Breve Análise do Análise do Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (2020): Melhorias de detalhes compensam
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85.9 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | 2.2 kg | 17.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
81.5 % v7 (old) | 04/2019 | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 15.75 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
85.8 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | 2.2 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
84.6 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | 2.4 kg | 23 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.8 % v7 (old) | 12/2019 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 22 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
|
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 347 cd/m²
Contraste: 1218:1 (Preto: 0.285 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.35 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.16
ΔE Greyscale 3.04 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
71.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.35
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX AU Optronics B156HAN08.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Samsung SDCA029, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -3% | -7% | 27% | -2% | -9% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 70.2 | 66.9 -5% | 65.6 -7% | 99.9 42% | 68 -3% | 64 -9% |
sRGB Coverage | 99 | 98.1 -1% | 92.2 -7% | 100 1% | 99 0% | 90.3 -9% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 71.4 | 68.5 -4% | 66.9 -6% | 98.2 38% | 69.8 -2% | 65.4 -8% |
Response Times | -65% | -12% | 72% | -95% | -47% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 6 ? | 12.8 ? -113% | 7 ? -17% | 2.2 ? 63% | 16.4 ? -173% | 9.6 ? -60% |
Response Time Black / White * | 9 ? | 10.4 ? -16% | 9.6 ? -7% | 1.8 ? 80% | 10.4 ? -16% | 12 ? -33% |
PWM Frequency | 23810 ? | 60 ? | 23580 ? | |||
Screen | 0% | -22% | 2% | 9% | -19% | |
Brightness middle | 347 | 293 -16% | 323.6 -7% | 385 11% | 291 -16% | 313 -10% |
Brightness | 328 | 270 -18% | 315 -4% | 390 19% | 278 -15% | 295 -10% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 87 -2% | 91 2% | 93 4% | 91 2% | 89 0% |
Black Level * | 0.285 | 0.29 -2% | 0.29 -2% | 0.25 12% | 0.3 -5% | |
Contrast | 1218 | 1010 -17% | 1116 -8% | 1164 -4% | 1043 -14% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.35 | 1.69 28% | 3.31 -41% | 2.46 -5% | 1.19 49% | 3.33 -42% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.15 | 3.37 19% | 5.74 -38% | 4.01 3% | 3.04 27% | 6.25 -51% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.16 | 1.24 -7% | 2.73 -135% | 2.6 -124% | 1.77 -53% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.04 | 2.3 24% | 2.9 5% | 1.39 54% | 1.9 37% | 3.1 -2% |
Gamma | 2.35 94% | 2.3 96% | 2.29 96% | 2.31 95% | 2.216 99% | 2.51 88% |
CCT | 6658 98% | 6758 96% | 6765 96% | 6395 102% | 7018 93% | 6930 94% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 65 | 63 -3% | 59.7 -8% | 98 51% | 70 8% | 59 -9% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99 | 98.5 -1% | 91.8 -7% | 100 1% | 92 -7% | 90 -9% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -23% /
-8% | -14% /
-18% | 34% /
17% | -29% /
-7% | -25% /
-20% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise | |
↘ 3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (190 - 220, n=37) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (Boost) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (Hoch) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1003 - 1833, n=38) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (Boost) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (Hoch) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4665 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4352 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 6340 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5093 pontos | |
Ajuda |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q |
* ... smaller is better
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001 | Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Lite-On CA5-8D512 | Average Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -13% | -41% | 0% | 6% | -18% | -1% | -2% | |
Write 4K | 135.7 | 137.2 1% | 93.9 -31% | 127.4 -6% | 158.2 17% | 108.7 -20% | 118.7 -13% | 139.7 ? 3% |
Read 4K | 46.98 | 46.82 0% | 46.29 -1% | 147.5 214% | 50.7 8% | 41.4 -12% | 52.4 12% | 49.9 ? 6% |
Write Seq | 2180 | 1221 -44% | 974 -55% | 485.9 -78% | 1790 -18% | 1083 -50% | 2247 3% | 2036 ? -7% |
Read Seq | 1949 | 1217 -38% | 1425 -27% | 1352 -31% | 2469 27% | 917 -53% | 2234 15% | 2014 ? 3% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 510 | 527 3% | 259.4 -49% | 476.5 -7% | 503 -1% | 468.5 -8% | 515 1% | 461 ? -10% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 569 | 614 8% | 296.5 -48% | 531 -7% | 579 2% | 530 -7% | 584 3% | 499 ? -12% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 2984 | 1986 -33% | 977 -67% | 1061 -64% | 3102 4% | 3057 2% | 2235 -25% | 2903 ? -3% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3238 | 3234 0% | 1666 -49% | 2552 -21% | 3413 5% | 3422 6% | 3171 -2% | 3479 ? 7% |
AS SSD | -4% | -37% | -37% | 21% | 14% | -24% | 5% | |
Seq Read | 1950 | 1832 -6% | 1239 -36% | 1200 -38% | 2979 53% | 2341 20% | 2021 4% | 2553 ? 31% |
Seq Write | 2322 | 1864 -20% | 920 -60% | 836 -64% | 2581 11% | 2575 11% | 2090 -10% | 2084 ? -10% |
4K Read | 45.48 | 52.1 15% | 45.74 1% | 65.8 45% | 47.33 4% | 51 12% | 47.71 5% | 53.1 ? 17% |
4K Write | 95.4 | 108.3 14% | 95.7 0% | 103.8 9% | 140 47% | 118.6 24% | 101.1 6% | 131.2 ? 38% |
4K-64 Read | 1484 | 1159 -22% | 322 -78% | 789 -47% | 1710 15% | 1637 10% | 856 -42% | 1477 ? 0% |
4K-64 Write | 1887 | 1807 -4% | 722 -62% | 929 -51% | 2188 16% | 2442 29% | 1041 -45% | 1805 ? -4% |
Access Time Read * | 0.051 | 0.05 2% | 0.073 -43% | 0.103 -102% | 0.05 2% | 0.066 -29% | 0.052 -2% | 0.04983 ? 2% |
Access Time Write * | 0.038 | 0.034 11% | 0.047 -24% | 0.045 -18% | 0.026 32% | 0.028 26% | 0.111 -192% | 0.04222 ? -11% |
Score Read | 1725 | 1394 -19% | 492 -71% | 975 -43% | 2055 19% | 1922 11% | 1105 -36% | 1786 ? 4% |
Score Write | 2215 | 2102 -5% | 910 -59% | 1117 -50% | 2586 17% | 2818 27% | 1351 -39% | 2144 ? -3% |
Score Total | 4843 | 4221 -13% | 1654 -66% | 2594 -46% | 5673 17% | 5738 18% | 3037 -37% | 4826 ? 0% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1903 | 2083 9% | 1236 -35% | 2474 30% | 2098 ? 10% | |||
Copy Program MB/s | 505 | 496.5 -2% | 703 39% | 679 34% | 500 ? -1% | |||
Copy Game MB/s | 1113 | 977 -12% | 812 -27% | 1037 -7% | 1132 ? 2% | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -9% /
-7% | -39% /
-39% | -19% /
-21% | 14% /
15% | -2% /
1% | -13% /
-15% | 2% /
3% |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 11 Performance | 20888 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 32880 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 17148 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 7683 pontos | |
Ajuda |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (GPU: Hoch) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (74.3 - 96, n=11) | |
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 |
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (170.2 - 181.1, n=4) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
Average of class Gaming (27 - 271, n=29, last 2 years) | |
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (89 - 106, n=10) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (GPU: Hoch) | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 |
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Average of class Gaming (34 - 218, n=103, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (91 - 110, n=4) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q |
Battlefield V - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (109.7 - 125, n=4) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q |
Red Dead Redemption 2 - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings | |
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (40.6 - 45, n=5) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q |
Doom Eternal - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS | |
Average of class Gaming (160.9 - 179, n=2, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (140 - 177.7, n=8) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 347.4 | 330.2 | 300.5 | 173 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 308.4 | 239.9 | 153.2 | 87.7 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 134.3 | 128.7 | 117.4 | 115 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 109 | 95.8 | 80.8 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 111 | 100 | 96 | 91 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 117 | 104 | 100 | 93 |
Battlefield V (2018) | 154.3 | 124.7 | 116.2 | 109.7 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 131 | 93.2 | 70.3 | 57.2 |
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 227.8 | 123.8 | 83.8 | 61 |
Control (2019) | 221.7 | 96.6 | 71 | |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 128.3 | 101.6 | 78.2 | 62.5 |
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) | 130 | 95 | 88 | 66 |
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) | 165.5 | 114.1 | 96.4 | 93.8 |
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) | 99.5 | 94.1 | 88.7 | |
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) | 113.3 | 96.5 | 62.7 | 40.6 |
Doom Eternal (2020) | 212.2 | 165.1 | 147.9 | 144.4 |
Gears Tactics (2020) | 188.8 | 171.6 | 122.2 | 82.9 |
F1 2020 (2020) | 219 | 174 | 150 | 115 |
Death Stranding (2020) | 139.8 | 118.7 | 108.6 | 104.5 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 30.1 / 30.1 / 30.1 dB |
Carga |
| 46.8 / 46 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.1 dB(A) |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 8% | -7% | -13% | -15% | -9% | -4% | 6% | |
off / environment * | 30.1 | 28.3 6% | 28.7 5% | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 31 -3% | 27.9 ? 7% | 24 ? 20% |
Idle Minimum * | 30.1 | 28.8 4% | 29.8 1% | 34 -13% | 30 -0% | 31 -3% | 29.7 ? 1% | 25.5 ? 15% |
Idle Average * | 30.1 | 28.8 4% | 32.4 -8% | 36 -20% | 35 -16% | 34 -13% | 30.8 ? -2% | 27.2 ? 10% |
Idle Maximum * | 30.1 | 29 4% | 38 -26% | 41 -36% | 44 -46% | 37 -23% | 35.4 ? -18% | 30.2 ? -0% |
Load Average * | 46.8 | 33.5 28% | 38.2 18% | 48 -3% | 53 -13% | 47 -0% | 47.2 ? -1% | 42.5 ? 9% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 48.4 | 45 7% | 56.6 -17% | 48 1% | 53 -10% | 50 -3% | ||
Load Maximum * | 46 | 45.2 2% | 56.6 -23% | 54 -17% | 55 -20% | 54 -17% | 49.6 ? -8% | 53.4 ? -16% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-12.3 °C / -22.2 F).
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 4% | 3% | 1% | -2% | -12% | 1% | 1% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 52 | 47 10% | 47 10% | 49 6% | 49 6% | 60 -15% | 47.9 ? 8% | 46.1 ? 11% |
Maximum Bottom * | 53 | 49.2 7% | 48.6 8% | 61 -15% | 52 2% | 66 -25% | 51.9 ? 2% | 49.2 ? 7% |
Idle Upper Side * | 29.3 | 28.6 2% | 28.8 2% | 27 8% | 30 -2% | 30 -2% | 30 ? -2% | 31.2 ? -6% |
Idle Bottom * | 30.2 | 31.4 -4% | 33.2 -10% | 29 4% | 34 -13% | 32 -6% | 31 ? -3% | 32.2 ? -7% |
* ... smaller is better
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.4 / 0.6 Watt |
Ocioso | 10.6 / 13.1 / 15.8 Watt |
Carga |
131 / 169 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -12% | -33% | -52% | -17% | -4% | -28% | -34% | |
Idle Minimum * | 10.6 | 12.5 -18% | 16.1 -52% | 18 -70% | 6 43% | 11 -4% | 12.9 ? -22% | 13.5 ? -27% |
Idle Average * | 13.1 | 15.3 -17% | 20.9 -60% | 21 -60% | 14 -7% | 15 -15% | 17.3 ? -32% | 18.9 ? -44% |
Idle Maximum * | 15.8 | 20.7 -31% | 27 -71% | 38 -141% | 25 -58% | 21 -33% | 26.9 ? -70% | 26.7 ? -69% |
Load Average * | 131 | 90.2 31% | 93.4 29% | 113 14% | 108 18% | 94 28% | 123.9 ? 5% | 106.6 ? 19% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 146 | 162 -11% | 168.2 -15% | 149 -2% | 195 -34% | 143 2% | ||
Load Maximum * | 169 | 209.3 -24% | 215.3 -27% | 256 -51% | 280 -66% | 173 -2% | 205 ? -21% | 249 ? -47% |
* ... smaller is better
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 80 Wh | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 50 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 94.2 Wh | MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, 99.99 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 62 Wh | Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 65 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 27% | -51% | 15% | -7% | -18% | -34% | -5% | |
Reader / Idle | 522 | 953 83% | 518 -1% | 454 -13% | 439 -16% | 565 ? 8% | ||
H.264 | 437 | 408 ? -7% | ||||||
WiFi v1.3 | 366 | 393 7% | 181 -51% | 364 -1% | 364 -1% | 340 -7% | 241 -34% | 376 ? 3% |
Load | 113 | 102 -10% | 166 47% | 106 -6% | 79 -30% | 85.3 ? -25% |
Pro
Contra
A Razer coloca muito poder de computação em uma carcaça de metal elegante e fina. Graças ao processador Core i7-8550U e à GPU GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, o portátil consegue lidar com todos os jogos mais recentes. Nenhum compromisso precisa ser feito em termos de configurações de qualidade. Se a GPU em algum ponto não atender mais aos seus requisitos, uma GPU externa pode ser conectada por meio da porta Thunderbolt 3.
Com o Blade 15 Advanced Model (2020), a Razer optou por realizar melhorias detalhadas que compensam.
O 2020 Blade 15 possui tecnologia USB 3.2 Gen 2 e todas as portas USB Tipo A funcionam de acordo com este padrão. Isso também se aplica à porta USB Type-C recém-adicionada (DisplayPort, Power Delivery). Este último substituiu o antigo Mini DisplayPort. Além disso, tanto a porta Thunderbolt 3 quanto a porta USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2 permitem que você carregue a bateria. Conseguimos acionar um processo de carregamento com um adaptador de energia de 45 watts em cada caso. Usar as duas portas para fornecer energia ao portátil não é possível, já que, no máximo, podem ser transferidos 100 watts de potência.
A tela mate Full HD IPS de 300 Hz também é uma das inovações em comparação com o Modelo predecessor. A tela ganha pontos com ângulos de visão estáveis, brilho suficiente, bom contraste, tempos de resposta rápidos e ótima reprodução de cores. A cobertura do espaço de cores também é agradável.
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
- 08/10/2020 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck