Breve Análise do 2-em-1 Teclast Tbook 16 Power (x7-Z8750, 8 GB)
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2013-10 | |
| Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ | |
| Teclast Tbook 16 Power | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 256GB | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100 | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3410UA | |
| Chuwi Vi8 Plus (CWI519) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB (Klaus I211) | |
| Microsoft Surface Book with Performance Base | |
| Cube i7 Book CDK09 (Klaus I211) | |
| Teclast Tbook 16 Power | |
| Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Microsoft Surface Book with Performance Base | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB (Klaus I211) | |
| Cube i7 Book CDK09 (Klaus I211) | |
| Teclast Tbook 16 Power | |
| Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 79 %
iluminação com acumulador: 244 cd/m²
Contraste: 642:1 (Preto: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 7.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.15
| Teclast Tbook 16 Power 1920x1080, 11.6" | Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 Samsung 123YL01-001 ID: SDC3853, , 2736x1824, 12.3" | Cube i9 KDC0000, , 1920x1200, 12.2" | Chuwi Hi12 SEC3542, , 2160x1440, 12" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 3% | -3% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.1 | 66.9 1% | 65.7 -1% | 66 0% |
| sRGB Coverage | 93.2 | 97.5 5% | 88.7 -5% | 95.3 2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.4 | 68.6 2% | 65.1 -3% | 68.1 1% |
| Response Times | -17% | -23% | 39% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40 ? | 48.4 ? -21% | 37.2 ? 7% | 28 ? 30% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 30.2 ? | 35.6 ? -18% | 24 ? 21% | 16 ? 47% |
| PWM Frequency | 12000 ? | 10420 -13% | 200 ? -98% | |
| Screen | 53% | 16% | 17% | |
| Brightness middle | 244 | 436.7 79% | 263 8% | 293 20% |
| Brightness | 215 | 433 101% | 263 22% | 277 29% |
| Brightness Distribution | 79 | 87 10% | 77 -3% | 89 13% |
| Black Level * | 0.38 | 0.326 14% | 0.28 26% | 0.256 33% |
| Contrast | 642 | 1340 109% | 939 46% | 1145 78% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.7 | 1.82 73% | 4.1 39% | 5.2 22% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.7 | 12.1 -3% | 11.4 3% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.4 | 1.44 81% | 3.8 49% | 8.5 -15% |
| Gamma | 2.15 102% | 2.1 105% | 2.25 98% | 2.21 100% |
| CCT | 8867 73% | 6560 99% | 6433 101% | 7048 92% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60.6 | 62.3 3% | 57.7 -5% | 62 2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 93 | 97.5 5% | 76.2 -18% | 82.5 -11% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 13% /
29% | -3% /
5% | 19% /
17% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.8 ms rise | |
| ↘ 13.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms rise | |
| ↘ 20 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 12000 Hz | ≤ 26 % brightness setting |
| ≤ 60 cd/m² brightness | ||
The display backlight flickers at 12000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 26 % (60 cd/m²) and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 12000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. As the flickering occurs only on very low brightness settings, it should not be an issue in typical office settings. Nonetheless, use in low light conditions may be straining to the eyes. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | ||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Cube i7 Book CDK09 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Cube i9 | |
| Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q | |
| Chiligreen Mobilitas SF2600 | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 | |
| HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV | |
| Teclast Tbook 16 Power | |
| Microsoft Surface 3 | |
| Chuwi Hi12 | |
| VOYO VBook V3 | |
| Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Cube i7 Book CDK09 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Cube i9 | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 | |
| Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q | |
| Chiligreen Mobilitas SF2600 | |
| Microsoft Surface 3 | |
| Teclast Tbook 16 Power | |
| HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV | |
| Teclast Tbook 10s | |
| Chuwi Hi12 | |
| Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602 | |
| VOYO VBook V3 | |
| Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
| PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Cube i7 Book CDK09 | |
| Cube i9 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 | |
| Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q | |
| Chiligreen Mobilitas SF2600 | |
| Microsoft Surface 3 | |
| HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV | |
| Teclast Tbook 16 Power | |
| VOYO VBook V3 | |
| Acer Switch One 10 SW1-011-14UQ | |
| Medion Akoya E2215T | |
| Teclast Tbook 10s | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 1499 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 1732 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 1006 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Cube i9 | |
| Cube i7 Book CDK09 | |
| Microsoft Surface 3 | |
| Teclast Tbook 16 Power | |
| Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602 | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Acer Aspire ES1-731G-P5UR | |
| Cube i9 | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 | |
| Chiligreen Mobilitas SF2600 | |
| Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q | |
| HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE | |
| Teclast Tbook 16 Power | |
| HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT | |
| Acer Switch One 10 SW1-011-14UQ | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Acer Aspire ES1-731G-P5UR | |
| Cube i9 | |
| Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE | |
| Chiligreen Mobilitas SF2600 | |
| HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT | |
| HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV | |
| Teclast Tbook 16 Power | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Acer Aspire ES1-731G-P5UR | |
| Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q | |
| HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 2274 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 451 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 1743 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1280x720 min (0/3) fastest | |
| Cube i9 | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 | |
| Teclast Tbook 16 Power | |
| Chuwi Hi12 | |
| World of Warships - 1366x768 Low Preset AF:Trilinear | |
| Cube i9 | |
| Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q | |
| Teclast Tbook 16 Power | |
| Chuwi Hi12 | |
| Farming Simulator 17 - 1280x720 Low Preset | |
| Cube i9 | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 | |
| Chuwi Hi12 | |
| Teclast Tbook 16 Power | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 22.1 | 13.7 | ||
| World of Warships (2015) | 15 | |||
| Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 17.6 | |||
| Rocket League (2017) | 18.7 | |||
| Team Fortress 2 (2017) | 19.6 | |||
| Battle Bay (2018) | 37 | |||
| World of Tanks Blitz (2018) | 37 | 24 | ||
| Arena of Valor (2018) | 25 | |||
| Shadow Fight 3 (2018) | 30 | |||
| PUBG Mobile (2018) | 0 game wont start (Hangs after a few minutes) | |||
| League of Legends (2019) | 23.6 | 18 | 13.9 | |
| Hearthstone (2020) | 17.8 | 18 | 9.91 |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41 °C / 105.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-13 °C / -23.4 F).
Teclast Tbook 16 Power audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 13.2% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (26.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.2% higher than median
(-) | highs are not linear (22.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (56.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 100% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.215 / 2.2 Watt |
| Ocioso |  2.6 / 2.7 / 2.7 Watt |
| Carga |
12.7 / 13.1 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Teclast Tbook 16 Power Z8750, HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 11.6" | Chuwi Hi12 Z8300, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Hynix HCG8E 64 GB, IPS, 2160x1440, 12" | Cube i7 Book CDK09 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, FORESEE 64GB O1229B, IPS, 1920x1080, 10.6" | Cube i9 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, FORESEE 128GB O1229B, IPS, 1920x1200, 12.2" | Microsoft Surface 3 Z8700, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 128 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1280, 10.8" | Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 N3710, HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), 128 GB eMMC Flash, TN LED, 1366x768, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 21% | -180% | -132% | -70% | -100% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.6 | 1.7 35% | 6.6 -154% | 4.6 -77% | 2.5 4% | 4.1 -58% |
| Idle Average * | 2.7 | 1.7 37% | 10 -270% | 9.6 -256% | 7 -159% | 8.3 -207% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.7 | 3.3 -22% | 12 -344% | 9.6 -256% | 8.4 -211% | 8.6 -219% |
| Load Average * | 12.7 | 7.9 38% | 21.1 -66% | 18.6 -46% | 11.2 12% | 13.5 -6% |
| Load Maximum * | 13.1 | 10.8 18% | 22 -68% | 16.3 -24% | 12.4 5% | 14.5 -11% |
* ... smaller is better
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 | |
| Acer Switch One 10 SW1-011-14UQ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Chuwi Vi10 Ultimate 64GB | |
| Chuwi Hi12 | |
| Teclast Tbook 16 Power | |
| Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
| Cube i7 Book CDK09 | |
| Cube i9 | |
| Teclast Tbook 10s | |
Pro
Contra
O maior atributo de venda do Teclast Tbook 16 Power é o seu veloz microprocessador Atom x7. Embora tenha superado o Atom x5 concorrente, também foi muito mais lento do que seus concorrentes Core m3 e Pentium N3710. Especialmente em jogos, o Intel HD Graphics 405 foi uma grande decepção.
Outro grande ponto de venda é o sistema operacional pré-instalado do Android 6. Durante o curto período de tempo que pudemos usá-lo, ele se desempenhou muito bem e parecia rápido e suave. Infelizmente, a opção de dual-boot (inicialização dupla) desapareceu depois de fazer uma atualização do Windows, por isso não foi possível testá-lo mais.
Em geral, sofremos com um conjunto de problemas grandes e menores, como a nossa unidade de teste. Uma manhã, a tela se recusou a mostrar nada além de ruído branco e o dispositivo teve que ser reiniciado. Por algum motivo, depois as bordas permaneceram mais brilhantes do que o resto da tela por algumas horas. O carregador faltante também causou algumas dores de cabeça importantes - nem o carregador USB-C da Apple nem o da Inateck nem o Anker funcionaram bem e consistentemente com o aparelho. Às vezes, ele recusava-se a carregar completamente; às vezes, ele mudava de idéia a cada segundo; e, às vezes, perdia conexão depois que a bateria estava completamente carregada.
As portas USB integradas não funcionaram como o esperado, e não conseguimos usar um SSD externo SSDs, como o G-Drive, o Angelbird, ou o OCZ. Outros dispositivos, como um disco rígido externo ou o SanDisk Extreme 900, funcionaram perfeitamente. Nosso palpite é que as portas USB não são suficientemente potentes. O modo standby também foi um problema com este aparelho. Além do alto consumo de bateria no modo standby, o tablet às vezes simplesmente permaneceu ativo com a tela desligada e algum processo de fundo causando uma alta carga da CPU, drenando a bateria completamente em pouco tempo. Não conseguimos determinar a causa disto; nosso melhor palpite é que é um controlador defeituoso ou com bugs, do aparelho.
Além de todos esses problemas, o tablet também possui algumas desvantagens visíveis no design: câmeras, alto-falantes e touchpad. Além disso, o aparelho ainda não está disponível para compra na Europa devido à falta de certificação CE, e atualmente só pode ser importado da China. Portanto, a garantia e suporte dependem totalmente do revendedor, e vem com altas taxas e custos de envio.
No entanto, também há alguns aspectos positivos: Apesar de ser inadequado para o seu uso em exteriores, a tela não era muito pobre. A rigidez da carcaça é excelente e oferece um toque e uma sensação muito agradáveis. Gostamos da completa ausência de ruído do sistema (sem ventoinha, sem ruído de bobina) e o leitor de cartões MicroSD foi comparativamente rápido.
Recebemos nossa unidade de teste da Gearbest, diretamente da China, onde atualmente é vendido por volta dos $310. O dock de teclado são $35 extras e é, apesar de suas desvantagens, definitivamente recomendável.
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
- 05/15/2017 v6 (old)
Klaus Hinum
Price comparison
