Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA T600

NVIDIA T600

A GPU Nvidia T600 Desktop é uma placa gráfica profissional para estações de trabalho que se baseia na arquitectura Turing (chip TU117). A versão de secretária oferece apenas 640 dos 1024 núcleos e portanto também menos que o T600 móvel (896 núcleos CUDA). A placa oferece 4 GB de memória gráfica GDDR6 ligada a um bus de 128 bit (até 160 GB/s de largura de banda). O T600 suporta condutores certificados (antiga linha Quadro) para aplicações profissionais como CAD, modelação 3D, DCC, medicina, ou aplicações de visualização.

O consumo máximo de energia da placa é avaliado em 40W.

Quadro Turing Serie

Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1000 896 @ 1.07 - 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
ArquiteturaTuring
Pipelines640 - unificado
TMUs40
ROPs32
Velocidade do núcleo735 - 1335 (Boost) MHz
Velocidade da memória10000 effective = 1250 MHz
Largura do Bus de Memória128 Bit
Modelo de memóriaGDDR6
Max. quantidade de memória4 GB
Memória compartilhadanão
Memory Bandwidth160 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_1, Shader 6.6, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Consumo de energia40 Watt
Contagem de transistores4.7 Billion
Die Size 200 mm²
tecnología12 nm
PCIe3.0 x16
Displays4 Displays (max.), DisplayPort 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Data do anúncio12.04.2021

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
2.9 pt (9%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -98%
...
2.62 -9%
2.63 -9%
2.63 -9%
2.68 -7%
2.69 -7%
2.71 -6%
2.74 -5%
2.8 -3%
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
2.8 -3%
NVIDIA T600
2.89
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
2.89 0%
2.91 1%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
2.98 3%
3.01 4%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
3.02 4%
3.03 5%
AMD Radeon 680M
3.03 5%
AMD FirePro W7170M
3.06 6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
3.23 12%
...
33.3 1052%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
2496 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
2195 Points (6%)
112 -95%
...
1864 -15%
1989 -9%
2021 -8%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
2046 -7%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
2049 -7%
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
2062 -6%
2068 -6%
2070 -6%
2116 -4%
NVIDIA T600
2195
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
2198 0%
2210 1%
AMD Radeon 680M
2227 1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
2245 2%
2309 5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
2309 5%
2472 13%
2601 18%
2713 24%
...
36259 1552%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
304731 Points (31%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
152912 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
31922 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
40917 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
6284 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
6552 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
182459 Points (20%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
9497 Points (12%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
8694 Points (7%)
171.8 -98%
...
AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
8323 -4%
8351 -4%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
8387 -4%
8415 -3%
8519 -2%
8553 -2%
8571 -1%
8597 -1%
8656 0%
NVIDIA T600
8694
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
8781 1%
8851 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
9167 5%
9448 9%
9453 9%
9523 10%
9569 10%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
9591 10%
9603 10%
...
104201 1099%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
344838 Points (100%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
30400 Points (17%)
62 -100%
...
28186 -7%
28693 -6%
29214 -4%
29345 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
29448 -3%
29844 -2%
29938 -2%
30123 -1%
30252 0%
NVIDIA T600
30400
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
30786 1%
31181 3%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
31451 3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
31597 4%
31800 5%
32171 6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
32349 6%
32473 7%
32473 7%
...
170928 462%
0%
100%
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
46380 Points (51%)
133.4 -100%
...
39066 -16%
43011 -7%
43138 -7%
43361 -7%
AMD Radeon 660M
43616 -6%
AMD Radeon 680M
43633 -6%
44877 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop)
46145 -1%
46269 0%
NVIDIA T600
46380
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
46728 1%
47870 3%
48523 5%
48758 5%
49414 7%
50971 10%
52117 12%
52987 14%
54279 17%
...
87172 88%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
43997 Points (57%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
32.7 fps (10%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
115 fps (29%)
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
68.6 fps (10%)
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
35.3 fps (8%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
19.5 fps (5%)
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
67.4 fps (18%)
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
5 fps (4%)
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
78.5 fps (31%)
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
76.9 fps (13%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
80 fps (14%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
114 fps (31%)
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
122 fps (14%)
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
34.9 fps (8%)
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
35.7 fps (7%)
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
99.8 fps (11%)
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
12.6 fps (4%)
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
98 fps (14%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
79.9 fps (14%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k
16.9 fps (5%)
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
75.6 fps (8%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
4.5 fps (4%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
46.1 fps (8%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
6.7 fps (1%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
32.3 fps (15%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
13.8 fps (9%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
19.4 fps (8%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6830 pontos (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
104.1 fps (34%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
227.1 fps (13%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
1121 Samples/s (4%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
2049 Samples/s (4%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
4825 pontos (5%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
76.7 Watt (11%)
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
83.5 Watt (12%)
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.3 fps per Watt (27%)
- Gama de valores benchmark para essa solução gráfica
red legend - Média de valores benchmark para essa solução gráfica
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Benchmarks de jogos

Os seguintes benchmarks têm origem em nossos benchmarks de portáteis de análise O desempenho depende da memória gráfica utilizada, frequência, processador, configurações do sistema, controladores, e sistemas operacionais. Assim os resultados não tem que representantes para todos os portáteis com esta GPU. Para informações detalhadas sobre os resultados de benchmark, clique no número de fps.

Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
baixo 1280x720
93.5  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
média 1920x1080
44.6  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
alto 1920x1080
21.3  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
6.3  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
» Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados média.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Graphics Quality 1920x1080
55.4
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
baixo 1280x720
171.9  fps    + Comparar
média 1920x1080
78.8  fps    + Comparar
alto 1920x1080
63.7  fps    + Comparar
ultra 1920x1080
40.2  fps    + Comparar
QHD 2560x1440
29.1  fps    + Comparar
4K 3840x2160
15.7  fps    + Comparar
» Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados ultra.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
baixo 1280x720
150.4  fps    + Comparar
média 1920x1080
73.1  fps    + Comparar
alto 1920x1080
55.5  fps    + Comparar
ultra 1920x1080
38.6  fps    + Comparar
QHD 2560x1440
27  fps    + Comparar
4K 3840x2160
14.5  fps    + Comparar
» Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados ultra.
baixo 1280x720
média 1920x1080
42  fps    + Comparar
alto 1920x1080
ultra 1920x1080
QHD 2560x1440
4K 3840x2160
5.5  fps    + Comparar
» Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados média.
baixo 1280x720
74.6  fps    + Comparar
média 1920x1080
34  fps    + Comparar
alto 1920x1080
24  fps    + Comparar
ultra 1920x1080
19.4  fps    + Comparar
QHD 2560x1440
14.8  fps    + Comparar
4K 3840x2160
8.5  fps    + Comparar
» Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados baixo.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
baixo 1280x720
174.4  fps    + Comparar
média 1920x1080
64.9  fps    + Comparar
alto 1920x1080
51.4  fps    + Comparar
ultra 1920x1080
44.8  fps    + Comparar
QHD 2560x1440
31.9  fps    + Comparar
4K 3840x2160
17.9  fps    + Comparar
» Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
baixo 1280x720
95  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
média 1920x1080
46  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
alto 1920x1080
42  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
39  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
26  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
12  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
» Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
52
baixo 1280x720
média 1920x1080
107  fps    + Comparar
alto 1920x1080
4K 3840x2160
» Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados alto.
baixo 1280x720
70.7  fps    + Comparar
média 1920x1080
34.9  fps    + Comparar
alto 1920x1080
25.1  fps    + Comparar
QHD 2560x1440
17.8  fps    + Comparar
4K 3840x2160
10  fps    + Comparar
» Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados baixo.
baixo 1280x720
162.8  fps    + Comparar
média 1366x768
148.6  fps    + Comparar
alto 1920x1080
120.7  fps    + Comparar
ultra 1920x1080
110.5  fps    + Comparar
4K 3840x2160
39.6  fps    + Comparar
» Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados ultra.
baixo 1024x768
139.1  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
média 1366x768
82.8  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
alto 1920x1080
47.5  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27.2  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
16.1  fps    + Comparar + 📈 Graph
» Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados alto.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
baixo 1024x768
181.5  fps    + Comparar
média 1366x768
175.6  fps    + Comparar
alto 1920x1080
80.3  fps    + Comparar
ultra 1920x1080
38.2  fps    + Comparar
QHD 2560x1440
26.6  fps    + Comparar
4K 3840x2160
25  fps    + Comparar
» Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings possible 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
8.8
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
179
baixomédiaaltoultraQHD4K
Far Cry 693.544.621.36.33
F1 2021171.978.863.740.229.115.7
F1 2020150.473.155.538.62714.5
Borderlands 3107.64226.719.913.45.54
Metro Exodus74.6342419.414.88.47
Strange Brigade174.464.951.444.831.917.9
Far Cry 5954642392612
X-Plane 11.11132.810795.940.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark70.734.925.117.89.98
Dota 2 Reborn162.8148.6120.7110.539.6
The Witcher 3139.182.847.527.216.1
GTA V181.5175.680.338.226.625
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


5
7

5
5
2
4
4
3
1
4
5
1
7
1

9
2

Para mais jogos compatíveis e uma lista de todos os jogos e soluções gráficas visite nosso Lista de jogos

v1.28
log 20. 00:32:49

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Dec 2024 05:31:27 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.027s ... 0.028s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#20 composed specs +0s ... 0.03s

#21 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#22 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.03s

#23 getting avg benchmarks for device 11373 +0.027s ... 0.057s

#24 got single benchmarks 11373 +0.009s ... 0.065s

#25 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.065s

#26 min, max, avg, median took s +0.914s ... 0.98s

#27 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.98s

#28 Got 65 rows for game benchmarks. +0.012s ... 0.992s

#29 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.992s

#30 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.008s ... 0.999s

#31 benchmarks composed for output. +0.717s ... 1.717s

#32 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.003s ... 1.72s

#33 return log +0s ... 1.72s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

Class 1

NVIDIA RTX A6000 Desktop
Radeon Pro W6800 Desktop
NVIDIA Titan RTX Desktop
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Desktop
Radeon RX 6750 XT Desktop
Radeon RX 6700 XT Desktop
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Desktop
Arc B580
Radeon RX 6650 XT Desktop
GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop) Desktop

Class 2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Desktop
Titan X Pascal Desktop
Radeon VII Desktop
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop) Desktop
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) Desktop
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop) Desktop
Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop) Desktop
GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop) Desktop
RX Vega 64 Desktop
RX Vega 56 Desktop
Radeon RX 5600 XT (Desktop) Desktop
Pro Vega 56 Desktop
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop) Desktop
GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop) Desktop
RTX A2000 Desktop
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop) Desktop
GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) Desktop
Radeon R9 Nano Desktop
Radeon RX 580 Desktop
GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop) Desktop
Radeon RX 570 Desktop
Radeon RX 480 Desktop
Arc A380 Desktop

Class 3

Class 4

VideoCore VII *

Posição aproximada do adaptador gráfico

Klaus Hinum, 2022-12-31 (Update: 2022-12-31)