Breve Análise do Acer TravelMate X3410 (i7-8550U, 16 GB RAM, SSD de 512 GB)
Acer TravelMate X3410-M-866T (TravelMate X Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-8550U 4 x 1.8 - 4 GHz, Kaby Lake Refresh
Placa gráfica
Intel UHD Graphics 620 - 1024 MB VRAM, Análises do: 400 MHz, Memoría: 665 MHz, Intel UHD Graphics 620 24.20.100.6287
Memória
16 GB
, DDR4-2666 / PC4-21300, 1333.3 MHz, 1x16 GB, 2 slots DIMM
Pantalha
14.00 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, Chi Mei CMN14D4, IPS, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Micron SSD 1100 SED 512GB, M.2 (MTFDDAV512TBN), 512 GB
, 480 GB livre
peso
1.692 kg, Suprimento de energia: 315 g
Preço
1300 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Latitude 7490 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L50010US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=33, last 2 years) | |
| Acer TravelMate X3410-M-866T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 7490 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L50010US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=30, last 2 years) | |
| Acer TravelMate X3410-M-866T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chi Mei CMN14D4 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 253.5 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 229.6 cd/m² Minimum: 20.43 cd/m²iluminação: 77 %
iluminação com acumulador: 253.1 cd/m²
Contraste: 844:1 (Preto: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.71 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 3.44
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
62% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.99% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.59% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.997
| Acer TravelMate X3410-M-866T Chi Mei CMN14D4, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L50010US B140HAK01.0, TFT-LCD, 14", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 LP140QH2-SPB1, IPS LED, 14", 2560x1440 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS5DU00 LP140QH2-SPB1, IPS, 14", 2560x1440 | Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109 Toshiba TOS508F, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Toshiba Tecra X40-D Toshiba TOS508F, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Dell Latitude 7490 AUO503D (D04YD_B140HAN), IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA IVO M140NVF7 R0, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -13% | 65% | 69% | 54% | -3% | 58% | 44% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 41.59 | 36.31 -13% | 71.4 72% | 72.7 75% | 67.2 62% | 40.55 -3% | 66.6 60% | 61 47% |
| sRGB Coverage | 62.4 | 54.5 -13% | 96.6 55% | 97.9 57% | 90.8 46% | 61 -2% | 96.8 55% | 87.7 41% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 42.99 | 37.51 -13% | 72.1 68% | 74.6 74% | 66.5 55% | 41.89 -3% | 67.9 58% | 62.1 44% |
| Response Times | 8% | 16% | 16% | -14% | 4% | 3% | -14% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40.4 ? | 39.2 ? 3% | 36 ? 11% | 38 ? 6% | 42 ? -4% | 38 ? 6% | 41.6 ? -3% | 33 ? 18% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 35.2 ? | 30.8 ? 12% | 28 ? 20% | 26 ? 26% | 37 ? -5% | 26.8 ? 24% | 32 ? 9% | 26 ? 26% |
| PWM Frequency | 25000 ? | 17000 ? -32% | 20410 ? -18% | 3125 ? -87% | ||||
| Screen | -11% | 29% | 15% | 13% | -3% | 20% | 47% | |
| Brightness middle | 253.1 | 276.7 9% | 311 23% | 316 25% | 350 38% | 283.9 12% | 308.6 22% | 655 159% |
| Brightness | 230 | 272 18% | 302 31% | 311 35% | 343 49% | 261 13% | 294 28% | 630 174% |
| Brightness Distribution | 77 | 90 17% | 91 18% | 84 9% | 73 -5% | 85 10% | 89 16% | 93 21% |
| Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.21 30% | 0.36 -20% | 0.35 -17% | 0.29 3% | 0.25 17% | 0.23 23% | 0.56 -87% |
| Contrast | 844 | 1318 56% | 864 2% | 903 7% | 1207 43% | 1136 35% | 1342 59% | 1170 39% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.71 | 7.22 -53% | 3 36% | 4.5 4% | 6.36 -35% | 6.4 -36% | 6.07 -29% | 3.27 31% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 20.72 | 25.87 -25% | 6.1 71% | 10.3 50% | 11.63 44% | 18.7 10% | 10.58 49% | 5.92 71% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.44 | 5.01 -46% | 1.7 51% | 1.6 53% | 1.7 51% | 1.67 51% | 3.22 6% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.4 | 6.7 -97% | 4 -18% | 7.7 -126% | 8.04 -136% | 6.3 -85% | 7.3 -115% | 2.85 16% |
| Gamma | 1.997 110% | 2.321 95% | 2.17 101% | 2.2 100% | 2.47 89% | 2.39 92% | 2.061 107% | 2.45 90% |
| CCT | 6266 104% | 6656 98% | 6961 93% | 6639 98% | 7716 84% | 6511 100% | 7269 89% | 6065 107% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 40 | 34 -15% | 66.7 67% | 68.6 72% | 59 48% | 38 -5% | 62 55% | 57 43% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 62 | 54 -13% | 96.7 56% | 97.9 58% | 91 47% | 60 -3% | 97 56% | 88 42% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -5% /
-9% | 37% /
34% | 33% /
26% | 18% /
16% | -1% /
-2% | 27% /
25% | 26% /
36% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 40.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 60 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 25000 Hz | ≤ 21 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 25000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 21 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 25000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA; CPU Single 64Bit: Ø480 (455.19-630.99)
Acer TravelMate X3410-M-866T UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Micron SSD 1100 SED 512GB, M.2 (MTFDDAV512TBN); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø473 (376.73-498.27)
Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L50010US UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø564 (558.47-604.06)
Toshiba Tecra X40-D HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø344 (340.59-346.79)
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Average of class Office (194.4 - 2103, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (258 - 435, n=11) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ICH | |
| MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Average of class Office (4252 - 4830, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L50010US | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS5DU00 | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| Dell Latitude 7490 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3024 - 4197, n=33) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 | |
| Acer TravelMate X3410-M-866T | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 | |
| Dell Latitude 7490 | |
| Acer TravelMate X3410-M-866T | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3518 - 5154, n=27) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS5DU00 | |
| Average of class Office (2900 - 5526, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3386 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4893 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3460 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Acer TravelMate X3410-M-866T Micron SSD 1100 SED 512GB, M.2 (MTFDDAV512TBN) | Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L50010US Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS5DU00 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Toshiba Tecra X40-D Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Dell Latitude 7490 Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G | HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA Toshiba KXG50ZNV1T02 | Average Micron SSD 1100 SED 512GB, M.2 (MTFDDAV512TBN) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 225% | 229% | 153% | 255% | 184% | -12% | 124% | -11% | |
| Seq Read | 464.9 | 1420 205% | 2440 425% | 2399 416% | 2276 390% | 2479 433% | 486.2 5% | 2300 395% | 467 ? 0% |
| Seq Write | 465.2 | 1341 188% | 1382 197% | 1343 189% | 2331 401% | 1117 140% | 294.9 -37% | 856 84% | 436 ? -6% |
| 4K Read | 22.96 | 50.5 120% | 49.81 117% | 46.21 101% | 51.4 124% | 51.6 125% | 26.66 16% | 26.75 17% | 22.8 ? -1% |
| 4K Write | 89.1 | 107.4 21% | 114.4 28% | 109.4 23% | 128.6 44% | 124.8 40% | 79.2 -11% | 90 1% | 73.7 ? -17% |
| 4K-64 Read | 350.5 | 1447 313% | 1329 279% | 664 89% | 1561 345% | 1663 374% | 316.1 -10% | 813 132% | 314 ? -10% |
| 4K-64 Write | 313.3 | 1704 444% | 1456 365% | 1020 226% | 1273 306% | 438.4 40% | 248.1 -21% | 908 190% | 254 ? -19% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.045 | 0.045 | 0.056 | 0.044 | 0.061 | 0.112 | 0.059 | 0.071 ? | |
| Access Time Write * | 0.047 | 0.035 26% | 0.033 30% | 0.033 30% | 0.03 36% | 0.028 40% | 0.056 -19% | 0.055 -17% | 0.056 ? -19% |
| Score Read | 420 | 1639 290% | 1623 286% | 950 126% | 1840 338% | 1963 367% | 391 -7% | 1070 155% | 384 ? -9% |
| Score Write | 449 | 1945 333% | 1708 280% | 1264 182% | 1635 264% | 675 50% | 357 -20% | 1084 141% | 371 ? -17% |
| Score Total | 1090 | 4425 306% | 4115 278% | 2659 144% | 4424 306% | 3576 228% | 947 -13% | 2630 141% | 956 ? -12% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1412 | 1688 | 263 ? | ||||||
| Copy Program MB/s | 387.5 | 326.2 | 174.4 ? | ||||||
| Copy Game MB/s | 1110 | 905 | 222 ? | ||||||
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 94% | 232% | 171% | 209% | 189% | -18% | 138% | -8% | |
| Write 4K | 113.3 | 123.2 9% | 144.2 27% | 98.6 -13% | 137.6 21% | 195.1 72% | 79.4 -30% | 96.1 -15% | 95.5 ? -16% |
| Read 4K | 28.65 | 44.43 55% | 45.55 59% | 39.75 39% | 47.05 64% | 48.5 69% | 27.37 -4% | 31.12 9% | 27.1 ? -5% |
| Write Seq | 428.7 | 845 97% | 1803 321% | 1757 310% | 2372 453% | 1226 186% | 343.9 -20% | 919 114% | 422 ? -2% |
| Read Seq | 435.2 | 865 99% | 2335 437% | 1169 169% | 1568 260% | 1763 305% | 472.7 9% | 2089 380% | 448 ? 3% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 274.6 | 287.3 5% | 701 155% | 333.8 22% | 204.5 -26% | 547 99% | 206 -25% | 425.6 55% | 239 ? -13% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 326.5 | 360.9 11% | 442.4 35% | 268 -18% | 350.8 7% | 633 94% | 188.3 -42% | 275.3 -16% | 284 ? -13% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 505 | 1718 240% | 1917 280% | 2069 310% | 2395 374% | 1226 143% | 343.3 -32% | 958 90% | 469 ? -7% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 530 | 1779 236% | 3399 541% | 3426 546% | 3286 520% | 3421 545% | 533 1% | 3118 488% | 479 ? -10% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 160% /
167% | 231% /
230% | 162% /
161% | 232% /
235% | 187% /
186% | -15% /
-14% | 131% /
130% | -10% /
-10% |
* ... smaller is better
Micron SSD 1100 SED 512GB, M.2 (MTFDDAV512TBN)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
530 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
505 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
326.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
