Análise do Tablet Huawei MatePad T8 - O tablet de 99 euros (~$ 117) vale a pena?
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80.5 % v7 (old) | 09/2020 | Huawei MatePad T8 Helio MT8768, PowerVR GE8320 | 310 g | 8.55 mm | 8.00" | 1280x800 | |
| 80.6 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 MT8168, Mali-G52 MP1 | 355 g | 9.7 mm | 8.00" | 1280x800 | |
| 80.8 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 MT8168, Mali-G52 MP1 | 355 g | 9.7 mm | 8.00" | 1280x800 | |
| 81 % v7 (old) | 01/2020 | Lenovo Tab M8 HD Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320 | 305 g | 8.2 mm | 8.00" | 1280x800 | |
| 79.6 % v7 (old) | 01/2020 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 SD 429, Adreno 504 | 345 g | 8 mm | 8.00" | 1280x800 |
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Wide-angleLow-light photography4X zoomWide-angle
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 331 cd/m²
Contraste: 2069:1 (Preto: 0.16 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
85.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.31
| Huawei MatePad T8 LCD, 1280x800, 8" | Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Lenovo Tab M8 HD IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 TFT, 1280x800, 8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 10% | 12% | -7% | -33% | |
| Brightness middle | 331 | 490 48% | 501 51% | 379 15% | 377 14% |
| Brightness | 326 | 447 37% | 463 42% | 346 6% | 372 14% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 88 -4% | 85 -8% | 88 -4% | 87 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.16 | 0.23 -44% | 0.25 -56% | 0.21 -31% | 0.29 -81% |
| Contrast | 2069 | 2130 3% | 2004 -3% | 1805 -13% | 1300 -37% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.1 | 4 2% | 3.6 12% | 3.8 7% | 6.1 -49% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.2 | 8.3 -15% | 8.4 -17% | 7.5 -4% | 10.9 -51% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.9 | 2 49% | 1 74% | 5 -28% | 6.6 -69% |
| Gamma | 2.31 95% | 2.29 96% | 2.17 101% | 2.23 99% | 2.13 103% |
| CCT | 7355 88% | 6618 98% | 6473 100% | 7514 87% | 7861 83% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 31.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 47.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 26 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (745 - 9443, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
| Huawei MatePad T8 | |
| Average Mediatek MT8768 () | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (1418 - 30983, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MatePad T8 | |
| Average Mediatek MT8768 () | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
| Compute RenderScript Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (2128 - 10799, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MatePad T8 | |
| Average Mediatek MT8768 () | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Average of class Tablet (8.1 - 122, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
| Huawei MatePad T8 | |
| Average Mediatek MT8768 (10 - 19, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (7.3 - 530, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
| Average Mediatek MT8768 (10 - 12, n=3) | |
| Huawei MatePad T8 | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (4.8 - 120, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
| Huawei MatePad T8 | |
| Average Mediatek MT8768 (7 - 13, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (5 - 400, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
| Average Mediatek MT8768 (6.9 - 8.3, n=3) | |
| Huawei MatePad T8 | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 | |
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score | |
| Huawei MatePad T8 | |
| Average Mediatek MT8768 (89714 - 91467, n=2) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek MT8768 (14 - 23.3, n=3) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79) | |
| Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 ) | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 (Silk Browser) | |
| Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 ) | |
| Average Mediatek MT8768 (22.1 - 23, n=2) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79) | |
| Average Mediatek MT8768 (24 - 39, n=4) | |
| Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 ) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 (Silk Browser) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79) | |
| Average Mediatek MT8768 (13.3 - 17.3, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79) | |
| Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 ) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek MT8768 (4070 - 6281, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 (Silk Browser) | |
| Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 ) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 ) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser) | |
| Average Mediatek MT8768 (10163 - 12342, n=4) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 (Silk Browser) | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79) | |
| Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei MatePad T8 | Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 | Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | Lenovo Tab M8 HD | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 | Average 16 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 15% | 16% | 12% | 17% | -41% | 657% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 274.1 | 314.2 15% | 315 15% | 297.1 8% | 291.9 6% | 164.5 ? -40% | 1045 ? 281% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 67.4 | 100.2 49% | 103.9 54% | 79.6 18% | 108.5 61% | 43 ? -36% | 686 ? 918% |
| Random Read 4KB | 57.5 | 69.1 20% | 67.6 18% | 77.4 35% | 57.8 1% | 21.7 ? -62% | 189.4 ? 229% |
| Random Write 4KB | 14.63 | 15.62 7% | 15.72 7% | 15.84 8% | 16.89 15% | 8.08 ? -45% | 189.9 ? 1198% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 82.9 ? | 84.9 ? 2% | 84.1 ? 1% | 83.8 ? 1% | 87.1 ? 5% | 59.1 ? -29% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 62.4 ? | 61.5 ? -1% | 62 ? -1% | 64.3 ? 3% | 69.9 ? 12% | 39.8 ? -36% |
PUBG Mobile
Real Racing 3
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Huawei MatePad T8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.01 / 0.17 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.68 / 2.24 / 2.27 Watt |
| Carga |
3.06 / 4.45 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei MatePad T8 5100 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 4850 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 4850 mAh | Lenovo Tab M8 HD 5100 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 5100 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -19% | -23% | 10% | -8% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.68 | 0.74 -9% | 0.72 -6% | 0.66 3% | 0.62 9% |
| Idle Average * | 2.24 | 2.81 -25% | 2.97 -33% | 2.15 4% | 2.68 -20% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.27 | 2.83 -25% | 2.99 -32% | 2.18 4% | 2.7 -19% |
| Load Average * | 3.06 | 3.73 -22% | 4.02 -31% | 2.48 19% | 3.61 -18% |
| Load Maximum * | 4.45 | 4.97 -12% | 5.1 -15% | 3.49 22% | 4 10% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei MatePad T8 5100 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 4850 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 4850 mAh | Lenovo Tab M8 HD 5100 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 5100 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -8% | -8% | 30% | -1% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2393 | 2661 11% | 3581 50% | 3132 31% | |
| H.264 | 1137 | 949 -17% | 1696 49% | 934 -18% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 949 | 869 -8% | 902 -5% | 1124 18% | 831 -12% |
| Load | 359 | 286 -20% | 374 4% | 342 -5% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto para o MatePad T8 - As soluções alternativas da Huawei não compensam a perda de serviços do Google Play
Quando se trata de desempenho, qualidade de construção e duração da bateria, o T8 é muito competitivo. O módulo Wi-Fi do Huawei atinge os melhores resultados em nosso teste de Wi-Fi. Por um pequeno acréscimo de 20 euros (~$ 23), os compradores podem obter uma versão com um modem LTE.
O painel IPS tem ângulos de visão relativamente estáveis e a reprodução de cores está em um bom nível para um tablet de 100 euros (~$ 118). No entanto, a tela não é brilhante o suficiente para uso externo em dias ensolarados. Se algum dispositivo deve ou não ser fornecido com 2 GB de RAM e 16 GB de memória eMMC em 2020 está em debate. Porém, em nossa opinião, o fato de que nenhum dispositivo deve vir com uma porta microUSB e um carregador de 5 watts não é mais discutível.
Por causa da situação com Google, é muito difícil chegar a qualquer tipo de conclusão sobre o MatePad T8 de baixo preço. Você pode assistir a vídeos do YouTube, navegar na web ou ler arquivos PDF com o T8. Os aplicativos que não requerem o uso do Google Play Services funcionarão bem. No entanto, se seus aplicativos favoritos dependem do Google Play Services, você está sem sorte. Além disso, o AppGallery da Huawei não apresenta uma ampla seleção de aplicativos.
A Huawei não consegue compensar a perda que muitos usuários terão devido ao fato de que seu tablet básico não oferece suporte ao Google Play Services. O T8 não oferece nenhum recurso matador que o diferencie da multidão.
Huawei MatePad T8
- 09/18/2020 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich
Price comparison
