
4%
89
-3%
Black Level *
0.28
0.44
-57%
0.68
-143%
Contrast
2457
1373
-44%
999
-59%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1
1.2
-20%
0.8
20%
0.8
20%
2.7
-170%
4.61
-361%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.2
2.3
-5%
2.4
-9%
1.4
36%
5.9
-168%
7.72
-251%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.7
1.6
6%
1.1
35%
1.3
24%
3
-76%
4.2
-147%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.25 98%
2.24 98%
2.22 99%
2.09 105%
2.244 98%
CCT
6790 96%
6688 97%
6610 98%
6213 105%
6246 104%
7201 90%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
21.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 15.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 27.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
Geekbench 5.5 | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | AnTuTu v8 | BaseMark OS II | Basemark GPU 1.2
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
1336 Points
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
746 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
740 Points -45%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1342 Points 0%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (1326 - 1342, n=4)
1333 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)
995 Points -26%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
3281 Points
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2573 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
2722 Points -17%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3531 Points +8%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (3235 - 3531, n=4)
3381 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)
3312 Points +1%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
97290 Points
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
73984 Points -24%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
62006 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
78551 Points -19%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
97216 Points 0%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (96826 - 97290, n=4)
97152 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
209431 Points
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
102168 Points -51%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
112424 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
108114 Points -48%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
208190 Points -1%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (206190 - 209431, n=4)
208254 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
33851 Points
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37641 Points +11%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
24131 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
40137 Points +19%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33925 Points 0%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (33851 - 33925, n=4)
33885 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
6168 Points
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7263 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7500 Points +22%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3424 Points -44%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points -100%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (6168 - 7893, n=2)
7031 Points +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)
4204 Points -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
9218 Points
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8765 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9670 Points +5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3485 Points -62%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points -100%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (9218 - 11302, n=2)
10260 Points +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)
4740 Points -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
2857 Points
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4540 Points +59%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
1774 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4201 Points +47%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3228 Points +13%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points -100%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (2857 - 3839, n=2)
3348 Points +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)
3303 Points +16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
10699 Points
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7196 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7842 Points -27%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3522 Points -67%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
10427 Points -3%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (9199 - 10699, n=3)
10108 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)
11109 Points +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
20135 Points
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9217 Points -54%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10410 Points -48%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3648 Points -82%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
20154 Points 0%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (17853 - 20154, n=3)
19381 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)
19708 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
4052 Points
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4072 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4208 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3155 Points -22%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3877 Points -4%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (3411 - 4052, n=3)
3780 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)
5001 Points +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
4050 Points
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5615 Points +39%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
2421 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5727 Points +41%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2405 Points -41%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4901 Points +21%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (4050 - 5471, n=4)
4706 Points +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)
3084 Points -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
4573 Points
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6214 Points +36%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
2581 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6312 Points +38%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2245 Points -51%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5761 Points +26%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (4573 - 6088, n=4)
5537 Points +21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)
3263 Points -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
2892 Points
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4199 Points +45%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
1989 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4324 Points +50%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3202 Points +11%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3218 Points +11%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (2429 - 4038, n=4)
3144 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)
3286 Points +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
5688 Points
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5685 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
2505 Points -56%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6285 Points +10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2567 Points -55%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6006 Points +6%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (5362 - 6067, n=4)
5781 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)
7767 Points +37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
7847 Points
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6383 Points -19%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
2783 Points -65%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7148 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2492 Points -68%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
8374 Points +7%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (7847 - 9773, n=4)
8528 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)
11536 Points +47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
2898 Points
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4112 Points +42%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
1854 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4418 Points +52%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3202 Points +10%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3018 Points +4%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (2078 - 3219, n=4)
2803 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)
4613 Points +59%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
88 fps +47%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
119.8 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps 0%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (59 - 60, n=5)
59.8 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)
