Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

A NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M é uma placa de vídeo de workstation móvel para portáteis de alta capacidade. Está baseada no núcleo da Geforce GTX 280M core (G92 core) e apresenta núcleos de 128 CUDA (shaders unificados).

Comparada com a Quadro FX 3700M, a Quadro FX 3800M apresenta freqüências mais altas e é fabricada em 55nm (3700M - 65nm). A FX3800M possui uma freqüência ainda mais alta que a GeForce GTX 280M e, portanto, se desempenha melhor.

A série Quadro FX de placas está otimizada para aplicativos profissionais, como CAD ou DCC. Especialmente o desempenho OpenGL deve ser mais notável que com placas GeForce de consumidor.

No momento do anúncio (12-2009), a FX 3800M era a placa de vídeo de workstation mais veloz para portáteis.

Quadro FX Serie

Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CódigoN10E-GLM4
ArquiteturaG9x
Pipelines128 - unificado
Velocidade do núcleo675 MHz
Velocidade de shader1688 MHz
Velocidade da memória1000 MHz
Largura do Bus de Memória256 Bit
Modelo de memóriaGDDR3
Max. quantidade de memória1024 MB
Memória compartilhadanão
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Consumo de energia100 Watt
Contagem de transistores754 Milhão
tecnología55 nm
CaracterísticasOpenGL 2.1, CUDA, PowerMizer 8.0
Tamanho do Portátilgrande
Data do anúncio20.12.2009
Link à página do Fabricantewww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 6584     avg: 6951     median: 6779 (2%)     max: 7491 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 5758     avg: 5926     median: 6002 (3%)     max: 6019 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 32886     avg: 34790     median: 34790 (36%)     max: 36694 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 33146     avg: 37082     median: 38191 (20%)     max: 39909 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 16593     avg: 18199     median: 18043 (20%)     max: 19960 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings +
3DMark 06
13232 pontos (17%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 12050     avg: 12765     median: 12923 (17%)     max: 13323 Points
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3dsmax
32.8 pontos (68%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia
45.8 pontos (96%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - EnSight
47.4 pontos (100%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya
59.7 pontos (32%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Pro/Engeneer
51.1 pontos (100%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks
59.7 pontos (88%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter
38.5 pontos (100%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS NX
35.3 pontos (72%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
18.8 fps (11%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
18.7 fps (11%)
specvp11 sw-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
30.6 fps (23%)
specvp11 proe-05 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
6.9 fps (8%)
specvp11 maya-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
16.6 fps (12%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
38.4 fps (41%)
specvp11 ensight-04 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
16.2 fps (8%)
specvp11 catia-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
23.4 fps (12%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.9 Points (87%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
6.9 Points (87%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 4429     avg: 4928     median: 4928 (4%)     max: 5427 pontos
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 32.07     avg: 32.7     median: 32.7 (11%)     max: 33.29 fps
- Gama de valores benchmark para essa solução gráfica
- Média de valores benchmark para essa solução gráfica
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Benchmarks de jogos

Os seguintes benchmarks têm origem em nossos benchmarks de portáteis de análise O desempenho depende da memória gráfica utilizada, frequência, processador, configurações do sistema, controladores, e sistemas operacionais. Assim os resultados não tem que representantes para todos os portáteis com esta GPU. Para informações detalhadas sobre os resultados de benchmark, clique no número de fps.

Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
média 1024x768
230.6  fps    + Comparar
alto 1360x768
124.2  fps    + Comparar
» Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados alto.
Risen

Risen

2009
média 1024x768
64.9  fps    + Comparar
ultra 1920x1080
31.8  fps    + Comparar
» Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados média.
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
média 1024x768
78.5  fps    + Comparar
ultra 1920x1080
40.9  fps    + Comparar
» Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados ultra.
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
baixo 800x600
97  fps    + Comparar
média 1024x768
82  fps    + Comparar
ultra 1920x1080
29.9  fps    + Comparar
» Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados média.
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
baixo 1024x768
142.8  fps    + Comparar
ultra 1280x1024
61.9  fps    + Comparar
» Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados ultra.
baixomédiaaltoultraQHD4K
Fifa 11230.6124.2
Risen64.931.8
Need for Speed Shift78.540.9
Colin McRae: DIRT 2978229.9
Anno 1404142.861.9
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


1
1


3
1



1
1
2
1






Para mais jogos compatíveis e uma lista de todos os jogos e soluções gráficas visite nosso Lista de jogos

v1.28
log 09. 13:10:17

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 08 Nov 2024 19:43:11 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.036s ... 0.037s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.037s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.037s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.037s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.038s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.038s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.038s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.038s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.039s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.039s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.039s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.039s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.04s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.04s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.04s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.04s

#20 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.04s

#21 composed specs +0s ... 0.04s

#22 did output specs +0s ... 0.041s

#23 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.041s

#24 getting avg benchmarks for device 1541 +0.014s ... 0.055s

#25 got single benchmarks 1541 +0.015s ... 0.07s

#26 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.07s

#27 min, max, avg, median took s +0.422s ... 0.492s

#28 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.492s

#29 Got 11 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.494s

#30 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.494s

#31 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.496s

#32 benchmarks composed for output. +0.098s ... 0.594s

#33 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.002s ... 0.596s

#34 return log +0s ... 0.596s

Análises de Portáteis com NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M Placa de vídeo

Eurocom Panther 2.0: Intel Core i7-980X EE, 17.30", 3.6 kg
  ánalise externa » Eurocom Panther 2.0

HP EliteBook 8740W-XT911UT: Intel Core i7-740QM, 17.00", 3.6 kg
  ánalise externa » HP EliteBook 8740W-XT911UT

HP 8740W-WW427PA: Intel Core i7-820QM, 17.00", 3.6 kg
  ánalise externa » HP 8740W-WW427PA

HP EliteBook 8740w-WD943EA: Intel Core i7-840QM, 17.00", 3.6 kg
  ánalise externa » HP EliteBook 8740w-WD943EA

Lenovo ThinkPad W701ds: Intel Core i7-920XM, 17.00", 4.1 kg
  ánalise externa » Lenovo ThinkPad W701ds

Please share our article, every link counts!

Class 1

M4 20-core GPU
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *

Class 3

Vega M GH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Vega 8
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
UHD Graphics 610
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600

Posição aproximada do adaptador gráfico

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > FAQ/Técnica > Comparação de Placas de Vídeo > NVidia > NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
Klaus Hinum, 2010-05-16 (Update: 2012-05-18)