Breve Análise do Apple MacBook Pro 13 (Mid 2017, i5, Touch Bar)
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 (MacBook Pro 13 2017 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-7267U 2 x 3.1 - 3.5 GHz, Kaby Lake
Placa gráfica
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Memória
8 GB
, DDR3L-2133, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
13.30 polegadas 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 227 PPI, APPA034, IPS, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Apple SSD AP0256, 256 GB
peso
1.37 kg, Suprimento de energia: 269 g
Preço
1999 Euro
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
APPA034 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 551 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 514.1 cd/m² Minimum: 4.8 cd/m²iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 502 cd/m²
Contraste: 1148:1 (Preto: 0.48 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 APPA034, , 2560x1600, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) APPA033, , 2560x1600, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 APPA034, , 2560x1600, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 Sharp SHP144A, , 3200x1800, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 B140HAN03_1, , 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | -1% | -22% | -27% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 98.6 | 99.2 1% | 97.1 -2% | 64.6 -34% | 61.4 -38% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.9 0% | 99.8 0% | 91.6 -8% | 85.9 -14% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 86.5 | 87.6 1% | 86.7 0% | 66.5 -23% | 62.4 -28% |
| Response Times | -28% | -26% | 21% | 10% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 48 ? | 47.2 ? 2% | 47.2 ? 2% | 31 ? 35% | 41.6 ? 13% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 33.6 ? | 53 ? -58% | 51.6 ? -54% | 31.2 ? 7% | 31.6 ? 6% |
| PWM Frequency | 119000 ? | ||||
| Screen | -35% | -38% | -129% | -210% | |
| Brightness middle | 551 | 569 3% | 600 9% | 444 -19% | 311 -44% |
| Brightness | 514 | 542 5% | 564 10% | 393 -24% | 288 -44% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 90 2% | 89 1% | 82 -7% | 85 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.48 | 0.56 -17% | 0.57 -19% | 0.33 31% | 0.24 50% |
| Contrast | 1148 | 1016 -11% | 1053 -8% | 1345 17% | 1296 13% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.8 | 1.4 -75% | 1.5 -88% | 4 -400% | 5.5 -588% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1.4 | 2.9 -107% | 2.9 -107% | 7.7 -450% | 9 -543% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1 | 1.8 -80% | 2 -100% | 2.83 -183% | 6.2 -520% |
| Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.16 102% | 2.27 97% | 2.05 107% | 2.02 109% |
| CCT | 6672 97% | 6877 95% | 6855 95% | 6963 93% | 5950 109% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 78.4 | 77 | 59.3 | 55.96 | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.3 | 92 | 91.4 | 85.77 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -21% /
-26% | -22% /
-27% | -43% /
-81% | -76% /
-134% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 24.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 119000 Hz | ≤ 80 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 119000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 80 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 119000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3829 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5188 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4081 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3427 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 Apple SSD AP0256 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) Apple SSD AP0256 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 Apple SSD AP0256 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 42% | 36% | 263% | 148% | |
| Read Seq | 1540 | 1662 8% | 1345 -13% | 1827 19% | 1168 -24% |
| Write Seq | 1353 | 1336 -1% | 1320 -2% | 1383 2% | 329 -76% |
| Read 512 | 926 | 1183 28% | 831 -10% | 814 -12% | 1015 10% |
| Write 512 | 698 | 1481 112% | 1486 113% | 1098 57% | 307 -56% |
| Read 4k | 9.92 | 16.1 62% | 31.68 219% | 61 515% | 33 233% |
| Write 4k | 10.74 | 23.5 119% | 11.02 3% | 172.2 1503% | 132 1129% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 618 | 657 6% | 533 -14% | 601 -3% | 525 -15% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 403.8 | 419 4% | 362 -10% | 495.6 23% | 325 -20% |
| AS SSD | 21% | -2% | 181% | -68% | |
| Seq Read | 2327 | 2405 3% | 2275 -2% | 2434 5% | 1412 -39% |
| Seq Write | 1364 | 1499 10% | 1435 5% | 1506 10% | 46 -97% |
| 4K Read | 12.7 | 18.8 48% | 13.3 5% | 56.8 347% | |
| 4K Write | 19.3 | 26.1 35% | 15.4 -20% | 151.1 683% | |
| 4K-64 Read | 852 | 894 5% | 904 6% | 1022 20% | |
| 4K-64 Write | 419 | 448 7% | 417 0% | 905 116% | |
| Access Time Read * | 0.26 | 0.156 40% | 0.288 -11% | 0.028 89% | |
| Access Time Write * | 0.027 | ||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 32% /
32% | 17% /
18% | 222% /
225% | 40% /
105% |
* ... smaller is better
Apple SSD AP0256
Sequential Read:
1540 MB/s
Sequential Write:
1353 MB/s
512K Read:
926 MB/s
512K Write:
698 MB/s
4K Read:
9.92 MB/s
4K Write:
10.74 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
618 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
403.8 MB/s
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 15175 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2924 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8403 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1586 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 623 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 84 | 54.4 | 46.5 | 13.3 |
| GTA V (2015) | 56.5 | 49.9 | 11.6 | 5 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 21.4 | |||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 95 | 64 | 29.7 | 25 |
| Rainbow Six Siege (2015) | 54.2 | 35.6 | 20.8 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 25.9 | 18.3 | ||
| Far Cry Primal (2016) | 32 | 15 | ||
| The Division (2016) | 30 | |||
| Overwatch (2016) | 79.2 | 57.4 | 25.6 | 21.4 |
| Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 19.2 | 14.6 | 8.2 | |
| Battlefield 1 (2016) | 46.1 | 29.5 | ||
| Civilization VI (2016) | 42.2 | 20.2 | ||
| Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 36.8 | 19.9 | ||
| Titanfall 2 (2016) | 54.1 | 37.9 | ||
| Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016) | 32.4 | |||
| Dishonored 2 (2016) | 15 | |||
| For Honor (2017) | 39.7 | 15.2 | ||
| Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 17.6 | |||
| Mass Effect Andromeda (2017) | 25.8 | 10.5 | ||
| Prey (2017) | 51.4 | 20.2 | ||
| Rocket League (2017) | 113 | 56.8 | 38.9 | |
| Dirt 4 (2017) | 64 | 21.3 | 14.2 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.6 / 30.6 / 30.6 dB |
| HDD |
| 30.6 dB |
| Carga |
| 41.8 / 41.8 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.6 dB(A) | ||
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-2.7 °C / -4.9 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-2.7 °C / -4.9 F).
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 Iris Plus Graphics 650, i5-7267U, Apple SSD AP0256 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) Iris Graphics 550, 6267U, Apple SSD AP0256 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 Iris Graphics 540, 6360U, Apple SSD AP0256 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -2% | -4% | -5% | -11% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 43 | 45 -5% | 42 2% | 48 -12% | 40 7% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 39 | 39 -0% | 41 -5% | 47.2 -21% | 42 -8% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 25 | 26 -4% | 26 -4% | 23.5 6% | 28 -12% |
| Idle Bottom * | 24 | 24 -0% | 26 -8% | 22.6 6% | 31 -29% |
* ... smaller is better
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 i5-7267U, Iris Plus Graphics 650, 49.2 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) 6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 49.2 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 6360U, Iris Graphics 540, 54 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 6% | 42% | 41% | 43% | |
| H.264 | 415 | 483 16% | 620 49% | 711 71% | 547 32% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 519 | 566 9% | 686 32% | 496 -4% | 526 1% |
| Load | 70 | 66 -6% | 101 44% | 110 57% | 137 96% |
Nossos resultados de teste iniciais sugerem uma atualização bastante menor. O novo processador Kaby Lake da Intel é um pouco mais rápido do que seu antecessor e pode manter o desempenho por longos períodos, mas isso não justifica uma atualização para os proprietários do modelo 2016.
A tela mais uma vez deixa uma excelente impressão. A Apple confirma claramente sua reivindicação de fornecer as melhores telas no mercado.
Vamos completar a análise nos próximos dias e verificar se a Apple resolveu os problemas do antecessor (problemas de WLAN com dispositivos USB-C anexados). Fique ligado!
Price comparison
