Breve Análise do Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52: O muito versátil portátil para jogos oferece uma duração de bateria decente
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
80.6 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.2 kg | 24.9 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
82.9 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 R7 4800H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | 2.6 kg | 26 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
83.2 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.8 kg | 30 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
81.6 % v7 (old) | 07/2019 | HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | 2.8 kg | 25 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
82.3 % v7 (old) | Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | 2.8 kg | 26.3 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=324) | |
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl | |
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887 | |
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=324) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS | |
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH | |
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887 | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl | |
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 |
|
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 263 cd/m²
Contraste: 560:1 (Preto: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.07 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 4.9
ΔE Greyscale 2.55 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
59% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.77% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.47% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.37
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887 IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 2% | 72% | 56% | 57% | 57% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 39.47 | 40.55 3% | 69 75% | 62.8 59% | 63.3 60% | 62.7 59% |
sRGB Coverage | 58.9 | 59.7 1% | 98.3 67% | 89.8 52% | 90.2 53% | 92.5 57% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.77 | 41.89 3% | 70.7 73% | 64.2 57% | 64.3 58% | 63.5 56% |
Response Times | 31% | 50% | 53% | 18% | -3% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 35 ? | 22.4 ? 36% | 18 ? 49% | 16.8 ? 52% | 31.6 ? 10% | 37 ? -6% |
Response Time Black / White * | 26 ? | 19.2 ? 26% | 12.8 ? 51% | 12 ? 54% | 19.6 ? 25% | 26 ? -0% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | 15% | 44% | 27% | 28% | 25% | |
Brightness middle | 263 | 264.8 1% | 286 9% | 274 4% | 299.6 14% | 407 55% |
Brightness | 246 | 253 3% | 282 15% | 273 11% | 285 16% | 364 48% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 90 6% | 87 2% | 95 12% | 86 1% | 84 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.47 | 0.31 34% | 0.19 60% | 0.26 45% | 0.33 30% | 0.3 36% |
Contrast | 560 | 854 53% | 1505 169% | 1054 88% | 908 62% | 1357 142% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.07 | 4.73 7% | 3.57 30% | 4.62 9% | 3.68 27% | 4.55 10% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 20.5 | 18.89 8% | 7.5 63% | 7.66 63% | 8.05 61% | 12.44 39% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.9 | 4.64 5% | 1.31 73% | 1.93 61% | 3.15 36% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.55 | 1.4 45% | 4.51 -77% | 5.3 -108% | 3.8 -49% | 7.61 -198% |
Gamma | 2.37 93% | 2.16 102% | 2.36 93% | 2.34 94% | 2.12 104% | 2.51 88% |
CCT | 6446 101% | 6641 98% | 7411 88% | 7619 85% | 7240 90% | 7212 90% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37 | 38.4 4% | 64 73% | 58 57% | 58.1 57% | 59 59% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59 | 59.3 1% | 98 66% | 90 53% | 89.8 52% | 92 56% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 16% /
15% | 55% /
50% | 45% /
36% | 34% /
32% | 26% /
27% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise | |
↘ 12 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
35 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise | |
↘ 18 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS | |
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (431 - 504, n=43) | |
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887 | |
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH | |
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (1749 - 3325, n=43) | |
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G | |
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887 | |
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (43.1 - 99.2, n=43) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS | |
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 199, n=182, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3836 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4075 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5552 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5201 pontos | |
