Breve Análise do 2-em-1 HP Elite x2 1013 G3 (i5-8350U, SSD, 3k)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
|
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 456 cd/m²
Contraste: 942:1 (Preto: 0.48 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.05 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.56
ΔE Greyscale 4.87 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.71
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA IPS, 3000x2000, 13" | HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA IPS, 2716x1824, 12.3" | Lenovo Miix 520-12IKB 20M3000LGE IPS, 1920x1200, 12.2" | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 IPS, 1920x1280, 12.3" | Asus Transformer 4 Pro (i7-7500U, HD620) IPS, 2160x1440, 12.6" | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | -3% | -5% | -2% | -1% | 1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 67.5 | 66.7 -1% | 66.1 -2% | 62.8 -7% | 69.6 3% | 66.6 -1% | 67.6 0% |
sRGB Coverage | 96.7 | 98 1% | 91.6 -5% | 94 -3% | 90 -7% | 96.5 0% | 99 2% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.2 | 68.7 1% | 66.7 -2% | 64.7 -5% | 65.9 -3% | 67.8 -1% | 69.1 1% |
Response Times | 10% | 18% | -4% | 3% | 13% | -1% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 47 ? | 45.6 ? 3% | 36 ? 23% | 42.4 ? 10% | 41 ? 13% | 37 ? 21% | 42 ? 11% |
Response Time Black / White * | 26 ? | 21.6 ? 17% | 23 ? 12% | 30.8 ? -18% | 28 ? -8% | 25 ? 4% | 29 ? -12% |
PWM Frequency | 2119 ? | 200 ? | 210.1 ? | 22130 ? | 21000 | ||
Screen | 16% | -19% | 5% | 1% | 5% | 15% | |
Brightness middle | 452 | 443 -2% | 384 -15% | 523.2 16% | 262 -42% | 482 7% | 417 -8% |
Brightness | 412 | 446 8% | 355 -14% | 522 27% | 254 -38% | 466 13% | 401 -3% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 88 4% | 80 -6% | 88 4% | 89 5% | 92 8% | 88 4% |
Black Level * | 0.48 | 0.41 15% | 0.56 -17% | 0.42 12% | 0.26 46% | 0.395 18% | 0.29 40% |
Contrast | 942 | 1080 15% | 686 -27% | 1246 32% | 1008 7% | 1220 30% | 1438 53% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.05 | 2.6 36% | 4.58 -13% | 4 1% | 3.34 18% | 4 1% | 3.63 10% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.64 | 4 40% | 11.63 -75% | 8.6 -30% | 7.12 -7% | 7.2 -8% | 6.74 -2% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.56 | ||||||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.87 | 3 38% | 5.63 -16% | 5.5 -13% | 3.28 33% | 5.7 -17% | 2.18 55% |
Gamma | 2.71 81% | 2.38 92% | 2.45 90% | 2.16 102% | 2.47 89% | 2.28 96% | 3.09 71% |
CCT | 7160 91% | 6780 96% | 7571 86% | 7546 86% | 7180 91% | 7950 82% | 6767 96% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62 | 62.6 1% | 60 -3% | 64.86 5% | 59 -5% | 62 0% | 63 2% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97 | 98 1% | 92 -5% | 93.97 -3% | 90 -7% | 96 -1% | 99 2% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 9% /
12% | -1% /
-11% | -1% /
2% | 1% /
1% | 6% /
5% | 5% /
10% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise | |
↘ 12 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23 ms rise | |
↘ 24 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Geekbench 3 | |
32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Lenovo Miix 520-12IKB 20M3000LGE | |
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA | |
Average Intel Core i5-8350U () | |
32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Lenovo Miix 520-12IKB 20M3000LGE | |
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA | |
Average Intel Core i5-8350U () |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Lenovo Miix 520-12IKB 20M3000LGE | |
Average Intel Core i5-8350U (12679 - 12920, n=2) | |
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Lenovo Miix 520-12IKB 20M3000LGE | |
Average Intel Core i5-8350U (4160 - 4260, n=2) | |
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA (Edge 42) | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA (Edge 40.15063.0.0) | |
Average Intel Core i5-8350U (1017 - 1289, n=5) | |
Asus Transformer 4 Pro (i7-7500U, HD620) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 (Edge 40) | |
Average of class Convertible (407 - 2676, n=63, last 2 years) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Convertible (50984 - 92146, n=14, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 (Edge 40) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 | |
Average Intel Core i5-8350U (28223 - 38722, n=5) | |
Asus Transformer 4 Pro (i7-7500U, HD620) | |
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA (Edge 42) | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA (Edge 40.15063.0.0) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Average of class Convertible (393 - 443, n=3, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Miix 520-12IKB 20M3000LGE (Edge 41) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 (Edge 40) | |
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA (Edge 42) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA (Edge 40.15063.0.0) | |
Average Intel Core i5-8350U (173 - 232, n=5) | |
Asus Transformer 4 Pro (i7-7500U, HD620) | |
Fujitsu Stylistic Q738 | |
Huawei Matebook E |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 7 Score | 5676 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3413 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4669 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4200 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3559 pontos | |
Ajuda |
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo Miix 520-12IKB 20M3000LGE Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Asus Transformer 4 Pro (i7-7500U, HD620) SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 Samsung PM971 KUS040202M | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 Samsung PM971 KUS030202M | Average Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 30% | 14% | -9% | -45% | 4% | -15% | 14% | |
Read Seq | 1786 | 1875 5% | 883 -51% | 1294 -28% | 475.3 -73% | 1308 -27% | 723 -60% | 1627 ? -9% |
Write Seq | 1209 | 1261 4% | 932 -23% | 865 -28% | 260.9 -78% | 961 -21% | 853 -29% | 1136 ? -6% |
Read 512 | 717 | 1235 72% | 586 -18% | 406 -43% | 289.3 -60% | 227.5 -68% | 225 -69% | 887 ? 24% |
Write 512 | 798 | 844 6% | 627 -21% | 589 -26% | 260.7 -67% | 792 -1% | 445 -44% | 781 ? -2% |
Read 4k | 49.66 | 56.9 15% | 54.8 10% | 31.75 -36% | 30.06 -39% | 53.6 8% | 46 -7% | 53 ? 7% |
Write 4k | 104.2 | 145.4 40% | 139.3 34% | 72.2 -31% | 73.5 -29% | 136.3 31% | 125 20% | 126.7 ? 22% |
Read 4k QD32 | 286 | 398.3 39% | 607 112% | 493.3 72% | 296.8 4% | 485.6 70% | 423 48% | 419 ? 47% |
Write 4k QD32 | 298.4 | 472.5 58% | 498.5 67% | 434.5 46% | 239.8 -20% | 421.5 41% | 373 25% | 384 ? 29% |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 10622 pontos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1851 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 56649 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 7437 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1026 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 384 pontos | |
Ajuda |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Average of class Convertible (471 - 40768, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1144 - 3432, n=244) | |
Lenovo Miix 520-12IKB 20M3000LGE (Cool Mode Off) | |
Lenovo Miix 520-12IKB 20M3000LGE (Cool Mode On) | |
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA | |
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA | |
Asus Transformer 4 Pro (i7-7500U, HD620) | |
Huawei Matebook E | |
Fujitsu Stylistic Q738 |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tomb Raider (2013) | 91.5 | 45 | 28.6 | 12.8 |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 60.6 | 31.1 | 26.8 | 8.7 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 17.2 | 11.4 | 6 | 3.1 |
BioShock Infinite - 1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
Lenovo Miix 520-12IKB 20M3000LGE | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (18.3 - 90.2, n=187) | |
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA | |
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA | |
Fujitsu Stylistic Q738 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 | |
Huawei Matebook E | |
Asus Transformer 4 Pro (i7-7500U, HD620) |
Tomb Raider - 1024x768 Low Preset | |
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA | |
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (24.3 - 114.4, n=18) |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 30.3 / 30.3 / 31.2 dB |
Carga |
| 32.8 / 32.9 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.3 dB(A) |
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620 | HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | Lenovo Miix 520-12IKB 20M3000LGE i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620 | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620 | Asus Transformer 4 Pro (i7-7500U, HD620) i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620 | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 i7-7660U, Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 4% | -1% | 6% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 8% | |
off / environment * | 30.3 | 29.5 3% | 30.2 -0% | 28.2 7% | 30.2 -0% | 29.6 2% | 29 ? 4% | 23.8 ? 21% |
Idle Minimum * | 30.3 | 29.5 3% | 30.2 -0% | 28.2 7% | 30.2 -0% | 29.6 2% | 29.1 ? 4% | 24.2 ? 20% |
Idle Average * | 30.3 | 29.5 3% | 30.2 -0% | 28.2 7% | 30.2 -0% | 29.6 2% | 29.1 ? 4% | 24.5 ? 19% |
Idle Maximum * | 31.2 | 29.5 5% | 30.2 3% | 28.2 10% | 29.6 5% | 29.7 ? 5% | 25.3 ? 19% | |
Load Average * | 32.8 | 30.6 7% | 33.4 -2% | 30.4 7% | 30.8 6% | 33.4 -2% | 33.5 ? -2% | 34.3 ? -5% |
Load Maximum * | 32.9 | 32.5 1% | 34.2 -4% | 34 -3% | 32.9 -0% | 34.1 -4% | 36.1 ? -10% | 40.8 ? -24% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 33.4 |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.4 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.1 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41 °C / 105.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-13 °C / -23.4 F).
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620 | HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | Lenovo Miix 520-12IKB 20M3000LGE i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620 | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620 | Asus Transformer 4 Pro (i7-7500U, HD620) i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620 | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 i7-7660U, Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620 | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 15% | 5% | 12% | 16% | 13% | 8% | 16% | 13% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 49.4 | 42.3 14% | 43.7 12% | 38.2 23% | 40.5 18% | 42 15% | 39.2 21% | 41.1 ? 17% | 41.1 ? 17% |
Maximum Bottom * | 47.1 | 44.5 6% | 44.5 6% | 48.6 -3% | 37 21% | 42 11% | 40.3 14% | 44.3 ? 6% | 43.8 ? 7% |
Idle Upper Side * | 38 | 29.5 22% | 38 -0% | 29.6 22% | 31.1 18% | 31 18% | 37 3% | 26.8 ? 29% | 28.9 ? 24% |
Idle Bottom * | 30.8 | 25.2 18% | 30.8 -0% | 28.8 6% | 28.2 8% | 28 9% | 32.3 -5% | 27.7 ? 10% | 29.6 ? 4% |
* ... smaller is better
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.45 / 4 Watt |
Ocioso | 4.9 / 8.9 / 11 Watt |
Carga |
32 / 36 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620 | HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | Lenovo Miix 520-12IKB 20M3000LGE i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620 | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620 | Asus Transformer 4 Pro (i7-7500U, HD620) i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620 | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 i7-7660U, Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620 | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -6% | 14% | 19% | 34% | -7% | 22% | 5% | -26% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.9 | 4.1 16% | 3.9 20% | 2.85 42% | 3.4 31% | 4.2 14% | 3.6 27% | 3.81 ? 22% | 5.18 ? -6% |
Idle Average * | 8.9 | 9.2 -3% | 8.2 8% | 6.76 24% | 5.7 36% | 10.1 -13% | 8.1 9% | 6.94 ? 22% | 8.18 ? 8% |
Idle Maximum * | 11 | 11.1 -1% | 8.4 24% | 6.91 37% | 7.4 33% | 14 -27% | 8.7 21% | 8.75 ? 20% | 11.1 ? -1% |
Load Average * | 32 | 33.8 -6% | 25.2 21% | 32.88 -3% | 15 53% | 37.4 -17% | 25.5 20% | 35 ? -9% | 46.8 ? -46% |
Load Maximum * | 36 | 49.2 -37% | 37 -3% | 37.41 -4% | 29.7 17% | 34 6% | 23.5 35% | 47.5 ? -32% | 67.2 ? -87% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 38.1 |
* ... smaller is better
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 47 Wh | Lenovo Miix 520-12IKB 20M3000LGE i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 38 Wh | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | Asus Transformer 4 Pro (i7-7500U, HD620) i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 39 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 i7-7660U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, 45 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -3% | -27% | 7% | -15% | 16% | 40% | 46% | |
Reader / Idle | 781 | 833 7% | 1075 38% | 842 8% | 1054 35% | 1330 ? 70% | ||
H.264 | 389 | 377 -3% | 614 58% | 770 ? 98% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 459 | 378 -18% | 334 -27% | 486 6% | 280 -39% | 489 7% | 744 62% | 599 ? 31% |
Load | 137 | 138 1% | 105 -23% | 118 -14% | 112 -18% | 168 23% | 113.1 ? -17% | |
Witcher 3 ultra | 115 | 90 ? |
Pro
Contra
O Elite x2 1013 G3 da HP é um dispositivo 2-em-1 de 13 polegadas destinado principalmente a clientes empresariais. É o sucessor do Elite x2 1012 G2. Dado que o 1013 G3 é uma versão completamente renovada, estes dois não têm muito em comum. Subjetivamente, o novo dispositivo é mais elegante e mais fino que seu antecessor.
É impulsionado por uma CPU Core i5-8350U que oferece desempenho mais que suficiente para tarefas de escritório e Internet do dia a dia. O dispositivo permaneceu muito silencioso independentemente da carga de trabalho e permaneceu relativamente frio durante o uso diário. É muito veloz graças ao seu SSD NVMe. O SSD pode ser substituído.
O Elite x2 1013 G3 da HP é um dispositivo 2-em-1 bem feito. Encontramos apenas algumas coisas para criticar. Entre outras coisas, esperávamos um modem LTE, considerando o preço alto do dispositivo de quase $2.000.
O dock de teclado incluído fez um ótimo trabalho. O teclado permitia uma digitação rápida e suave, e era até adequado para sessões de digitação extensas e regulares. Ele também possui retro iluminação do teclado. A duração da bateria foi boa. O Surface Pro (2017) tinha muito mais a oferecer neste aspecto.
A tela de alto contraste de 13:3 de 13 polegadas foi muito brilhante e oferece amplos ângulos de visão. A tela táctil suporta entradas com o dedo e caneta. Nossa unidade de teste não tinha um modem LTE, mas contava com uma conexão para WWAN. Em outras palavras: Um modem LTE pode ser pode ser colocado retroativamente.
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
- 10/17/2019 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck