Notebookcheck Logo

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE review - Laptop de jogos totalmente equipado com RTX 3080 Ti

Intel HX com os freios aplicados.

Com o novo ROG Strix Scar 17 SE de 2022, a Asus oferece um laptop de alta tecnologia com o melhor hardware atualmente disponível no mercado. Além do GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, este também inclui o Core i9-12950HX e um rápido monitor de 240-Hz.

O ROG Strix Scar SE é o carro-chefe dos jogos da Asus e, em 2022 também, está novamente equipado com os componentes mais rápidos atualmente disponíveis no mercado. Testamos o modelo top G733CX com o Intel Core i9-12950HX, o Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, dois SSDs 2-TB da Samsung, e um painel QHD rápido com uma taxa de atualização de 240-Hz. O preço também é de alto nível, uma vez que o MSRP de nossa unidade de teste vem em 3.999 Euros (~$4.129).

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W (ROG Strix Scar 17 G733 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i9-12950HX 16 x 1.7 - 5 GHz, 115 W PL2 / Short Burst, 70 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-HX
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1590 MHz, Memoría: 2000 MHz, 175 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), 526.86, Optimus, MUX
Memória
32 GB 
, DDR5-4800, dual-channel, 2 slots, max. 64 GB
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 170 PPI, NE173QHM-NZ2, IPS, Brilhante: não, 240 Hz
placa mãe
Intel HM670 (Alder Lake-S PCH)
Disco rígido
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, 2048 GB 
, 2x 2TB RAID-0, 3640 GB livre
Placa de Som
Intel Alder Lake-S PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Conexões
2 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm audio port
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 28.3 x 395 x 282
Bateria
90 Wh, 5845 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Características adicionais
Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 330W PSU, switchable ROG face plates, Asus Keystone, ROG software, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.927 kg, Suprimento de energia: 1.1 kg
Preço
4000 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possíveis concorrentes em comparação

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
86.9 %
v7 (old)
11/2022
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.9 kg28.3 mm17.30"2560x1440
88.9 %
v7 (old)
09/2022
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.6 kg20 mm16.00"2560x1600
88.3 %
v7 (old)
08/2022
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3.3 kg23 mm17.30"1920x1080
87.6 %
v7 (old)
09/2022
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.8 kg27 mm17.00"2560x1600
89.2 %
v7 (old)
05/2022
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3.1 kg20.9 mm17.30"1920x1080

Case - Laptop de jogos com um design que se destaca e uma iluminação extensa

O ROG Strix Scar 17 é claramente um laptop de jogo que não esconde de forma alguma suas ambições. O caso é, em grande parte, idêntico ao g733QS do ano passadoe uma parte da unidade base é transparente novamente. Além disso, há elementos amplamente iluminados e alguns elementos adicionais de design ou artifícios, como a escrita especial na tampa que só se torna visível quando se acende uma luz UV sobre ela

A qualidade da caixa plástica é boa em geral, mesmo que as superfícies continuem a ser propensas a impressões digitais e você possa ouvir o ruído ocasional de rangidos leves ao abrir o visor, por exemplo. A estabilidade da unidade base espessa é decente, mas você ainda pode pressionar minimamente a unidade base na área central do teclado. Enquanto a tampa relativamente fina do visor faz um bom trabalho, a dobradiça ainda é incapaz de evitar alguns leves rangidos depois que o laptop é movido, por exemplo.

Mesmo que a tampa inferior da caixa possa ser removida, você tem que ter cuidado ao fazer isso. Como a iluminação está integrada na peça, primeiro é necessário desconectar dois pequenos cabos planos, antes de remover a tampa. Com acesso aos ventiladores, os dois SSDs, dois módulos de RAM e o módulo WLAN, as opções de manutenção são boas.

Comparação de tamanho

395 mm 282 mm 28.3 mm 2.9 kg395 mm 282 mm 28.3 mm 2.8 kg399.23 mm 299.57 mm 20.9 mm 3.1 kg397 mm 330 mm 23 mm 3.3 kg381.7 mm 272.8 mm 27 mm 2.8 kg358 mm 263.5 mm 20 mm 2.6 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

Equipamentos - ROG Strix Scar 17 com HDMI 2.1 & Wi-Fi 6E

Além de uma conexão Thunderbolt, o G733CX oferece uma porta HDMI 2.1, e a porta USB na parte traseira também pode ser usada para carregar na estrada (máx. 100 watts). A maioria das conexões estão na parte traseira, e você encontrará apenas duas portas USB-A normais e a porta de áudio de 3,5 mm no lado esquerdo. O lado direito também oferece um slot para o Asus Keystone, permitindo armazenar as configurações e os dados do sistema.

O desempenho da WLAN com Intel AX211 é muito bom, e também conseguimos nos conectar à rede de 6-GHz de nosso roteador de referência Asus sem nenhum problema. Há também uma conexão Ethernet com 2,5 Gbit/s para conexões com fio. Os usuários do ROG Strix Scar 17 têm que passar sem uma webcam, mas se necessário, o fabricante oferece uma webcam externa correspondente (ROG Eye S).

Voltar: USB-C 4.0 com Thunderbolt 4 (40 Gbit/s, modo DisplayPort ALT), USB-C 3.2 Gen.2 (10 Gbit/s, modo DisplayPort ALT, Power Delivery), HDMI 2.1, 2.5 Gbit/s Ethernet, alimentação
Voltar: USB-C 4.0 com Thunderbolt 4 (40 Gbit/s, modo DisplayPort ALT), USB-C 3.2 Gen.2 (10 Gbit/s, modo DisplayPort ALT, Power Delivery), HDMI 2.1, 2.5 Gbit/s Ethernet, alimentação
Esquerda: 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen.1 (5 Gbit/s), porta de áudio de 3.5-mm
Esquerda: 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen.1 (5 Gbit/s), porta de áudio de 3.5-mm
Certo: Slot para Asus Keystone
Certo: Slot para Asus Keystone
Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1732 (1685min - 1744max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1723 (1681min, 1688.83P1 - 1736max) MBit/s -1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1680 (1438min - 1732max) MBit/s -3%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (700 - 1857, n=213)
1493 MBit/s -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (853 - 1788, n=68, last 2 years)
1488 MBit/s -14%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1655 (1613min, 1615.32P1 - 1702max) MBit/s +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1645 (1589min - 1741max) MBit/s
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1488 (1300min - 1531max) MBit/s -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (648 - 1878, n=68, last 2 years)
1429 MBit/s -13%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (385 - 1851, n=214)
1368 MBit/s -17%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1691 (1589min - 1731max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1890, n=147, last 2 years)
1390 MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=242)
1382 MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
MediaTek RZ608
967 (949min - 978max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1610 (1421min - 1675max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (64 - 1921, n=242)
1231 MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1843, n=147, last 2 years)
1227 MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
MediaTek RZ608
936 (898min - 971max) MBit/s
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1645 (1589-1741)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1732 (1685-1744)

Dispositivos de entrada - Asus com um bom teclado

O Asus mudou novamente o layout do teclado, agora usando um layout mais convencional com teclas especiais menores. Há também um bloco de números "regular" novamente, o que também significa que as teclas de seta se moveram ligeiramente para a esquerda e agora são menores. Nem todos os usuários gostariam que isso acontecesse. No entanto, a qualidade do teclado é muito boa com o cubo longo de 2 mm, e você pode ficar louco na iluminação, o que permite configurar cada tecla separadamente, incluindo modos específicos do jogo através da tecnologia AuraSync. O grande ClickPad oferece boas características de deslizamento e funciona de forma confiável, mas também é bastante alto quando você o pressiona.

Dispositivos de entrada
Dispositivos de entrada
Iluminação do teclado
Iluminação do teclado

Mostrador - QHD com 240 Hz

Além do painel Full-HD com 360 Hz que testamos em cicatriz 17 G733QS do ano passadoa Asus também oferece um painel QHD com uma taxa de atualização de 240 Hz, que é o painel em nossa unidade de teste. A impressão subjetiva da imagem do painel IPS mate (2560 x 1440 pixels, 16:9) é muito boa, e além do Dolby Vision HDR, o Adaptive Sync também é suportado. Os tempos de resposta são extremamente rápidos e o PWM não é usado. O brilho é de cerca de 300 cd/m² em média, que também é o mesmo nível do painel Full-HD com 360 Hz. Por outro lado, o valor de preto é um pouco alto, resultando também em uma relação de contraste medíocre de cerca de 1.000:1.

Matriz subpixel
Matriz subpixel
Pequenos halos leves
Pequenos halos leves
Estabilidade dos ângulos de visão
Estabilidade dos ângulos de visão
302
cd/m²
303
cd/m²
279
cd/m²
311
cd/m²
320
cd/m²
296
cd/m²
303
cd/m²
317
cd/m²
294
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
NE173QHM-NZ2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 320 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 302.8 cd/m² Minimum: 3.7 cd/m²
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 320 cd/m²
Contraste: 1067:1 (Preto: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
84.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.13
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NE173QHM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Sharp SHP1544 LQ173M1JW08, IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 17.3"
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
BOE0A99, IPS, 2560x1600, 17"
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
AU Optronics B173HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AU Optronics B173HAN05.4, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Display
-16%
-14%
-16%
-8%
-14%
Display P3 Coverage
97.1
69.3
-29%
70.8
-27%
69
-29%
79.2
-18%
71
-27%
sRGB Coverage
99.9
98.2
-2%
98.9
-1%
99.8
0%
99.8
0%
99.4
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
84.8
70.8
-17%
73
-14%
69.6
-18%
79.6
-6%
72.2
-15%
Response Times
-38%
48%
-25%
-55%
-12%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
5.7 ?(2.7, 3)
12.6 ?(5.9, 6.7)
-121%
3.03 ?(1.28, 1.75)
47%
10.8 ?(5.1, 5.7)
-89%
12.4 ?(6.4, 6)
-118%
6.6 ?(2.2, 4.4)
-16%
Response Time Black / White *
10.1 ?(5, 5.1)
5.6 ?(1.5, 4.1)
45%
5.28 ?(2.32, 2.96)
48%
6.1 ?(2.5, 3.6)
40%
9.2 ?(5.2, 4)
9%
10.8 ?(5.2, 5.6)
-7%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-41%
-63%
-9%
-89%
-25%
Brightness middle
320
547
71%
280
-12%
415
30%
365.4
14%
303.8
-5%
Brightness
303
523
73%
275
-9%
399
32%
344
14%
292
-4%
Brightness Distribution
87
88
1%
79
-9%
90
3%
85
-2%
85
-2%
Black Level *
0.3
0.44
-47%
0.4
-33%
0.43
-43%
0.29
3%
0.23
23%
Contrast
1067
1243
16%
700
-34%
965
-10%
1260
18%
1321
24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.1
2.1
-91%
2.1
-91%
1.44
-31%
3.17
-188%
1.87
-70%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.7
7
-159%
5.83
-116%
2.33
14%
7.69
-185%
3.26
-21%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.1
3.2
-191%
3.3
-200%
1.8
-64%
5.3
-382%
2.7
-145%
Gamma
2.13 103%
2.23 99%
2.13 103%
2.132 103%
2.18 101%
2.26 97%
CCT
6599 98%
6979 93%
7060 92%
6327 103%
5879 111%
6436 101%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.9
1.58
0.89
0.51
1.45
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
65.6
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.4
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-32% / -35%
-10% / -35%
-17% / -13%
-51% / -65%
-17% / -20%

* ... smaller is better

A tela cobre o espaço de cores P3, e nossa análise com o software profissional CalMAN mostra que a tela já é muito precisa no estado de entrega. Também não há coloração, e nossa própria calibração não levou a nenhuma melhoria adicional, portanto, não estamos oferecendo um perfil para você aqui. Este painel QHD é adequado para processamento de imagem e vídeo sem nenhuma limitação.

CalMAN Grayscale (DCI-P3 target color space)
CalMAN Grayscale (DCI-P3 target color space)
Saturação CalMAN (DCI-P3 target color space)
Saturação CalMAN (DCI-P3 target color space)
CalMAN ColorChecker (DCI-P3 target color space)
CalMAN ColorChecker (DCI-P3 target color space)
vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. DCI-P3
vs. DCI-P3
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5.1 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.7 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Sob a luz direta do sol
Sob a luz direta do sol

Desempenho - Intel HX com os freios aplicados

 
 
 

Condições de teste

O software ROG oferece amplas opções de configuração e perfis de potência. Por exemplo, você pode desativar completamente a GPU integrada (MUX) ou definir manualmente os valores de potência para a CPU e a GPU. Para nossos benchmarks e medidas abaixo, utilizamos o perfil de performance, já que isto já torna disponível a performance completa da GPU. Embora a performance da CPU seja ainda ligeiramente maior no modo Turbo, isto não justifica o ruído significativamente maior da ventoinha em nossa opinião.

Processador - Core i9-12950HX

OIntel Core i9-12950HX é atualmente o processador móvel mais rápido da Intel. Mesmo sendo capaz de consumir até 175 watts, ele permanece longe deste valor em nossa unidade de teste. Em vez disso, vemos um consumo máximo de 115 watts (mesmo no modo Turbo), e em algum momento os níveis de valor se situam em 70 watts (105 watts no modo Turbo). Embora o desempenho da CPU não seja nada ruim, você também poderia obter isto com um Core i9 regular, e o prêmio adicional para o chip HX não vale a despesa adicional

Na operação com bateria, o consumo de energia é limitado a 35 watts, levando a um desempenho multi-core que é reduzido em cerca de 40%. Você pode encontrar referências adicionais de CPU em nossa seção técnica correspondente.

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

018036054072090010801260144016201800198021602340252027002880306032403420Tooltip
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX: Ø2740 (2605.18-3101.02)
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX: Ø3279 (3244.91-3512.16)
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX: Ø3311 (3259.45-3569.52)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2230 (2203.37-2292.39)
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2889 (2849.61-2917.79)
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2216 (2202.89-2222.96)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX
84.3 pt
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
84 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
79.8 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
78.4 pt
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX
 
76.8 pt
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
74.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
59.2 pt
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
57.3 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
22982 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX
22449 Points +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=189, last 2 years)
21994 Points +10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
19965 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX
  (16277 - 23113, n=7)
19930 Points 0%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18870 (18654.1min - 18869.7max) Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
14152 Points -29%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
13618 (13498.1min - 13618.3max) Points -32%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX
1935 Points +2%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
1913 Points +1%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1905 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
1903 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2235, n=188, last 2 years)
1894 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX
  (1465 - 1922, n=7)
1835 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1557 Points -18%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1497 Points -21%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
8667 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX
8522 Points +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=186, last 2 years)
8352 Points +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX
  (6625 - 8777, n=7)
7689 Points +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
7511 Points
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
7169 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5549 Points -26%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5277 Points -30%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX
743 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
741 Points
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
738 Points 0%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
727 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX
  (703 - 741, n=7)
727 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 856, n=186, last 2 years)
727 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
605 Points -18%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
572 Points -23%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
3570 (3259.45min - 3569.52max) Points +15%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX
3512 (3244.91min - 3512.16max) Points +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=193, last 2 years)
3440 Points +11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
3101 (2605.18min - 3101.02max) Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX
  (2464 - 3530, n=7)
3090 Points 0%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
2918 (2849.61min - 2917.79max) Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
2296 Points -26%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2223 (2202.89min - 2222.96max) Points -28%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX
280 Points +2%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
278 Points +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=190, last 2 years)
278 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
274 Points
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
272 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX
  (167 - 276, n=7)
257 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
248 Points -9%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
240 Points -12%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
230 Seconds * -31%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
216 Seconds * -23%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
175 Seconds *
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
173.6 Seconds * +1%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX
  (138 - 193, n=7)
171.4 Seconds * +2%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=181, last 2 years)
169.4 Seconds * +3%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX
149 Seconds * +15%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
147 Seconds * +16%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX
86384 MIPS +12%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
86234 MIPS +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=185, last 2 years)
85738 MIPS +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX
  (65637 - 85019, n=7)
77515 MIPS +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
77003 MIPS
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
69146 MIPS -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
64439 MIPS -16%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
62023 MIPS -19%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX
6358 MIPS +2%
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=185, last 2 years)
6322 MIPS +1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
6256 MIPS 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
6255 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX
  (6022 - 6318, n=7)
6174 MIPS -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5872 MIPS -6%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
5803 MIPS -7%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5747 MIPS -8%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX
16447 Points +9%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
16250 Points +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
15144 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=186, last 2 years)
15098 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX
  (14028 - 16009, n=7)
15046 Points -1%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
13717 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
10126 Points -33%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
8732 Points -42%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
1923 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=186, last 2 years)
1898 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX
  (1847 - 1945, n=7)
1891 Points +1%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1878 Points +1%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX
1874 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
1868 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1590 Points -15%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1539 Points -18%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
25.6 fps +14%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX
25.4 fps +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=185, last 2 years)
23.6 fps +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
22.5 fps
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX
  (18.6 - 26.5, n=7)
22.3 fps -1%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
21.4 fps -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
17.5 fps -22%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
16.9 fps -25%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
56 s * -61%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 199, n=182, last 2 years)
48.1 s * -39%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
45.9 s * -32%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
40.7 s * -17%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX
  (34.7 - 45.4, n=7)
40.2 s * -16%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
39 s * -12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
34.7 s *
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX
34.5 s * +1%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.4964 sec * -17%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
0.4808 sec * -13%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX
  (0.4251 - 0.4515, n=7)
0.4374 sec * -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=186, last 2 years)
0.4366 sec * -3%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
0.4323 sec * -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
0.4251 sec *
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX
0.4209 sec * +1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
0.4194 sec * +1%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
3101 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
257 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
274 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
7511 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
741 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1903 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
19965 Points
Ajuda
Performance Rating
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
97.4 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
95 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
85.8 pt
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX
 
83.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
79.5 pt
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
77.9 pt
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
75 pt
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=182, last 2 years)
21963 KRay/s +25%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
21797 KRay/s +24%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX
  (15499 - 22868, n=7)
17911 KRay/s +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
17542 KRay/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
16115 KRay/s -8%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
16014 KRay/s -9%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
11535 KRay/s -34%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9759 KRay/s -44%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
107354 Points +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=182, last 2 years)
106952 Points +23%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
100718 Points +16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
98800 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX
  (77846 - 115907, n=7)
92341 Points +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
86936 Points
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
52916 Points -39%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
43695 Points -50%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
4945 MB/s +18%
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=182, last 2 years)
4920 MB/s +18%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
4216 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
4179 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX
  (3426 - 5069, n=7)
4106 MB/s -2%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3504 MB/s -16%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
3439 MB/s -18%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3422 MB/s -18%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=182, last 2 years)
117347 Points +12%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
107120 Points +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
104422 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX
  (102752 - 104726, n=7)
103895 Points -1%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
103894 Points -1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
103770 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
102167 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
101029 Points -3%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=182, last 2 years)
13290 Points +16%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
13062 Points +14%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
12969 Points +13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
12783 Points +11%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
12726 Points +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX
  (10134 - 12823, n=7)
11619 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
11502 Points
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
10402 Points -10%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
55679 Points +31%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
54060 Points +27%
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=182, last 2 years)
53819 Points +26%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
52544 Points +23%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX
  (37146 - 57340, n=7)
44595 Points +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
42613 Points
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
31779 Points -25%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
27285 Points -36%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
179186 MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
167077 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
135833 MB/s -19%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
134473 MB/s -20%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
125268 MB/s -25%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX
  (72599 - 181128, n=7)
119390 MB/s -29%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=182, last 2 years)
109208 MB/s -35%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
106367 MB/s -36%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1392 MB/s +16%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1389 MB/s +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=182, last 2 years)
1369 MB/s +14%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1205 MB/s
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1203 MB/s 0%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX
  (996 - 1417, n=7)
1195 MB/s -1%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
875 MB/s -27%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
845 MB/s -30%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=182, last 2 years)
11830 KRay/s +24%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
11612 KRay/s +22%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX
  (8455 - 12432, n=7)
9620 KRay/s +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9507 KRay/s
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
8630 KRay/s -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
8529 KRay/s -10%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
6663 KRay/s -30%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
5748 KRay/s -40%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
42438 MPixel/s
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
41007 MPixel/s -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX
  (35479 - 42655, n=7)
40844 MPixel/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=183, last 2 years)
40303 MPixel/s -5%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40239 MPixel/s -5%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
34534 MPixel/s -19%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
30226 MPixel/s -29%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
20034 MPixel/s -53%

Desempenho do sistema

A impressão de desempenho subjetivo é excelente, o que também é confirmado pelos bons resultados de referência. Não notamos nenhum problema durante os testes.

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
8636 Points +20%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8203 Points +14%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
8186 Points +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=163, last 2 years)
7813 Points +8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7208 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
7208 Points 0%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
7184 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6966 Points -3%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
11205 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
11190 Points +9%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11093 Points +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=162, last 2 years)
10836 Points +5%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
10593 Points +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10306 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
10306 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9740 Points -5%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
10932 Points +11%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10178 Points +3%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
10144 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=162, last 2 years)
9909 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9856 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
9856 Points 0%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
9573 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9564 Points -3%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
14291 Points +43%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
13270 Points +33%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
13098 Points +31%
Average of class Gaming
  (6807 - 18475, n=162, last 2 years)
12168 Points +22%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10003 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
10003 Points 0%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
9923 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9848 Points -2%
CrossMark / Overall
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2132 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2112 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
2112 Points 0%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2108 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=144, last 2 years)
1910 Points -10%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1903 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1699 Points -20%
CrossMark / Productivity
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2012 Points +2%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1978 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1966 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
1966 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=144, last 2 years)
1809 Points -8%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1808 Points -8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1646 Points -16%
CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2336 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
2336 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2307 Points -1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2288 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=144, last 2 years)
2099 Points -10%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
2095 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1867 Points -20%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2007 Points +4%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1991 Points +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1936 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
1936 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=144, last 2 years)
1707 Points -12%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1666 Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1405 Points -27%
PCMark 10 Score
7208 pontos
Ajuda
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=182, last 2 years)
65546 MB/s +3%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
64030 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
63993 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
63831 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX
  (59731 - 64732, n=7)
63039 MB/s -1%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
53861 MB/s -16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
50231 MB/s -21%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
42260 MB/s -34%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
69716 MB/s +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=182, last 2 years)
69486 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
69256 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX
  (59744 - 70359, n=7)
66028 MB/s -5%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62140 MB/s -10%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
57237 MB/s -17%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
51403 MB/s -26%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
47331 MB/s -32%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=182, last 2 years)
67309 MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65800 MB/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
63527 MB/s -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX
  (57750 - 67899, n=7)
63186 MB/s -4%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
60014 MB/s -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
55263 MB/s -16%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
54443 MB/s -17%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
45155 MB/s -31%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
98.4 ns * -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=182, last 2 years)
93.8 ns * -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
90.8 ns * -7%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
88.8 ns * -4%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX
  (84.5 - 92.2, n=7)
87.9 ns * -3%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
86 ns * -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
85.2 ns *
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
76.5 ns * +10%

* ... smaller is better

Latências DPC

Em nosso teste de latência padronizado (navegando na Internet, vídeo 4K YouTube, carga de CPU), nossa unidade de teste com sua versão BIOS tem alguns problemas, por isso não é adequada para processamento de vídeo e áudio em tempo real.

LatencyMon - Visão geral
LatencyMon - Visão geral
LatencyMon - Motoristas
LatencyMon - Motoristas
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4362 μs * -28%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3413 μs *
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2203.2 μs * +35%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
638.25 μs * +81%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1155.7 μs * +66%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1101.9 μs * +68%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
611 μs * +82%

* ... smaller is better

Solução de armazenamento

2x PCIe 4.0 SSDs
2x PCIe 4.0 SSDs

A Asus usa dois SSDs rápidos de 2 TB da Samsung (PM91A) em uma configuração RAID 0 aqui. Isto permite taxas de transferência extremamente altas de mais de 10 GB/s. Entretanto, o desempenho não permanece estável sob carga constante, caindo maciçamente em seu lugar. Mas isso não deve causar nenhuma limitação durante os jogos do dia-a-dia. Você pode encontrar referências adicionais de SSD aqui.