274.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
435.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
428.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
28.65 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
113.3 MB/s
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Office (7982 - 58068, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng | |
| HP EliteBook 735 G5 3UN62EA | |
| Dell Latitude 15 3590-K8JP | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6205 - 16400, n=225) | |
| Acer TravelMate X3410-M-866T | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE | |
| Average of class Office (1089 - 9375, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE | |
| Dell Latitude 15 3590-K8JP | |
| HP EliteBook 735 G5 3UN62EA | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (557 - 2608, n=213) | |
| Acer TravelMate X3410-M-866T | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1702 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 7673 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1012 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 46 | 32 | 26 | 16 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.2 / 28.2 / 28.2 dB |
| Carga |
| 33.2 / 35.6 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A) | ||
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.8 °C / 82 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-0.1 °C / -0.1 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.8 °C / 82 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-0.1 °C / -0.1 F).
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Acer TravelMate X3410-M-866T audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (64.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.41 / 0.72 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.5 / 6.3 / 7 Watt |
| Carga |
28.7 / 67.7 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer TravelMate X3410-M-866T i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Micron SSD 1100 SED 512GB, M.2 (MTFDDAV512TBN), IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L50010US i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, TFT-LCD, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 2560x1440, 14" | Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Toshiba Tecra X40-D i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 7490 i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KXG50ZNV1T02, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -13% | -29% | -25% | 9% | 22% | -10% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.5 | 3.8 16% | 3.4 24% | 4.7 -4% | 5.2 -16% | 2 56% | 3.8 16% |
| Idle Average * | 6.3 | 7.7 -22% | 7.5 -19% | 9.4 -49% | 6.9 -10% | 4.7 25% | 8.3 -32% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7 | 9.3 -33% | 10.8 -54% | 16 -129% | 7 -0% | 5.7 19% | 10.7 -53% |
| Load Average * | 28.7 | 45.7 -59% | 55.4 -93% | 26.4 8% | 24.6 14% | 38.4 -34% | 35.5 -24% |
| Load Maximum * | 67.7 | 46.1 32% | 70.3 -4% | 34 50% | 30.1 56% | 38.9 43% | 37 45% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 34 |
* ... smaller is better
| Acer TravelMate X3410-M-866T i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L50010US i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 24 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS5DU00 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Wh | Toshiba Tecra X40-D i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Dell Latitude 7490 i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -29% | -16% | -13% | -11% | -25% | -11% | -28% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1248 | 1366 9% | 876 -30% | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 617 | 437 -29% | 530 -14% | 537 -13% | 551 -11% | 357 -42% | 548 -11% | 444 -28% |
| Load | 131 | 76 -42% | 126 -4% |
Pro
+ Sólida qualidade de construção
+ Flexão mínima
+ Touchpad confortável
+ Boa seleção de portas
+ Suporte legado via VGA
+ Excelente duração da bateria
+ Fácil manutenção
Contra
- Tela medíocre
- Lento leitor de cartões SD
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
- Teclado raso
- Afogamento pesado do desempenho
O Acer TravelMate X3410 é um bom exemplo de compromisso. Com um preço de $1.300, o TravelMate X3410 oferece um chassi portátil e bem construído, uma boa quantidade de armazenamento (512 GB) e desempenho adequado para o trabalho de escritório. Dito isto, o dispositivo fica aquém em quase todas as categorias quando comparado com os seus rivais, particularmente o ThinkPad T480s da Lenovo, Latitude 7490 da Dell, e o HP EliteBook 840 G1 da HP.
O teclado do TravelMate é responsivo, mas se sente barato, a tela é fraca e granulada, e o desempenho é fortemente limitado com poucos motivos. A duração da bateria é excelente, mas alguns rivais (como o ThinkPad T480) oferecem várias configurações de bateria para tempos de duração mais longos.
Tudo dito, o TravelMate X3410 é um portátil de negócios "bom o suficiente". Aqueles com um orçamento apertado que querem uma máquina de escritório fina e leve e não se importam em comprometer alguns recursos importantes podem querer olhar para o Acer TravelMate X3410, mas a maioria dos usuários deve pagar algumas centenas de dólares a mais para obter uma máquina melhor.
Acer TravelMate X3410-M-866T
- 01/28/2019 v6 (old)
Sam Medley
Office - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
