Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.2 GHz

Especificações do Portátil

Price comparison

Análises para o Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.2 GHz

80% MacBook review
Origem: Techradar EN→PT Archive.org version
Apple has given the MacBook's performance a much-needed boost, and it helps OS X zip along much better. Its critical flaws remain, but the 2016 version is less of a risk than it was last year. We just wish it was a bit cheaper.
Análise única, Disponível online, Longa, Data: 08/11/2017
Pontuação: Pontuação total: 80%

70% Apple MacBook 2016 Review
Origem: Laptop Mag EN→PT Archive.org version
The updated MacBook packs more performance and battery life into a wonderfully thin and light design, but Apple didn't address the biggest drawbacks.
Análise única, Disponível online, Muito longa, Data: 11/28/2016
Pontuação: Pontuação total: 70%

83% Macbook 2016 (12-inch) review
Origem: Tab Times EN→PT Archive.org version
As a Mac user of many years, the 12-inch Macbook definitely requires a compromise in the way I work. For example, my 15-inch Macbook Pro with Retina Display powers a two screen set up and the Macbook 2016 is incapable of doing that, especially as none of Apple’s official adapters currently offer DisplayPort functionality. Ironically, Google makes a USB Type-C to DisplayPort adapter that is perfect for this task, but with the limitations of a single port, the Macbook doesn’t stack up to my particular usage.
Análise única, Disponível online, Muito longa, Data: 11/09/2016
Pontuação: Pontuação total: 83%

80% Apple MacBook (2016) review: Is port-free still the future?
Origem: Pocket Lint EN→PT Archive.org version
The 12-inch MacBook has divided opinion since day one, having done-away with a full-size USB port for the smaller USB Type-C. A couple of years down the line and this will be a more standard format, but the bigger issue is the MacBook's persistence to offer just one of these ports for both charging and connectivity. If you're a casual or cloud-based user that won't be a big issue though. Just as we said of the first iteration: the 12-inch MacBook is all about portability; it's a laptop so thin, so sleek, so light, that everything else has been pushed by the wayside.
Análise única, Disponível online, Curta, Data: 09/21/2016
Pontuação: Pontuação total: 80%

80% MacBook review
Origem: Techradar EN→PT Archive.org version
Apple has given the MacBook's performance a much-needed boost, and it helps OS X zip along much better. Its critical flaws remain, but the 2016 version is less of a risk than it was last year. We just wish it was a bit cheaper.
Análise única, Disponível online, Média, Data: 09/20/2016
Pontuação: Pontuação total: 80%

70% Apple MacBook 2016
Origem: Laptop Mag EN→PT Archive.org version
The 2016 MacBook is certainly an improvement over its predecessor. It's significantly faster, especially if you opt for the Core m5 model, and it lasts an hour longer on a charge, all while being extremely portable. I also continue to love the Retina display and don't really mind the flat butterfly keyboard.
Análise única, Disponível online, Longa, Data: 05/02/2016
Pontuação: Pontuação total: 70%

MacBook 2016 Review – Still controversial
Origem: Slashgear EN→PT Archive.org version
I'll be sticking with my first-gen MacBook, then, though that's not going to stop me recommending it to those who travel frequently, have mainstream needs for processing, and who are willing to pay a premium for OS X on a notebook that's still a relatively rare sight in the wild. Apple doesn't expect it to be the Mac for every user: that's why it's not the only Mac. Just make sure you're going into it with your eyes wide open.
Análise única, Disponível online, Média, Data: 05/02/2016

80% Apple MacBook Retina 12in
Origem: It Pro EN→PT Archive.org version
The 12in Retina MacBook isn’t for everyone. If you value portability and battery life above all and predominately use wireless peripherals as well as cloud apps and storage, then this MacBook will be a great fit. If you use lots of demanding applications, need to connect lots of wired peripherals or just can’t get on with the low-travel keyboard, then one of Apple’s more conventional MacBooks will be a better choice.
Análise única, Disponível online, Longa, Data: 04/29/2016
Pontuação: Pontuação total: 80%

82% Apple's updated MacBook is indeed faster with longer battery life
Origem: Engadget EN→PT Archive.org version
Apple deserves credit for improving the MacBook's battery life and disk speeds, but other than that, this is, for better and worse, the same machine as last year's model. If you previously shied away from the 12-inch MacBook because of the "one port" thing, this still isn't the laptop for you.
Análise única, Disponível online, Longa, Data: 04/25/2016
Pontuação: Pontuação total: 82%

70% Apple MacBook 2016
Origem: Laptop Mag EN→PT Archive.org version
The 2016 MacBook is certainly an improvement over its predecessor. It's significantly faster, especially if you opt for the Core m5 model, and it lasts an hour longer on a charge, all while being extremely portable. I also continue to love the Retina display and don't really mind the flat butterfly keyboard.
Análise única, Disponível online, Longa, Data: 04/22/2016
Pontuação: Pontuação total: 70%

84% MacBook still short on ports, but this improved minimalist laptop is more tempting than ever
Origem: CNet EN→PT Archive.org version
In hands-on use, the new MacBook feels almost exactly like the previous version. If you've got the 2015 MacBook, there's no need to upgrade, but if you were holding off to see what the second generation looked like, the potential boost to performance and battery life makes me feel even more confident about using this as primary laptop, especially for frequent travelers.
Análise única, Disponível online, Longa, Data: 04/21/2016
Pontuação: Pontuação total: 84% desempenho: 80% mobilidade: 80%

Rhapsody in Rosé
Origem: Notebooksbilliger Blog DE→PT Archive.org version
Análise única, Disponível online, Longa, Data: 06/08/2016

Apple Macbook vs. HP Elitebook: Dünn und dünner
Origem: Spiegel Online DE→PT Archive.org version
Análise única, Disponível online, Muito curta, Data: 05/30/2016

Apple Macbook 12. Опыт Реальной Эксплуатации.
Origem: Mobileimho.ru RU→PT Archive.org version
Análise única, Disponível online, Muito longa, Data: 04/06/2017

Обзор Apple MacBook (Early 2016): ноутбук или планшет — нелегкий выбор
Origem: 3DNews.ru RU→PT Archive.org version
Análise única, Disponível online, Muito longa, Data: 07/12/2016

Красивая печатная машинка. Обзор ноутбука Apple MacBook (2016)
Origem: Ferra.ru RU→PT Archive.org version
Análise única, Disponível online, Longa, Data: 06/21/2016

Comentario

Intel HD Graphics 515:

Alguns jogos atuais não tão exigentes podem ser jogados fluentemente com poucos detalhes.

>> Mais informação pode ser encontrada na nossa Comparativa de de Placas de Vídeo e a Benchmark Lista.

6Y54:
>> Mais informação pode ser encontrada na nossa Comparativa de Processadores Móveis.

12.00": Esta diagonal de tela é bastante grande para tablets, mas pequena para subportáteis. Alguns conversíveis também usam esse tamanho.

Grandes tamanhos de tela permitem maiores resoluções. Portanto, detalhes como letras são maiores. Por outro lado, o consumo de energia é menor com diagonais de tela menores e os aparelhos são menores, mais leves e mais econômicos.
>> Para saber quão fina é uma tela, veja nossa lista DPI.

0.92 kg: Principalmente tablets maiores e conversíveis pesam quase igual.

77.9%: Esta avaliação não é convincente. Deve ser considerado que dificilmente existem portáteis que recebem uma avaliação abaixo de 60%. Este portátil é avaliado abaixo da média, esta realmente não é uma recomendação para a compra.

>> Mais informação pode ser encontrada na nossa Laptop Guia da Compra.

Portáteis de um fabricante diferente e com CPU diferente

Portáteis com o mesmo GPU

Portáteis com o tamanho de tela e peso