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 5370.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 10109.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 1005.85 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 767.97 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 80.63 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 229.37 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 1886.09 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 2061.23 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
81.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
76.3 pt
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
72.6 pt
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
70.7 pt
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
 
67 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
59.6 pt
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
57.8 pt
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
50.3 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5568 (5541.55min - 5568.34max) MB/s
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
4931 (4875.77min - 4930.83max) MB/s -11%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4343 MB/s -22%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (2376 - 5676, n=32)
3898 MB/s -30%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3872 (3855.82min - 3871.97max) MB/s -30%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3561 (3468.06min - 3560.96max) MB/s -36%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=164, last 2 years)
3477 MB/s -38%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
2931 (2925.53min - 2931.41max) MB/s -47%
seq write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7531 (7479min - 7530.7max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4954 (4429.55min - 4954.26max) MB/s -34%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
4819 (4728.89min - 4819.25max) MB/s -36%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4242 (4225.7min - 4241.7max) MB/s -44%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (2370 - 7628, n=32)
4122 MB/s -45%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3966 (3885.39min - 3966.13max) MB/s -47%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=164, last 2 years)
3818 MB/s -49%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
3530 (3445.02min - 3530max) MB/s -53%
seq q8 t1 read
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
13195 (9412.86min - 13194.8max) MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
12556 (4870.54min - 12556.3max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (3471 - 12556, n=32)
7102 MB/s -43%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6722 (987.46min - 6721.79max) MB/s -46%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
6693 (6460.49min - 6692.89max) MB/s -47%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6384 (5573.36min - 6384.17max) MB/s -49%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=164, last 2 years)
6318 MB/s -50%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
5541 (2954.89min - 5540.89max) MB/s -56%
seq q8 t1 write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10261 (10045.2min - 10261.4max) MB/s
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
8227 (8104.29min - 8226.71max) MB/s -20%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
5907 (5803.79min - 5907.4max) MB/s -42%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (3537 - 10261, n=32)
5469 MB/s -47%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5043 (5032.12min - 5043.21max) MB/s -51%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5037 (5025min - 5036.73max) MB/s -51%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4985 (4772.28min - 4984.61max) MB/s -51%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=164, last 2 years)
4859 MB/s -53%
4k q1 t1 read
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
79.3 (77.82min - 79.25max) MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
79.1 (78.08min - 79.08max) MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
79 (77.42min - 79.03max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (56.2 - 91.2, n=32)
77.5 MB/s -2%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
77 (74.91min - 76.95max) MB/s -3%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
74.1 (72.94min - 74.14max) MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=164, last 2 years)
65.9 MB/s -17%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
49.6 (49.23min - 49.56max) MB/s -37%
4k q1 t1 write
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
258 (233.29min - 257.8max) MB/s +17%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
244 (215.8min - 243.91max) MB/s +10%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
241 MB/s +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (78 - 397, n=164, last 2 years)
223 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
221 (218.91min - 220.66max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (115.5 - 295, n=32)
214 MB/s -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
195.1 (194.02min - 195.09max) MB/s -12%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
170.2 (168.21min - 170.2max) MB/s -23%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4483 (4465.42min - 4482.78max) MB/s +109%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3797 (3780.09min - 3796.62max) MB/s +77%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (658 - 4075, n=32)
2876 MB/s +34%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2842 (2837.59min - 2841.89max) MB/s +32%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=164, last 2 years)
2565 MB/s +19%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2148 (1952.04min - 2148.3max) MB/s
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
971 (953.87min - 970.88max) MB/s -55%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
874 (867.39min - 873.79max) MB/s -59%
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4383 (4358.15min - 4383.06max) MB/s +109%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3504 (3465.89min - 3503.69max) MB/s +67%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2658 (2651.88min - 2657.7max) MB/s +27%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (387 - 3548, n=32)
2190 MB/s +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=164, last 2 years)
2128 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2101 (1969.73min - 2101.4max) MB/s
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
626 (612.08min - 626.28max) MB/s -70%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
461 (442.02min - 461.29max) MB/s -78%
AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9218 Points +23%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8492 Points +13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7498 Points
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
7400 Points -1%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (3537 - 9031, n=31)
7222 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=155, last 2 years)
6733 Points -10%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
4941 Points -34%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
4428 Points -41%
Score Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3428 Points +14%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3327 Points +10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3012 Points
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2855 Points -5%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (1224 - 3399, n=31)
2666 Points -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=155, last 2 years)
2440 Points -19%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1948 Points -35%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
1760 Points -42%
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4113 Points +37%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3531 Points +17%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (1081 - 3999, n=31)
3262 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
3128 Points +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=155, last 2 years)
3109 Points +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3013 Points
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
2137 Points -29%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
1857 Points -38%
Seq Read
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9971 MB/s
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
6561.69 MB/s -34%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (2591 - 9971, n=31)
5479 MB/s -45%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
5232 MB/s -48%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5157 MB/s -48%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5061.06 MB/s -49%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
4981 MB/s -50%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=155, last 2 years)
4948 MB/s -50%
Seq Write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8590 MB/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4336 MB/s -50%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (1900 - 8590, n=31)
3992 MB/s -54%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3764.99 MB/s -56%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=155, last 2 years)
3759 MB/s -56%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3733 MB/s -57%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
3480.87 MB/s -59%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
3050 MB/s -64%
4K Read
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
72.43 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (49.8 - 86.4, n=31)
72.4 MB/s 0%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
69.89 MB/s -4%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
69.21 MB/s -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
68.93 MB/s -5%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
67.72 MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=155, last 2 years)
65 MB/s -10%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
57 MB/s -21%
4K Write
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
261.3 MB/s +28%
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=155, last 2 years)
212 MB/s +4%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
211.73 MB/s +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
204.33 MB/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
203.82 MB/s 0%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (112.6 - 254, n=31)
197.6 MB/s -3%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
184.49 MB/s -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
157.01 MB/s -23%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2842.96 MB/s +46%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2751.05 MB/s +42%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2264.38 MB/s +17%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (662 - 2811, n=31)
2045 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1942.29 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=155, last 2 years)
1874 MB/s -4%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1223.07 MB/s -37%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
1205 MB/s -38%
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3582.58 MB/s +84%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2942.87 MB/s +51%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (567 - 3414, n=31)
2665 MB/s +37%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=155, last 2 years)
2524 MB/s +29%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2490.61 MB/s +28%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1949.41 MB/s
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1604.89 MB/s -18%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
1290 MB/s -34%
Access Time Read
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=154, last 2 years)
0.05551 ms * -152%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.049 ms * -123%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (0.018 - 0.078, n=31)
0.03406 ms * -55%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.034 ms * -55%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
0.032 ms * -45%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
0.03 ms * -36%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
0.027 ms * -23%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.022 ms *
Access Time Write
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
0.066 ms * -187%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=155, last 2 years)
0.04751 ms * -107%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
0.044 ms * -91%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (0.017 - 0.092, n=31)
0.03371 ms * -47%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.025 ms * -9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.023 ms *
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
0.021 ms * +9%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.02 ms * +13%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

0510102015302040255030603570408045905100561061206630714076508160867091809690Tooltip
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W: Ø1479 (639.61-10176.63)

Placa Gráfica

GPU-Z GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
GPU-Z GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Asus usa oGeForce RTX 3080 Ti versão com um TGP de 150 watts, e a GPU também é capaz de usar um Dynamic Boost adicional de 25 watts do processador. Ele também atinge este valor (175 watts) no modo Performance, portanto não é necessário usar o modo Turbo. Há também um MUX que permite desativar completamente a GPU integrada (requer um reinício), o que melhora as latências enquanto se joga, mas não tem muito efeito sobre a performance gráfica em si

A performance gráfica se enquadra no grupo dos melhores jogadores e também é superior aos valores médios para o RTX 3080 Ti em nosso banco de dados. Além disso, o desempenho dos gráficos permanece completamente estável. O teste de estresse 3DMark Time Spy é aprovado sem problemas, e também não há queda de desempenho em nosso teste de carga constante Witcher 3. O desempenho dos jogos é facilmente suficiente para o máximo de detalhes na resolução nativa QHD, mesmo em jogos exigentes.

Na operação por bateria, a GPU pode consumir no máximo 44 watts, o que corresponde a uma queda de performance de cerca de 70%. Você pode encontrar referências adicionais de GPU aqui.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Alienware x17 R2 P48E -4!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
97.6 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
94.8 pt
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS -2!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
93.9 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
90.3 pt
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE -2!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
90 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
90 pt
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 -3!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
84.5 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
 
84 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
44906 Points +2%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
44381 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
44134 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=182, last 2 years)
43891 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
43823 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
43337 Points -2%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
40704 Points -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (13920 - 45841, n=45)
39402 Points -11%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
34439 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
33120 Points +2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
33025 Points +2%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
32849 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
32505 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=193, last 2 years)
31461 Points -3%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
29508 Points -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (6928 - 34439, n=43)
29496 Points -9%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
13554 Points +6%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
13455 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=188, last 2 years)
13142 Points +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
12791 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
12684 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
12325 Points -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (4921 - 13835, n=43)
11850 Points -7%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
11598 Points -9%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
28879 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
27878 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
27501 Points +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
26982 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (20846 - 28879, n=9)
26251 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (4663 - 44948, n=20, last 2 years)
25566 Points -5%
V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU CUDA
Average of class Gaming
  (120 - 2797, n=114, last 2 years)
1580 mpaths +19%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1384 mpaths +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
1333 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (846 - 1384, n=20)
1273 mpaths -5%
GPU RTX
Average of class Gaming
  (171 - 3824, n=112, last 2 years)
2199 mpaths +16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
1893 mpaths
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1880 mpaths -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1225 - 1915, n=19)
1745 mpaths -8%
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 - GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (54 - 1334, n=150, last 2 years)
715 mpaths +39%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
526 mpaths +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
513 mpaths
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
511 mpaths 0%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
502 mpaths -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (311 - 552, n=35)
500 mpaths -3%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
499 mpaths -3%
Geekbench 5.5 - OpenCL Score
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
151633 Points
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
147189 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
138625 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
138534 Points -9%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
137987 Points -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (88580 - 151633, n=41)
136691 Points -10%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
136135 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (5039 - 237138, n=188, last 2 years)
127665 Points -16%
3DMark 11 Performance
35997 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
28793 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
12904 pontos
Ajuda
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (20 - 28, n=13)
23.1 Seconds * -0%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
23 Seconds * -0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
23 Seconds *
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
22 Seconds * +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 95, n=178, last 2 years)
20.8 Seconds * +10%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=184, last 2 years)
36.9 Seconds * -9%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
36 Seconds * -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (32 - 41, n=13)
35 Seconds * -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
34 Seconds *
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
32 Seconds * +6%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
301 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (261 - 429, n=13)
295 Seconds * +2%
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=187, last 2 years)
293 Seconds * +3%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
268 Seconds * +11%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
263 Seconds * +13%

* ... smaller is better

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
129.3 (110min, 111.14P1) fps +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=162, last 2 years)
128.5 fps +8%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
128 (124min) fps +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
121 (98min) fps +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
118.8 (111min, 113P1) fps
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
114.4 (108min, 109P1) fps -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30 - 130.6, n=43)
112.1 fps -6%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
105.5 (91min) fps -11%
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
115.7 (46.4min) fps +33%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
99.4 (40.7min) fps +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (54 - 144.1, n=16)
93.6 fps +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (16.7 - 159.7, n=68, last 2 years)
93.5 fps +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
87 fps
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
54 fps -38%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (37.7 - 116, n=56, last 2 years)
69.6 fps +24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
56 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (36 - 69.6, n=13)
55.4 fps -1%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
36 fps -36%
GTA V
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
131.8 (6.21min, 90.9P1) fps +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
126.7 (9.75min, 76.9P1) fps
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
126.3 (5.94min, 90.9P1) fps 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=169, last 2 years)
113.8 fps -10%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
111.4 (6.89min, 66.7P1) fps -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30 - 139.2, n=42)
111 fps -12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
101.8 (18.4min, 71.4P1) fps -20%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
93 (7.94min, 71.4P1) fps -27%
2560x1440 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
114.1 (7.48min, 76.9P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (36.9 - 160.6, n=111, last 2 years)
107.1 fps -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
101.1 (9.21min, 71.4P1) fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30 - 121.2, n=28)
98.2 fps -14%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
82.4 (6.53min, 52.6P1) fps -28%
F1 22
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
91 fps +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (13 - 144.7, n=95, last 2 years)
85.3 fps +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (78.9 - 91, n=4)
82.7 fps +5%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
79.8 (65min, 29P1) fps +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
78.9 (69min, 50P1) fps
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62 fps +17%
Average of class Gaming
  (29.9 - 92.2, n=76, last 2 years)
61.9 fps +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (52.9 - 62, n=2)
57.5 fps +9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
52.9 (46min, 41P1) fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1920x1080 High Quality
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
137.6 fps +16%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
127.8 fps +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
122.8 fps +4%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
121.2 fps +2%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=181, last 2 years)
120.1 fps +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
118.5 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30.7 - 140.6, n=42)
113.8 fps -4%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
106 fps -11%
2560x1440 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (32.5 - 169.2, n=132, last 2 years)
104.7 fps +13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
96.4 fps +4%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
92.8 fps 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
92.8 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30.8 - 105.8, n=34)
85.9 fps -7%

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø118.8 (111-126)
baixomédiaaltoultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 186.8 180.7 126.7 114.1
The Witcher 3 (2015) 118.8
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 211 191 180.8 169.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 173.3 156.2 118.5 92.8
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 165.3 143.5 116.2
Strange Brigade (2018) 236 211 157.7
F1 2021 (2021) 236 211 132.8 106.2
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) 103 101 98 87 56
F1 22 (2022) 235 235 199.7 78.9 52.9
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) 135 109 107 78

Emissões e gerenciamento de energia

Níveis de ruídos

Sistema de resfriamento da câmara de vapor
Sistema de resfriamento da câmara de vapor

O Asus usa aqui um sistema de resfriamento por câmara de vapor. No modo Performance power, o dispositivo também permanece relativamente silencioso, e somos capazes de medir um máximo de 46 dB(A) durante o teste de estresse, bem como durante o jogo. É claro que isto ainda é perceptível, mas nossa unidade de teste ainda é significativamente mais silenciosa com isto do que os concorrentes. No modo Turbo, o desempenho do jogo é apenas insignificantemente maior, mas os dois ventiladores em funcionamento produzem um alto 54 dB(A). Durante a operação ociosa, os ventiladores muitas vezes permanecem desligados, mas quase sempre notamos alguns ruídos eletrônicos silenciosos. Sob carga, há também alguns ruídos audíveis da bobina que vêm da GPU, estamos adivinhando.

Barulho

Ocioso
23.9 / 23.9 / 23.9 dB
Carga
34.3 / 45.9 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 23.9 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.329.33029.231.42526.729.229.129.831.33123.323.522.521.825.64024.12825.825.427.45023.724.423.628.724.46328.624.622.827.225.2802421.618.418.624.410028.726.618.219.124.812531.623.620.319.527.216028.422.617.417.324.320030.8241918.425.825031.422.41817.125.83153222.415.815.52740035.627.912.612.629.650037.824.111.610.829.363033.121.912.412.328.680034.520.511.91129.8100034.623.310.610.929.2125034.722.410.31029.2160035.820.710.210.228.4200034.122.410.710.526.1250033.924.112.811.125.9315034.524.816.911.628.1400033.317.11211.828.3500034.920.212.41223.3630031.319.714.112.220.1800024.320.114.512.516.11000021.319.312.612.413.8125001819.11312.213.81600016.321.813.111.714.7SPL45.934.325.223.939.1N5.52.10.70.53.1median 33.1median 22.4median 12.8median 12.2median 26.1Delta4.51.92.52.14.4hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
Noise
-19%
-9%
-27%
1%
-4%
off / environment *
23.9
24.5
-3%
21.9
8%
26
-9%
22.7
5%
25
-5%
Idle Minimum *
23.9
24.5
-3%
24.53
-3%
26
-9%
23.1
3%
25.2
-5%
Idle Average *
23.9
30
-26%
24.53
-3%
29
-21%
23.1
3%
25.2
-5%
Idle Maximum *
23.9
32.5
-36%
24.53
-3%
40
-67%
23.1
3%
25.2
-5%
Load Average *
34.3
43.9
-28%
46.25
-35%
47
-37%
31.9
7%
30.7
10%
Load Maximum *
45.9
54.2
-18%
54.25
-18%
54
-18%
52.5
-14%
51.3
-12%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48.8
56.86
52
52.5
51.3

* ... smaller is better

Temperatura

Apesar dos ventiladores relativamente silenciosos, as temperaturas de superfície não dão motivos para preocupação. Apesar de medirmos mais de 50 °C (122 °F) em alguns pontos isolados sob carga, o teclado permanece muito frio e não há nenhuma limitação durante os jogos

Durante o teste de estresse, a GPU recebe tratamento preferencial, funcionando de forma estável a 150 watts assim que o processador se desnivelar em cerca de 36 watts. Não há redução de desempenho logo após o teste de estresse.

Medidas da CPU e GPU durante o teste de estresse
Medidas da CPU e GPU durante o teste de estresse
 41.7 °C45.5 °C48.8 °C 
 39.7 °C40.1 °C45.3 °C 
 24.7 °C25.1 °C25.4 °C 
Máximo: 48.8 °C
Médio: 37.4 °C
50.4 °C49.3 °C48.2 °C
40.3 °C52.4 °C51.1 °C
25.6 °C27.2 °C25.2 °C
Máximo: 52.4 °C
Médio: 41.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  43 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.8 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52.4 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26 °C / 78.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+2.9 °C / 5.2 F).
Temperaturas da superfície durante o teste de estresse (topo)
Temperaturas da superfície durante o teste de estresse (topo)
Temperaturas da superfície durante o teste de estresse (fundo)
Temperaturas da superfície durante o teste de estresse (fundo)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Heat
-8%
-3%
1%
7%
4%
Maximum Upper Side *
48.8
44.4
9%
40.8
16%
49
-0%
49.6
-2%
40
18%
Maximum Bottom *
52.4
60.8
-16%
52.4
-0%
52
1%
42.4
19%
39.8
24%
Idle Upper Side *
30.4
33.8
-11%
34.6
-14%
30
1%
29.2
4%
34.6
-14%
Idle Bottom *
34.1
38.8
-14%
38.4
-13%
33
3%
32
6%
38.4
-13%

