Breve Análise do 2-em-1 Teclast Tbook 16 Power (x7-Z8750, 8 GB)

Name: Teclast Tbook 16 Power
Brand: Teclast

Magnésio. Com o seu raro Atom x7-Z8750, 8 GB de RAM, e sua capacidade de dual-boot Android 6 / Windows 10, o Teclast Tbook 16 Power se destaca entre a multidão. Submetendo-o ao nosso extenso curso de testes, encontramos vários problemas ao longo do caminho.

Klaus Hinum, 👁 Klaus Hinum, ✓ Tanja Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 06/02/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Convertible / 2-in-1 Windows Tablet Touchscreen Laptop / Notebook Chinese Tech

Test device courtesy of Gearbest

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Teclast Tbook 16 Power (Tbook Serie)

Processador

Intel Atom x7-Z8750 4 x 1.6 - 2.6 GHz, Cherry Trail

Placa gráfica

Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell)

Memória

8 GB

, LPDDR3, single channel?, 8-10-11-23

Pantalha

11.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 190 PPI, multitouch, native pen support, IPS, não laminada, Brilhante: sim, detachable screen

placa mãe

Intel Cherry Trail

Disco rígido

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, 18.2 GB livre

Placa de Som

Intel SST Audio Device

Conexões

2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: headset, Card Reader: MicroSD, Sensores: Kionix KXCJ9 3-axis accelerometer SPB

Funcionamento em rede

Realtek RTL8723BS (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 10 x 303 x 179.5

Bateria

8500 mAh Lítio-Polímero, 3.8 / 8500mAh polymer lithium-ion battery , Duração da bateria (de acordo com o fabricante): 7 h

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Primary Camera: 5 MPix
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: estéreo, fanless

Released

11/16/2016

peso

897 g

Preço

287 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

The display is not laminated, and there is a gap between the glass and the panel

After a few hours, everything went back to normal

Size Comparison

Cube i9 CDK07 Docking Keyboard Teclast Tbook 16 Power Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Cube i7 Book CDK09 Microsoft Surface 3 DIN A4 ❌

Left to right: MicroSD (behind flap), mini-HDMI, Power, USB-C (3.0), USB-A (3.0), audio jack

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2013-10	78 MB/s +11%
Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ	78 MB/s +11%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power	70 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 256GB	68 MB/s -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100	65.9 MB/s -6%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1	64 MB/s -9%
Asus Zenbook UX3410UA	32.9 MB/s -53%
Chuwi Vi8 Plus (CWI519)	29 MB/s -59%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller (Klaus I211)	593 MBit/s +978%
Microsoft Surface Book with Performance Base Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller	588 MBit/s +969%
Cube i7 Book CDK09 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (Klaus I211)	219 MBit/s +298%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power Realtek RTL8723BS	55 MBit/s
Chuwi Hi10 Pro 802.11 b/g/n	41.6 MBit/s -24%
iperf3 receive AX12
Microsoft Surface Book with Performance Base Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller	501 MBit/s +702%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller (Klaus I211)	459 MBit/s +634%
Cube i7 Book CDK09 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (Klaus I211)	357 MBit/s +471%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power Realtek RTL8723BS	62.5 MBit/s
Chuwi Hi10 Pro 802.11 b/g/n	40.6 MBit/s -35%


193 cd/m²	210 cd/m²	196 cd/m²
222 cd/m²	244 cd/m²	208 cd/m²
230 cd/m²	229 cd/m²	206 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 244 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 215.3 cd/m² Minimum: 12.7 cd/m²
iluminação: 79 %
iluminação com acumulador: 244 cd/m²
Contraste: 642:1 (Preto: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 7.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.15

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Teclast Tbook 16 Power 1920x1080, 11.6"	Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 Samsung 123YL01-001 ID: SDC3853, , 2736x1824, 12.3"	Cube i9 KDC0000, , 1920x1200, 12.2"	Chuwi Hi12 SEC3542, , 2160x1440, 12"
Display		3%	-3%	1%
Display P3 Coverage	66.1	66.9 1%	65.7 -1%	66 0%
sRGB Coverage	93.2	97.5 5%	88.7 -5%	95.3 2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	67.4	68.6 2%	65.1 -3%	68.1 1%
Response Times		-17%	-23%	39%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	40 ?(20, 20)	48.4 ?(20.4, 28) -21%	37.2 ?(16.4, 20.8) 7%	28 ?(11.6, 16.4) 30%
Response Time Black / White *	30.2 ?(16.8, 13.4)	35.6 ?(8, 27.6) -18%	24 ?(9.2, 14.8) 21%	16 ?(5.2, 10.8) 47%
PWM Frequency	12000 ?(26, 60)	10420 -13%	200 ?(99, 255) -98%
Screen		53%	16%	17%
Brightness middle	244	436.7 79%	263 8%	293 20%
Brightness	215	433 101%	263 22%	277 29%
Brightness Distribution	79	87 10%	77 -3%	89 13%
Black Level *	0.38	0.326 14%	0.28 26%	0.256 33%
Contrast	642	1340 109%	939 46%	1145 78%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.7	1.82 73%	4.1 39%	5.2 22%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	11.7		12.1 -3%	11.4 3%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7.4	1.44 81%	3.8 49%	8.5 -15%
Gamma	2.15 ^102%	2.1 ^105%	2.25 ^98%	2.21 ^100%
CCT	8867 ^73%	6560 ^99%	6433 ^101%	7048 ^92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	60.6	62.3 3%	57.7 -5%	62 2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	93	97.5 5%	76.2 -18%	82.5 -11%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		13% / 29%	-3% / 5%	19% / 17%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
30.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16.8 ms rise
30.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20 ms rise
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

12000 Hz

≤ 26 % brightness setting

≤ 60 cd/m² brightness

The display backlight flickers at 12000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 26 % (60 cd/m²) and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 12000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

As the flickering occurs only on very low brightness settings, it should not be an issue in typical office settings. Nonetheless, use in low light conditions may be straining to the eyes.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Cube i7 Book CDK09 Intel Core m3-6Y30	89 Points +129%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	88 Points +126%
Cube i9 Intel Core m3-6Y30	73 Points +88%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q Intel Pentium N3710	42 Points +8%
Chiligreen Mobilitas SF2600 Intel Pentium N3710	41 Points +5%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 Intel Pentium N3710	41 Points +5%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV Intel Pentium N3710	39 Points 0%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power Intel Atom x7-Z8750	38.9 Points
Microsoft Surface 3 Intel Atom x7-Z8700	38 Points -2%
Chuwi Hi12 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	31 Points -20%
VOYO VBook V3 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	28 Points -28%
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602 Intel Celeron N2910	27 Points -31%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Cube i7 Book CDK09 Intel Core m3-6Y30	211 Points +59%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	206 Points +55%
Cube i9 Intel Core m3-6Y30	192 Points +44%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 Intel Pentium N3710	152 Points +14%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q Intel Pentium N3710	150 Points +13%
Chiligreen Mobilitas SF2600 Intel Pentium N3710	141 Points +6%
Microsoft Surface 3 Intel Atom x7-Z8700	134 Points +1%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power Intel Atom x7-Z8750	133 (112.75^min - 133^max) Points
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV Intel Pentium N3710	105 Points -21%
Teclast Tbook 10s Intel Atom x5-Z8350	101 Points -24%
Chuwi Hi12 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	99 Points -26%
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602 Intel Celeron N2910	97 Points -27%
VOYO VBook V3 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	94 Points -29%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro Intel Atom x5-Z8300	85 Points -36%

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit

1.75 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit

0.48 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit

8.8 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

38.9 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

133 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

10.3 fps

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

220 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

78 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

612 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

208 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Cube i7 Book CDK09 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, FORESEE 64GB O1229B	2976 Points +99%
Cube i9 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, FORESEE 128GB O1229B	2628 Points +75%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	2426 Points +62%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2114 Points +41%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710, Liteonit CV3-8D256	1999 Points +33%
Chiligreen Mobilitas SF2600 HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710	1792 Points +20%
Microsoft Surface 3 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1677 Points +12%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710, Toshiba MQ01ABF050	1651 Points +10%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Z8750, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1499 Points
VOYO VBook V3 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1352 Points -10%
Acer Switch One 10 SW1-011-14UQ HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1315 Points -12%
Medion Akoya E2215T HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1282 Points -14%
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1088 Points -27%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		1499 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		1732 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		1006 pontos
Ajuda

Performance Rating | CrystalDiskMark 3.0

Performance Rating - Percent
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	94.4 pt
Cube i9 FORESEE 128GB O1229B	68.2 pt
Cube i7 Book CDK09 FORESEE 64GB O1229B	65.7 pt
Microsoft Surface 3 128 GB eMMC Flash	22.9 pt
Teclast Tbook 16 Power 64 GB eMMC Flash	12.1 pt
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602 64 GB eMMC Flash	11.3 pt

CrystalDiskMark 3.0
Read Seq
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	663 MB/s +786%
Cube i7 Book CDK09 FORESEE 64GB O1229B	433.2 MB/s +479%
Cube i9 FORESEE 128GB O1229B	337 MB/s +351%
Microsoft Surface 3 128 GB eMMC Flash	149.3 MB/s +100%
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602 64 GB eMMC Flash	86.4 MB/s +16%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power 64 GB eMMC Flash	74.8 MB/s
Write Seq
Cube i9 FORESEE 128GB O1229B	208 MB/s +646%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	158.2 MB/s +467%
Cube i7 Book CDK09 FORESEE 64GB O1229B	157 MB/s +463%
Microsoft Surface 3 128 GB eMMC Flash	47.99 MB/s +72%
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602 64 GB eMMC Flash	40.52 MB/s +45%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power 64 GB eMMC Flash	27.9 MB/s
Read 512
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	313.1 MB/s +328%
Cube i7 Book CDK09 FORESEE 64GB O1229B	252.4 MB/s +245%
Cube i9 FORESEE 128GB O1229B	197 MB/s +169%
Microsoft Surface 3 128 GB eMMC Flash	133.7 MB/s +83%
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602 64 GB eMMC Flash	78.1 MB/s +7%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power 64 GB eMMC Flash	73.2 MB/s
Write 512
Cube i9 FORESEE 128GB O1229B	199 MB/s +648%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	158.2 MB/s +495%
Cube i7 Book CDK09 FORESEE 64GB O1229B	130.7 MB/s +391%
Microsoft Surface 3 128 GB eMMC Flash	39.9 MB/s +50%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power 64 GB eMMC Flash	26.61 MB/s
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602 64 GB eMMC Flash	9.096 MB/s -66%
Read 4k
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	30.14 MB/s +279%
Cube i9 FORESEE 128GB O1229B	18.4 MB/s +131%
Cube i7 Book CDK09 FORESEE 64GB O1229B	14.72 MB/s +85%
Microsoft Surface 3 128 GB eMMC Flash	12.64 MB/s +59%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power 64 GB eMMC Flash	7.96 MB/s
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602 64 GB eMMC Flash	6.615 MB/s -17%
Write 4k
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	68 MB/s +3423%
Cube i9 FORESEE 128GB O1229B	56.8 MB/s +2843%
Cube i7 Book CDK09 FORESEE 64GB O1229B	51.3 MB/s +2558%
Microsoft Surface 3 128 GB eMMC Flash	9.52 MB/s +393%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power 64 GB eMMC Flash	1.93 MB/s
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602 64 GB eMMC Flash	1.504 MB/s -22%
Read 4k QD32
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	243.7 MB/s +2126%
Cube i7 Book CDK09 FORESEE 64GB O1229B	121.3 MB/s +1008%
Microsoft Surface 3 128 GB eMMC Flash	27.94 MB/s +155%
Cube i9 FORESEE 128GB O1229B	22.7 MB/s +107%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power 64 GB eMMC Flash	10.95 MB/s
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602 64 GB eMMC Flash	7.358 MB/s -33%
Write 4k QD32
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	149.2 MB/s +7143%
Cube i9 FORESEE 128GB O1229B	116 MB/s +5531%
Cube i7 Book CDK09 FORESEE 64GB O1229B	96.2 MB/s +4570%
Microsoft Surface 3 128 GB eMMC Flash	11.2 MB/s +444%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power 64 GB eMMC Flash	2.06 MB/s
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602 64 GB eMMC Flash	1.775 MB/s -14%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

64 GB eMMC Flash

Sequential Read: 74.8 MB/s

Sequential Write: 27.9 MB/s

512K Read: 73.2 MB/s

512K Write: 26.61 MB/s

4K Read: 7.96 MB/s

4K Write: 1.93 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 10.95 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 2.06 MB/s

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire ES1-731G-P5UR NVIDIA GeForce 910M, Intel Pentium N3700	1413 Points +246%
Cube i9 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	899 Points +120%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710	496 Points +22%
Chiligreen Mobilitas SF2600 Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710	489 Points +20%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710	473 Points +16%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710	463 Points +13%
Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Intel Atom x5-Z8550	418 Points +2%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Atom x7-Z8750	408 Points
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Intel Celeron N3060	382 Points -6%
Acer Switch One 10 SW1-011-14UQ Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8300	298 Points -27%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Aspire ES1-731G-P5UR NVIDIA GeForce 910M, Intel Pentium N3700	6636 Points +276%
Cube i9 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	5602 Points +217%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710	2831 Points +60%
Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Intel Atom x5-Z8550	2455 Points +39%
Chiligreen Mobilitas SF2600 Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710	2329 Points +32%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Intel Celeron N3060	1907 Points +8%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710	1897 Points +7%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Atom x7-Z8750	1767 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Aspire ES1-731G-P5UR NVIDIA GeForce 910M, Intel Pentium N3700	1022 Points
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710	278 Points
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710	231 Points

