Breve Análise do Apple iPad 10.2 (2020) - Rejuvenescimento do tablet Apple de baixo preço
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88 % v7 (old) | 10/2020 | Apple iPad 10.2 2020 A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU | 495 g | 7.5 mm | 10.20" | 2160x1620 | |
85.4 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Apple iPad 7 2019 A10 Fusion, A10 Fusion GPU | 483 g | 7.5 mm | 10.20" | 2160x1620 | |
87.5 % v7 (old) | 04/2019 | Apple iPad Air 3 2019 A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU | 456 g | 6.1 mm | 10.50" | 2224x1668 | |
84.7 % v7 (old) | 10/2020 | Huawei MatePad 10.4 Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6 | 460 g | 7.35 mm | 10.40" | 2000x1200 | |
83.1 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3 | 467 g | 7 mm | 10.40" | 2000x1200 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
WeitwinkelWeitwinkelZoom (5-fach)Low-Light
|
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 477 cd/m²
Contraste: 954:1 (Preto: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 IPS, 2160x1620, 10.2" | Apple iPad 7 2019 IPS, 2160x1620, 10.2" | Apple iPad Air 3 2019 IPS, 2224x1668, 10.5" | Huawei MatePad 10.4 IPS, 2000x1200, 10.4" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite TFT, 2000x1200, 10.4" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 26% | 16% | -38% | -24% | |
Brightness middle | 477 | 499 5% | 515 8% | 511 7% | 503 5% |
Brightness | 452 | 470 4% | 483 7% | 472 4% | 477 6% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 87 1% | 90 5% | 85 -1% | 91 6% |
Black Level * | 0.5 | 0.49 2% | 0.41 18% | 0.53 -6% | 0.29 42% |
Contrast | 954 | 1018 7% | 1256 32% | 964 1% | 1734 82% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 0.97 56% | 1.6 27% | 4.6 -109% | 4.4 -100% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5 | 1.98 60% | 4.4 12% | 10.3 -106% | 10.4 -108% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.3 | 0.9 73% | 2.8 15% | 6.5 -97% | 7.5 -127% |
Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.135 103% | 2.21 100% | 2.19 100% | 2.19 100% |
CCT | 7019 93% | 6571 99% | 6944 94% | 7553 86% | 7700 84% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise | |
↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
39.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.8 ms rise | |
↘ 20.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Average Apple A12 Bionic (48 - 60, n=5) | |
Apple iPad Air 3 2019 | |
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 | |
Average of class Tablet (4.8 - 120, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MatePad 10.4 | |
Apple iPad 7 2019 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Apple iPad Air 3 2019 | |
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 | |
Average Apple A12 Bionic (62 - 96, n=5) | |
Average of class Tablet (5 - 400, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Apple iPad 7 2019 | |
Huawei MatePad 10.4 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite |
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score | |
Average Apple A12 Bionic (411764 - 430333, n=2) | |
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 | |
Huawei MatePad 10.4 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14) | |
Average Apple A12 Bionic (108.4 - 123.8, n=4) | |
Apple iPad Air 3 2019 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Apple iPad 7 2019 (Safari 13) | |
Huawei MatePad 10.4 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4.303) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Average Apple A12 Bionic (267 - 273, n=4) | |
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14) | |
Apple iPad 7 2019 (Safari 13) | |
Average of class Tablet (last 2 years) | |
Huawei MatePad 10.4 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4.303) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14) | |
Average Apple A12 Bionic (155 - 166, n=6) | |
Apple iPad Air 3 2019 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=47, last 2 years) | |
Apple iPad 7 2019 (Safari 13) | |
Huawei MatePad 10.4 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4.303) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14) | |
Average Apple A12 Bionic (123 - 139, n=4) | |
Apple iPad Air 3 2019 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Apple iPad 7 2019 (Safari 13) | |
Huawei MatePad 10.4 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4.303) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average Apple A12 Bionic (41367 - 43280, n=6) | |
Apple iPad Air 3 2019 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14) | |
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Apple iPad 7 2019 (Safari 13) | |
Huawei MatePad 10.4 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4.303) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MatePad 10.4 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4.303) | |
Apple iPad 7 2019 (Safari 13) | |
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14) | |
Apple iPad Air 3 2019 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
Average Apple A12 Bionic (603 - 653, n=6) |
* ... smaller is better
Gaming
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MatePad 10.4 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.01 / 0.16 Watt |
Ocioso | 2.12 / 6.43 / 6.69 Watt |
Carga |
8.17 / 11.84 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 8827 mAh | Apple iPad 7 2019 mAh | Apple iPad Air 3 2019 8134 mAh | Huawei MatePad 10.4 7250 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 7040 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -15% | 4% | 31% | 30% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.12 | 2.2 -4% | 2.18 -3% | 1.29 39% | 1.21 43% |
Idle Average * | 6.43 | 6.7 -4% | 6.4 -0% | 4.57 29% | 4.24 34% |
Idle Maximum * | 6.69 | 8.2 -23% | 6.43 4% | 4.64 31% | 4.34 35% |
Load Average * | 8.17 | 11.3 -38% | 7.48 8% | 6.01 26% | 6.99 14% |
Load Maximum * | 11.84 | 12.5 -6% | 10.65 10% | 8.06 32% | 8.79 26% |
* ... smaller is better
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 8827 mAh | Apple iPad 7 2019 mAh | Apple iPad Air 3 2019 8134 mAh | Huawei MatePad 10.4 7250 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 7040 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -19% | -19% | 26% | 7% | |
Reader / Idle | 2241 | 1486 -34% | 1501 -33% | 2020 -10% | 2120 -5% |
H.264 | 934 | 802 -14% | 684 -27% | 1003 7% | 950 2% |
WiFi v1.3 | 782 | 707 -10% | 738 -6% | 1190 52% | 792 1% |
Load | 238 | 196 -18% | 214 -10% | 366 54% | 309 30% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto - Não há muita novidade, mas ainda está forte
O iPad 2020 não é um grande salto em frente na série iPad 10.2. Além de um SoC mais poderoso, há um novo carregador USB-C 20-W (iPads da geração anterior fornecidos com adaptadores de energia USB-A). Aqueles que esperavam que a Apple substituísse a porta Lightning por uma porta USB Type-C ficarão desapontados. Presumivelmente, a Apple decidiu ficar com a porta Lightning para manter baixo o preço do iPad básico.
O iPad 10.2 ainda é o tablet mais poderoso em sua faixa de preço.
Além disso, mudar para uma porta USB-C significaria que acessórios mais antigos, como o Apple Pencil de primeira geração, não seriam mais utilizáveis. Em vez disso, os compradores podem continuar usando acessórios feitos para Pads de gerações anteriores, que não são apenas fáceis de usar, mas também estão em linha com o impulso de sustentabilidade da Apple. Quando comparado ao predecessor, o iPad 2020 tem uma pegada de carbono menor.
No entanto, a tela um pouco pior e o chip Bluetooth 4.2 merecem algumas críticas. No entanto, isso não influencia o desempenho do tablet. Você pode usar o iPad para estudar, trabalhar, jogar e fazer streaming de filmes. Tudo é possível com o iPad.
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
-
10/16/2020 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt