Breve Análise do Apple iPhone SE 2020 - Telefone pequeno com um coração que bate rápido
Competing Devices
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85.2 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | Apple iPhone SE 2020 A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU | 148 g | 128 GB NVMe | 4.70" | 1334x750 | |
| 85.7 % v7 (old) | 12/2019 | Google Pixel 4 SD 855, Adreno 640 | 162 g | 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 5.70" | 2280x1080 | |
| 86.5 % v7 (old) | 09/2019 | Apple iPhone 11 A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU | 194 g | 64 GB SSD | 6.10" | 1792x828 | |
| 82.9 % v7 (old) | 10/2017 | Apple iPhone 8 A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU | 148 g | Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus) | 4.70" | 1334x750 | |
| 86 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite SD 855, Adreno 640 | 186 g | 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.70" | 2400x1080 | |
| 83.8 % v7 (old) | 01/2020 | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro SD 730G, Adreno 618 | 208 g | 256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.47" | 2340x1080 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone SE 2020 | |
| Google Pixel 4 | |
| Apple iPhone 11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite | |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone SE 2020 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite | |
| Apple iPhone 11 | |
| Google Pixel 4 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 688 cd/m²
Contraste: 2457:1 (Preto: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
| Apple iPhone SE 2020 IPS, 1334x750, 4.7" | Apple iPhone 8 IPS True Tone, 1334x750, 4.7" | Apple iPhone 11 IPS, 1792x828, 6.1" | Google Pixel 4 OLED, 2280x1080, 5.7" | Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Super AMOLED Plus, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -18% | -19% | 8% | -71% | -132% | |
| Brightness middle | 688 | 604 -12% | 679 -1% | 554 -19% | 622 -10% | 579 -16% |
| Brightness | 659 | 580 -12% | 671 2% | 550 -17% | 630 -4% | 576 -13% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 91 -1% | 93 1% | 94 2% | 96 4% | 89 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.44 -57% | 0.68 -143% | |||
| Contrast | 2457 | 1373 -44% | 999 -59% | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1 | 1.2 -20% | 0.8 20% | 0.8 20% | 2.7 -170% | 4.61 -361% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.2 | 2.3 -5% | 2.4 -9% | 1.4 36% | 5.9 -168% | 7.72 -251% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 1.6 6% | 1.1 35% | 1.3 24% | 3 -76% | 4.2 -147% |
| Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.25 98% | 2.24 98% | 2.22 99% | 2.09 105% | 2.244 98% |
| CCT | 6790 96% | 6688 97% | 6610 98% | 6213 105% | 6246 104% | 7201 90% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 36.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 27.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone SE 2020 | |
| Google Pixel 4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro | |
| Average Apple A13 Bionic (489463 - 534558, n=3) | |
| Basemark GPU 1.2 | |
| 1920x1080 Metal Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone SE 2020 | |
| Average Apple A13 Bionic (136.6 - 153, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (251 - 314, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Metal Medium Native (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone SE 2020 | |
| Average Apple A13 Bionic (94.9 - 211, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (152.9 - 240, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
| Average Apple A13 Bionic (128.5 - 142.2, n=5) | |
| Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80) | |
| Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
| Average Apple A13 Bionic (279 - 302, n=5) | |
| Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80) | |
| Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average Apple A13 Bionic (153 - 171, n=5) | |
| Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
| Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80) | |
| Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
| Average Apple A13 Bionic (146 - 202, n=5) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80) | |
| Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
| Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
| Average Apple A13 Bionic (47288 - 49388, n=5) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80) | |
| Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80) | |
| Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
| Average Apple A13 Bionic (545 - 573, n=5) | |
| Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Apple iPhone SE 2020 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPhone 8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.01 / 0.1 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.44 / 1.56 / 1.63 Watt |
| Carga |
2.32 / 4.12 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Apple iPhone SE 2020 1822 mAh | Google Pixel 4 2800 mAh | Apple iPhone 11 3110 mAh | Apple iPhone 8 1821 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite 4500 mAh | Average Apple A13 Bionic | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -70% | -63% | -27% | -42% | -92% | -84% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.44 | 1.01 -130% | 0.56 -27% | 0.54 -23% | 0.58 -32% | 0.76 ? -73% | 0.883 ? -101% |
| Idle Average * | 1.56 | 1.63 -4% | 2.99 -92% | 1.63 -4% | 1.55 1% | 3.39 ? -117% | 1.467 ? 6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.63 | 1.69 -4% | 3.02 -85% | 1.67 -2% | 1.64 -1% | 3.44 ? -111% | 1.621 ? 1% |
| Load Average * | 2.32 | 4.67 -101% | 4.17 -80% | 2.74 -18% | 4.29 -85% | 4.66 ? -101% | 6.58 ? -184% |
| Load Maximum * | 4.12 | 8.78 -113% | 5.44 -32% | 7.78 -89% | 8.03 -95% | 6.42 ? -56% | 9.91 ? -141% |
* ... smaller is better
| Apple iPhone SE 2020 1822 mAh | Google Pixel 4 2800 mAh | Apple iPhone 11 3110 mAh | Apple iPhone 8 1821 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite 4500 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro 5260 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -16% | 56% | 3% | 44% | 60% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1938 | 1007 -48% | 2765 43% | 1629 -16% | 2504 29% | |
| H.264 | 681 | 617 -9% | 1147 68% | 698 2% | 1183 74% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 694 | 460 -34% | 866 25% | 585 -16% | 823 19% | 1112 60% |
| Load | 143 | 185 29% | 267 87% | 202 41% | 222 55% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto - A atualização do iPhone 8 foi um sucesso, mas não para todos
Com o iPhone SE, a Apple lançou um atraente smartphone que brilha com um processador rápido, uma ótima tela, Wi-Fi rápido e um longo período de atualização. Além disso, é à prova d'água e compatível com o carregamento sem fio.
O iPhone SE (2020) é atualmente o bilhete mais barato para o universo Apple.
As maiores fraquezas são a má relação tela/corpo e a tela menor. No entanto, aqueles que vêm de um iPhone 6, 7, 8 ou da primeira geração SE provavelmente não acharão este último um grande problema. Este é exatamente o grupo alvo do iPhone SE2. Em contraste, é improvável que os usuários Android sejam influenciados devido aos inconvenientes acima mencionados e às poucas possibilidades em termos de câmera. Para este grupo, o iPhone 11 será provavelmente uma opção mais atrativa.
O iPhone SE (2020) é uma peça de tecnologia muito polida. Entretanto, o Google Pixel 4 é a única opção real para potenciais compradores que procuram um equivalente baseado em Android, que neste caso oferece uma melhor relação tela/corpo, um painel de 90-Hz, uma configuração de câmara dupla e pior duração da bateria a um preço idêntico.
Apple iPhone SE 2020
- 05/15/2020 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Price comparison
