Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise de Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018 (Core i7, Full-HD)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 304 cd/m²
Contraste: 1490:1 (Preto: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.19 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 1.67
ΔE Greyscale 1.97 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.43
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK Lenovo LEN40A9 / AUO B140HAK02.3, , 1920x1080, 14" | HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA IVO M140NVF7 R0, , 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 7490 AUO503D (D04YD_B140HAN), , 1920x1080, 14" | HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA AUO383D, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE B140HAN03_1, , 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -10% | -1% | -9% | -9% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 68.3 | 61 -11% | 66.6 -2% | 61.3 -10% | 61.6 -10% |
| sRGB Coverage | 94.9 | 87.7 -8% | 96.8 2% | 87.6 -8% | 87.6 -8% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 69.3 | 62.1 -10% | 67.9 -2% | 62.3 -10% | 62.6 -10% |
| Response Times | 7% | -16% | 6% | -21% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40 ? | 33 ? 17% | 41.6 ? -4% | 35 ? 12% | 48 ? -20% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 25 ? | 26 ? -4% | 32 ? -28% | 25 ? -0% | 30.4 ? -22% |
| PWM Frequency | 3125 ? | ||||
| Screen | -18% | -55% | -18% | -25% | |
| Brightness middle | 298 | 655 120% | 308.6 4% | 421 41% | 278 -7% |
| Brightness | 287 | 630 120% | 294 2% | 398 39% | 271 -6% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 93 2% | 89 -2% | 86 -5% | 91 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.2 | 0.56 -180% | 0.23 -15% | 0.27 -35% | 0.16 20% |
| Contrast | 1490 | 1170 -21% | 1342 -10% | 1559 5% | 1738 17% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.19 | 3.27 -49% | 6.07 -177% | 4.08 -86% | 4.5 -105% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.39 | 5.92 -35% | 10.58 -141% | 7.48 -70% | 8.4 -91% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.67 | 3.22 -93% | 1.67 -0% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.97 | 2.85 -45% | 7.3 -271% | 2.92 -48% | 3.2 -62% |
| Gamma | 2.43 91% | 2.45 90% | 2.061 107% | 2.32 95% | 2.02 109% |
| CCT | 6571 99% | 6065 107% | 7269 89% | 7043 92% | 7042 92% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62 | 57 -8% | 62 0% | 57 -8% | 57 -8% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 95 | 88 -7% | 97 2% | 87 -8% | 87.5 -8% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -7% /
-13% | -24% /
-40% | -7% /
-13% | -18% /
-21% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3690 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4600 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3764 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA | HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA Toshiba KXG50ZNV1T02 | Dell Latitude 7490 Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G | HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK | Average Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 45% | -11% | 17% | -2% | ||
| Read Seq | 1880 | 2087 11% | 1549 -18% | 1277 -32% | 1703 ? -9% | |
| Write Seq | 479 | 907 89% | 269.7 -44% | 648 35% | 642 ? 34% | |
| Read 512 | 1227 | 993 -19% | 823 -33% | 972 -21% | 1217 ? -1% | |
| Write 512 | 243.3 | 623 156% | 298.1 23% | 311 28% | 272 ? 12% | |
| Read 4k | 34.87 | 32.84 -6% | 24.9 -29% | 34.63 -1% | 23.9 ? -31% | |
| Write 4k | 94.1 | 110.1 17% | 97.1 3% | 128.5 37% | 73.3 ? -22% | |
| Read 4k QD32 | 306.1 | 312.1 2% | 310.6 1% | 477.3 56% | 330 ? 8% | |
| Write 4k QD32 | 184.7 | 391.5 112% | 208.4 13% | 241.2 31% | 172 ? -7% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2065 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 9353 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1141 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Rainbow Six Siege | |
| 1024x768 Low Preset AA:T AF:Linear | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (28.2 - 48.4, n=5) | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset AA:T AF:2x | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (16.1 - 29.4, n=5) | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1024x768 Lowest Preset | |
| HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (10.4 - 110.7, n=82) | |
| Dell Latitude 7490 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE | |
| Farming Simulator 17 | |
| 1280x720 Low Preset | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (19 - 95.9, n=8) | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (8 - 67.9, n=12) | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:2xMS AF:2x | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (18.8 - 26.2, n=11) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK | |
| 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:4xMS AF:4x | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (10 - 13, n=4) | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rainbow Six Siege (2015) | 48.4 | 28.8 | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 23.9 | 12.2 | ||
| Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 95.2 | 67.9 | 22.3 | 12.3 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.25 / 30.25 / 30.25 dB |
| Carga |
| 31.3 / 31.3 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.25 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.4 °C / 81.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+0.3 °C / 0.6 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (64.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell Latitude 7490 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.3 / 2.7 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.7 / 7.3 / 9.4 Watt |
| Carga |
28 / 28.2 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KXG50ZNV1T02, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 7490 i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA R7 2700U, Vega 10, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -13% | 11% | -19% | -8% | -12% | -32% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.7 | 3.8 19% | 2 57% | 4.9 -4% | 3.8 19% | 3.81 ? 19% | 4.51 ? 4% |
| Idle Average * | 7.3 | 8.3 -14% | 4.7 36% | 8.1 -11% | 7.1 3% | 6.94 ? 5% | 7.47 ? -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 9.4 | 10.7 -14% | 5.7 39% | 10.6 -13% | 8.3 12% | 8.75 ? 7% | 9.11 ? 3% |
| Load Average * | 28 | 35.5 -27% | 38.4 -37% | 32.2 -15% | 34.2 -22% | 35 ? -25% | 42.4 ? -51% |
| Load Maximum * | 28.2 | 37 -31% | 38.9 -38% | 42.3 -50% | 43.3 -54% | 47.5 ? -68% | 60.5 ? -115% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Dell Latitude 7490 i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA R7 2700U, Vega 10, 50 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -29% | -12% | -36% | -15% | -1% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1468 | 639 -56% | 819 -44% | 1300 ? -11% | ||
| H.264 | 657 | 426 -35% | 573 -13% | 703 ? 7% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 621 | 444 -29% | 548 -12% | 394 -37% | 547 -12% | 598 ? -4% |
| Load | 111 | 95 -14% | 122 10% | 117.1 ? 5% |
Pro
Contra
O Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6 2018 é um excelente portátil empresarial que merece a nossa avaliação de 92%. Sua única desvantagem é o seu preço exorbitante. Nós ainda recomendamos de todo o coração o Carbon G6, já que ele se destacou em praticamente todos os testes aos quais o submetemos.
O Carbon G6 está equipado com hardware premium. O dispositivo possui uma tela impressionante, E/S de última geração, excelente duração da bateria e garantia do fabricante de três anos. O Carbon G6 representa verdadeiramente o melhor do que a Lenovo oferece atualmente.
Há vantagens em escolher um painel 1080p sobre a opção HDR WQHD também. O painel de 1080p tem um acabamento mate em comparação com o acabamento brilhante da HDR, o que é útil ao usar o dispositivo em ambientes externos. Da mesma forma, ter uma tela de resolução mais baixa ajudará a prolongar a duração da bateria e permitirá que o dispositivo funcione mais frio, já que está usando menos recursos para alimentar a tela. Recomendaríamos até mesmo o painel 1080p não táctil pelos mesmos motivos. Além disso, uma resolução WQHD não é essencial para o trabalho de escritório.
A escolha de um processador Core i5-8350U sobre uma versão Core i7 também é uma medida acertada, já que o primeiro geralmente supera o último, ao mesmo tempo em que ajuda a manter o dispositivo frio e a estender a duração da bateria também.
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
-
10/03/2019 v7 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn
Price comparison