* ... smaller is better

Oradores

O sistema de som consiste de um total de quatro módulos que produzem um som potente e espaçoso. Embora as caixas acústicas não sejam as mais barulhentas do mercado, a qualidade é muito boa em geral. Entretanto, devido ao barulho alto dos ventiladores durante os jogos, ainda assim recomendamos um fone de ouvido.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.232.32529.829.63121.824.34025.427.15028.726.36327.230.88018.641.410019.148.712519.552.516017.352.620018.456.125017.151.531515.553.140012.656.650010.858.663012.362.88001162.4100010.959.812501060.5160010.260.6200010.559.4250011.162.6315011.666.7400011.858.950001257.8630012.259.7800012.561.41000012.451.21250012.241.21600011.735.6SPL23.973.3N0.533.1median 12.2median 58.6Delta2.14.5018.927.5019.124.201516014.515.9014.815.6021.321.501725.5020.437.2014.442.2014.655.5018.260.301565.1012.268.2014.570.509.371.70977.108.37408.474.408.475.208.671.209.670.509.872.409.668.209.66409.965.209.969.909.56509.465.409.26208.459.283.421.983.460.20.460.2median 9.6median 68.2median 71.8722.45.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014WMSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 71.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 71.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 71.8% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (107.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 100% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

fonte de alimentação de 330 watts
fonte de alimentação de 330 watts

O ROG Strix Scar 17 SE não é um laptop muito eficiente, o que não é muito surpreendente considerando o poderoso hardware. Já medimos até 27 watts durante a operação ociosa, e enquanto jogamos, o valor aumenta para cerca de 230 watts. A fonte de alimentação de 330 watts é, portanto, suficientemente grande. O consumo em modo standby também é bastante alto a 2,6 watts, mas isto se deve aos efeitos de iluminação que são ativados por padrão.

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.58 / 2.6 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 19.3 / 26.5 / 27.1 Watt
Carga midlight 141 / 307.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

020406080100120140160180200220240260280300Tooltip
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø225 (221-232)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø238 (220-308)

Power Consumption With External Monitor

0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø127 (115.4-183.5)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø78.3 (73.5-109)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø148.3 (141.9-156.4)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø215 (206-220)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø214 (211-217)

Vida útil da bateria

Em nosso teste WLAN a 150 cd/m², o que corresponde a 48% do brilho máximo, nossa unidade de teste dura apenas cerca de 4 horas. Considerando os altos valores de consumo, isto não é muito surpreendente. Alguns dos concorrentes duram significativamente mais aqui, se você precisar fazer a ponte entre o tempo de saída e o tempo de funcionamento. O jogo é possível por cerca de uma hora, mas apenas com uma redução significativa do desempenho. Leva cerca de 100 minutos para recarregar completamente a bateria de 90-Wh, com 80% da capacidade já disponível após cerca de 53 minutos.

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 107)
4h 10min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 107)
3h 40min
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
559 min +124%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
537 min +115%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh
412.1 min +65%
Average of class Gaming
  (85 - 889, n=153, last 2 years)
376 min +50%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
267 min +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
250 min
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 87 Wh
117 min -53%

Pro

+ bom painel QHD com 240 Hz
+ alto e estável desempenho no jogo
+ iluminação extensiva da caixa
+ TB4, Wi-Fi 6E, e PCIe 4.0
+ ventiladores relativamente silenciosos enquanto jogam

Contra

- desempenho inconsistente da SSD
- o prêmio adicional para a CPU HX não vale a pena
- sem webcam
- ruídos eletrônicos

Veredicto - Um laptop de jogo rápido totalmente equipado

Testando o Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 2022. Unidade de teste fornecida pela Asus Alemanha.
Testando o Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 2022. Unidade de teste fornecida pela Asus Alemanha.

O atual Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE fornece realmente tudo o que o coração de um jogador deseja. Um rápido painel QHD com 240 Hz junto com o GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, que também oferece potência suficiente para a resolução nativa em detalhes máximos. Embora o desempenho da CPU também seja bom para um laptop para jogos, o potencial do processador HX não pode ser usado totalmente. Portanto, você deve economizar o prêmio adicional para o processador mais potente e apenas escolher um Core i9 regular

Outras vantagens incluem as cores muito precisas, se você tiver que trabalhar diretamente no processamento de vídeo, por exemplo, as temperaturas moderadas da superfície, e os ventiladores relativamente silenciosos durante os jogos. Embora um modo Turbo esteja disponível, que também se torna significativamente mais alto, isto não tem muito impacto sobre o desempenho dos jogos, portanto, em nossa opinião, não vale a pena

O novo Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE oferece muitos recursos de desempenho e jogos, mas você deve economizar no prêmio adicional para o processador Intel HX.

Os concorrentes no mercado de jogos oferecem especificações de desempenho semelhantes, mas também displays mais brilhantes em peças e caixas menos brilhantes. Além disso, os ruídos eletrônicos podem se tornar irritantes a longo prazo.

Preço e Disponibilidade

Nossa configuração de teste do ROG Strix Scar 17 SE está disponível em Amazon por $3899e uma configuração menor com o Core i9-12900H regular também está disponível lá por $2278.

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W - 11/18/2022 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff

Acabamento
81 / 98 → 82%
Teclado
86%
Mouse
83%
Conectividade
61 / 80 → 77%
Peso
57 / 10-66 → 84%
Bateria
59 / 95 → 62%
Pantalha
91%
Desempenho do jogos
100%
Desempenho da aplicação
95%
Temperatura
85 / 95 → 90%
Ruído
91 / 90 → 100%
Audio
74%
Médio
74%
87%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE review - Laptop de jogos totalmente equipado com RTX 3080 Ti
Andreas Osthoff, 2022-11-21 (Update: 2022-11-21)