Ajuda |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS |
* ... smaller is better
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00 | Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB | HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887 WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Average WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 10% | -27% | 22% | 16% | -21% | 16% | |
Write 4K | 140 | 189.7 36% | 105.1 -25% | 117.5 -16% | 135.3 -3% | 104.6 -25% | 182.7 ? 31% |
Read 4K | 49.04 | 62.3 27% | 34.41 -30% | 46.47 -5% | 63.7 30% | 39.76 -19% | 48.6 ? -1% |
Write Seq | 1963 | 1681 -14% | 1298 -34% | 1345 -31% | 1337 -32% | 1268 -35% | 1979 ? 1% |
Read Seq | 1455 | 1608 11% | 1099 -24% | 2804 93% | 1617 11% | 1414 -3% | 1828 ? 26% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 398.2 | 468.6 18% | 335.7 -16% | 368.2 -8% | 568 43% | 287.9 -28% | 498 ? 25% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 461.9 | 541 17% | 231.4 -50% | 412.9 -11% | 645 40% | 381.1 -17% | 573 ? 24% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1969 | 1770 -10% | 1454 -26% | 3248 65% | 1428 -27% | 1319 -33% | 1980 ? 1% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 1927 | 1898 -2% | 1740 -10% | 3559 85% | 3184 65% | 1735 -10% | 2336 ? 21% |
Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 38509 pontos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 18057 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 117009 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 31601 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 14191 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 5759 pontos | |
Ajuda |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (50.6 - 74, n=40) | |
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G | |
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRH | |
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887 | |
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl |
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRH | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (119 - 156, n=17) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS | |
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH | |
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887 | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
Average of class Gaming (27 - 271, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRH | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (54 - 86, n=22) | |
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 327.4 | 285.5 | 263.5 | 138.4 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 277 | 188.3 | 108.9 | 63 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 146.1 | 133.9 | 123.8 | 116.8 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 98.3 | 84.1 | 75.8 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 114 | 89 | 82 | 73 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 142.4 | 75.9 | 56.6 | 44.5 |
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 229.6 | 107.4 | 66.9 | 46.3 |
Control (2019) | 201.9 | 74.9 | 54.6 | |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 133 | 86.9 | 62.2 | 47.7 |
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) | 133.5 | 90.2 | 74.3 | 65.5 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) | 116.9 | 76.1 | 50.7 | 32.5 |
Escape from Tarkov (2020) | 121 | 121 | 117.5 | 103.3 |
Hunt Showdown (2020) | 170.6 | 94.2 | 75 | |
Doom Eternal (2020) | 195.6 | 125.4 | 112.4 | 108.9 |
Gears Tactics (2020) | 236.1 | 145.6 | 93.3 | 60.7 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 30.2 / 30.2 / 30.2 dB |
Carga |
| 41.5 / 44.6 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.2 dB(A) |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 R7 4800H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887 i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -5% | -14% | -7% | 7% | -3% | -3% | 4% | |
off / environment * | 30.2 | 28.7 5% | 30 1% | 30 1% | 28.2 7% | 30 1% | 27.9 ? 8% | 24 ? 21% |
Idle Minimum * | 30.2 | 28.7 5% | 30 1% | 30 1% | 30.1 -0% | 30.2 -0% | 29 ? 4% | 25.5 ? 16% |
Idle Average * | 30.2 | 30.5 -1% | 32 -6% | 32 -6% | 30.1 -0% | 30.2 -0% | 30 ? 1% | 27.2 ? 10% |
Idle Maximum * | 30.2 | 32.5 -8% | 39 -29% | 34 -13% | 30.1 -0% | 31 -3% | 33 ? -9% | 30.3 ? -0% |
Load Average * | 41.5 | 42.5 -2% | 51 -23% | 44 -6% | 34.2 18% | 43.4 -5% | 44 ? -6% | 42.7 ? -3% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 44.5 | 50.1 -13% | 54 -21% | 50 -12% | 34.2 23% | 48.5 -9% | ||
Load Maximum * | 44.6 | 53.4 -20% | 54 -21% | 52 -17% | 43.8 2% | 45.5 -2% | 51.6 ? -16% | 53.4 ? -20% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50.6 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.8 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.1 °C / 79 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+2.8 °C / 5 F).
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 R7 4800H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRH i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887 i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -4% | -4% | -3% | -11% | -5% | -7% | -4% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 50.6 | 47.6 6% | 47 7% | 43 15% | 42.6 16% | 51.7 -2% | 47.2 ? 7% | 46.1 ? 9% |
Maximum Bottom * | 53.8 | 50.8 6% | 48 11% | 46 14% | 49 9% | 55.4 -3% | 52.7 ? 2% | 49 ? 9% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26.6 | 33 -24% | 30 -13% | 31 -17% | 34 -28% | 29.1 -9% | 31 ? -17% | 31.3 ? -18% |
Idle Bottom * | 27.8 | 29 -4% | 34 -22% | 34 -22% | 39.4 -42% | 29 -4% | 32.9 ? -18% | 32.3 ? -16% |
* ... smaller is better
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.2 / 0.3 Watt |
Ocioso | 5.4 / 9.8 / 10.9 Watt |
Carga |
104 / 193 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 R7 4800H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887 i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -15% | -60% | -89% | 5% | 10% | -61% | -85% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.4 | 7.4 -37% | 11 -104% | 19 -252% | 5.4 -0% | 3.9 28% | 11.5 ? -113% | 13.6 ? -152% |
Idle Average * | 9.8 | 10.5 -7% | 18 -84% | 22 -124% | 9.2 6% | 8.9 9% | 16.5 ? -68% | 19 ? -94% |
Idle Maximum * | 10.9 | 17 -56% | 28 -157% | 30 -175% | 13 -19% | 12.2 -12% | 23.7 ? -117% | 26.8 ? -146% |
Load Average * | 104 | 103.7 -0% | 99 5% | 79 24% | 85.9 17% | 83 20% | 107.5 ? -3% | 106.3 ? -2% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 134.3 | 128.1 5% | 146 -9% | 134 -0% | 107.9 20% | 130 3% | ||
Load Maximum * | 193 | 183.2 5% | 210 -9% | 201 -4% | 182.2 6% | 168 13% | 199.7 ? -3% | 249 ? -29% |
* ... smaller is better
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 57.48 Wh | Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 R7 4800H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 90 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 57 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 62 Wh | HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 52.5 Wh | Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887 i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 57 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 25% | -49% | -42% | -20% | -4% | -14% | |
Reader / Idle | 661 | 543 -18% | 311 -53% | 313 -53% | 695 5% | 806 22% | 567 ? -14% |
H.264 | 439 | 202 -54% | 380 -13% | 413 ? -6% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 396 | 512 29% | 220 -44% | 244 -38% | 339 -14% | 369 -7% | 376 ? -5% |
Load | 120 | 196 63% | 68 -43% | 79 -34% | 59 -51% | 101 -16% | 85.7 ? -29% |
Pro
Contra
O portátil para jogos de 17,3 polegadas da Acer é capaz de rodar todos os jogos mais recentes sem problemas na tela Full HD mate, graças ao processador Core i7-8550U e a GPU GeForce GTX 2060. Geralmente, você pode jogar na resolução Full HD e nas configurações de qualidade alta a máxima aqui.
O Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52 é um portátil de jogos bastante versátil que merece uma tela melhor.
Espaço suficiente para jogos e outros aplicativos é fornecido pelo SSD NVMe de 1 TB. Se o espaço de armazenamento acabar, poderá ser expandido. O portátil também pode acomodar um segundo SSD M.2 2280 NVMe e um dispositivo de armazenamento de 2,5 polegadas. Como o computador não possui uma escotilha de manutenção, a carcaça precisaria ser aberta para isso.
Em suma, a tela IPS de 120 Hz não é capaz de convencer. O brilho, o contraste e a cobertura do espaço de cores são muito baixos. Os tempos de resposta podem ser descritos apenas como médios. Um portátil de 1.500 euros (~US$ 1.697) precisa oferecer mais aqui. Os ângulos de visão estáveis, superfície mate e reprodução de cores decente falam pela tela.
O portátil vem com as portas mais necessárias. Você procurará em vão por uma porta Thunderbolt 3. Existe apenas uma porta USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2, que não suporta o DisplayPort via função USB-C. O teclado integrado (com Iluminação RGB) provou ser adequado para o uso diário. Além disso, a duração da bateria é mais do que aceitável para um portátil de jogos de 17,3 polegadas.
Atualmente, o portátil custa pouco menos de 1.500 Euros (~$1,697). Como resultado, ele realmente não se representa como uma barganha. No entanto, oferece uma boa relação preço-desempenho.
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
- 06/18/2020 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck