AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U Breve Análise do Portátil Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
81.2 % v7 (old) | 09/2020 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 R7 4800HS, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
84.5 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | 2.5 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
83.3 % v6 (old) | 05/2019 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 20.4 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
86.9 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 17.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
83.3 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.5 kg | 26.1 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.5 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.2 kg | 19.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.6 % v7 (old) | Eluktronics RP-15 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 1.9 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H |
|
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 255.9 cd/m²
Contraste: 1163:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.15 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 4.83
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.22% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 Panda LM156LF-2F01, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU Panda LM156LF-CL03, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H BOE CQ NV156FHM-NX1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 Sharp LQ156M1JW03, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Eluktronics RP-15 BOE NV156FHM-N4G, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 114% | 4% | 74% | -0% | 71% | 61% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 38.9 | 87 124% | 40.33 4% | 69.4 78% | 38.8 0% | 67.5 74% | 63.7 64% |
sRGB Coverage | 58.5 | 100 71% | 60.6 4% | 98.8 69% | 57.8 -1% | 98.3 68% | 92 57% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.22 | 99.9 148% | 41.69 4% | 70.5 75% | 40.09 0% | 68.9 71% | 65.2 62% |
Response Times | -63% | -24% | 78% | 14% | 55% | 45% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 24.4 ? | 56.4 ? -131% | 34 ? -39% | 3.2 ? 87% | 26 ? -7% | 12 ? 51% | 17.2 ? 30% |
Response Time Black / White * | 25.6 ? | 24.4 ? 5% | 28 ? -9% | 8 ? 69% | 17 ? 34% | 10.4 ? 59% | 10.4 ? 59% |
PWM Frequency | 21280 ? | 23580 ? | |||||
Screen | 57% | -4% | 30% | 6% | 28% | 13% | |
Brightness middle | 255.9 | 398 56% | 240.1 -6% | 345.4 35% | 301 18% | 272 6% | 298.6 17% |
Brightness | 246 | 385 57% | 231 -6% | 342 39% | 277 13% | 259 5% | 289 17% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 90 1% | 85 -4% | 90 1% | 77 -13% | 91 2% | 90 1% |
Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.28 -27% | 0.34 -55% | 0.34 -55% | 0.26 -18% | 0.27 -23% | 0.35 -59% |
Contrast | 1163 | 1421 22% | 706 -39% | 1016 -13% | 1158 0% | 1007 -13% | 853 -27% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.15 | 1.53 70% | 4.2 18% | 3.18 38% | 5.12 1% | 2.42 53% | 5.01 3% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 17.11 | 3.69 78% | 17.8 -4% | 6.57 62% | 8.86 48% | 6.93 59% | 7.06 59% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.83 | 0.77 84% | 4.09 15% | 1.77 63% | 4.88 -1% | 0.88 82% | 2.52 48% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.2 | 2.4 43% | 2.8 33% | 3.8 10% | 3.47 17% | 4.5 -7% | 5.4 -29% |
Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.19 100% | 2.2 100% | 2.15 102% | 2.37 93% | 2.188 101% | 2.54 87% |
CCT | 7500 87% | 6996 93% | 6925 94% | 7109 91% | 7062 92% | 7369 88% | 7461 87% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 36.9 | 100 171% | 38.4 4% | 64.3 74% | 37 0% | 69 87% | 59.1 60% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58 | 100 72% | 60.4 4% | 99 71% | 57 -2% | 91 57% | 91.6 58% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 36% /
53% | -8% /
-5% | 61% /
44% | 7% /
6% | 51% /
39% | 40% /
26% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.2 ms rise | |
↘ 10.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
24.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.6 ms rise | |
↘ 12.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Eluktronics RP-17 | |
Alienware m17 R3 P45E | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
Dell G5 15 5590 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Eluktronics RP-17 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
Alienware m17 R3 P45E | |
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Dell G5 15 5590 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Eluktronics RP-17 | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Alienware m17 R3 P45E | |
MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
Dell G5 15 5590 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Alienware m17 R3 P45E | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Eluktronics RP-17 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Dell G5 15 5590 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
Eluktronics RP-17 | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Alienware m17 R3 P45E |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Alienware m17 R3 P45E | |
MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Eluktronics RP-17 | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Eluktronics RP-17 | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Alienware m17 R3 P45E | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Alienware m17 R3 P45E | |
MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Eluktronics RP-17 | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
Alienware m17 R3 P45E | |
Eluktronics RP-17 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Alienware m17 R3 P45E | |
Eluktronics RP-17 | |
MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
Eluktronics RP-17 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
Alienware m17 R3 P45E |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
Eluktronics RP-17 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Alienware m17 R3 P45E |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4913 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5901 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5291 pontos | |
Ajuda |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
Eluktronics RP-15 |
* ... smaller is better
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0) | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 60% | -20% | 56% | 1% | 72% | |
Seq Read | 1197 | 2981 149% | 907 -24% | 1957 63% | 2012 68% | 2612 118% |
Seq Write | 1637 | 2783 70% | 926 -43% | 2092 28% | 1261 -23% | 2368 45% |
4K Read | 56.3 | 43.98 -22% | 47.26 -16% | 50.2 -11% | 43.66 -22% | 51.1 -9% |
4K Write | 159 | 113.9 -28% | 98.7 -38% | 96.5 -39% | 109.3 -31% | 135.9 -15% |
4K-64 Read | 583 | 1519 161% | 321.5 -45% | 1594 173% | 851 46% | 1635 180% |
4K-64 Write | 838 | 1296 55% | 736 -12% | 2005 139% | 780 -7% | 1831 118% |
Access Time Read * | 0.062 | 0.062 -0% | 0.064 -3% | 0.057 8% | 0.117 -89% | 0.042 32% |
Access Time Write * | 0.128 | 0.033 74% | 0.045 65% | 0.112 12% | 0.036 72% | 0.028 78% |
Score Read | 759 | 1861 145% | 459 -40% | 1840 142% | 1096 44% | 1947 157% |
Score Write | 1160 | 1688 46% | 927 -20% | 2310 99% | 1016 -12% | 2204 90% |
Score Total | 2350 | 4492 91% | 1641 -30% | 5103 117% | 2643 12% | 5138 119% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1376 | 2438 77% | 905 -34% | 1793 30% | 1481 8% | 2334 70% |
Copy Program MB/s | 568 | 604 6% | 496.9 -13% | 573 1% | 467.5 -18% | 569 0% |
Copy Game MB/s | 1180 | 1404 19% | 819 -31% | 1418 20% | 734 -38% | 1401 19% |
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 35% | -33% | 21% | -14% | 16% | |
Write 4K | 189.6 | 127.6 -33% | 132.2 -30% | 139.8 -26% | 145.4 -23% | 156.3 -18% |
Read 4K | 61.7 | 48.4 -22% | 55.5 -10% | 48.62 -21% | 51.6 -16% | 47.65 -23% |
Write Seq | 1730 | 2958 71% | 986 -43% | 2260 31% | 1007 -42% | 2374 37% |
Read Seq | 1620 | 2984 84% | 1318 -19% | 2135 32% | 1145 -29% | 2045 26% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 474.2 | 472.7 0% | 220.3 -54% | 499.3 5% | 468.4 -1% | 431.3 -9% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 528 | 529 0% | 315.5 -40% | 552 5% | 528 0% | 509 -4% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1795 | 3431 91% | 987 -45% | 2960 65% | 1381 -23% | 2385 33% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 1880 | 3536 88% | 1416 -25% | 3269 74% | 2291 22% | 3505 86% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 48% /
51% | -27% /
-25% | 39% /
43% | -7% /
-5% | 44% /
51% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 25384 pontos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 17377 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 38220 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 12739 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 5461 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 257.5 | 166.5 | 94.5 | 51.3 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 119 | 112 | 106 | 103 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 131 | 74.1 | 54.6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 93.7 | 80.4 | 67.8 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 113 | 85 | 75 | 67 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 129.5 | 66.5 | 49.1 | 38.3 |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 116.5 | 81.5 | 54.9 | 42.3 |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 4800HS, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0) | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Eluktronics RP-15 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Phison PM81000GPMQCN28BTF-E12S4 M.2 NVM SSD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -12% | -7% | -0% | -3% | -9% | -3% | |
off / environment * | 26.3 | 30 -14% | 28 -6% | 27 -3% | 30.7 -17% | 25 5% | 28 -6% |
Idle Minimum * | 26.7 | 33 -24% | 29.4 -10% | 27 -1% | 30.7 -15% | 29 -9% | 28 -5% |
Idle Average * | 26.7 | 34 -27% | 31.9 -19% | 27 -1% | 30.7 -15% | 30 -12% | 28 -5% |
Idle Maximum * | 31.9 | 35 -10% | 33 -3% | 27 15% | 30.7 4% | 40 -25% | 31.5 1% |
Load Average * | 38.9 | 48 -23% | 41.2 -6% | 44.7 -15% | 36.6 6% | 51 -31% | 44 -13% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 51 | 48 6% | 53.8 -5% | 51.2 -0% | 47 8% | 48 6% | 48.8 4% |
Load Maximum * | 54.9 | 49 11% | 55.7 -1% | 54 2% | 50.9 7% | 54 2% | 54.1 1% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 26.7 / 26.7 / 31.9 dB |
Carga |
| 38.9 / 54.9 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 26.3 dB(A) |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52.2 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 65 °C / 149 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.4 °C / 77.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+3.5 °C / 6.3 F).
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.12 / 1.2 Watt |
Ocioso | 5.1 / 8.4 / 9.1 Watt |
Carga |
55.1 / 140.2 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 R7 4800HS, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Eluktronics RP-15 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Phison PM81000GPMQCN28BTF-E12S4 M.2 NVM SSD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -204% | -68% | -147% | -17% | -95% | -176% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.1 | 23 -351% | 7.4 -45% | 14.3 -180% | 3.2 37% | 7 -37% | 21.7 -325% |
Idle Average * | 8.4 | 30 -257% | 8.6 -2% | 22.3 -165% | 8.3 1% | 18 -114% | 30.1 -258% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.1 | 39 -329% | 39.1 -330% | 36.9 -305% | 8.7 4% | 31 -241% | 35 -285% |
Load Average * | 55.1 | 156 -183% | 65.9 -20% | 118.4 -115% | 82 -49% | 107 -94% | 112.6 -104% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 97.5 | 152 -56% | 106.9 -10% | 153.7 -58% | 151 -55% | 146 -50% | 134.4 -38% |
Load Maximum * | 140.2 | 208 -48% | 141.3 -1% | 220.8 -57% | 195 -39% | 186 -33% | 201.5 -44% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 R7 4800HS, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 76 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 90 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 76 Wh | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 80 Wh | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 60 Wh | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 99.9 Wh | Eluktronics RP-15 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 46.7 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -22% | 58% | 21% | 36% | 2% | -32% | |
Reader / Idle | 425 | 480 13% | 916 116% | 848 100% | 537 26% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 315 | 185 -41% | 482 53% | 380 21% | 433 37% | 381 21% | 213 -32% |
Load | 116 | 72 -38% | 123 6% | 84 -28% | 69 -41% |
Pro
Contra
Não há dúvida de que o Zephyrus G15 GA502IU é uma grande melhoria em relação ao GA502DU em termos de poder de processamento. O desempenho por watt é incrível devido à combinação de uma CPU Ryzen de 7 nm e GPU GeForce Max-Q, enquanto o chassi é pequeno e atraente para o preço. Quando confrontado com concorrentes de orçamento como o Acer Nitro 5, MSI GL/ série GF, Dell série G, ou Aorus G series, o Zephyrus G15 definitivamente se destacará.
As principais desvantagens do GA502IU são o preço e a tela. Por US$ 1300, o sistema é mais caro do que a maioria das outras alternativas com a mesma GPU GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. Basicamente, você está pagando a mais pela nova CPU AMD e pelo design de chassi elegante que muitos portáteis baratos para jogos não têm. Enquanto isso, o espaço de cor médio e tempos de resposta do painel de 144 Hz são um tanto decepcionantes. A configuração de 240 Hz mais avançada supostamente aborda essas questões, mas essa opção exigirá mais de sua carteira. Este ainda é um portátil para jogos econômico de gama média, especialmente se você puder encontrar um à venda.
O Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU oferece excelente desempenho do processador em um design de chassi atraente que é difícil de bater pelo preço. A potência dos gráficos, a resposta do teclado, os tempos de resposta da tela e precisão de cores, no entanto, são um pouco desanimadores. É uma pena que um processador tão bom não esteja mais amplamente disponível em outros modelos no momento.
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
-
09/10/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo