Breve Análise Hands-On do Portátil para Jogos MSI Alpha 15: Ryzen e Navi em vez de Intel e NVIDIA
Device Overview
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
v (old) | 11/2019 | MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK R7 3750H, Radeon RX 5500M | 2.3 kg | 27.5 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 80.4 % v6 (old) | 07/2019 | Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 2.2 kg | 26.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 79.3 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Dell G3 3590 i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 2.5 kg | 21.6 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 77 % v7 (old) | 12/2019 | Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 2.1 kg | 23.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 81.5 % v7 (old) | 07/2019 | HP Omen 15-dc1020ng i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 2.3 kg | 25 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 82.5 % v6 (old) | 05/2019 | Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 2.2 kg | 27 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 82.3 % v7 (old) | 08/2019 | Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | 2.2 kg | 26 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 83.9 % v7 (old) | 08/2019 | HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | 2.4 kg | 23.4 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 83.3 % v6 (old) | 05/2019 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 20.4 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 266 cd/m²
Contraste: 1506:1 (Preto: 0.18 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.38 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 4.29
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
36.74% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
53.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
35.56% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.15
| MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK AU Optronics B156HAN13.0 (AUOD0ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 Panda LM156LF-GL, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell G3 3590 BOE NV15N3D, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE CMN 156HCA-EAB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE BOE 084D, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng LG Philips LGD05FE, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 11% | 13% | 20% | 76% | 79% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 35.56 | 39.56 11% | 40.13 13% | 42.81 20% | 63.6 79% | 64.2 81% |
| sRGB Coverage | 53.5 | 59.5 11% | 59.8 12% | 63.8 19% | 91.7 71% | 95.1 78% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 36.74 | 40.91 11% | 41.47 13% | 44.31 21% | 65.2 77% | 65.8 79% |
| Response Times | 6% | -25% | -22% | 66% | 58% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 36.1 | 30.4 ? 16% | 46 ? -27% | 45.6 ? -26% | 8.8 ? 76% | 16.4 ? 55% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 26.4 | 27.6 ? -5% | 32.4 ? -23% | 30.8 ? -17% | 12 ? 55% | 10.4 ? 61% |
| PWM Frequency | 200 ? | 25910 ? | ||||
| Screen | -34% | -20% | -15% | -5% | 15% | |
| Brightness middle | 271 | 286.2 6% | 276.2 2% | 275 1% | 299 10% | 345 27% |
| Brightness | 266 | 267 0% | 261 -2% | 253 -5% | 290 9% | 324 22% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 84 -8% | 86 -5% | 83 -9% | 89 -2% | 86 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.18 | 0.33 -83% | 0.24 -33% | 0.18 -0% | 0.29 -61% | 0.42 -133% |
| Contrast | 1506 | 867 -42% | 1151 -24% | 1528 1% | 1031 -32% | 821 -45% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.38 | 5.45 -24% | 5.56 -27% | 5.4 -23% | 3.7 16% | 1.3 70% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 17.6 | 18.08 -3% | 23.45 -33% | 21.3 -21% | 7 60% | 2.8 84% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.29 | 4.47 -4% | 5.23 -22% | 4.4 -3% | 2 53% | 1.1 74% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 5.3 -152% | 2.8 -33% | 3.7 -76% | 4.1 -95% | 1.2 43% |
| Gamma | 2.15 102% | 2.1 105% | 2.37 93% | 2.12 104% | 2.19 100% | 2.31 95% |
| CCT | 6867 95% | 7679 85% | 6710 97% | 6376 102% | 7166 91% | 6476 100% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37.6 | 37.8 | 40.8 | 59.3 | 60.5 | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59.1 | 59 | 63.6 | 91.5 | 94.9 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -6% /
-19% | -11% /
-14% | -6% /
-8% | 46% /
23% | 51% /
35% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ ms rise |  |
| ↘ ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 36.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ ms rise |  |
| ↘ ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4800 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 6613 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5167 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4733 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 26559 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 13344 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 22627 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 10080 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 4024 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| F1 2019 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (91 - 99, n=4) | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q (71 - 77, n=2) | |
| HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng | |
| MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (59 - 65, n=5) | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ | |
| Rage 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (Resolution Scale Off) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (67.9 - 68.8, n=2) | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q (58.2 - 64.8, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng | |
| MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (45.1 - 60, n=3) | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ | |
| Ghost Recon Breakpoint - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (51 - 55, n=2) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q (48 - 51, n=2) | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (30 - 37, n=2) | |
| Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ | |
| MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK | |
| Borderlands 3 - 1920x1080 Badass Overall Quality (DX11) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (46.6 - 48.6, n=3) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q (41.5 - 42.3, n=2) | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng | |
| MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (29 - 34.6, n=5) | |
| Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ | |
| Control - 1920x1080 High Quality Preset (DX11) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (50.7 - 52.8, n=2) | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q () | |
| MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (32.1 - 33.5, n=5) | |
| Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ | |
| Total War: Three Kingdoms - 1920x1080 Ultra (incl textures) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile () | |
| HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q (41.1 - 41.6, n=2) | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng | |
| MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (24.4 - 26.9, n=4) | |
| Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Counter-Strike: GO (2012) | 191 | 137 | 76.3 | |||
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 201 | 169 | 123 | |||
| GTA V (2015) | 93 | 48.6 | 20.2 | |||
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 165 | 72 | 43.6 | |||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 93 | 86 | 81 | 72 | 53 | |
| World of Warships (2015) | 93 | 54.9 | ||||
| Rainbow Six Siege (2015) | 151 | 143 | 59.6 | |||
| Overwatch (2016) | 124 | 109 | 74 | |||
| Rocket League (2017) | 175 | 175 | 72 | |||
| Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) | 59.4 | |||||
| Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) | 70 | 24 | ||||
| Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) | 41 | 35 | ||||
| Fortnite (2018) | 65 | |||||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 62 | 59 | 48 | |||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 59 | 53 | 32 | 15 | ||
| Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) | 48 | 43 | 40 | 31 | ||
| Call of Duty Black Ops 4 (2018) | 67.5 | 53.9 | 28.8 | |||
| Battlefield V (2018) | 61 | 43.7 | 16.2 | |||
| Farming Simulator 19 (2018) | 70 | 49.1 | 32.8 | |||
| Apex Legends (2019) | 72 | 51.7 | 28.4 | |||
| Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 51 | 47 | 25 | |||
| Metro Exodus (2019) | 92.3 | 45.4 | 38.1 | 32.2 | 25 | |
| Anthem (2019) | 48 (stuttering) | 47 (stuttering) | 44 (stuttering) | 32 (stuttering) | ||
| Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) | 58.4 | 38.1 | 22.8 | |||
| The Division 2 (2019) | 51 | 42 | ||||
| Anno 1800 (2019) | 60 | 46.3 | 23.9 | |||
| Rage 2 (2019) | 67 | 55.7 | 53.4 | 15.4 | ||
| Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 134 | 69.1 | 48.7 | 35.8 | 19.4 | 6.9 |
| F1 2019 (2019) | 79 | 74 | 64 | 64 | 49.1 | 33.3 |
| Control (2019) | 119 | 47.5 | 34.2 | |||
| Borderlands 3 (2019) | 76 | 66 | 47.2 | 35.6 | 23.9 | 6.7 |
| FIFA 20 (2019) | 122 | 122 | 96 | |||
| Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) | 58 | 53 | 48 | 26 | ||
| GRID 2019 (2019) | 81 | 67 | 36.7 | 29.9 | 15.2 | |
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) | 112 | 94 | 81 | 64 | 35.4 | 20.1 |
| Need for Speed Heat (2019) | 63 | 57.7 | 52.3 | 45.8 | 41 | 14.1 |
| Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) | 58.6 | 40.1 | 19.8 | |||
| Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) | 92 | 63 | 40.5 | 23.8 | ||
| God of War (2022) | 36.1 | 36 | 33 | 9.06 | ||
| Rainbow Six Extraction (2022) | 95 | 78 | 76 | 36 | ||
| GRID Legends (2022) | 81 | 71.8 | 71.1 | 59.2 | ||
| Elden Ring (2022) | 37 | 35.8 | 35.2 | 35.2 | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 55.9 | 44.9 | 34.4 | 27.7 | ||
| Elex 2 (2022) | 20.1 | 19.3 | 19.4 | 18.8 | ||
| Ghostwire Tokyo (2022) | 56 | 56 | 55.7 | 54.9 | ||
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 88.5 | 71.2 | 38.6 | 28.3 | ||
| Vampire Bloodhunt (2022) | 93.8 | 82.1 | 78.7 | 77.3 | ||
| F1 22 (2022) | 95 | 92 | 78 | 66 | ||
| The Quarry (2022) | 65.5 | 47 | 40.3 | 23.8 | ||
| FIFA 23 (2022) | 46.6 | 38.4 | 33.3 | 33.2 | ||
| A Plague Tale Requiem (2022) | 47.2 | 36.9 | 26.9 | 20.7 | ||
| Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection (2022) | 36.6 | 32.3 | 20.6 | 18.6 | ||
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) | 70 | 66 | 56 | 43 | ||
| Spider-Man Miles Morales (2022) | 48 | 43.3 | 30.6 | 26 | ||
| The Callisto Protocol (2022) | 57.7 | 47.4 | 29.8 | 28.6 | ||
| Need for Speed Unbound (2022) | 43.2 | 41 | 34.7 | 27.3 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 31.1 / 34.8 / 35.5 dB |
| Carga |
| 43 / 53.6 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3.1 °C / -5.6 F).
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.18 / 0.91 Watt |
| Ocioso | 11.7 / 15.7 / 22.4 Watt |
| Carga |
70.7 / 191 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK R7 3750H, Radeon RX 5500M, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell G3 3590 i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNS128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Omen 15-dc1020ng i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, KBG30ZMS128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 32% | 18% | 35% | 11% | 43% | 36% | 34% | 38% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 11.7 | 7 40% | 6.2 47% | 5 57% | 7.4 37% | 3.8 68% | 4.04 65% | 4 66% | 3.4 71% |
| Idle Average * | 15.7 | 9.9 37% | 8.4 46% | 7 55% | 8.6 45% | 6.6 58% | 7.2 54% | 7 55% | 7.6 52% |
| Idle Maximum * | 22.4 | 12 46% | 27.7 -24% | 11 51% | 39.1 -75% | 8.9 60% | 11.4 49% | 12 46% | 10.2 54% |
| Load Average * | 70.7 | 68.4 3% | 91 -29% | 89 -26% | 65.9 7% | 78.4 -11% | 80.8 -14% | 95 -34% | 73 -3% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 148 | 94.9 36% | 94.4 36% | 90 39% | 106.9 28% | 82 45% | 93.6 37% | 86 42% | 107 28% |
| Load Maximum * | 191 | 130.9 31% | 131.5 31% | 132 31% | 141.3 26% | 124 35% | 144.5 24% | 135 29% | 140.5 26% |
* ... smaller is better
Veredicto inicial
O MSI Alpha 15: A AMD Radeon RX 5500M traz um respiro de ar fresco para portáteis de jogos de gama média
Embora a MSI não tenha tentado derrubar o melhor da classe com o Alpha 15, ele desenvolveu um pacote que desafia discretamente o mercado de médio porte que a Intel e a NVIDIA dominaram até agora. Em suma, o Alpha 15 representa uma incursão inicial em um mercado no qual a AMD poderia ganhar uma posição.
A principal característica do Alpha 15 é a GPU Radeon RX 5500M, baseada na arquitetura Navi da AMD. A GPU, fabricada em um processador de 7 nm, se posiciona entre a GeForce GTX 1650 e a GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q no papel, algo que nossos testes com nosso modelo de pré-produção confirmaram. No entanto, deve-se notar que o intervalo de resultados possíveis é alto por enquanto. Por exemplo, enquanto a RX 5500M não ultrapassa o nível de uma GTX 1650 em alguns jogos, atinge os níveis da GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q em outros. No geral, ela se posiciona entre as duas, no entanto.
O MSI Alpha 15 pode competir com os portáteis Core i5-9300H e GeForce 1660 Ti Max-Q em alguns jogos com seu processador Ryzen 7 3750H e a nova GPU Radeon RX 5500M.
Se alguém pode falar se o dispositivo é um sucesso para a AMD ou MSI depende do preço pelo qual o Alpha 15 é lançado. As informações iniciais sugerem que o dispositivo será vendido por US$ 999 a US$ 1.099 para as opções de 120 e 144 Hz, preço que coloca o Alpha 15 fora do alcance dos processadores Core i5-9300H e GTX 1650, que normalmente custam bem menos de US$ 1.000. No entanto, os portáteis GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q geralmente ultrapassam US$ 1.000, o que coloca o RX 5500M em um cenário melhor. Imaginamos que a decisão entre as três GPUs também dependerá dos recursos que oferecem os portáteis nos quais eles estão.
No geral, o Alpha 15 ofereceu uma impressão positiva da Radeon RX 5500M e da arquitetura RDNA nos portáteis. Parece que a decisão entre a AMD e a NVIDIA será novamente uma escolha real, embora ainda não se saiba até que ponto a AMD pode penetrar no mercado de portáteis para jogos de gama alta. O que é certo é que GPUs de portáteis mais poderosas que o RX 5500M provavelmente estão a caminho.
Price comparison