86.1 fps +44%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
250 fps
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
139 fps -44%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
161.3 fps -35%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
166 fps -34%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
309 fps +24%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (250 - 322, n=5)
295 fps +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)
283 fps +13%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
67 fps +12%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
114.5 fps +91%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps 0%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (60 - 60, n=5)
60 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)
75.5 fps +26%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
149 fps
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
75 fps -50%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
70.8 fps -52%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
99 fps -34%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
168 fps +13%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (149 - 175, n=5)
163.2 fps +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)
167.1 fps +12%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
51 fps -15%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
109.7 fps +83%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
57 fps -5%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps 0%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (57 - 60, n=5)
59.4 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)
65.6 fps +9%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
93 fps
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
57 fps -39%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
54 fps -42%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
69 fps -26%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
112 fps +20%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (93 - 117, n=5)
106.4 fps +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)
118.5 fps +27%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
30 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
37 fps -38%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
49 fps -18%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (43 - 60, n=5)
52 fps -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years)
47.9 fps -20%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
59 fps
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
34 fps -42%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
43 fps -27%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
63 fps +7%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (59 - 73, n=5)
65.4 fps +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)
71.2 fps +21%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
33 fps -45%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
38 fps -37%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
16 fps -73%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
57 fps -5%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (50 - 60, n=5)
57 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 247, n=202, last 2 years)
50.5 fps -16%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
72 fps
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
32 fps -56%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
42 fps -42%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps -75%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
74 fps +3%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (72 - 87, n=5)
78 fps +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years)
80.3 fps +12%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps -60%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
25 fps -58%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
10 fps -83%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
45 fps -25%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (35 - 60, n=5)
49.2 fps -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years)
37.6 fps -37%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
31 fps
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
13 fps -58%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps -45%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
6.7 fps -78%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
29 fps -6%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (29 - 33, n=5)
30.6 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years)
32.3 fps +4%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
489463 Points
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
376698 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
451559 Points -8%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
534558 Points +9%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (489463 - 534558, n=3)
511422 Points +4%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
Points
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5277 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4837 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  ()
5607 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)
6326 Points
System (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8058 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8515 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  ()
14189 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)
10181 Points
Memory (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6458 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5287 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  ()
2350 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)
6785 Points
Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9307 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8598 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  ()
16996 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)
17165 Points
Web (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1601 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
1414 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  ()
1745 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)
1566 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2
1920x1080 Metal Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
136.6 (72.64min - 258.13max) fps
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (136.6 - 153, n=2)
144.8 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (251 - 314, n=5, last 2 years)
268 fps +96%
Metal Medium Native (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
211.2 (93.41min - 435.35max) fps
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (94.9 - 211, n=2)
153.1 fps -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (152.9 - 240, n=6, last 2 years)
183.7 fps -13%
Jetstream 2 | JetStream 1.1 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
139.7 Points
Average Apple A13 Bionic (128.5 - 142.2, n=5)
134.5 Points -4%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
132.9 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)
120.4 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
63.8 Points -54%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
56.7 Points -59%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
293.4 Points +5%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (279 - 302, n=5)
293 Points +5%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
278.6 Points
Apple iPhone 8
206.7 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
112.3 Points -60%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
107.5 Points -61%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average Apple A13 Bionic (153 - 171, n=5)
158.4 runs/min 0%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
158 runs/min
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
157 runs/min -1%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
136.2 runs/min -14%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
62.2 runs/min -61%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
61.8 runs/min -61%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
184 Points +26%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (146 - 202, n=5)
179.2 Points +23%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
148.7 Points +2%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
146 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
95 Points -35%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
94 Points -36%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
48991 Points
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
48819 Points 0%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (47288 - 49388, n=5)
48727 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
37161 Points -24%
Apple iPhone 8
34163 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
22942 Points -53%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
22572 Points -54%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
2139 ms * -289%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
2072 ms * -277%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)
1568 ms * -185%
Apple iPhone 8
731 ms * -33%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
573 ms * -4%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (545 - 573, n=5)
562 ms * -2%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
550 ms *

* ... smaller is better

051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Apple iPhone SE 2020; PUBG Mobile; 0.18.0: Ø59.5 (58-60)
Apple iPhone SE 2020; Battle Bay; 4.8.22668: Ø59.5 (57-60)
Carga Máxima
 40.5 °C40.5 °C36.8 °C 
 39 °C38.6 °C36.5 °C 
 36.8 °C37.2 °C36.5 °C 
Máximo: 40.5 °C
Médio: 38 °C
37.7 °C40.2 °C41.4 °C
36.8 °C37.7 °C41.3 °C
36.3 °C38.5 °C39.2 °C
Máximo: 41.4 °C
Médio: 38.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  31 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.827.42526.227.43123.322.94021.925502825.86319.924.48019.125.510019.928.612516.53916019.64920017.549.325017.54831513.951.540013.952.850015.858.863015.260.78001466.310001468.6125013.972160013.473.9200013.874.6250014.375.931501477.1400014.576.9500014.677.9630014.576800014.772.61000015.166.5125001558.31600014.847.1SPL26.586.4N0.862.5median 14.6median 66.3Delta1.111.631.639.125.437.625.336.932.940.833.635.231.633.328.433.82733.520.842.82250.821.351.520.849.821.253.919.45619.558.717.761.617.962.917.866.217.368.217.468.416.768.517.267.318.26817.969.817.668.817.767.517.861.717.959.118.160.618.256.23078.41.343.6median 17.9median 61.61.48hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple iPhone SE 2020Apple iPhone 8
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple iPhone SE 2020 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.1 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.44 / 1.56 / 1.63 Watt
Carga midlight 2.32 / 4.12 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Apple iPhone SE 2020
1822 mAh		Google Pixel 4
2800 mAh		Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh		Apple iPhone 8
1821 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
4500 mAh		Average Apple A13 Bionic
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-70%
-63%
-27%
-42%
-92%
-83%
Idle Minimum *
0.44
1.01
-130%
0.56
-27%
0.54
-23%
0.58
-32%
0.76 ?(0.44 - 1.3, n=5)
-73%
0.895 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=153, last 2 years)
-103%
Idle Average *
1.56
1.63
-4%
2.99
-92%
1.63
-4%
1.55
1%
3.39 ?(1.56 - 7.5, n=5)
-117%
1.453 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=153, last 2 years)
7%
Idle Maximum *
1.63
1.69
-4%
3.02
-85%
1.67
-2%
1.64
-1%
3.44 ?(1.63 - 7.58, n=5)
-111%
1.613 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=153, last 2 years)
1%
Load Average *
2.32
4.67
-101%
4.17
-80%
2.74
-18%
4.29
-85%
4.66 ?(2.32 - 10, n=5)
-101%
6.5 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=148, last 2 years)
-180%
Load Maximum *
4.12
8.78
-113%
5.44
-32%
7.78
-89%
8.03
-95%
6.42 ?(4.12 - 10.9, n=5)
-56%
9.86 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=148, last 2 years)
-139%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
32h 18min
WiFi Websurfing (Safari Mobile 13.1)
11h 34min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 21min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 23min
Apple iPhone SE 2020
1822 mAh		Google Pixel 4
2800 mAh		Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh		Apple iPhone 8
1821 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
4500 mAh		Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
5260 mAh
Battery Runtime
-16%
56%
3%
44%
60%
Reader / Idle
1938
1007
-48%
2765
43%
1629
-16%
2504
29%
H.264
681
617
-9%
1147
68%
698
2%
1183
74%
WiFi v1.3
694
460
-34%
866
25%
585
-16%
823
19%
1112
60%
Load
143
185
29%
267
87%
202
41%
222
55%

Pro

+ Tela brilhante e de cores precisas
+ SoC veloz
+ Suporta Wi-Fi 6 e uma ampla gama de frequências LTE
+ Certificação IP67
+ Carregamento sem fio
+ Leve e fino
+ Boas capacidades de localização

Contra

- Adaptador de força fraco
- Sem armazenamento expansível
- Relação tela-corpo ruim
- Uma só câmera
- Qualidade de chamada medíocre
- Apenas 12 meses de garantia

Veredicto - A atualização do iPhone 8 foi um sucesso, mas não para todos

In review: Apple iPhone SE (2020)
In review: Apple iPhone SE (2020)

Com o iPhone SE, a Apple lançou um atraente smartphone que brilha com um processador rápido, uma ótima tela, Wi-Fi rápido e um longo período de atualização. Além disso, é à prova d'água e compatível com o carregamento sem fio.

O iPhone SE (2020) é atualmente o bilhete mais barato para o universo Apple.

As maiores fraquezas são a má relação tela/corpo e a tela menor. No entanto, aqueles que vêm de um iPhone 6, 7, 8 ou da primeira geração SE provavelmente não acharão este último um grande problema. Este é exatamente o grupo alvo do iPhone SE2. Em contraste, é improvável que os usuários Android sejam influenciados devido aos inconvenientes acima mencionados e às poucas possibilidades em termos de câmera. Para este grupo, o iPhone 11 será provavelmente uma opção mais atrativa.

O iPhone SE (2020) é uma peça de tecnologia muito polida. Entretanto, o Google Pixel 4 é a única opção real para potenciais compradores que procuram um equivalente baseado em Android, que neste caso oferece uma melhor relação tela/corpo, um painel de 90-Hz, uma configuração de câmara dupla e pior duração da bateria a um preço idêntico.

Apple iPhone SE 2020 - 05/15/2020 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento
82%
Teclado
68 / 75 → 91%
Mouse
89%
Conectividade
51 / 70 → 72%
Peso
93%
Bateria
89%
Pantalha
90%
Desempenho do jogos
60 / 64 → 94%
Desempenho da aplicação
83 / 86 → 97%
Temperatura
88%
Ruído
100%
Audio
71 / 90 → 79%
Camera
63%
Médio
79%
85%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

More articles related to this device

Apple iPhone SE 2020 (iPhone SE 2020 Serie)

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Apple iPhone SE 2020 - Telefone pequeno com um coração que bate rápido
Daniel Schmidt, 2020-05-26 (Update: 2020-06- 3)