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 06 Standard Score		2274 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance		451 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		1743 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

Dota 2 Reborn | World of Warships | Farming Simulator 17

Dota 2 Reborn - 1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
Cube i9 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	48 (42.2^min) fps +117%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710	35.2 fps +59%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Atom x7-Z8750	22.1 (19^min) fps
Chuwi Hi12 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8300	20 (18^min) fps -10%

World of Warships - 1366x768 Low Preset AF:Trilinear
Cube i9 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	32 (13^min - 48^max) fps +113%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710	21.8 fps +45%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Atom x7-Z8750	15 (4^min - 25^max) fps
Chuwi Hi12 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8300	13.9 (7^min - 19^max) fps -7%

Farming Simulator 17 - 1280x720 Low Preset
Cube i9 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	48 (42^min - 60^max) fps +173%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710	31.3 fps +78%
Chuwi Hi12 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8300	22.6 (21^min - 27^max) fps +28%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Atom x7-Z8750	17.6 (16^min - 23^max) fps

	baixo	média	alto
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	22.1	13.7
World of Warships (2015)	15
Farming Simulator 17 (2016)	17.6
Rocket League (2017)	18.7
Team Fortress 2 (2017)	19.6
Battle Bay (2018)			37
World of Tanks Blitz (2018)	37		24
Arena of Valor (2018)	25
Shadow Fight 3 (2018)	30
PUBG Mobile (2018)	0 game wont start (Hangs after a few minutes)
League of Legends (2019)	23.6	18	13.9
Hearthstone (2020)	17.8	18	9.91

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


41 °C	32 °C	27 °C
43 °C	32 °C	27 °C
41 °C	33 °C	30 °C

Máximo: 43 °C
Médio: 34 °C


28 °C	32 °C	35 °C
29 °C	33 °C	40 °C
29 °C	33 °C	38 °C

Máximo: 40 °C
Médio: 33 °C

Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41 °C / 105.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-12.9 °C / -23.2 F).

Teclast Tbook 16 Power audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 13.2% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (26.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.2% higher than median
(-) | highs are not linear (22.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (56.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 100% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.215 / 2.2 Watt
Ocioso	2.6 / 2.7 / 2.7 Watt
Carga	12.7 / 13.1 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Teclast Tbook 16 Power Z8750, HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 11.6"	Chuwi Hi12 Z8300, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Hynix HCG8E 64 GB, IPS, 2160x1440, 12"	Cube i7 Book CDK09 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, FORESEE 64GB O1229B, IPS, 1920x1080, 10.6"	Cube i9 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, FORESEE 128GB O1229B, IPS, 1920x1200, 12.2"	Microsoft Surface 3 Z8700, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 128 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1280, 10.8"	Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 N3710, HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), 128 GB eMMC Flash, TN LED, 1366x768, 14"
Power Consumption		21%	-180%	-132%	-70%	-100%
Idle Minimum *	2.6	1.7 35%	6.6 -154%	4.6 -77%	2.5 4%	4.1 -58%
Idle Average *	2.7	1.7 37%	10 -270%	9.6 -256%	7 -159%	8.3 -207%
Idle Maximum *	2.7	3.3 -22%	12 -344%	9.6 -256%	8.4 -211%	8.6 -219%
Load Average *	12.7	7.9 38%	21.1 -66%	18.6 -46%	11.2 12%	13.5 -6%
Load Maximum *	13.1	10.8 18%	22 -68%	16.3 -24%	12.4 5%	14.5 -11%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

WiFi Websurfing		6h 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		7h 06min

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 N3710, HD Graphics 405 (Braswell)	661 min +76%
Acer Switch One 10 SW1-011-14UQ Z8300, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)	533 min +42%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 6Y30, HD Graphics 515	488 min +30%
Chuwi Vi10 Ultimate 64GB Z8300, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)	435 min +16%
Chuwi Hi12 Z8300, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)	405 min +8%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power Z8750, HD Graphics 405 (Braswell)	376 min
Chuwi Hi10 Pro Z8300, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)	364 min -3%
Cube i7 Book CDK09 6Y30, HD Graphics 515	300 min -20%
Cube i9 6Y30, HD Graphics 515	262 min -30%
Teclast Tbook 10s Z8350, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)	228 min -39%

