Breve Análise do Aorus 15G XB: Máquina de jogos de sucesso com teclado mecânico
Aorus 15G XB (15G Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-10875H 8 x 2.3 - 5.1 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 930 MHz, Memoría: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, interface de 256-bits, 27.21.14.5167, Optimus
Memória
16 GB
, DDR4 3200, dual-channel, dois slots de memória (ambos ocupados)
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, Sharp LQ156M1JW03, IGZO, Brilhante: não, 240 Hz
placa mãe
Intel HM470
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, 512 GB
, 2x M.2 2280 (1x NVMe, 1x NVMe/SATA), 402 GB livre
peso
2.257 kg, Suprimento de energia: 725 g
Preço
2290 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86.5 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Aorus 15G XB i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | 2.3 kg | 25 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84.4 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | 2.4 kg | 24.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84.8 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Alienware m15 R3 P87F i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | 2.3 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
v (old) | 04/2020 | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
| 82.8 % v7 (old) | 12/2019 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 22 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Aorus 15G XB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Alienware m15 R3 P87F (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Aorus 15G XB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Alienware m15 R3 P87F (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years) | |
24.9 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
8 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
13 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
8 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
3 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
11 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
6 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 264 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 248.3 cd/m²iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 264 cd/m²
Contraste: 880:1 (Preto: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.21 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.192
| Aorus 15G XB Sharp LQ156M1JW03, IGZO, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Alienware m15 R3 P87F AU Optronics B156HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO7A8C), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Samsung SDCA029, AMOLED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 4% | 2% | 4% | 31% | -6% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 67.2 | 69.9 4% | 68.6 2% | 70.3 5% | 99.9 49% | 64 -5% |
| sRGB Coverage | 97.8 | 99.6 2% | 98.9 1% | 99.5 2% | 100 2% | 90.3 -8% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68 | 71.4 5% | 69.8 3% | 72.2 6% | 97.4 43% | 65.4 -4% |
| Response Times | 14% | 40% | 9% | 20% | 17% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 16 ? | 14.4 ? 10% | 4 ? 75% | 14.4 ? 10% | 2.7 ? 83% | 9.6 ? 40% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 11.2 ? | 9.2 ? 18% | 10.8 ? 4% | 10.4 ? 7% | 2.6 ? 77% | 12 ? -7% |
| PWM Frequency | 23580 ? | 59.5 ? -100% | ||||
| Screen | -0% | -28% | -51% | -48% | -38% | |
| Brightness middle | 264 | 307.2 16% | 326.7 24% | 320 21% | 366.7 39% | 313 19% |
| Brightness | 248 | 301 21% | 316 27% | 318 28% | 371 50% | 295 19% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 91 2% | 87 -2% | 88 -1% | 91 2% | 89 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.21 30% | 0.33 -10% | 0.24 20% | 0.3 -0% | |
| Contrast | 880 | 1463 66% | 990 13% | 1333 51% | 1043 19% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.21 | 1.85 -53% | 2.4 -98% | 4.03 -233% | 5.21 -331% | 3.33 -175% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.07 | 3.92 -28% | 6.06 -97% | 8.43 -175% | 7.92 -158% | 6.25 -104% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.92 | 1.26 -37% | 1.51 -64% | 0.98 -7% | 1.77 -92% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 2 -25% | 3.2 -100% | 5.94 -271% | 2 -25% | 3.1 -94% |
| Gamma | 2.192 100% | 2.15 102% | 2.13 103% | 2.42 91% | 2.17 101% | 2.51 88% |
| CCT | 6340 103% | 6479 100% | 7129 91% | 6751 96% | 6514 100% | 6930 94% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 68 | 65 -4% | 63.7 -6% | 66 -3% | 86.6 27% | 59 -13% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 90 | 99.7 11% | 99.2 10% | 99 10% | 100 11% | 90 0% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 6% /
2% | 5% /
-14% | -13% /
-33% | 1% /
-17% | -9% /
-25% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 7.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 23580 Hz | ≤ 24 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 23580 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 24 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 23580 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Aorus 15G XB Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1613 (1597.32-1826.4)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS Intel Core i9-10980HK, Intel Core i9-10980HK: Ø1622 (1604.75-1733.1)
Alienware m15 R3 P87F Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1338 (1320.39-1347.39)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1213 (1201.27-1287.87)
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1069 (1047.18-1166.18)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1002 (974.71-1181)
Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Cinebench R20 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
| R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
| Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
| Aorus 15G XB | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
| Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=187, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4719 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4518 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 6081 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5393 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
| Aorus 15G XB | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
| Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
| Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3360 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
2978 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
557 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
499 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1297 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
2617 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
44.37 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
121.6 MB/s
| Aorus 15G XB Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS 2x Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 (RAID 0) | Alienware m15 R3 P87F 2x Micron 2200S 512 GB (RAID 0) | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Lite-On CA5-8D512 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 4% | -3% | 9% | 6% | -14% | |
| Write 4K | 121.6 | 128.4 6% | 67.3 -45% | 131.7 8% | 118.7 -2% | 108.7 -11% |
| Read 4K | 44.37 | 53.7 21% | 41.47 -7% | 47.34 7% | 52.4 18% | 41.4 -7% |
| Write Seq | 2617 | 1875 -28% | 2239 -14% | 2884 10% | 2247 -14% | 1083 -59% |
| Read Seq | 1297 | 2315 78% | 2112 63% | 2303 78% | 2234 72% | 917 -29% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 499 | 427.2 -14% | 488.9 -2% | 423.9 -15% | 515 3% | 468.5 -6% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 557 | 440.7 -21% | 557 0% | 487.7 -12% | 584 5% | 530 -5% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 2978 | 2793 -6% | 2654 -11% | 2822 -5% | 2235 -25% | 3057 3% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3360 | 3101 -8% | 3137 -7% | 3478 4% | 3171 -6% | 3422 2% |
| AS SSD | -8% | -78% | 2% | -23% | 15% | |
| Seq Read | 1795 | 1982 10% | 2058 15% | 2767 54% | 2021 13% | 2341 30% |
| Seq Write | 2724 | 1444 -47% | 2316 -15% | 2613 -4% | 2090 -23% | 2575 -5% |
| 4K Read | 49.67 | 50.3 1% | 39.72 -20% | 47.55 -4% | 47.71 -4% | 51 3% |
| 4K Write | 109.3 | 120.1 10% | 62.9 -42% | 98.9 -10% | 101.1 -8% | 118.6 9% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1284 | 1016 -21% | 1334 4% | 1205 -6% | 856 -33% | 1637 27% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1962 | 1351 -31% | 1271 -35% | 2007 2% | 1041 -47% | 2442 24% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.063 | 0.044 30% | 0.062 2% | 0.065 -3% | 0.052 17% | 0.066 -5% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.034 | 0.109 -221% | 0.388 -1041% | 0.038 -12% | 0.111 -226% | 0.028 18% |
| Score Read | 1513 | 1264 -16% | 1580 4% | 1529 1% | 1105 -27% | 1922 27% |
| Score Write | 2344 | 1615 -31% | 1565 -33% | 2367 1% | 1351 -42% | 2818 20% |
| Score Total | 4685 | 3510 -25% | 3968 -15% | 4677 0% | 3037 -35% | 5738 22% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1533 | 3474 127% | 1685 10% | 2474 61% | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 528 | 751 42% | 669 27% | 679 29% | ||
| Copy Game MB/s | 1042 | 1684 62% | 1493 43% | 1037 0% | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -2% /
-4% | -41% /
-51% | 6% /
5% | -9% /
-12% | 1% /
3% |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
No graph data
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 23892 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 49906 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 18883 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 7590 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
The Witcher 3 | BioShock Infinite | Shadow of the Tomb Raider | Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 | Doom Eternal | Red Dead Redemption 2
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
| Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
| Aorus 15G XB | |
| Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 | |
| BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| Aorus 15G XB | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (27 - 271, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
| Aorus 15G XB | |
| Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
| Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings AA:T2X Filmic SM | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
| Aorus 15G XB | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 | |
| Doom Eternal - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (160.9 - 179, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
| Aorus 15G XB | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
| Aorus 15G XB | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, 2x Micron 2200S 512 GB (RAID 0); FPS: Ø70.8 (65-79)
Aorus 15G XB GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ: Ø73.9 (68-80)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, 2x Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 (RAID 0): Ø76.5 (71-83)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ: Ø84.4 (72-91)
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, Lite-On CA5-8D512: Ø62.4 (55-69)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001: Ø60.8 (55-68)
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 420.2 | 359.5 | 329.8 | 166.5 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 323.7 | 232 | 136.2 | 75.5 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 133 | 112 | 106 | 96 |
| Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 255.2 | 122.8 | 77.6 | 54.8 |
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) | 160.9 | 116.2 | 97.8 | 84.2 |
| Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) | 108 | 98.2 | 92.1 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) | 132.8 | 86.6 | 60.2 | 39.4 |
| Doom Eternal (2020) | 232.3 | 152 | 135.1 | 130.2 |
| Gears Tactics (2020) | 272.4 | 165.8 | 109.2 | 79 |
| F1 2020 (2020) | 258 | 163 | 145 | 104 |
| Death Stranding (2020) | 164.3 | 114.5 | 104.3 | 101.8 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 32 / 34 / 38 dB |
| Carga |
| 48 / 54 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 25 dB(A) | ||
| Aorus 15G XB i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | Alienware m15 R3 P87F i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -1% | 8% | 0% | 6% | -2% | 13% | |
| off / environment * | 25 | 26.5 -6% | 26.3 -5% | 30 -20% | 28.4 -14% | 31 -24% | 24 ? 4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 32 | 27.1 15% | 26.7 17% | 30 6% | 28.4 11% | 31 3% | 25.5 ? 20% |
| Idle Average * | 34 | 32.2 5% | 26.7 21% | 33 3% | 28.4 16% | 34 -0% | 27.3 ? 20% |
| Idle Maximum * | 38 | 34 11% | 30.7 19% | 36 5% | 31.7 17% | 37 3% | 30.4 ? 20% |
| Load Average * | 48 | 52.4 -9% | 40.2 16% | 50 -4% | 47.7 1% | 47 2% | 42.8 ? 11% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 50 | 57.5 -15% | 51 -2% | 48 4% | 47.5 5% | 50 -0% | |
| Load Maximum * | 54 | 57.5 -6% | 59.7 -11% | 50 7% | 49.5 8% | 54 -0% | 53.4 ? 1% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 63 °C / 145 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-0.1 °C / -0.2 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 63 °C / 145 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-0.1 °C / -0.2 F).
| Aorus 15G XB i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | Alienware m15 R3 P87F i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -5% | -33% | 2% | -8% | -16% | -3% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 44 | 46.2 -5% | 55.8 -27% | 44 -0% | 49.6 -13% | 60 -36% | 46.2 ? -5% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 63 | 55.2 12% | 62 2% | 50 21% | 50.2 20% | 66 -5% | 49.1 ? 22% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 27 | 31.4 -16% | 43.4 -61% | 29 -7% | 32.2 -19% | 30 -11% | 31.3 ? -16% |
| Idle Bottom * | 29 | 32.2 -11% | 42 -45% | 31 -7% | 34.6 -19% | 32 -10% | 32.3 ? -11% |
* ... smaller is better
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Aorus 15G XB audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.3 / 0.9 Watt |
| Ocioso | 16 / 20 / 30 Watt |
| Carga |
102 / 256 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Aorus 15G XB i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | Alienware m15 R3 P87F i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 2% | -69% | 18% | 11% | 22% | 6% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 16 | 8 50% | 34 -113% | 11 31% | 11.1 31% | 11 31% | 13.6 ? 15% |
| Idle Average * | 20 | 9.8 51% | 48.6 -143% | 15 25% | 13.7 31% | 15 25% | 19 ? 5% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30 | 25.8 14% | 58.2 -94% | 25 17% | 33.4 -11% | 21 30% | 26.8 ? 11% |
| Load Average * | 102 | 169 -66% | 129.4 -27% | 95 7% | 104.4 -2% | 94 8% | 106.3 ? -4% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 156 | 201 -29% | 214.5 -38% | 140 10% | 159.9 -3% | 143 8% | |
| Load Maximum * | 256 | 271.6 -6% | 257.3 -1% | 211 18% | 203.8 20% | 173 32% | 249 ? 3% |
* ... smaller is better
| Aorus 15G XB i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 94 Wh | Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, 66 Wh | Alienware m15 R3 P87F i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 86 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 84 Wh | Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 65 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 62 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -29% | -59% | -24% | -42% | -30% | -16% | |
| Reader / Idle | 579 | 486 -16% | 299 -48% | 495 -15% | 439 -24% | 565 ? -2% | |
| H.264 | 459 | 409 ? -11% | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 418 | 293 -30% | 167 -60% | 378 -10% | 241 -42% | 340 -19% | 375 ? -10% |
| Load | 147 | 88 -40% | 44 -70% | 78 -47% | 79 -46% | 85.6 ? -42% |
Pro
+ Tela mate IGZO
+ Painel de 240 Hz
+ Marcos finos da tela
+ Carcaça de metal de alta qualidade
+ Bom desempenho
+ SSD NVMe
+ Slot M.2 2280 disponível (NVMe e SATA)
+ Teclado mecânico
+ Iluminação RGB (individual para cada tecla)
+ Leitor de cartões de memória muito veloz
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Thunderbolt 3
Contra
- O brilho e contraste da tela são bastante baixos
- Sem G-Sync
- Quente e barulhento sob uso intenso
O mais recente lançamento da Gigabyte pode ser considerado um sucesso. A elegante carcaça de metal do Aorus 15G XB deixou uma impressão de alta qualidade tanto visual quanto tátil. Os marcos finos da tela contribuem enormemente para a atratividade do portátil.
A combinação de um processador Core i7-8550U octa-core e GPU GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q é perfeita. Ele roda todos os jogos de computador modernos sem problemas na tela Full HD, e as configurações de qualidade máxima sempre podem ser selecionadas aqui.
O Aorus 15G XB atende aos requisitos de um poderoso dispositivo para jogos moderno e deve satisfazer muitos jogadores.
O Core i7 chama a atenção com seu bom desempenho. Os resultados de benchmark alcançados estão entre os melhores que medimos com este processador até agora. No entanto, tudo isto tem um preço: Os ventiladores aumentam bastante sua atividade, e o portátil aquece consideravelmente em algumas partes.
O monitor IGZO de 240 Hz da Sharp ganha pontos com ângulos de visão estáveis, tempos de resposta rápidos, boa cobertura do espaço de cores e - graças a uma certificação X-Rite Pantone - uma reprodução de cores naturais. O brilho e o contraste, por outro lado, poderiam ser melhores.
O teclado mecânico (com iluminação RGB) é um recurso incomum no portátil. Em suma, causou boa impressão e será um importante critério de compra para muitos compradores em potencial. Aqueles que nunca usaram esse teclado antes, primeiro terão que se acostumar com esse tipo de experiência de digitação.
O espaço de armazenamento oferecido pelo rápido SSD NVMe de 512 GB será um pouco apertado para jogadores apaixonados. Um segundo SSD no formato M.2 2280 (NVMe ou SATA) pode ser instalado aqui, se necessário. O processo é bastante fácil de realizar, já que a tampa inferior do portátil pode ser removida sem problemas. Além disso, a duração da bateria é extremamente boa para um portátil de jogos. Isso é complementado por uma configuração de portas bem completa que inclui uma porta Thunderbolt 3 entre outras conexões.
Aorus 15G XB
- 08/11/2020 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Gaming - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
