Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia 10
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 547 cd/m²
Contraste: 1519:1 (Preto: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.17
| Sony Xperia 10 IPS-LCD, 2520x1080, 6" | Motorola Moto G7 IPS, 2270x1080, 6.2" | Nokia 8.1 IPS, 2246x1080, 6.2" | Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 TFT, 1480x720, 6" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3" | Xiaomi Poco F1 IPS, 2246x1080, 6.2" | Xiaomi Mi 8 AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.2" | Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -15% | -10% | -11% | 18% | 4% | 0% | 36% | |
| Brightness middle | 547 | 471 -14% | 567 4% | 512 -6% | 541 -1% | 489 -11% | 430 -21% | 570 4% |
| Brightness | 525 | 453 -14% | 547 4% | 508 -3% | 540 3% | 486 -7% | 434 -17% | 565 8% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 94 1% | 92 -1% | 95 2% | 91 -2% | 93 0% | 94 1% | 93 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.5 -39% | 0.61 -69% | 0.28 22% | 0.33 8% | 0.34 6% | ||
| Contrast | 1519 | 942 -38% | 930 -39% | 1829 20% | 1639 8% | 1438 -5% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.6 | 5.5 -20% | 4.39 5% | 5.6 -22% | 2.7 41% | 3.8 17% | 5.09 -11% | 1.5 67% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.1 | 7.95 34% | 7.28 40% | 11.8 2% | 4.6 62% | 7.1 41% | 8.05 33% | 3.6 70% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.9 | 5 -28% | 4.9 -26% | 8 -105% | 3.1 21% | 4.4 -13% | 3.3 15% | 1.2 69% |
| Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.326 95% | 2.248 98% | 2.14 103% | 2.26 97% | 2.22 99% | 2.257 97% | 2.07 106% |
| CCT | 7158 91% | 7654 85% | 7642 85% | 7831 83% | 6853 95% | 7213 90% | 7026 93% | 6504 100% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2336 Hz | ≤ 17 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 2336 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 17 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2336 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 64.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 28.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 36.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=162, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 () | |
| Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72) | |
| Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72) | |
| Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
| Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (35 - 39, n=5) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 72) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72) | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68) | |
| Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
| Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4398 - 5202, n=13) | |
| Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 72) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 72) | |
| Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (8396 - 10257, n=13) | |
| Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72) | |
| Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72) | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Sony Xperia 10 | Motorola Moto G7 | Nokia 8.1 | Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | Xiaomi Poco F1 | Xiaomi Mi 8 | Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 78% | -6% | -9% | 9% | 41% | 86% | 2% | 16% | 890% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 273.8 | 297 8% | 279.3 2% | 292.9 7% | 283.4 4% | 705 157% | 693 153% | 295.8 8% | 274 ? 0% | 1834 ? 570% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 232.9 | 216 -7% | 203.8 -12% | 95.6 -59% | 204.7 -12% | 155.6 -33% | 207.8 -11% | 104.9 -55% | 176.2 ? -24% | 1426 ? 512% |
| Random Read 4KB | 53.1 | 69.3 31% | 69.9 32% | 64.6 22% | 82.9 56% | 101 90% | 136.3 157% | 84 58% | 59.4 ? 12% | 278 ? 424% |
| Random Write 4KB | 14.39 | 75.6 425% | 7.3 -49% | 12.71 -12% | 16.06 12% | 17.81 24% | 21 46% | 15.45 7% | 32 ? 122% | 310 ? 2054% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 83.2 ? | 86.9 ? 4% | 84.7 ? 2% | 76.6 ? -8% | 83.2 ? 0% | 85.3 ? 3% | 78.2 ? -6% | 77.4 ? -7% | ||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 63.8 ? | 66.8 ? 5% | 58.3 ? -9% | 61.5 ? -4% | 59.5 ? -7% | 65.6 ? 3% | 64.4 ? 1% | 58.3 ? -9% |
PUBG Mobile
Asphalt Legends
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Sony Xperia 10 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Motorola Moto G7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 68.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 68.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 68.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (122.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.01 / 0.16 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.72 / 2.16 / 2.17 Watt |
| Carga |
3.32 / 5.34 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Sony Xperia 10 2870 mAh | Motorola Moto G7 3000 mAh | Nokia 8.1 3500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 3300 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco F1 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 8 3400 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 3300 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -22% | 8% | -5% | -15% | -14% | -64% | -7% | -1% | -28% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.72 | 1.1 -53% | 0.8 -11% | 0.64 11% | 0.61 15% | 0.65 10% | 1.5 -108% | 0.71 1% | 0.732 ? -2% | 0.895 ? -24% |
| Idle Average * | 2.16 | 1.8 17% | 1.5 31% | 1.81 16% | 1.95 10% | 1.97 9% | 2.2 -2% | 1.36 37% | 1.835 ? 15% | 1.447 ? 33% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.17 | 2.6 -20% | 1.8 17% | 1.91 12% | 2.03 6% | 2.01 7% | 2.6 -20% | 1.47 32% | 2.16 ? -0% | 1.608 ? 26% |
| Load Average * | 3.32 | 4.2 -27% | 3.2 4% | 4.88 -47% | 4.56 -37% | 4.29 -29% | 6.1 -84% | 5.13 -55% | 3.81 ? -15% | 6.41 ? -93% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.34 | 6.8 -27% | 5.4 -1% | 6.38 -19% | 9.15 -71% | 9.05 -69% | 10.9 -104% | 7.89 -48% | 5.62 ? -5% | 9.61 ? -80% |
* ... smaller is better
| Sony Xperia 10 2870 mAh | Motorola Moto G7 3000 mAh | Nokia 8.1 3500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 3300 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco F1 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 8 3400 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 3300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 32% | 37% | 40% | 50% | 51% | 34% | 28% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1006 | 1548 54% | 1682 67% | 2080 107% | 1950 94% | 2088 108% | 1634 62% | 1467 46% |
| H.264 | 620 | 819 32% | 857 38% | 706 14% | 940 52% | 936 51% | 897 45% | 836 35% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 541 | 798 48% | 738 36% | 651 20% | 768 42% | 808 49% | 736 36% | 605 12% |
| Load | 233 | 219 -6% | 246 6% | 272 17% | 259 11% | 220 -6% | 215 -8% | 273 17% |
Pro
Contra
O Sony Xperia 10 é uma proposta intrigante. Ele será atraente para aqueles que são fanáticos de smartphones compactos, porque sua relação de aspecto de 21:9 permite que seja visivelmente mais estreito que seus concorrentes.
No entanto, seu painel IPS alongado tem suas desvantagens. Nossa unidade de análise é muito pesada e muitos aplicativos não suportam atualmente 21: 9, então você fica vendo o conteúdo em 16: 9. Aplicativos como o YouTube podem aumentar o zoom na maioria dos conteúdos, mas você acaba vendo uma imagem ou um vídeo muito recortado. Em suma, ter uma relação de aspecto de 21:9 poderia ser útil, mas é pouco prático no momento.
A Sony deu um passo na direção certa com sua nova série Xperia. O Xperia 10 é um smartphone de gama média peculiar e decente, mas o seu SoC desatualizado o torna atualmente muito caro, em nossa opinião.
Apesar de tudo, é um prazer usar a tela e é brilhante o suficiente para todos os ambientes. Da mesma forma, oferece cores precisas e é rica em contraste, de modo que o conteúdo se vê vibrante. Nossa unidade de teste é bem feita também, e recebemos com agrado a inclusão de um conector para fones, juntamente com a capacidade de ajustar o áudio para uma qualidade alta.
No entanto, seu armazenamento interno, RAM e SoC são mais adequados para um dispositivo de 250 euros (~$282) e não para 350 euros (~$395). Também não somos fanáticos da carcaça de plástico, embora seja mais resistente do que uma de metal ou de vidro. No geral, o Sony Xperia 10 é um smartphone decente, mas teria sido ainda mais atraente se fosse cerca de 100 Euros (~$113) mais barato.
Sony Xperia 10
-
04/15/2019 v6 (old)
Marcus Herbrich
Price comparison
