Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia 10

Name: Sony Xperia 10
Brand: Sony

Cinema de bolso.

A Sony está tentando abrir novos caminhos no mercado de smartphones com novos dispositivos Xperia. O Xperia 10 é a última tentativa da empresa para quebrar o setor de gama média, e equipou o smartphone com um SoC Snapdragon 630 e uma tela de 6 polegadas com uma relação de aspecto de 21:9. O último permite que o dispositivo mantenha seu formato no mínimo e ainda tenha uma tela grande. Leia esta análise para ver como o Xperia 10 se desempenha em nossos testes e como ele se compara com seus concorrentes de gama média.

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 04/22/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Touchscreen Smartphone

Test device courtesy of Sony Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Sony Xperia 10 (Xperia 10 Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 8 x 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A53

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 508

Memória

3 GB

, 3 GB

Pantalha

6.00 polegadas 21:9, 2520 x 1080 pixel 457 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva multi-touch, IPS LCD, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, 46.8 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 512 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, bússola, sensor hall, sensor de proximidade, USB Type-C, OTG, Miracast, LED de notificação, rádio FM

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900. 3G: B1, B2, B5, B8. 4G: B1, B2, B3, B5, B7, B8, B20, B28, B32, B38., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.4 x 156 x 68

Bateria

2870 mAh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix , f/2.0, 27 mm, 1/3", 1.12 μm. 5MP wide-angle sensor, f/2.4, 22 mm, 1/4", 1.4 μm. Camera2 API Level: Limited
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix , f/2.0, 24 mm, 1/4", 1.12 μm

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Mono, Teclado: Virtual, Fonte de alimentação modular, cabo USB, fones, Sony UI, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR values: 1.31 W/kg – Body, 0.9 W/kg – Head. LTE Cat.12: 600 Mbps/100 Mbps. DRM Widevine: L1, fanless

peso

162 g, Suprimento de energia: 44 g

Preço

350 Euro

Links

Sony página inicial
Sony Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Poco F1 Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	647 (598^min - 665^max) MBit/s +156%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	429 (256^min - 448^max) MBit/s +70%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash	320 (164^min - 362^max) MBit/s +26%
Nokia 8.1 Adreno 616, SD 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash	300 (169^min - 367^max) MBit/s +19%
Sony Xperia 10 Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	253 (128^min - 283^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash	238 (189^min - 285^max) MBit/s -6%
Motorola Moto G7 Adreno 506, SD 632, 64 GB eMMC Flash	112 (107^min - 117^max) MBit/s -56%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Adreno 308, 425, 32 GB eMMC Flash	43.1 (18^min - 66^max) MBit/s -83%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Poco F1 Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	675 (630^min - 704^max) MBit/s +102%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	491 (444^min - 499^max) MBit/s +47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash	350 (327^min - 361^max) MBit/s +5%
Sony Xperia 10 Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	334 (326^min - 341^max) MBit/s
Nokia 8.1 Adreno 616, SD 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash	312 (273^min - 341^max) MBit/s -7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash	279 (265^min - 284^max) MBit/s -16%
Motorola Moto G7 Adreno 506, SD 632, 64 GB eMMC Flash	112 (94^min - 118^max) MBit/s -66%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Adreno 308, 425, 32 GB eMMC Flash	52.6 (42^min - 58^max) MBit/s -84%

Sony Xperia 10; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø333 (326-341)

Sony Xperia 10; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø248 (128-283)

GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cycling around a lake

GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Taking a tight corner

GPS Test: Sony Xperia 10 – Cycling around a lake

GPS Test: Sony Xperia 10 – Taking a tight corner

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Sony Xperia 10

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

Honor View 20

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Sony Xperia 10

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

Honor View 20

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Sony Xperia 10

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

Honor View 20

Canon EOS 70D


516 cd/m²	548 cd/m²	520 cd/m²
524 cd/m²	547 cd/m²	511 cd/m²
523 cd/m²	522 cd/m²	517 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 548 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 525.3 cd/m² Minimum: 5.57 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 547 cd/m²
Contraste: 1519:1 (Preto: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.17

