Breve Análise d Smartphone OnePlus 8T – Carga mais rápida por menos dinheiro

Name: OnePlus 8T
Brand: OnePlus

Um filho único.

O OnePlus 8T oferece muitas pequenas melhorias e uma grande queda no preço em comparação com seu antecessor. Descubra se o smartphone de última geração é realmente o assassino de carros que esperamos que seja, em nossa análise.

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Notebookcheck), Published 10/26/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

ARM Android OnePlus Smartphone

Test device courtesy of OnePlus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

OnePlus 8T (8 Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 8 x 2.4 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 650

Memória

8 GB

Pantalha

6.55 polegadas 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Brilhante: sim, HDR, 120 Hz

Disco rígido

128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 236 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: Áudio via USB-C, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G,3G,4G(B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B66),5G(n1/n3/n7/n28/n41/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.4 x 160.7 x 74.1

Bateria

4500 mAh Lítio-Polímero, OnePlus Warp Charge 65

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Sistema Operativo

Android 11

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix f/1.7, phase comparison-AF, contrast-AF, OIS, dual LED-flash, Videos @2160p/60fps (Camera 1); 16.0MP, f/2.2, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 5.0MP, f/2.4, macro lens (Camera 3); 2.0MP, f/2.4, monochrome, depth of field (Camera 4)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.4, vídeos @1080p/30fps

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo (híbridos), Teclado: Teclado virtual, carregador, cabo USB, ferramenta SIM, protetor de silicone, 24 Meses Garantia, A-GPS (L1/L5), GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo (E1/E5a); LTE 4x4 MIMO DL Cat 20/UL Cat 18 (2.0Gbps /200Mbps); aptX HD; SAR values: 0,94 W/kg (head), 1,24 W/kg (body), fanless

peso

188 g, Suprimento de energia: 169 g

Preço

599 Euro

Links

OnePlus página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Comparison Devices

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
87.8 % v7 ^(old)	10/2020	OnePlus 8T SD 865, Adreno 650	188 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.55"	2400x1080
88.4 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	OnePlus 8 SD 865, Adreno 650	180 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.55"	2400x1080
86.5 % v7 ^(old)	09/2019	Apple iPhone 11 A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU	194 g	64 GB SSD	6.10"	1792x828
88.1 % v7 ^(old)	10/2020	Samsung Galaxy Note20 Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11	192 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	2400x1080
87.4 % v7 ^(old)	04/2020	Huawei P40 Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16	175 g	128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.10"	2340x1080
87.8 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	Xiaomi Mi 10 SD 865, Adreno 650	208 g	128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.67"	2340x1080

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei P40 Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	1296 (1095^min - 1376^max) MBit/s +81%
OnePlus 8 Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	937 (466^min - 960^max) MBit/s +31%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	867 (440^min - 907^max) MBit/s +21%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	833 (418^min - 883^max) MBit/s +16%
OnePlus 8T Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	716 (679^min - 724^max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 11 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	529 (204^min - 603^max) MBit/s -26%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei P40 Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	1368 (1104^min - 1442^max) MBit/s +78%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	903 (881^min - 916^max) MBit/s +18%
OnePlus 8 Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	894 (864^min - 925^max) MBit/s +17%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	864 (802^min - 879^max) MBit/s +13%
OnePlus 8T Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	767 (611^min - 837^max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 11 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	563 (490^min - 597^max) MBit/s -27%

OnePlus 8T; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø767 (611-837)

OnePlus 8T; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø716 (679-724)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptobjektiv Blume Hauptobjektiv Umgebung Hauptobjektiv Low Light Ultraweitwinkel

click to load images

OnePlus 8T

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

Canon 600D

click to load images

OnePlus 8T

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

Canon 600D

click to load images

OnePlus 8T

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

Canon 600D

click to load images

OnePlus 8T

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

Canon 600D

ColorChecker OnePlus 8T: 11.13 ∆E min: 1.21 - max: 24.09 ∆E


697 cd/m²	762 cd/m²	732 cd/m²
702 cd/m²	743 cd/m²	756 cd/m²
716 cd/m²	733 cd/m²	762 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 762 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 733.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.8 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 743 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.89 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.199

	OnePlus 8T AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"	OnePlus 8 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"	Apple iPhone 11 IPS, 1792x828, 6.1"	Samsung Galaxy Note20 Super AMOLED Plus, 2400x1080, 6.7"	Huawei P40 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.1"	Xiaomi Mi 10 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"
Screen		-6%	-5%	-76%	-89%	-11%
Brightness middle	743	778 5%	679 -9%	610 -18%	583 -22%	786 6%
Brightness	734	783 7%	671 -9%	621 -15%	593 -19%	791 8%
Brightness Distribution	91	95 4%	93 2%	95 4%	94 3%	96 5%
Black Level *			0.68
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	0.89	0.9 -1%	0.8 10%	2.4 -170%	3.03 -240%	1.1 -24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	1.69	2.2 -30%	2.4 -42%	4.3 -154%	5.33 -215%	2.2 -30%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.4	1.7 -21%	1.1 21%	2.8 -100%	2 -43%	1.8 -29%
Gamma	2.199 ^100%	2.25 ^98%	2.24 ^98%	2.09 ^105%	2.301 ^96%	2.26 ^97%
CCT	6423 ^101%	6481 ^100%	6610 ^98%	6368 ^102%	6621 ^98%	6315 ^103%
Contrast			999

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

458.7 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 458.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 458.7 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11 ms rise
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	889 Points
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	919 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	917 Points +3%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	755 Points -15%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	910 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (764 - 924, n=23)	903 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)	1037 Points +17%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	3164 Points
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3427 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	2766 Points -13%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	2988 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	3309 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2687 - 3449, n=23)	3268 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)	3464 Points +9%
Vulkan Score 5.5 (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	3494 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4667 Points +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2634 - 4737, n=15)	3203 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (79 - 21892, n=47, last 2 years)	8171 Points +134%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	3214 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	5364 Points +67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2896 - 4464, n=15)	3239 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (459 - 18407, n=42, last 2 years)	8129 Points +153%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	10990 Points
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	13079 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	13627 Points +24%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	11268 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	11850 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (10990 - 19989, n=22)	13584 Points +24%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	9202 Points
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	10800 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	10008 Points +9%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	8736 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	10613 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (9202 - 15299, n=23)	11246 Points +22%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	56045 Points
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	72524 Points +29%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	97276 Points +74%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	68943 Points +23%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	46552 Points -17%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	Points -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (56045 - 112989, n=20)	84555 Points +51%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	144828 Points
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	144611 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	209204 Points +44%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	87223 Points -40%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	66142 Points -54%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	Points -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (110875 - 180392, n=20)	147707 Points +2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	17817 Points
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	27026 Points +52%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	33864 Points +90%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	39771 Points +123%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	22857 Points +28%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	Points -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (17817 - 58293, n=20)	35224 Points +98%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8877 Points
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8810 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	8097 Points -9%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	3973 Points -55%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8581 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8215 - 9611, n=20)	8915 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	11586 Points
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11540 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	11272 Points -3%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	3894 Points -66%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	12234 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (10599 - 13305, n=20)	11750 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	4882 Points
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	4819 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4077 Points -16%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4279 Points -12%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	4196 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (3965 - 5274, n=20)	4844 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	9897 Points
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9850 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	9199 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	8485 Points -14%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4432 Points -55%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8499 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8499 - 11492, n=22)	9645 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	12878 Points
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	12873 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	17853 Points +39%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	11868 Points -8%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4293 Points -67%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	12601 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (11956 - 16809, n=22)	12921 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	5468 Points
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5406 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	3411 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4247 Points -22%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4998 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	3973 Points -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (3956 - 5765, n=22)	5138 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	7145 Points
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	7174 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	4400 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	6544 Points -8%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5651 Points -21%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	7190 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (5996 - 7653, n=21)	7103 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=70, last 2 years)	3006 Points -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8222 Points
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8288 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	5726 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	8005 Points -3%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6244 Points -24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8371 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (6500 - 9167, n=20)	8128 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=70, last 2 years)	3166 Points -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	4900 Points
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	4879 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	2429 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	3993 Points -19%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4242 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	4813 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (4582 - 5209, n=20)	4941 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=70, last 2 years)	3260 Points -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8125 Points
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8153 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	6067 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	7076 Points -13%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6140 Points -24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	7957 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (7517 - 8947, n=23)	8073 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 22303, n=162, last 2 years)	8158 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	9420 Points
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9542 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	8119 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	870 Points -91%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6606 Points -30%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	9389 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8633 - 11999, n=22)	9501 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 40163, n=162, last 2 years)	12271 Points +30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	5485 Points
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5401 Points -2%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	3219 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4143 Points -24%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4924 Points -10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	5187 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (4733 - 5780, n=22)	5319 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 10259, n=162, last 2 years)	4723 Points -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	4604 Points
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	6543 Points +42%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	5042 Points +10%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5456 Points +19%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	6182 Points +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (4582 - 6961, n=20)	6202 Points +35%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=69, last 2 years)	2784 Points -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8372 Points
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8294 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	6136 Points -27%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6326 Points -24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8175 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (7618 - 9104, n=19)	8249 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 7971, n=69, last 2 years)	3009 Points -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	1788 Points
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3763 Points +110%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	3104 Points +74%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	3684 Points +106%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	3336 Points +87%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1786 - 4061, n=19)	3414 Points +91%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=69, last 2 years)	2686 Points +50%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	60 fps
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	60 fps 0%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	60 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	90 fps +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (50 - 138, n=23)	75.4 fps +26%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	86.6 fps +44%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	207 fps
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	207 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	322 fps +56%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	191 fps -8%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	151 fps -27%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	202 fps -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (168 - 266, n=23)	206 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=174, last 2 years)	296 fps +43%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	60 fps
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	60 fps 0%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	46 fps -23%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	88 fps +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (50 - 111, n=23)	71.7 fps +20%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	76.1 fps +27%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	127 fps
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	125 fps -2%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	175 fps +38%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	114 fps -10%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	100 fps -21%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	123 fps -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (96 - 151, n=23)	123.6 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=174, last 2 years)	175 fps +38%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	60 fps
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	58 fps -3%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	57 fps -5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	75 fps +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (43 - 83, n=24)	60.1 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	66.7 fps +11%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	88 fps
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	88 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	117 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	80 fps -9%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	33 fps -62%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	86 fps -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (67 - 103, n=24)	86 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=174, last 2 years)	124.3 fps +41%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	46 fps
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	46 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps +30%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	44 fps -4%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	36 fps -22%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	42 fps -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (25 - 54, n=24)	40.5 fps -12%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 154, n=175, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +8%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	53 fps
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	52 fps -2%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	73 fps +38%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	49 fps -8%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	43 fps -19%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	50 fps -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (39 - 62, n=24)	51.1 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=174, last 2 years)	74.7 fps +41%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	47 fps
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	48 fps +2%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps +28%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	52 fps +11%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	42 fps -11%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	46 fps -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (28 - 57, n=25)	43.2 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 247, n=207, last 2 years)	51.7 fps +10%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	55 fps
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	54 fps -2%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	87 fps +58%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	56 fps +2%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	49 fps -11%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	53 fps -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (27 - 67, n=25)	52.7 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 321, n=207, last 2 years)	84.6 fps +54%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	30 fps
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	31 fps +3%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	27 fps -10%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	27 fps -10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	29 fps -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (18 - 40, n=25)	27.8 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=207, last 2 years)	38.9 fps +30%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	20 fps
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	20 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	33 fps +65%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	23 fps +15%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	29 fps +45%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	20 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (20 - 27, n=25)	20.5 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 129, n=207, last 2 years)	34 fps +70%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	576457 Points
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	563466 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	522516 Points -9%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	450373 Points -22%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	566256 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (527301 - 631025, n=24)	579049 Points 0%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	6083 Points
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5897 Points -3%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4826 Points -21%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5105 Points -16%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	5752 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (5264 - 6402, n=23)	5871 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 12993, n=157, last 2 years)	6460 Points +6%
System (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	10029 Points
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	10021 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	9421 Points -6%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	8992 Points -10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	9810 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8412 - 10147, n=23)	9660 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 17953, n=157, last 2 years)	10308 Points +3%
Memory (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	7899 Points
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	6912 Points -12%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	3829 Points -52%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6942 Points -12%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	7450 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (5304 - 8874, n=23)	7073 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 18911, n=157, last 2 years)	7016 Points -11%
Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	11790 Points
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11654 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	10789 Points -8%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	8634 Points -27%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	11730 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (11366 - 13833, n=23)	11779 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=157, last 2 years)	17782 Points +51%
Web (sort by value)
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	1466 Points
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	1498 Points +2%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	1394 Points -5%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	1260 Points -14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	1276 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1276 - 2169, n=23)	1497 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2363, n=157, last 2 years)	1574 Points +7%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	132.9 Points +91%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)	124.4 Points +79%
OnePlus 8T (Chrome 86)	69.4 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (45.2 - 77, n=20)	63.6 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)	56.1 Points -19%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)	55.6 Points -20%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)	51.3 Points -26%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)	50.9 Points -27%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	293.4 Points +147%
OnePlus 8T (Chrome 86)	118.7 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (74.2 - 145.1, n=21)	113.1 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)	109.2 Points -8%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)	103.2 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)	95.2 Points -20%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)	79.1 Points -33%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	157 runs/min +120%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)	143.9 runs/min +102%
OnePlus 8T (Chome 86)	71.3 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)	64.4 runs/min -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (30.6 - 74.5, n=19)	63.9 runs/min -10%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)	63 runs/min -12%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)	56.2 runs/min -21%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)	50.8 runs/min -29%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	184 Points +70%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	150.2 Points +39%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)	118 Points +9%
OnePlus 8T (Chrome 86)	108 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (97 - 127, n=23)	106.7 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)	101 Points -6%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)	99 Points -8%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)	95 Points -12%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	48819 Points +145%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)	38550 Points +94%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (14606 - 31224, n=23)	22518 Points +13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)	22016 Points +11%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)	21348 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)	20022 Points +1%
OnePlus 8T (Chrome 86)	19915 Points
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)	15745 Points -21%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)	2538 ms * -36%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)	2294 ms * -23%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)	2287 ms * -23%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)	2104 ms * -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1623 - 2911, n=24)	2031 ms * -9%
OnePlus 8T (Chrome 86)	1860 ms *
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)	1523 ms * +18%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	573 ms * +69%

* ... smaller is better

	OnePlus 8T	OnePlus 8	Samsung Galaxy Note20	Huawei P40	Xiaomi Mi 10	Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		34%	40%	8%	29%	46%	95%
Sequential Read 256KB	1659	1707 3%	1683 1%	1592 -4%	1498 -10%	1602 ?(1030 - 3134, n=60) -3%	1882 ?(226 - 4512, n=197, last 2 years) 13%
Sequential Write 256KB	728	748 3%	780 7%	212.9 -71%	680 -7%	748 ?(233 - 1332, n=60) 3%	1467 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=197, last 2 years) 102%
Random Read 4KB	132.6	215 62%	207.6 57%	189.4 43%	207 56%	243 ?(126.2 - 428, n=60) 83%	278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=197, last 2 years) 110%
Random Write 4KB	121.4	203.9 68%	233.8 93%	197 62%	215.9 78%	244 ?(121.4 - 503, n=60) 101%	310 ?(9.4 - 753, n=197, last 2 years) 155%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard				81.6 ?(Nano Memory Card)		85.9 ?(85.8 - 86, n=2)
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard				66.4 ?(Nano Memory Card)		68.8 ?(68.6 - 69, n=2)

OnePlus 8T; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 1.0.0: Ø59.8 (55-61)

OnePlus 8T; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.0.0: Ø59.8 (55-61)

OnePlus 8T; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 1.0.0_1112729_1135452: Ø59.5 (54-61)

OnePlus 8T; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 1.0.0_1112729_1135452: Ø59.2 (50-61)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


45 °C	42.9 °C	41.1 °C
45 °C	43 °C	40.1 °C
44.7 °C	43.1 °C	40 °C

Máximo: 45 °C
Médio: 42.8 °C


38 °C	40 °C	40.1 °C
38.8 °C	40.7 °C	43.3 °C
38.8 °C	41.1 °C	43.8 °C

Máximo: 43.8 °C
Médio: 40.5 °C

alimentação elétrica 43.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

OnePlus 8T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 66.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 66.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 66.7% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (117.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

