Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Aorus 15G XB: Máquina de jogos de sucesso com teclado mecânico

Clicou.

O Aorus 15G XB roda todos os jogos de computador modernos sem problemas na tela mate de 15,6 polegadas (240 Hz, Full HD, IGZO). O resto do equipamento também está certo: SSD NVMe SSD, 16 GB de RAM (modo dual-channel), um teclado mecânico, e uma porta Thunderbolt 3.
Comet Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Windows
Aorus 15G XB (15G Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-10875H 8 x 2.3 - 5.1 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 930 MHz, Memoría: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, interface de 256-bits, 27.21.14.5167, Optimus
Memória
16 GB 
, DDR4 3200, dual-channel, dois slots de memória (ambos ocupados)
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, Sharp LQ156M1JW03, IGZO, Brilhante: não, 240 Hz
placa mãe
Intel HM470
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, 512 GB 
, 2x M.2 2280 (1x NVMe, 1x NVMe/SATA), 402 GB livre
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Comet Point-LP PCH - cAVS
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: Áudio combinado, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, TPM 2.0
Funcionamento em rede
Killer E2600 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 25 x 356 x 250
Bateria
94 Wh, 6200 mAh Lítio-Polímero, 15,2 V
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: mecânico, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Almofada termicamente condutiva para um segundo SSD M.2, Xsplit Gamecaster, Xsplit Broadcaster, MS Office 365 (versão de teste), 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.257 kg, Suprimento de energia: 725 g
Preço
2290 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
86.5 %
v7 (old)
08/2020
Aorus 15G XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		2.3 kg25 mm15.60"1920x1080
84.4 %
v7 (old)
07/2020
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile		2.4 kg24.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
84.8 %
v7 (old)
08/2020
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		2.3 kg19.9 mm15.60"1920x1080

v (old)
04/2020
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q		2.1 kg18 mm15.60"1920x1080
86 %
v7 (old)
05/2020
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		2.1 kg19.9 mm15.60"3840x2160
82.8 %
v7 (old)
12/2019
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		2.1 kg22 mm15.60"1920x1080

Size comparison

❌
360 mm 275 mm 24.9 mm 2.4 kg356 mm 250 mm 25 mm 2.3 kg359 mm 243 mm 22 mm 2.1 kg360.3 mm 276 mm 19.9 mm 2.3 kg359 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 19.9 mm 2.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Right side: 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type-A), Thunderbolt 3, memory card reader (SD), power supply
Right side: 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type-A), Thunderbolt 3, memory card reader (SD), power supply
Left side: HDMI 2.0, Mini DisplayPort 1.4, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type-A), combo audio, Gigabit Ethernet
Left side: HDMI 2.0, Mini DisplayPort 1.4, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type-A), combo audio, Gigabit Ethernet
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus 15G XB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
210 MB/s
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
189.3 MB/s -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years)
95.5 MB/s -55%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Aorus 15G XB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
248 MB/s
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
225 MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years)
119.3 MB/s -52%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1622 (1486min - 1748max) MBit/s +18%
Aorus 15G XB
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1370 MBit/s
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1340 MBit/s -2%
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650w
1202 (1013min - 1346max) MBit/s -12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1140 MBit/s -17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1057 (522min - 1214max) MBit/s -23%
iperf3 receive AX12
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1522 (1406min - 1631max) MBit/s +36%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1390 MBit/s +24%
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650w
1375 (1240min - 1425max) MBit/s +23%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1360 MBit/s +21%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1238 (1020min - 1354max) MBit/s +11%
Aorus 15G XB
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1120 MBit/s
ColorChecker
24.9 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Aorus 15G XB: 11.85 ∆E min: 2.61 - max: 29.22 ∆E
ColorChecker
15.4 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
8 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3: 10.61 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 18.71 ∆E
ColorChecker
5.1 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
13 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
8 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
3 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Alienware m15 R3 P87F: 9.14 ∆E min: 3.05 - max: 12.97 ∆E
ColorChecker
6.7 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
11 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
6 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328: 8.13 ∆E min: 3.62 - max: 13.2 ∆E
243
cd/m²		248
cd/m²		243
cd/m²
258
cd/m²		264
cd/m²		250
cd/m²
241
cd/m²		236
cd/m²		252
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 264 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 248.3 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 264 cd/m²
Contraste: 880:1 (Preto: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.21 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.192
Aorus 15G XB
Sharp LQ156M1JW03, IGZO, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Alienware m15 R3 P87F
AU Optronics B156HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO7A8C), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
Samsung SDCA029, AMOLED, 3840x2160, 15.6"		SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display
4%
2%
4%
31%
-6%
Display P3 Coverage
67.2
69.9
4%
68.6
2%
70.3
5%
99.9
49%
64
-5%
sRGB Coverage
97.8
99.6
2%
98.9
1%
99.5
2%
100
2%
90.3
-8%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
68
71.4
5%
69.8
3%
72.2
6%
97.4
43%
65.4
-4%
Response Times
14%
40%
9%
20%
17%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
16 ?(8.4, 7.6)
14.4 ?(6.8, 7.6)
10%
4 ?(1.6, 2.4)
75%
14.4 ?(7.2, 7.2)
10%
2.7 ?(1.2, 1.5)
83%
9.6 ?(4.8, 4.8)
40%
Response Time Black / White *
11.2 ?(6.8, 4.4)
9.2 ?(4.8, 4.4)
18%
10.8 ?(5.2, 5.6)
4%
10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2)
7%
2.6 ?(1.1, 1.5)
77%
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
-7%
PWM Frequency
23580 ?(24)
59.5 ?(100)
-100%
Screen
-0%
-28%
-51%
-48%
-38%
Brightness middle
264
307.2
16%
326.7
24%
320
21%
366.7
39%
313
19%
Brightness
248
301
21%
316
27%
318
28%
371
50%
295
19%
Brightness Distribution
89
91
2%
87
-2%
88
-1%
91
2%
89
0%
Black Level *
0.3
0.21
30%
0.33
-10%
0.24
20%
0.3
-0%
Contrast
880
1463
66%
990
13%
1333
51%
1043
19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.21
1.85
-53%
2.4
-98%
4.03
-233%
5.21
-331%
3.33
-175%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.07
3.92
-28%
6.06
-97%
8.43
-175%
7.92
-158%
6.25
-104%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.92
1.26
-37%
1.51
-64%
0.98
-7%
1.77
-92%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.6
2
-25%
3.2
-100%
5.94
-271%
2
-25%
3.1
-94%
Gamma
2.192 100%
2.15 102%
2.13 103%
2.42 91%
2.17 101%
2.51 88%
CCT
6340 103%
6479 100%
7129 91%
6751 96%
6514 100%
6930 94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
68
65
-4%
63.7
-6%
66
-3%
86.6
27%
59
-13%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
90
99.7
11%
99.2
10%
99
10%
100
11%
90
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
6% / 2%
5% / -14%
-13% / -33%
1% / -17%
-9% / -25%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.4 ms rise
↘ 7.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 23580 Hz ≤ 24 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 23580 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 24 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 23580 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
HWiNFO
 
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650170017501800Tooltip
Aorus 15G XB Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1613 (1597.32-1826.4)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS Intel Core i9-10980HK, Intel Core i9-10980HK: Ø1622 (1604.75-1733.1)
Alienware m15 R3 P87F Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1338 (1320.39-1347.39)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1213 (1201.27-1287.87)
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1069 (1047.18-1166.18)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1002 (974.71-1181)
CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop
CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
133.9 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1826 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
202 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3723 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
482 Points
Ajuda
Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Cinebench R20 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)
276 Points +37%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
211 Points +4%
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
202 Points
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
Intel Core i7-10750H
201 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
Intel Core i7-10750H
193 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
192 Points -5%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
190 Points -6%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)
3394 Points +86%
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
1826 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1733 (1604.75min - 1733.1max) Points -5%
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
Intel Core i7-10750H
1347 (1320.39min - 1347.39max) Points -26%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
1288 (1201.27min - 1287.87max) Points -29%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
1181 Points -35%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
Intel Core i7-10750H
1166 (1047.18min - 1166.18max) Points -36%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
Intel Core i7-10750H
423 Seconds * -49%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
368 Seconds * -30%
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
Intel Core i7-10750H
326 Seconds * -15%
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
284 Seconds *
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
279 Seconds * +2%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years)
172.1 Seconds * +39%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (4168 - 7581, n=190, last 2 years)
6281 MIPS +18%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5525 MIPS +4%
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
5319 MIPS
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
Intel Core i7-10750H
5051 MIPS -5%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
5015 MIPS -6%
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
Intel Core i7-10750H
4504 MIPS -15%
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=190, last 2 years)
84653 MIPS +82%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
47806 MIPS +3%
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
46426 MIPS
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
Intel Core i7-10750H
35346 MIPS -24%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
35130 MIPS -24%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
Intel Core i7-10750H
29009 MIPS -38%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years)
722 Points +50%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
490 Points +2%
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
482 Points
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
Intel Core i7-10750H
479 Points -1%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
Intel Core i7-10750H
470 Points -2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
468 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
434 Points -10%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years)
8240 Points +121%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
3871 Points +4%
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
3723 Points
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
Intel Core i7-10750H
3299 Points -11%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
2932 Points -21%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
Intel Core i7-10750H
2600 Points -30%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
2384 Points -36%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years)
1882 Points +47%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1368 Points +7%
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
1281 Points
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
Intel Core i7-10750H
1269 Points -1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
1233 Points -4%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
Intel Core i7-10750H
1114 Points -13%
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years)
14891 Points +82%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
8586 Points +5%
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
8190 Points
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
Intel Core i7-10750H
6380 Points -22%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
6216 Points -24%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
Intel Core i7-10750H
5242 Points -36%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years)
23.3 fps +82%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
13 fps +2%
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
12.8 fps
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
Intel Core i7-10750H
11.1 fps -13%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
10.1 fps -21%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
Intel Core i7-10750H
8.074 fps -37%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
Intel Core i7-10750H
60.1 s * -8%
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
55.8 s *
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
Intel Core i7-10750H
53.2 s * +5%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
52.1 s * +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
48.4 s * +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years)
47.6 s * +15%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.708 sec * -21%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.606 sec * -3%
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.586 sec *
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.565 sec * +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years)
0.4402 sec * +25%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4719 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4518 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
6081 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
5393 pontos
Ajuda
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)
7774 Points +44%
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, 2x Micron 2200S 512 GB (RAID 0)
6255 Points +16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, 2x Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 (RAID 0)
6236 Points +16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001
5522 Points +2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5484 Points +2%
Aorus 15G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5393 Points
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
5244 Points -3%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, 2x Micron 2200S 512 GB (RAID 0)
5702 Points +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (4560 - 5937, n=20, last 2 years)
5223 Points +11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, 2x Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 (RAID 0)
5020 Points +6%
Aorus 15G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
4719 Points
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
3696 Points -22%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, 2x Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 (RAID 0)
6456 Points +6%
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, 2x Micron 2200S 512 GB (RAID 0)
6224 Points +2%
Average of class Gaming
  (5520 - 6853, n=18, last 2 years)
6102 Points 0%
Aorus 15G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
6081 Points
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
4705 Points -23%
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
6244 μs * -164%
Aorus 15G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
2364 μs *
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, 2x Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 (RAID 0)
1475 μs * +38%
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, 2x Micron 2200S 512 GB (RAID 0)
1206 μs * +49%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
905 μs * +62%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3360 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2978 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 557 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 499 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1297 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2617 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 44.37 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 121.6 MB/s
Aorus 15G XB
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ		Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
2x Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 (RAID 0)		Alienware m15 R3 P87F
2x Micron 2200S 512 GB (RAID 0)		Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ		Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
Lite-On CA5-8D512		SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
4%
-3%
9%
6%
-14%
Write 4K
121.6
128.4
6%
67.3
-45%
131.7
8%
118.7
-2%
108.7
-11%
Read 4K
44.37
53.7
21%
41.47
-7%
47.34
7%
52.4
18%
41.4
-7%
Write Seq
2617
1875
-28%
2239
-14%
2884
10%
2247
-14%
1083
-59%
Read Seq
1297
2315
78%
2112
63%
2303
78%
2234
72%
917
-29%
Write 4K Q32T1
499
427.2
-14%
488.9
-2%
423.9
-15%
515
3%
468.5
-6%
Read 4K Q32T1
557
440.7
-21%
557
0%
487.7
-12%
584
5%
530
-5%
Write Seq Q32T1
2978
2793
-6%
2654
-11%
2822
-5%
2235
-25%
3057
3%
Read Seq Q32T1
3360
3101
-8%
3137
-7%
3478
4%
3171
-6%
3422
2%
AS SSD
-8%
-78%
2%
-23%
15%
Seq Read
1795
1982
10%
2058
15%
2767
54%
2021
13%
2341
30%
Seq Write
2724
1444
-47%
2316
-15%
2613
-4%
2090
-23%
2575
-5%
4K Read
49.67
50.3
1%
39.72
-20%
47.55
-4%
47.71
-4%
51
3%
4K Write
109.3
120.1
10%
62.9
-42%
98.9
-10%
101.1
-8%
118.6
9%
4K-64 Read
1284
1016
-21%
1334
4%
1205
-6%
856
-33%
1637
27%
4K-64 Write
1962
1351
-31%
1271
-35%
2007
2%
1041
-47%
2442
24%
Access Time Read *
0.063
0.044
30%
0.062
2%
0.065
-3%
0.052
17%
0.066
-5%
Access Time Write *
0.034
0.109
-221%
0.388
-1041%
0.038
-12%
0.111
-226%
0.028
18%
Score Read
1513
1264
-16%
1580
4%
1529
1%
1105
-27%
1922
27%
Score Write
2344
1615
-31%
1565
-33%
2367
1%
1351
-42%
2818
20%
Score Total
4685
3510
-25%
3968
-15%
4677
0%
3037
-35%
5738
22%
Copy ISO MB/s
1533
3474
127%
1685
10%
2474
61%
Copy Program MB/s
528
751
42%
669
27%
679
29%
Copy Game MB/s
1042
1684
62%
1493
43%
1037
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-2% / -4%
-41% / -51%
6% / 5%
-9% / -12%
1% / 3%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data
3DMark 11 Performance
23892 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
49906 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18883 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
7590 pontos
Ajuda
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)
43521 Points +57%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
30568 Points +10%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
30456 Points +10%
Aorus 15G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
27715 Points
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
26160 Points -6%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
23326 Points -16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
21861 Points -21%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)
142796 Points +13%
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
133502 Points +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
130740 Points +3%
Aorus 15G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
126747 Points
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
125664 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
114009 Points -10%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
59017 Points -53%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)
31245 Points +48%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
22326 Points +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
22183 Points +5%
Aorus 15G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
21150 Points
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
20712 Points -2%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18166 Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
17419 Points -18%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years)
13034 Points +78%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
8389 Points +14%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
8379 Points +14%
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
7910 Points +8%
Aorus 15G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
7343 Points
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6722 Points -8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6387 Points -13%
The Witcher 3 | BioShock Infinite | Shadow of the Tomb Raider | Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 | Doom Eternal | Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)
126.9 fps +68%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
85.7 (80min - 91max) fps +14%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
83.4 (67min) fps +10%
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H
81 (77min - 86max) fps +7%
Aorus 15G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
75.5 (63min) fps
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H
61.9 (58min - 69max) fps -18%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
60.4 (49min) fps -20%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Aorus 15G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
166.5 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (27 - 271, n=29, last 2 years)
165.6 fps +73%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
104 fps +8%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
97 (75min) fps +1%
Aorus 15G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
96 fps
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H
93 fps -3%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H
85 fps -11%
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings AA:T2X Filmic SM
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
107 (72min) fps +27%
Aorus 15G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
84.2 fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
83.2 (65min) fps -1%
Doom Eternal - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (160.9 - 179, n=2, last 2 years)
170 fps +31%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
147 (94min) fps +13%
Aorus 15G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
130.2 fps
Red Dead Redemption 2 - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
43.7 (28min) fps +11%
Aorus 15G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
39.4 fps
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Alienware m15 R3 P87F GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, 2x Micron 2200S 512 GB (RAID 0); FPS: Ø70.8 (65-79)
Aorus 15G XB GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ: Ø73.9 (68-80)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, 2x Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 (RAID 0): Ø76.5 (71-83)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ: Ø84.4 (72-91)
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, Lite-On CA5-8D512: Ø62.4 (55-69)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001: Ø60.8 (55-68)
GPU measurements during our The Witcher 3 test
GPU measurements during our The Witcher 3 test
baixomédiaaltoultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 420.2 359.5 329.8 166.5
The Witcher 3 (2015) 323.7 232 136.2 75.5
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 133 112 106 96
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) 255.2 122.8 77.6 54.8
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) 160.9 116.2 97.8 84.2
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 108 98.2 92.1
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) 132.8 86.6 60.2 39.4
Doom Eternal (2020) 232.3 152 135.1 130.2
Gears Tactics (2020) 272.4 165.8 109.2 79
F1 2020 (2020) 258 163 145 104
Death Stranding (2020) 164.3 114.5 104.3 101.8