	Sony Xperia 10 IPS-LCD, 2520x1080, 6"	Motorola Moto G7 IPS, 2270x1080, 6.2"	Nokia 8.1 IPS, 2246x1080, 6.2"	Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 TFT, 1480x720, 6"	Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3"	Xiaomi Poco F1 IPS, 2246x1080, 6.2"	Xiaomi Mi 8 AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.2"	Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6"
Screen		-15%	-10%	-11%	18%	4%	0%	36%
Brightness middle	547	471 -14%	567 4%	512 -6%	541 -1%	489 -11%	430 -21%	570 4%
Brightness	525	453 -14%	547 4%	508 -3%	540 3%	486 -7%	434 -17%	565 8%
Brightness Distribution	93	94 1%	92 -1%	95 2%	91 -2%	93 0%	94 1%	93 0%
Black Level *	0.36	0.5 -39%	0.61 -69%	0.28 22%	0.33 8%	0.34 6%
Contrast	1519	942 -38%	930 -39%	1829 20%	1639 8%	1438 -5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.6	5.5 -20%	4.39 5%	5.6 -22%	2.7 41%	3.8 17%	5.09 -11%	1.5 67%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	12.1	7.95 34%	7.28 40%	11.8 2%	4.6 62%	7.1 41%	8.05 33%	3.6 70%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.9	5 -28%	4.9 -26%	8 -105%	3.1 21%	4.4 -13%	3.3 15%	1.2 69%
Gamma	2.17 ^101%	2.326 ^95%	2.248 ^98%	2.14 ^103%	2.26 ^97%	2.22 ^99%	2.257 ^97%	2.07 ^106%
CCT	7158 ^91%	7654 ^85%	7642 ^85%	7831 ^83%	6853 ^95%	7213 ^90%	7026 ^93%	6504 ^100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

2336 Hz

≤ 17 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2336 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 17 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2336 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CalMAN: Colour Accuracy – sRGB target colour space, custom white balance

CalMAN: Colour Space – sRGB target colour space, custom white balance

CalMAN: Grayscale – sRGB target colour space, custom white balance

CalMAN: Colour Saturation – sRGB target colour space, custom white balance

CalMAN: Colour Accuracy – sRGB target colour space, standard white balance

CalMAN: Colour Space – sRGB target colour space, standard white balance

CalMAN: Grayscale – sRGB target colour space, standard white balance

CalMAN: Colour Saturation – sRGB target colour space, standard white balance

CalMAN: Colour Accuracy – sRGB target colour space, vivid white balance

CalMAN: Colour Space – sRGB target colour space, vivid white balance

CalMAN: Grayscale – sRGB target colour space, vivid white balance

CalMAN: Colour Saturation – sRGB target colour space, vivid white balance

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6.8 ms rise
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
64.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 28.4 ms rise
64.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 36.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	837 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	1256 Points +50%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1799 Points +115%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072	644 Points -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1639 Points +96%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2468 Points +195%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2430 Points +190%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1525 Points +82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (710 - 885, n=13)	853 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=84, last 2 years)	5609 Points +570%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	3986 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	4765 Points +20%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	5856 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072	1801 Points -55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	5913 Points +48%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	9182 Points +130%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8907 Points +123%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	4429 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (2246 - 4234, n=13)	4009 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (4134 - 34246, n=84, last 2 years)	15765 Points +296%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	3763 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	4006 Points +6%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	6813 Points +81%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072	1411 Points -63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	5576 Points +48%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	14369 Points +282%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	13371 Points +255%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	4026 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (2910 - 3956, n=12)	3718 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 28121, n=61, last 2 years)	12557 Points +234%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	4948 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	7187 Points +45%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	8309 Points +68%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072	4088 Points -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	6870 Points +39%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	9664 Points +95%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	9689 Points +96%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	5625 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4948 - 6264, n=13)	5632 Points +14%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	5987 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	6038 Points +1%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	6887 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072	3243 Points -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	6187 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8101 Points +35%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	7983 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	5387 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4636 - 5987, n=12)	4968 Points -17%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	16290 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	14907 Points -8%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	28895 Points +77%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072	6093 Points -63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	26308 Points +61%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	63159 Points +288%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	55397 Points +240%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	15167 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (15466 - 17032, n=13)	16750 Points +3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	17878 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	14475 Points -19%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	39655 Points +122%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072	5447 Points -70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	29496 Points +65%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	82125 Points +359%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	77203 Points +332%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	15567 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (16508 - 18635, n=13)	18279 Points +2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	12437 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	16647 Points +34%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	14820 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072	10416 Points -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	19087 Points +53%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	34928 Points +181%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	27858 Points +124%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	13914 Points +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (12437 - 13217, n=13)	12963 Points +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1315 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	913 Points -31%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2691 Points +105%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072	68 Points -95%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2073 Points +58%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5687 Points +332%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4363 Points +232%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	960 Points -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1315 - 1374, n=13)	1341 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +220%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1235 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	780 Points -37%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2763 Points +124%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072	54 Points -96%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1925 Points +56%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8261 Points +569%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6243 Points +406%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	845 Points -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1234 - 1289, n=13)	1258 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +284%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1687 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	2273 Points +35%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2467 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072	899 Points -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2834 Points +68%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2720 Points +61%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2124 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1829 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1687 - 1816, n=13)	1746 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +96%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1375 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	941 Points -32%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2772 Points +102%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072	298 Points -78%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2073 Points +51%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5230 Points +280%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4034 Points +193%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1071 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1299 - 1415, n=13)	1379 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +708%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1299 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	809 Points -38%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2855 Points +120%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072	250 Points -81%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2006 Points +54%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6898 Points +431%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5328 Points +310%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	954 Points -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1204 - 1332, n=13)	1302 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +1417%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1732 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	2201 Points +27%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2516 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072	896 Points -48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2772 Points +60%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2832 Points +64%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2181 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1871 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1657 - 1819, n=13)	1731 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +189%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	809 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	512 Points -37%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1834 Points +127%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072	Points -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1358 Points +68%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3972 Points +391%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3356 Points +315%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	741 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (809 - 839, n=13)	825 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=70, last 2 years)	3006 Points +272%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	704 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	419 Points -40%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1702 Points +142%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072	Points -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1189 Points +69%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4746 Points +574%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4010 Points +470%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	634 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (704 - 729, n=13)	718 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=70, last 2 years)	3166 Points +350%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1645 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	2251 Points +37%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2514 Points +53%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072	Points -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2708 Points +65%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2528 Points +54%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2137 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1821 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1631 - 1822, n=13)	1734 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=70, last 2 years)	3260 Points +98%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	896 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	566 Points -37%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1964 Points +119%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072	Points -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1436 Points +60%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3669 Points +309%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3646 Points +307%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	737 Points -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (872 - 919, n=13)	904 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 23762, n=163, last 2 years)	8254 Points +821%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	792 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	467 Points -41%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1845 Points +133%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072	Points -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1262 Points +59%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4468 Points +464%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4471 Points +465%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	629 Points -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (767 - 809, n=13)	797 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 40163, n=163, last 2 years)	12419 Points +1468%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1664 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	2206 Points +33%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2534 Points +52%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072	Points -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2768 Points +66%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2257 Points +36%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2215 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1845 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1664 - 1778, n=13)	1710 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 10632, n=163, last 2 years)	4759 Points +186%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	861 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 ()	861 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=69, last 2 years)	2784 Points +223%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	693 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 ()	693 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 7971, n=69, last 2 years)	3009 Points +334%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	2167 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 ()	2167 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=69, last 2 years)	2686 Points +24%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	25 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	23 fps -8%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	57 fps +128%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072	13 fps -48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	44 fps +76%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps +140%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps +140%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (25 - 31, n=13)	29.2 fps +17%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	86.6 fps +246%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	29 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	24 fps -17%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	65 fps +124%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072	7.6 fps -74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	51 fps +76%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	150 fps +417%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	120 fps +314%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (29 - 30, n=13)	29.7 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=174, last 2 years)	296 fps +921%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	11 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	9.9 fps -10%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	31 fps +182%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072	5.5 fps -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	20 fps +82%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	58 fps +427%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	56 fps +409%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (11 - 15, n=13)	13.8 fps +25%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	76.1 fps +592%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	13 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	10 fps -23%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	32 fps +146%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072	2.8 fps -78%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	23 fps +77%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	71 fps +446%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	67 fps +415%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (13 - 14, n=13)	13.8 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=174, last 2 years)	175 fps +1246%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	7.8 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	6.5 fps -17%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	22 fps +182%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072	fps -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	13 fps +67%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	54 fps +592%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	45 fps +477%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 11, n=13)	9.36 fps +20%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	66.7 fps +755%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	9.5 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	6.9 fps -27%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	23 fps +142%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072	fps -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	15 fps +58%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35 fps +268%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	47 fps +395%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.2 - 10, n=13)	9.38 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=174, last 2 years)	124.3 fps +1208%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	4.3 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	3.6 fps -16%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	12 fps +179%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072	fps -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	7.8 fps +81%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	33 fps +667%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	28 fps +551%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4.3 - 6, n=13)	5.48 fps +27%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 154, n=175, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +1051%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	5.3 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	3.9 fps -26%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	13 fps +145%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072	fps -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	9.1 fps +72%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35 fps +560%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	26 fps +391%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 5.6, n=13)	5.48 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=174, last 2 years)	74.8 fps +1311%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	4.4 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	3.6 fps -18%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	13 fps +195%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	7.6 fps +73%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	31 fps +605%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35 fps +695%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4.4 - 5.4, n=4)	5.05 fps +15%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 166, n=207, last 2 years)	50.7 fps +1052%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	4.9 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	3.9 fps -20%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	14 fps +186%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	8.7 fps +78%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	32 fps +553%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	34 fps +594%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4.9 - 5.6, n=4)	5.28 fps +8%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 321, n=207, last 2 years)	84.9 fps +1633%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	2.7 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	2 fps -26%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	8.2 fps +204%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	4.8 fps +78%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	22 fps +715%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	22 fps +715%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (2.7 - 3.2, n=4)	3.03 fps +12%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=207, last 2 years)	38.9 fps +1341%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1.7 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	1.2 fps -29%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	5 fps +194%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	3.2 fps +88%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	14 fps +724%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	14 fps +724%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1.7 - 1.9, n=4)	1.825 fps +7%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 129, n=207, last 2 years)	34 fps +1900%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	88287 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	108408 Points +23%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	169262 Points +92%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072	41483 Points -53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	143352 Points +62%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	263165 Points +198%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	122826 Points +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (87300 - 90674, n=11)	89396 Points +1%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1374 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	1747 Points +27%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2731 Points +99%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072	702 Points -49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2342 Points +70%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3838 Points +179%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3852 Points +180%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	2009 Points +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1152 - 1570, n=13)	1479 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)	6499 Points +373%
System (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	3159 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	4378 Points +39%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	5681 Points +80%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072	1239 Points -61%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	5141 Points +63%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6506 Points +106%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6620 Points +110%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	4506 Points +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1763 - 3319, n=13)	3147 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)	10346 Points +228%
Memory (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	983 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	1963 Points +100%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2947 Points +200%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072	643 Points -35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2332 Points +137%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3239 Points +230%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3261 Points +232%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	2445 Points +149%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (838 - 1405, n=13)	1199 Points +22%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)	7058 Points +618%
Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1409 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	1075 Points -24%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	3086 Points +119%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072	446 Points -68%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2308 Points +64%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	7945 Points +464%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	7895 Points +460%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1356 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1409 - 1523, n=13)	1494 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)	17998 Points +1177%
Web (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	815 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	1008 Points +24%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1077 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072	685 Points -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1086 Points +33%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1296 Points +59%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1292 Points +59%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1090 Points +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (666 - 936, n=13)	859 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)	1578 Points +94%

Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)	124.4 Points +666%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 ()	16.3 Points 0%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)	16.25 Points

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	150.2 Points +285%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)	83 Points +113%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)	72 Points +85%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)	61 Points +56%
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71)	58 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)	57 Points +46%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)	39 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (35 - 39, n=5)	37.6 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 72)	25 Points -36%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)	38550 Points +692%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)	15086 Points +210%
Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68)	14514 Points +198%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)	12717 Points +161%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)	10679 Points +120%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)	9165 Points +88%
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71)	8351 Points +72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4398 - 5202, n=13)	4963 Points +2%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)	4865 Points
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 72)	3374 Points -31%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 72)	13549 ms * -32%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)	10257 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (8396 - 10257, n=13)	9702 ms * +5%
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71)	4900 ms * +52%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)	4123 ms * +60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)	3948 ms * +62%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)	3035 ms * +70%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)	2818 ms * +73%
Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68)	2714 ms * +74%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)	1523 ms * +85%

* ... smaller is better

	Sony Xperia 10	Motorola Moto G7	Nokia 8.1	Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018	Xiaomi Redmi Note 7	Xiaomi Poco F1	Xiaomi Mi 8	Samsung Galaxy A7 2018	Average 64 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		78%	-6%	-9%	9%	41%	86%	2%	16%	902%
Sequential Read 256KB	273.8	297 8%	279.3 2%	292.9 7%	283.4 4%	705 157%	693 153%	295.8 8%	274 ?(95.6 - 704, n=204) 0%	1887 ?(226 - 4512, n=198, last 2 years) 589%
Sequential Write 256KB	232.9	216 -7%	203.8 -12%	95.6 -59%	204.7 -12%	155.6 -33%	207.8 -11%	104.9 -55%	176.6 ?(40 - 274, n=204) -24%	1471 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=198, last 2 years) 532%
Random Read 4KB	53.1	69.3 31%	69.9 32%	64.6 22%	82.9 56%	101 90%	136.3 157%	84 58%	59.4 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=204) 12%	278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=198, last 2 years) 424%
Random Write 4KB	14.39	75.6 425%	7.3 -49%	12.71 -12%	16.06 12%	17.81 24%	21 46%	15.45 7%	32.2 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=204) 124%	311 ?(9.4 - 753, n=198, last 2 years) 2061%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	83.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	86.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 4%	84.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 2%	76.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -8%	83.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	85.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 3%		78.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -6%	77.4 ?(21.1 - 107.6, n=144) -7%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	63.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	66.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 5%	58.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -9%	61.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -4%	59.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -7%	65.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 3%		64.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%	58.3 ?(11.2 - 83.3, n=144) -9%

PUBG Mobile

Sony Xperia 10: Ø24.7 (17-26)

Asphalt Legends

Sony Xperia 10; Standard / low: Ø28.8 (24-31)

Sony Xperia 10; High Quality: Ø24.5 (19-30)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


37.7 °C	36.1 °C	30.1 °C
38.6 °C	33.2 °C	28.9 °C
35 °C	32.5 °C	29.3 °C

Máximo: 38.6 °C
Médio: 33.5 °C


27.9 °C	30.8 °C	36.4 °C
27.6 °C	29.4 °C	36.6 °C
28.1 °C	29.8 °C	34.6 °C

Máximo: 36.6 °C
Médio: 31.2 °C

alimentação elétrica 36.3 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Sony Xperia 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Motorola Moto G7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 68.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 68.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 68.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (122.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.01 / 0.16 Watt
Ocioso	0.72 / 2.16 / 2.17 Watt
Carga	3.32 / 5.34 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Sony Xperia 10 2870 mAh	Motorola Moto G7 3000 mAh	Nokia 8.1 3500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 3300 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Poco F1 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 8 3400 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 3300 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-22%	8%	-5%	-15%	-14%	-64%	-7%	-1%	-30%
Idle Minimum *	0.72	1.1 -53%	0.8 -11%	0.64 11%	0.61 15%	0.65 10%	1.5 -108%	0.71 1%	0.732 ?(0.35 - 1.4, n=13) -2%	0.883 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=160, last 2 years) -23%
Idle Average *	2.16	1.8 17%	1.5 31%	1.81 16%	1.95 10%	1.97 9%	2.2 -2%	1.36 37%	1.835 ?(1 - 2.31, n=13) 15%	1.467 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=160, last 2 years) 32%
Idle Maximum *	2.17	2.6 -20%	1.8 17%	1.91 12%	2.03 6%	2.01 7%	2.6 -20%	1.47 32%	2.16 ?(1.4 - 3.8, n=13) -0%	1.621 ?(0.83 - 4.46, n=160, last 2 years) 25%
Load Average *	3.32	4.2 -27%	3.2 4%	4.88 -47%	4.56 -37%	4.29 -29%	6.1 -84%	5.13 -55%	3.81 ?(2.82 - 6.2, n=13) -15%	6.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=154, last 2 years) -97%
Load Maximum *	5.34	6.8 -27%	5.4 -1%	6.38 -19%	9.15 -71%	9.05 -69%	10.9 -104%	7.89 -48%	5.62 ?(4.56 - 8, n=13) -5%	9.9 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=154, last 2 years) -85%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		16h 46min
WiFi Websurfing		9h 01min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10h 20min
Carga (máximo brilho)		3h 53min

	Sony Xperia 10 2870 mAh	Motorola Moto G7 3000 mAh	Nokia 8.1 3500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 3300 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Poco F1 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 8 3400 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 3300 mAh
Battery Runtime		32%	37%	40%	50%	51%	34%	28%
Reader / Idle	1006	1548 54%	1682 67%	2080 107%	1950 94%	2088 108%	1634 62%	1467 46%
H.264	620	819 32%	857 38%	706 14%	940 52%	936 51%	897 45%	836 35%
WiFi v1.3	541	798 48%	738 36%	651 20%	768 42%	808 49%	736 36%	605 12%
Load	233	219 -6%	246 6%	272 17%	259 11%	220 -6%	215 -8%	273 17%

Pro

+ Tela IPS brilhante

+ Razão alta de contraste

+ Bem construído

+ NFC

+ Bluetooth 5.0

+ Bom sensor de digitais

+ Conector para fones

Contra

- SoC bastante lento

- Armazenamento eMMC

- Traseira de plástico

- Câmeras decepcionantes

- Apenas 3 GB de RAM

The Sony Xperia 10 smartphone review. Test device courtesy of Sony Germany.

O Sony Xperia 10 é uma proposta intrigante. Ele será atraente para aqueles que são fanáticos de smartphones compactos, porque sua relação de aspecto de 21:9 permite que seja visivelmente mais estreito que seus concorrentes.

No entanto, seu painel IPS alongado tem suas desvantagens. Nossa unidade de análise é muito pesada e muitos aplicativos não suportam atualmente 21: 9, então você fica vendo o conteúdo em 16: 9. Aplicativos como o YouTube podem aumentar o zoom na maioria dos conteúdos, mas você acaba vendo uma imagem ou um vídeo muito recortado. Em suma, ter uma relação de aspecto de 21:9 poderia ser útil, mas é pouco prático no momento.

A Sony deu um passo na direção certa com sua nova série Xperia. O Xperia 10 é um smartphone de gama média peculiar e decente, mas o seu SoC desatualizado o torna atualmente muito caro, em nossa opinião.

Apesar de tudo, é um prazer usar a tela e é brilhante o suficiente para todos os ambientes. Da mesma forma, oferece cores precisas e é rica em contraste, de modo que o conteúdo se vê vibrante. Nossa unidade de teste é bem feita também, e recebemos com agrado a inclusão de um conector para fones, juntamente com a capacidade de ajustar o áudio para uma qualidade alta.

No entanto, seu armazenamento interno, RAM e SoC são mais adequados para um dispositivo de 250 euros (~$282) e não para 350 euros (~$395). Também não somos fanáticos da carcaça de plástico, embora seja mais resistente do que uma de metal ou de vidro. No geral, o Sony Xperia 10 é um smartphone decente, mas teria sido ainda mais atraente se fosse cerca de 100 Euros (~$113) mais barato.

Sony Xperia 10 - 04/15/2019 v6 ^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Acabamento

85%

Teclado

65 / 75 → 86%

Mouse

91%

Conectividade

46 / 60 → 76%

Peso

91%

Bateria