OnePlus 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0 / 0.2 Watt
Ocioso	1.1 / 1.5 / 1.7 Watt
Carga	4.6 / 9.4 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	OnePlus 8T 4500 mAh	OnePlus 8 4300 mAh	Apple iPhone 11 3110 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Note20 4300 mAh	Huawei P40 3800 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 10 4780 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-6%	-15%	0%	-2%	18%	-23%	-4%
Idle Minimum *	1.1	0.9 18%	0.56 49%	0.92 16%	1 9%	0.53 52%	1.133 ?(0.52 - 2.2, n=22) -3%	0.882 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=157, last 2 years) 20%
Idle Average *	1.5	2.3 -53%	2.99 -99%	1.5 -0%	1.9 -27%	1.46 3%	2.23 ?(1.19 - 5.37, n=22) -49%	1.448 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=157, last 2 years) 3%
Idle Maximum *	1.7	2.33 -37%	3.02 -78%	1.54 9%	2.4 -41%	1.52 11%	2.45 ?(1.23 - 5.41, n=22) -44%	1.603 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=157, last 2 years) 6%
Load Average *	4.6	3.5 24%	4.17 9%	5.49 -19%	3.5 24%	3.83 17%	5.26 ?(3.5 - 7.4, n=22) -14%	6.57 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=152, last 2 years) -43%
Load Maximum *	9.4	7.68 18%	5.44 42%	9.99 -6%	6.9 27%	8.89 5%	9.68 ?(7.67 - 12.3, n=22) -3%	9.92 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=152, last 2 years) -6%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		25h 39min
WiFi Websurfing		17h 03min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		18h 23min
Carga (máximo brilho)		3h 23min

	OnePlus 8T 4500 mAh	OnePlus 8 4300 mAh	Apple iPhone 11 3110 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Note20 4300 mAh	Huawei P40 3800 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 10 4780 mAh
Battery Runtime		-7%	25%	14%	6%	-2%
Reader / Idle	1539	1374 -11%	2765 80%	2067 34%	2063 34%	1789 16%
H.264	1103	1096 -1%	1147 4%	1123 2%	1052 -5%	1126 2%
WiFi v1.3	1023	1045 2%	866 -15%	589 -42%	806 -21%	662 -35%
Load	203	168 -17%	267 32%	326 61%	236 16%	226 11%

Pro

+ Tela precisa com bons núcleos ...

+ ... E uma taxa de atualização de 120-Hz

+ Muitas bandas LTE e 5G

+ Exterior de alta qualidade

+ Sem afogamento

+ Carga muito rápida

+ Boa duração da bateria

+ Localização precisa

+ Boa relação preço-desempenho

Contra

- Aquece sob uso intenso

- Não oferece carga sem fio

- Sem certificação IP

- A câmera carece de nitidez de detalhes

- Uma carcaça poderia ser mais estável

Veredicto – Mais por menos

Review: OnePlus 8T. Test unit provided by OnePlus Germany.

O OnePlus 8T oferece pequenas melhorias em comparação com seu já muito bom predecessor. Por exemplo, ele oferece uma tela com uma taxa de atualização de 120 Hz, uma câmera macro com uma resolução mais alta e uma lente adicional que fornece mais dados para fotos. No entanto, a qualidade da câmera não pode ser comparada à de seus concorrentes de ponta mais caros, pois as imagens não têm nitidez de detalhes.

Ficamos satisfeitos com o alto desempenho sem afogamento, a localização precisa, o carregamento muito rápido e a calibração precisa da tela. O novo software é atraente e oferece muitas mais opções de configuração, ao mesmo tempo que é fácil de usar para veteranos do Android.

O aparelho esquenta um pouco demais para o nosso gosto e seus alto-falantes estéreo oferecem uma qualidade de som apenas média. O Wi-Fi não é tão rápido quanto em outros dispositivos Wi-Fi 6. Os usuários também terão que se virar sem carregamento sem fio ou certificação IP.

O OnePlus 8T omite a maioria dos truques de ponta e concentra-se em sua proposta principal: muita potência e conectividade por um preço acessível.

Se você está procurando a melhor câmera para smartphone do mercado, o OnePlus 8T pode não ser a escolha certa para você. Embora produza imagens decentes de gama alta, outros fazem um trabalho ainda melhor. Se, por outro lado, você deseja o melhor desempenho e ótima conectividade com o mínimo de dinheiro, você está no lugar certo.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

OnePlus 8T - 08/31/2022 v7 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento

85%

Teclado

66 / 75 → 88%

Mouse

97%

Conectividade

51 / 70 → 73%

Peso

89%

Bateria

91%

Pantalha

93%

Desempenho do jogos

59 / 64 → 93%

Desempenho da aplicação

81 / 86 → 94%

Temperatura

86%

Ruído

100%

Audio

76 / 90 → 84%

Camera

77%

Médio

81%

88%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Katherine Bodner - Translator - 317 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise d Smartphone OnePlus 8T – Carga mais rápida por menos dinheiro

Florian Schmitt, 2020-10-26 (Update: 2024-11- 4)

Comparison Devices

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

OnePlus 8T audio analysis

OnePlus 8 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto – Mais por menos

More articles related to this device

Price comparison