Barulho

Ocioso
32 / 34 / 38 dB
Carga
48 / 54 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.834.831.932.134.72540.735.434.734.637.7313432.528.727.633.74029.430.930.234.333.45032.540.739.741.235.76334.631.129.626.835.98030.322.521.117.634.310025.624.720.11928.212527.923.319.914.829.316030.425.824.42134.320028.624.621.7173225028.224.920.515.432.631532.725.822.51435.640035.428.324.912.839.450035.32823.31339.163035.427.121.211.739.180035.426.621.811.540.5100036.226.221.41242125036.326.121.315.142.616003726.320.712.543.2200036.625.819.912.542.625003726.424.412.442.9315038.13119.912.743.4400039.323.717.713.342.8500037.622.519.413.345.2630028.416.514.31338.6800026.614.2141334.91000022.614.314.512.930.8125002113.713.712.725.31600024.713.815.612.223.2SPL48.23832.725.353.9N6.22.81.70.79.3median 35.3median 25.8median 20.5median 13median 39.1Delta4.63.42.31.46.6hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAorus 15G XB
Aorus 15G XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile		Alienware m15 R3 P87F
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q		Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
-1%
8%
0%
6%
-2%
13%
off / environment *
25
26.5
-6%
26.3
-5%
30
-20%
28.4
-14%
31
-24%
24 ?(19.5 - 27.9, n=157, last 2 years)
4%
Idle Minimum *
32
27.1
15%
26.7
17%
30
6%
28.4
11%
31
3%
25.5 ?(22.8 - 35, n=158, last 2 years)
20%
Idle Average *
34
32.2
5%
26.7
21%
33
3%
28.4
16%
34
-0%
27.2 ?(23 - 37.5, n=158, last 2 years)
20%
Idle Maximum *
38
34
11%
30.7
19%
36
5%
31.7
17%
37
3%
30.2 ?(23 - 47, n=158, last 2 years)
21%
Load Average *
48
52.4
-9%
40.2
16%
50
-4%
47.7
1%
47
2%
42.5 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=158, last 2 years)
11%
Witcher 3 ultra *
50
57.5
-15%
51
-2%
48
4%
47.5
5%
50
-0%
Load Maximum *
54
57.5
-6%
59.7
-11%
50
7%
49.5
8%
54
-0%
53.4 ?(43 - 67.5, n=158, last 2 years)
1%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 40 °C44 °C44 °C 
 33 °C39 °C43 °C 
 28 °C29 °C29 °C 
Máximo: 44 °C
Médio: 36.6 °C
58 °C63 °C48 °C
57 °C55 °C43 °C
38 °C37 °C34 °C
Máximo: 63 °C
Médio: 48.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  45 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 63 °C / 145 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-0.1 °C / -0.2 F).
Aorus 15G XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile		Alienware m15 R3 P87F
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q		Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-5%
-33%
2%
-8%
-16%
-3%
Maximum Upper Side *
44
46.2
-5%
55.8
-27%
44
-0%
49.6
-13%
60
-36%
46.1 ?(28.2 - 60, n=156, last 2 years)
-5%
Maximum Bottom *
63
55.2
12%
62
2%
50
21%
50.2
20%
66
-5%
49.2 ?(33.6 - 66, n=156, last 2 years)
22%
Idle Upper Side *
27
31.4
-16%
43.4
-61%
29
-7%
32.2
-19%
30
-11%
31.2 ?(22.4 - 42.8, n=156, last 2 years)
-16%
Idle Bottom *
29
32.2
-11%
42
-45%
31
-7%
34.6
-19%
32
-10%
32.2 ?(22.6 - 43.6, n=156, last 2 years)
-11%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.135.42534.639.73127.631.84034.331.15041.241.26326.835.98017.625.61001921.612514.827.41602138.12001748.825015.459.23151459.440012.865.25001365.263011.771.380011.57710001277.8125015.177.3160012.572.8200012.569.4250012.466.3315012.764.3400013.365.2500013.368.463001364.4800013641000012.969.71250012.765.71600012.256.7SPL25.383.9N0.756.2median 13median 65.2Delta1.46.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAorus 15G XB
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Aorus 15G XB audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.3 / 0.9 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 16 / 20 / 30 Watt
Carga midlight 102 / 256 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Aorus 15G XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile		Alienware m15 R3 P87F
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q		Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
2%
-69%
18%
11%
22%
6%
Idle Minimum *
16
8
50%
34
-113%
11
31%
11.1
31%
11
31%
13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=157, last 2 years)
16%
Idle Average *
20
9.8
51%
48.6
-143%
15
25%
13.7
31%
15
25%
18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=157, last 2 years)
5%
Idle Maximum *
30
25.8
14%
58.2
-94%
25
17%
33.4
-11%
21
30%
26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=157, last 2 years)
11%
Load Average *
102
169
-66%
129.4
-27%
95
7%
104.4
-2%
94
8%
106.6 ?(32.1 - 201, n=155, last 2 years)
-5%
Witcher 3 ultra *
156
201
-29%
214.5
-38%
140
10%
159.9
-3%
143
8%
Load Maximum *
256
271.6
-6%
257.3
-1%
211
18%
203.8
20%
173
32%
249 ?(55.3 - 418, n=157, last 2 years)
3%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
9h 39min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 44)
6h 58min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
7h 39min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 27min
Aorus 15G XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 94 Wh		Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, 66 Wh		Alienware m15 R3 P87F
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 86 Wh		Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 84 Wh		Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 65 Wh		SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 62 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-29%
-59%
-24%
-42%
-30%
-16%
Reader / Idle
579
486
-16%
299
-48%
495
-15%
439
-24%
565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years)
-2%
H.264
459
408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years)
-11%
WiFi v1.3
418
293
-30%
167
-60%
378
-10%
241
-42%
340
-19%
376 ?(85 - 889, n=157, last 2 years)
-10%
Load
147
88
-40%
44
-70%
78
-47%
79
-46%
85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years)
-42%

Pro

+ Tela mate IGZO
+ Painel de 240 Hz
+ Marcos finos da tela
+ Carcaça de metal de alta qualidade
+ Bom desempenho
+ SSD NVMe
+ Slot M.2 2280 disponível (NVMe e SATA)
+ Teclado mecânico
+ Iluminação RGB (individual para cada tecla)
+ Leitor de cartões de memória muito veloz
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Thunderbolt 3

Contra

- O brilho e contraste da tela são bastante baixos
- Sem G-Sync
- Quente e barulhento sob uso intenso
The Aorus 15G XB-8DE2130MH. Provided by Gigabyte Germany.
The Aorus 15G XB-8DE2130MH. Provided by Gigabyte Germany.

O mais recente lançamento da Gigabyte pode ser considerado um sucesso. A elegante carcaça de metal do Aorus 15G XB deixou uma impressão de alta qualidade tanto visual quanto tátil. Os marcos finos da tela contribuem enormemente para a atratividade do portátil.

A combinação de um processador Core i7-8550U octa-core e GPU GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q é perfeita. Ele roda todos os jogos de computador modernos sem problemas na tela Full HD, e as configurações de qualidade máxima sempre podem ser selecionadas aqui.

O Aorus 15G XB atende aos requisitos de um poderoso dispositivo para jogos moderno e deve satisfazer muitos jogadores.

O Core i7 chama a atenção com seu bom desempenho. Os resultados de benchmark alcançados estão entre os melhores que medimos com este processador até agora. No entanto, tudo isto tem um preço: Os ventiladores aumentam bastante sua atividade, e o portátil aquece consideravelmente em algumas partes.

O monitor IGZO de 240 Hz da Sharp ganha pontos com ângulos de visão estáveis, tempos de resposta rápidos, boa cobertura do espaço de cores e - graças a uma certificação X-Rite Pantone - uma reprodução de cores naturais. O brilho e o contraste, por outro lado, poderiam ser melhores.

O teclado mecânico (com iluminação RGB) é um recurso incomum no portátil. Em suma, causou boa impressão e será um importante critério de compra para muitos compradores em potencial. Aqueles que nunca usaram esse teclado antes, primeiro terão que se acostumar com esse tipo de experiência de digitação.

O espaço de armazenamento oferecido pelo rápido SSD NVMe de 512 GB será um pouco apertado para jogadores apaixonados. Um segundo SSD no formato M.2 2280 (NVMe ou SATA) pode ser instalado aqui, se necessário. O processo é bastante fácil de realizar, já que a tampa inferior do portátil pode ser removida sem problemas. Além disso, a duração da bateria é extremamente boa para um portátil de jogos. Isso é complementado por uma configuração de portas bem completa que inclui uma porta Thunderbolt 3 entre outras conexões.

Aorus 15G XB - 08/11/2020 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck

Acabamento
85 / 98 → 87%
Teclado
90%
Mouse
87%
Conectividade
71 / 80 → 88%
Peso
61 / 10-66 → 92%
Bateria
73 / 95 → 77%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
95%
Desempenho da aplicação
90%
Temperatura
83 / 95 → 87%
Ruído
61 / 90 → 67%
Audio
76%
Camera
42 / 85 → 49%
Médio
77%
87%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

More articles related to this device

Aorus 15G XB (15G Serie)
Análise
•
Revisão do Aorus 15G XC Gaming...

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Aorus 15G XB: Máquina de jogos de sucesso com teclado mecânico
Sascha Mölck, 2020-08-18 (Update: 2020-08-22)