Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Análise do Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (2020): Melhorias de detalhes compensam
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (Blade 15 RTX Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-10875H 8 x 2.3 - 5.1 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1080 MHz, Memoría: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, interface de 256-bits, 27.21.14.5167 (Nvidia 451.67), Optimus
Memória
16 GB
, DDR4 3200, dual-channel, dois slots de memória (ambos ocupados)
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, Brilhante: não, 300 Hz
placa mãe
Intel HM470
Disco rígido
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, 1024 GB
, 883 GB livre
peso
2.2 kg
Preço
3300 Euro
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85.9 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | 2.2 kg | 17.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 81.5 % v7 (old) | 04/2019 | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 15.75 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 85.8 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | 2.2 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
| 84.6 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | 2.4 kg | 23 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 82.8 % v7 (old) | 12/2019 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 22 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1419 (1355-1443)
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1521 (1406-1631)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1386 (1331-1568)
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1622 (1486-1748)
24 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
25.4 ∆E
24.7 ∆E
25.2 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
18 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
27.9 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
25.6 ∆E
26.6 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
10 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
5 ∆E
20.9 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
21.2 ∆E
12 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
11 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
6 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics B156HAN12.0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 347 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 327.8 cd/m² Minimum: 16.8 cd/m²iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 347 cd/m²
Contraste: 1218:1 (Preto: 0.285 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.35 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 1.16
ΔE Greyscale 3.04 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
71.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.35
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX AU Optronics B156HAN08.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Samsung SDCA029, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -3% | -7% | 27% | -2% | -9% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 70.2 | 66.9 -5% | 65.6 -7% | 99.9 42% | 68 -3% | 64 -9% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99 | 98.1 -1% | 92.2 -7% | 100 1% | 99 0% | 90.3 -9% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 71.4 | 68.5 -4% | 66.9 -6% | 98.2 38% | 69.8 -2% | 65.4 -8% |
| Response Times | -65% | -12% | 72% | -95% | -47% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 6 ? | 12.8 ? -113% | 7 ? -17% | 2.2 ? 63% | 16.4 ? -173% | 9.6 ? -60% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 9 ? | 10.4 ? -16% | 9.6 ? -7% | 1.8 ? 80% | 10.4 ? -16% | 12 ? -33% |
| PWM Frequency | 23810 ? | 60 ? | 23580 ? | |||
| Screen | 0% | -22% | 2% | 9% | -19% | |
| Brightness middle | 347 | 293 -16% | 323.6 -7% | 385 11% | 291 -16% | 313 -10% |
| Brightness | 328 | 270 -18% | 315 -4% | 390 19% | 278 -15% | 295 -10% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 87 -2% | 91 2% | 93 4% | 91 2% | 89 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.285 | 0.29 -2% | 0.29 -2% | 0.25 12% | 0.3 -5% | |
| Contrast | 1218 | 1010 -17% | 1116 -8% | 1164 -4% | 1043 -14% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.35 | 1.69 28% | 3.31 -41% | 2.46 -5% | 1.19 49% | 3.33 -42% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.15 | 3.37 19% | 5.74 -38% | 4.01 3% | 3.04 27% | 6.25 -51% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.16 | 1.24 -7% | 2.73 -135% | 2.6 -124% | 1.77 -53% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.04 | 2.3 24% | 2.9 5% | 1.39 54% | 1.9 37% | 3.1 -2% |
| Gamma | 2.35 94% | 2.3 96% | 2.29 96% | 2.31 95% | 2.216 99% | 2.51 88% |
| CCT | 6658 98% | 6758 96% | 6765 96% | 6395 102% | 7018 93% | 6930 94% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 65 | 63 -3% | 59.7 -8% | 98 51% | 70 8% | 59 -9% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99 | 98.5 -1% | 91.8 -7% | 100 1% | 92 -7% | 90 -9% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -23% /
-8% | -14% /
-18% | 34% /
17% | -29% /
-7% | -25% /
-20% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1028 (1017.94-1187.05)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H; Hoch: Ø1211 (1197.82-1369.91)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H; Boost: Ø1343 (1326.08-1451.69)
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1072 (986.63-1110.9)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1573 (1544.4-1818.6)
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK, Intel Core i9-10980HK: Ø1610 (1581.15-1708.45)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1002 (974.71-1181)
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1069 (1047.18-1166.18)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1056 (1046.13-1175)
Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Cinebench R20 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=196, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
| MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10875H (190 - 220, n=37) | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (Boost) | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (Hoch) | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
| Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=199, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
| MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1003 - 1833, n=38) | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (Boost) | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (Hoch) | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
| Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4665 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4352 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 6340 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5093 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
| MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS | |
| Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3238 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
2984 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
569 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
510 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1949 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
2180 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
46.98 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
135.7 MB/s
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001 | Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Lite-On CA5-8D512 | Average Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -13% | -41% | 0% | 6% | -18% | -1% | -2% | |
| Write 4K | 135.7 | 137.2 1% | 93.9 -31% | 127.4 -6% | 158.2 17% | 108.7 -20% | 118.7 -13% | 139.7 ? 3% |
| Read 4K | 46.98 | 46.82 0% | 46.29 -1% | 147.5 214% | 50.7 8% | 41.4 -12% | 52.4 12% | 49.9 ? 6% |
| Write Seq | 2180 | 1221 -44% | 974 -55% | 485.9 -78% | 1790 -18% | 1083 -50% | 2247 3% | 2036 ? -7% |
| Read Seq | 1949 | 1217 -38% | 1425 -27% | 1352 -31% | 2469 27% | 917 -53% | 2234 15% | 2014 ? 3% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 510 | 527 3% | 259.4 -49% | 476.5 -7% | 503 -1% | 468.5 -8% | 515 1% | 461 ? -10% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 569 | 614 8% | 296.5 -48% | 531 -7% | 579 2% | 530 -7% | 584 3% | 499 ? -12% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 2984 | 1986 -33% | 977 -67% | 1061 -64% | 3102 4% | 3057 2% | 2235 -25% | 2903 ? -3% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3238 | 3234 0% | 1666 -49% | 2552 -21% | 3413 5% | 3422 6% | 3171 -2% | 3479 ? 7% |
| AS SSD | -4% | -37% | -37% | 21% | 14% | -24% | 5% | |
| Seq Read | 1950 | 1832 -6% | 1239 -36% | 1200 -38% | 2979 53% | 2341 20% | 2021 4% | 2553 ? 31% |
| Seq Write | 2322 | 1864 -20% | 920 -60% | 836 -64% | 2581 11% | 2575 11% | 2090 -10% | 2084 ? -10% |
| 4K Read | 45.48 | 52.1 15% | 45.74 1% | 65.8 45% | 47.33 4% | 51 12% | 47.71 5% | 53.1 ? 17% |
| 4K Write | 95.4 | 108.3 14% | 95.7 0% | 103.8 9% | 140 47% | 118.6 24% | 101.1 6% | 131.2 ? 38% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1484 | 1159 -22% | 322 -78% | 789 -47% | 1710 15% | 1637 10% | 856 -42% | 1477 ? 0% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1887 | 1807 -4% | 722 -62% | 929 -51% | 2188 16% | 2442 29% | 1041 -45% | 1805 ? -4% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.051 | 0.05 2% | 0.073 -43% | 0.103 -102% | 0.05 2% | 0.066 -29% | 0.052 -2% | 0.04983 ? 2% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.038 | 0.034 11% | 0.047 -24% | 0.045 -18% | 0.026 32% | 0.028 26% | 0.111 -192% | 0.04222 ? -11% |
| Score Read | 1725 | 1394 -19% | 492 -71% | 975 -43% | 2055 19% | 1922 11% | 1105 -36% | 1786 ? 4% |
| Score Write | 2215 | 2102 -5% | 910 -59% | 1117 -50% | 2586 17% | 2818 27% | 1351 -39% | 2144 ? -3% |
| Score Total | 4843 | 4221 -13% | 1654 -66% | 2594 -46% | 5673 17% | 5738 18% | 3037 -37% | 4826 ? 0% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1903 | 2083 9% | 1236 -35% | 2474 30% | 2098 ? 10% | |||
| Copy Program MB/s | 505 | 496.5 -2% | 703 39% | 679 34% | 500 ? -1% | |||
| Copy Game MB/s | 1113 | 977 -12% | 812 -27% | 1037 -7% | 1132 ? 2% | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -9% /
-7% | -39% /
-39% | -19% /
-21% | 14% /
15% | -2% /
1% | -13% /
-15% | 2% /
3% |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
No graph data
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 20888 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 32880 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 17148 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 7683 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
The Witcher 3 | BioShock Infinite | Shadow of the Tomb Raider | Far Cry 5 | Battlefield V | Borderlands 3 | Control | Red Dead Redemption 2 | Doom Eternal
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (GPU: Hoch) | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (74.3 - 96, n=11) | |
| MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
| Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 | |
| BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (170.2 - 181.1, n=4) | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (27 - 271, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (89 - 106, n=10) | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (GPU: Hoch) | |
| Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
| Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (34 - 218, n=103, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (91 - 110, n=4) | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
| Battlefield V - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (109.7 - 125, n=4) | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings | |
| MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (40.6 - 45, n=5) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
| Doom Eternal - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS | |
| Average of class Gaming (160.9 - 179, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (140 - 177.7, n=8) | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR: Ø74.8 (63-82)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H; GPU: Hoch: Ø85.2 (76-91)
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8: Ø72.3 (68-77)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H): Ø80.3 (75-84)
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00: Ø84.5 (79-90)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001: Ø60.8 (55-68)
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, Lite-On CA5-8D512: Ø62.4 (55-69)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ: Ø72.8 (68-80)
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 347.4 | 330.2 | 300.5 | 173 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 308.4 | 239.9 | 153.2 | 87.7 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 134.3 | 128.7 | 117.4 | 115 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 109 | 95.8 | 80.8 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 111 | 100 | 96 | 91 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 117 | 104 | 100 | 93 |
| Battlefield V (2018) | 154.3 | 124.7 | 116.2 | 109.7 |
| Metro Exodus (2019) | 131 | 93.2 | 70.3 | 57.2 |
| Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 227.8 | 123.8 | 83.8 | 61 |
| Control (2019) | 221.7 | 96.6 | 71 | |
| Borderlands 3 (2019) | 128.3 | 101.6 | 78.2 | 62.5 |
| Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) | 130 | 95 | 88 | 66 |
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) | 165.5 | 114.1 | 96.4 | 93.8 |
| Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) | 99.5 | 94.1 | 88.7 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) | 113.3 | 96.5 | 62.7 | 40.6 |
| Doom Eternal (2020) | 212.2 | 165.1 | 147.9 | 144.4 |
| Gears Tactics (2020) | 188.8 | 171.6 | 122.2 | 82.9 |
| F1 2020 (2020) | 219 | 174 | 150 | 115 |
| Death Stranding (2020) | 139.8 | 118.7 | 108.6 | 104.5 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.1 / 30.1 / 30.1 dB |
| Carga |
| 46.8 / 46 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.1 dB(A) | ||
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 8% | -7% | -13% | -15% | -9% | -4% | 6% | |
| off / environment * | 30.1 | 28.3 6% | 28.7 5% | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 31 -3% | 27.9 ? 7% | 24 ? 20% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.1 | 28.8 4% | 29.8 1% | 34 -13% | 30 -0% | 31 -3% | 29.7 ? 1% | 25.5 ? 15% |
| Idle Average * | 30.1 | 28.8 4% | 32.4 -8% | 36 -20% | 35 -16% | 34 -13% | 30.8 ? -2% | 27.2 ? 10% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.1 | 29 4% | 38 -26% | 41 -36% | 44 -46% | 37 -23% | 35.4 ? -18% | 30.2 ? -0% |
| Load Average * | 46.8 | 33.5 28% | 38.2 18% | 48 -3% | 53 -13% | 47 -0% | 47.2 ? -1% | 42.4 ? 9% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 48.4 | 45 7% | 56.6 -17% | 48 1% | 53 -10% | 50 -3% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 46 | 45.2 2% | 56.6 -23% | 54 -17% | 55 -20% | 54 -17% | 49.6 ? -8% | 53.4 ? -16% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-12.3 °C / -22.2 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-12.3 °C / -22.2 F).