Pro

+ Alta qualidade

+ Resfriamento silencioso

+ USB-C energizado e DisplayPort

Contra

- Problemas acessando dispositivos USB(-C) externos

- Alto consumo de energia em modo inativo

- Sem carregador incluído

- Lento armazenamento eMMC

- Touchpad estreito

TBook 16 Power, affordable 2-in-1 convertible with some drawbacks

O maior atributo de venda do Teclast Tbook 16 Power é o seu veloz microprocessador Atom x7. Embora tenha superado o Atom x5 concorrente, também foi muito mais lento do que seus concorrentes Core m3 e Pentium N3710. Especialmente em jogos, o Intel HD Graphics 405 foi uma grande decepção.

Outro grande ponto de venda é o sistema operacional pré-instalado do Android 6. Durante o curto período de tempo que pudemos usá-lo, ele se desempenhou muito bem e parecia rápido e suave. Infelizmente, a opção de dual-boot (inicialização dupla) desapareceu depois de fazer uma atualização do Windows, por isso não foi possível testá-lo mais.

Em geral, sofremos com um conjunto de problemas grandes e menores, como a nossa unidade de teste. Uma manhã, a tela se recusou a mostrar nada além de ruído branco e o dispositivo teve que ser reiniciado. Por algum motivo, depois as bordas permaneceram mais brilhantes do que o resto da tela por algumas horas. O carregador faltante também causou algumas dores de cabeça importantes - nem o carregador USB-C da Apple nem o da Inateck nem o Anker funcionaram bem e consistentemente com o aparelho. Às vezes, ele recusava-se a carregar completamente; às vezes, ele mudava de idéia a cada segundo; e, às vezes, perdia conexão depois que a bateria estava completamente carregada.

As portas USB integradas não funcionaram como o esperado, e não conseguimos usar um SSD externo SSDs, como o G-Drive, o Angelbird, ou o OCZ. Outros dispositivos, como um disco rígido externo ou o SanDisk Extreme 900, funcionaram perfeitamente. Nosso palpite é que as portas USB não são suficientemente potentes. O modo standby também foi um problema com este aparelho. Além do alto consumo de bateria no modo standby, o tablet às vezes simplesmente permaneceu ativo com a tela desligada e algum processo de fundo causando uma alta carga da CPU, drenando a bateria completamente em pouco tempo. Não conseguimos determinar a causa disto; nosso melhor palpite é que é um controlador defeituoso ou com bugs, do aparelho.

Além de todos esses problemas, o tablet também possui algumas desvantagens visíveis no design: câmeras, alto-falantes e touchpad. Além disso, o aparelho ainda não está disponível para compra na Europa devido à falta de certificação CE, e atualmente só pode ser importado da China. Portanto, a garantia e suporte dependem totalmente do revendedor, e vem com altas taxas e custos de envio.

No entanto, também há alguns aspectos positivos: Apesar de ser inadequado para o seu uso em exteriores, a tela não era muito pobre. A rigidez da carcaça é excelente e oferece um toque e uma sensação muito agradáveis. Gostamos da completa ausência de ruído do sistema (sem ventoinha, sem ruído de bobina) e o leitor de cartões MicroSD foi comparativamente rápido.

Recebemos nossa unidade de teste da Gearbest, diretamente da China, onde atualmente é vendido por volta dos $310. O dock de teclado são $35 extras e é, apesar de suas desvantagens, definitivamente recomendável.

Teclast Tbook 16 Power - 05/15/2017 v6 ^(old)
Klaus Hinum

Acabamento

82 / 98 → 84%

Teclado

72%

Mouse

83%

Conectividade

40 / 80 → 50%

Peso

77 / 35-78 → 97%

Bateria

89%

Pantalha

78%

Desempenho do jogos

35 / 68 → 52%

Desempenho da aplicação

41 / 87 → 47%

Temperatura

90%

Ruído

100%

Audio

38 / 91 → 41%

Camera

26 / 85 → 31%

Impressão

-1%

Médio

61%

79%

Convertible - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Finn D Boerne - Translator - 450 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do 2-em-1 Teclast Tbook 16 Power (x7-Z8750, 8 GB)

Klaus Hinum, 2017-06- 2 (Update: 2017-06- 9)