Breve Análise do Apple MacBook Air 2020 Core i5 – O melhor MacBook que pode conseguir? – Não
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88 % v7 (old) | 04/2020 | Apple MacBook Air 2020 i5 i5-1030NG7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.3 kg | 16.1 mm | 13.30" | 2560x1600 | |
85.6 % v7 (old) | 08/2019 | Apple Macbook Air 2019 i5-8210Y, UHD Graphics 617 | 1.3 kg | 15.6 mm | 13.30" | 2560x1600 | |
90.6 % v7 (old) | 02/2020 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 2TB3 i5-8257U, Iris Plus Graphics 645 | 1.4 kg | 14.9 mm | 13.30" | 2560x1600 | |
84 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.3 kg | 14.5 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 | |
87 % v7 (old) | 02/2020 | Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.2 kg | 16.6 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 | |
88.8 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | 1.2 kg | 14.8 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
|
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 427 cd/m²
Contraste: 1344:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.6
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
97.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
71.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i5 APPA042, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Apple Macbook Air 2019 APPA041, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 2TB3 APPA03D, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Sharp LQ135P1JX51, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 BOE, NE135FBM-N41, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD SHP14CB, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -4% | 19% | -4% | 0% | 2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 70.4 | 67.4 -4% | 96.1 37% | 65.7 -7% | 70.1 0% | 71.5 2% |
sRGB Coverage | 97.7 | 94.7 -3% | 99.4 2% | 98.6 1% | 99.8 2% | 99.4 2% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 71.7 | 69.1 -4% | 85.6 19% | 67.8 -5% | 71.2 -1% | 73.5 3% |
Response Times | -4% | -16% | -57% | -48% | -54% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 38.7 ? | 42.4 ? -10% | 50.4 ? -30% | 59.2 ? -53% | 55 ? -42% | 60 ? -55% |
Response Time Black / White * | 30.44 ? | 29.6 ? 3% | 35.2 ? -16% | 41.6 ? -37% | 31 ? -2% | 33.2 ? -9% |
PWM Frequency | 117000 ? | 111100 ? -5% | 116300 ? -1% | 21740 ? -81% | 208 ? -100% | 2500 ? -98% |
Screen | -0% | 12% | 10% | -30% | -33% | |
Brightness middle | 430 | 421 -2% | 603 40% | 403.4 -6% | 474 10% | 619 44% |
Brightness | 405 | 393 -3% | 577 42% | 397 -2% | 426 5% | 591 46% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 88 -1% | 92 3% | 89 0% | 82 -8% | 91 2% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.34 -6% | 0.35 -9% | 0.34 -6% | 0.29 9% | 0.35 -9% |
Contrast | 1344 | 1238 -8% | 1723 28% | 1186 -12% | 1634 22% | 1769 32% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 1.5 17% | 1.7 6% | 0.94 48% | 2.38 -32% | 3 -67% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.6 | 3.8 17% | 3.1 33% | 2.92 37% | 5.88 -28% | 8.2 -78% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.6 | 0.7 56% | 0.99 38% | 2.69 -68% | 1 37% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 1.2 -9% | 2.1 -91% | 0.9 18% | 3.75 -241% | 5.2 -373% |
CCT | 6644 98% | 6694 97% | 6843 95% | 6620 98% | 6466 101% | 6340 103% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 64.2 | 61.3 -5% | 76.7 19% | 62.3 -3% | 65 1% | 66.9 4% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97.6 | 94.6 -3% | 99.4 2% | 98.7 1% | 100 2% | 99.3 2% |
Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.18 101% | 2.13 103% | 2.37 93% | 2.14 103% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -3% /
-2% | 5% /
8% | -17% /
-4% | -26% /
-28% | -28% /
-30% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
30.44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.9 ms rise | |
↘ 12.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
38.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise | |
↘ 19 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 117000 Hz | ≤ 75 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 117000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 75 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 117000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test - 12:1 8K CPU | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Average of class Subnotebook (25 - 32, n=3, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i5 |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i5 (macOS) | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i5 (Win 10) | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M (macOS) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M (Win 10) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=59, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS | |
Eve-Tech Eve V i7 | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i5 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 | |
BMAX MaxBook Y11 H1M6 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (436 - 17209, n=47, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) |
* ... smaller is better
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i5 Apple SSD AP0512 | Apple Macbook Air 2019 Apple SSD AP0256 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 2TB3 Apple SSD AP0256 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG | Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Apple SSD AP1024 7171 | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | -16% | -4% | 50% | 139% | 218% | 194% | 301% | |
Seq Read | 1153 | 933 -19% | 974 -16% | 1387 20% | 1703 48% | 2328 102% | 2531 120% | 4057 ? 252% |
Seq Write | 1367 | 1139 -17% | 1340 -2% | 504 -63% | 1373 0% | 1137 -17% | 2289 67% | 2631 ? 92% |
4K Read | 12.95 | 10.53 -19% | 11.35 -12% | 42.35 227% | 56.8 339% | 48.07 271% | 15.85 22% | 58.5 ? 352% |
4K Write | 24.52 | 15.03 -39% | 15.95 -35% | 120 389% | 164.4 570% | 120.6 392% | 39.88 63% | 176 ? 618% |
4K-64 Read | 665 | 534 -20% | 643 -3% | 497.4 -25% | 584 -12% | 899 35% | 1267 91% | 908 ? 37% |
4K-64 Write | 159.5 | 181.6 14% | 163 2% | 354.9 123% | 783 391% | 1220 665% | 1749 997% | 1867 ? 1071% |
Score Read | 793 | 638 -20% | 752 -5% | 678 -15% | 811 2% | 1180 49% | 1536 94% | 1372 ? 73% |
Score Write | 321 | 311 -3% | 313 -2% | 525 64% | 1085 238% | 1455 353% | 2018 529% | 2309 ? 619% |
Score Total | 1528 | 1283 -16% | 1465 -4% | 1520 -1% | 2313 51% | 3189 109% | 4317 183% | 4325 ? 183% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1433 | 1205 -16% | 1404 -2% | 764 -47% | 1401 -2% | 1995 39% | 2380 ? 66% | |
Copy Program MB/s | 363 | 302.1 -17% | 406.9 12% | 256.1 -29% | 480.4 32% | 584 61% | 778 ? 114% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 725 | 627 -14% | 850 17% | 368.4 -49% | 820 13% | 1135 57% | 1716 ? 137% |
Unigine Valley 1.0 - 1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Average of class Subnotebook (20.8 - 26.2, n=3, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i5 | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) () |
Basemark GPU 1.2 | |
3840x2160 Metal High Offscreen | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i5 | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) () | |
1920x1080 Metal Medium Offscreen | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i5 | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) () |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 8821 pontos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 2848 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1605 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 587 pontos | |
Ajuda |
The Witcher 3 - 1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
Average of class Subnotebook (48 - 187, n=48, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (28.2 - 58, n=20) | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i5 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1280x720 Lowest Preset | |
Average of class Subnotebook (45.9 - 113, n=6, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (15.6 - 33, n=13) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i5 |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 55.6 | 33.5 | 29.1 | 10.9 |
GTA V (2015) | 24.8 | |||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 28.2 | 5.13 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 59.4 | 30.7 | 20.5 | 19.8 |
Rocket League (2017) | 22.1 | 24.9 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 24 | 11.6 | 10.8 | |
World of Tanks enCore (2018) | 92.9 | 14.6 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 11 | |||
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 15.6 | |||
Battlefield V (2018) | 7.87 | |||
Anno 1800 (2019) | 19 | |||
FIFA 20 (2019) | 0 game wont start |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 30 / 30 / 30 dB |
Carga |
| 45.5 / 45.8 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i5 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1030NG7, Apple SSD AP0512 | Apple Macbook Air 2019 UHD Graphics 617, i5-8210Y, Apple SSD AP0256 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 2TB3 Iris Plus Graphics 645, i5-8257U, Apple SSD AP0256 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1035G7, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG | Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 7% | 9% | 12% | 9% | 12% | |
off / environment * | 30 | 29.5 2% | 29.5 2% | 28.5 5% | 30.3 -1% | 29.3 2% |
Idle Minimum * | 30 | 29.5 2% | 29.5 2% | 28.5 5% | 30.3 -1% | 29.3 2% |
Idle Average * | 30 | 29.5 2% | 29.5 2% | 28.5 5% | 30.3 -1% | 29.3 2% |
Idle Maximum * | 30 | 29.5 2% | 29.5 2% | 28.5 5% | 30.3 -1% | 29.3 2% |
Load Average * | 45.5 | 34 25% | 31.1 32% | 28.5 37% | 31.7 30% | 30 34% |
Load Maximum * | 45.8 | 41 10% | 39.3 14% | 40.4 12% | 32.7 29% | 32.4 29% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 40.4 |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-0.7 °C / -1.3 F).
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i5 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple Macbook Air 2019 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.04 / 0.23 Watt |
Ocioso | 2.4 / 6.8 / 10.5 Watt |
Carga |
25.7 / 30.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i5 i5-1030NG7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Apple SSD AP0512, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Air 2018 i5-8210Y, UHD Graphics 617, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 2TB3 i5-8257U, Iris Plus Graphics 645, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 5% | -28% | -51% | 21% | -26% | -35% | -58% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.4 | 2.2 8% | 2.1 12% | 4.4 -83% | 1.8 25% | 3.4 -42% | 3.91 ? -63% | 4.44 ? -85% |
Idle Average * | 6.8 | 5.7 16% | 6.9 -1% | 7.5 -10% | 4.6 32% | 6 12% | 7.33 ? -8% | 7.55 ? -11% |
Idle Maximum * | 10.5 | 10.3 2% | 7.8 26% | 7.8 26% | 6.1 42% | 10.2 3% | 9.16 ? 13% | 9.45 ? 10% |
Load Average * | 25.7 | 25.6 -0% | 42 -63% | 41.9 -63% | 27.4 -7% | 36.6 -42% | 39.2 ? -53% | 45.8 ? -78% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 24.5 | 40.8 -67% | ||||||
Load Maximum * | 30.4 | 30.6 -1% | 64.5 -112% | 63.9 -110% | 27 11% | 49.3 -62% | 49.8 ? -64% | 68.4 ? -125% |
* ... smaller is better
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i5 i5-1030NG7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 49.9 Wh | Apple MacBook Air 2018 i5-8210Y, UHD Graphics 617, 50.3 Wh | Apple Macbook Air 2019 i5-8210Y, UHD Graphics 617, 49.9 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 2TB3 i5-8257U, Iris Plus Graphics 645, 58.2 Wh | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 45 Wh | Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 54.5 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), 52 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 0% | 11% | 26% | -28% | -7% | 22% | 9% | |
H.264 | 640 | 740 16% | 627 -2% | 866 35% | 911 ? 42% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 618 | 668 8% | 689 11% | 777 26% | 495 -20% | 620 0% | 703 14% | 726 ? 17% |
Load | 173 | 131 -24% | 112 -35% | 139 -20% | 205 18% | 115.4 ? -33% | ||
Reader / Idle | 2064 | 1281 | 1750 ? |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto – O desempenho ainda é o calcanhar de Aquiles do MacBook Air
Atualmente, você pode ler muitos relatórios que dizem que o novo MacBook Air é o melhor MacBook que você pode obter atualmente. Após nossa análise abrangente, não podemos confirmar essas declarações. Sim, o teclado agora está melhor e o desempenho é um pouco mais alto, mas a Apple ainda (desnecessariamente) limita os recursos do sistema de refrigeração. O pequeno ventilador do chassi não é muito eficiente, porque não pode impedir uma queda no desempenho. Também é muito barulhento sob cargas de trabalho mais exigentes.
Na verdade, faz sentido para a Apple implementar um processador mais lento e manter distância do MacBook Pro 13. E isso não é uma coisa ruim em geral, porque o desempenho é suficiente para tarefas básicas sem muita tarefa multitarefa. No entanto, gostaríamos de ver um dispositivo com resfriamento completamente passivo. Um dispositivo completamente silencioso tornaria muito mais fácil aceitar os números de desempenho mais baixos. Talvez a Apple queira reservar esse passo para as próximas gerações com seus próprios processadores ARM (que foram rumorados durante um longo tempo).
O preço é muito alto: O processador do novo MacBook Air não é competitivo em uma máquina por 1500 Euros (~$1641) e o sistema de refrigeração é muito barulhento sob uso intenso. Se você ainda deseja o novo MacBook Air, recomendamos que aguarde ofertas especiais.
O problema é o preço alto, porque você pode obter portáteis muito mais potentes por 1500 Euros (~$1641), incluindo o MacBook Pro 13 da Apple. Mas a concorrência Windows, como o novo Dell XPS 139300 ou o Acer Swift 3, não precisa se esconder e ainda oferece mais recursos como o Wi-Fi 6, além de números de desempenho mais altos.
Se você consegue viver com o desempenho do MacBook Air e precisa apenas de itens básicos, mas exige um ótimo chassi, uma boa tela e duração de bateria longa, mais uma vez terá um ótimo companheiro móvel com o novo MacBook Air.
Definitivamente, também há muito o que gostar sobre o novo MacBook Air 2020, e apenas o nome do produto atrairá muitos clientes. Atualmente, o desempenho é completamente suficiente para coisas básicas, a tela e o chassi ainda são muito bons, o teclado foi finalmente aprimorado e os problemas de confiabilidade esperançosamente são coisa do passado. Se tiver que ser o novo MacBook Air, recomendamos aguardar ofertas ou descontos especiais, que definitivamente estarão disponíveis.
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i5
- 04/08/2020 v7 (old)
Klaus Hinum, Andreas Osthoff