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 4% | 3% | 1% | -2% | -12% | 1% | 1% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 52 | 47 10% | 47 10% | 49 6% | 49 6% | 60 -15% | 47.9 ? 8% | 46.2 ? 11% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 53 | 49.2 7% | 48.6 8% | 61 -15% | 52 2% | 66 -25% | 51.9 ? 2% | 49.2 ? 7% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 29.3 | 28.6 2% | 28.8 2% | 27 8% | 30 -2% | 30 -2% | 30 ? -2% | 31.2 ? -6% |
| Idle Bottom * | 30.2 | 31.4 -4% | 33.2 -10% | 29 4% | 34 -13% | 32 -6% | 31 ? -3% | 32.2 ? -7% |
* ... smaller is better
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.4 / 0.6 Watt |
| Ocioso | 10.6 / 13.1 / 15.8 Watt |
| Carga |
131 / 169 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -12% | -33% | -52% | -17% | -4% | -28% | -35% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 10.6 | 12.5 -18% | 16.1 -52% | 18 -70% | 6 43% | 11 -4% | 12.9 ? -22% | 13.6 ? -28% |
| Idle Average * | 13.1 | 15.3 -17% | 20.9 -60% | 21 -60% | 14 -7% | 15 -15% | 17.3 ? -32% | 19 ? -45% |
| Idle Maximum * | 15.8 | 20.7 -31% | 27 -71% | 38 -141% | 25 -58% | 21 -33% | 26.9 ? -70% | 26.8 ? -70% |
| Load Average * | 131 | 90.2 31% | 93.4 29% | 113 14% | 108 18% | 94 28% | 123.9 ? 5% | 106.9 ? 18% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 146 | 162 -11% | 168.2 -15% | 149 -2% | 195 -34% | 143 2% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 169 | 209.3 -24% | 215.3 -27% | 256 -51% | 280 -66% | 173 -2% | 205 ? -21% | 251 ? -49% |
* ... smaller is better
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 80 Wh | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 50 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 94.2 Wh | MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, 99.99 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 62 Wh | Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 65 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 27% | -51% | 15% | -7% | -18% | -34% | -6% | |
| Reader / Idle | 522 | 953 83% | 518 -1% | 454 -13% | 439 -16% | 565 ? 8% | ||
| H.264 | 437 | 408 ? -7% | ||||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 366 | 393 7% | 181 -51% | 364 -1% | 364 -1% | 340 -7% | 241 -34% | 375 ? 2% |
| Load | 113 | 102 -10% | 166 47% | 106 -6% | 79 -30% | 85.3 ? -25% |
Pro
+ Tela Full HD mate
+ Painel de 300 Hz
+ Tempos de resposta breves
+ Boa cobertura de espaço de cores
+ Carcaça de metal estável
+ Até 64 GB de memória
+ SSD NVMe
+ Retro iluminação RGB do teclado
+ Wi-Fi 6
+ Excelentes velocidades de transferência WLAN
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Leitor de cartões de memória muito veloz
+ USB 3.2 Gen 2
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ A bateria pode ser carregada via Thunderbolt 3
Contra
- Sem espaço para dispositivos de armazenamento adicionais
- O teclado precisa melhorar
A Razer coloca muito poder de computação em uma carcaça de metal elegante e fina. Graças ao processador Core i7-8550U e à GPU GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, o portátil consegue lidar com todos os jogos mais recentes. Nenhum compromisso precisa ser feito em termos de configurações de qualidade. Se a GPU em algum ponto não atender mais aos seus requisitos, uma GPU externa pode ser conectada por meio da porta Thunderbolt 3.
Com o Blade 15 Advanced Model (2020), a Razer optou por realizar melhorias detalhadas que compensam.
O 2020 Blade 15 possui tecnologia USB 3.2 Gen 2 e todas as portas USB Tipo A funcionam de acordo com este padrão. Isso também se aplica à porta USB Type-C recém-adicionada (DisplayPort, Power Delivery). Este último substituiu o antigo Mini DisplayPort. Além disso, tanto a porta Thunderbolt 3 quanto a porta USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2 permitem que você carregue a bateria. Conseguimos acionar um processo de carregamento com um adaptador de energia de 45 watts em cada caso. Usar as duas portas para fornecer energia ao portátil não é possível, já que, no máximo, podem ser transferidos 100 watts de potência.
A tela mate Full HD IPS de 300 Hz também é uma das inovações em comparação com o Modelo predecessor. A tela ganha pontos com ângulos de visão estáveis, brilho suficiente, bom contraste, tempos de resposta rápidos e ótima reprodução de cores. A cobertura do espaço de cores também é agradável.
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
-
08/10/2020 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Gaming - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
