Breve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 8.1

Name: Nokia 8.1
Brand: Nokia

Room for improvement.

A HMD Global está posicionando o Nokia 8.1 como um dispositivo de gama média-alta. No entanto, a empresa tem cotado o 8.1 a €400 (~$456), o que coloca na mira dos carros-chefes do ano. Leia mais para ver o que o Nokia 8.1 oferece para enfrentar a forte concorrência.

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 02/12/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Touchscreen Smartphone

Test device courtesy of www.notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Nokia 8.1 (8 Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 360

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 616

Memória

4 GB

Pantalha

6.18 polegadas 18,7:9, 2246 x 1080 pixel 408 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, 51 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSd de até 400 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, Bússola, Giroscópio, Sensor de Proximidade, USB Type-C

Funcionamento em rede

Qualcomm Wi-Fi B/G/N/AC (2x2) (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM: 850, 900, 1800, 1,900 MHz. UMTS: 850, 900, 1,900, 2,100 MHz. LTE: Bands 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20., Dual SIM, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8 x 154.8 x 75.8

Bateria

13.3 Wh, 3500 mAh Lítio-Ion, Carregador rápido de 18 W

Sistema Operativo

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix , f/1.8, Dual-pixel Phase-detection autofocus (PDAF), OIS, dual-LED flash, Videos at up to 2160p/30 FPS (main camera). 13.0 MP, f/2.4, Depth of Field (Secondary Camera)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix , f/2.0

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono no lado inferior do dispositivo, Teclado: Virtual, Carregador rápido, cabo USB Type-C, fones, ferramenta SIM, Android One, Nokia Mobile Care, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR values: Body – 1.490 W/kg, Head - 0.514 W/kg; FM radio; LTE Cat. 6 – up to 300 MBit/s download and 50 MBit/s upload speeds; VoLTE, VoWiFi., fanless

peso

180 g, Suprimento de energia: 72 g

Preço

400 Euro

Links

Nokia página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	668 MBit/s +123%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	633 MBit/s +111%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Adreno 540, SD 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	550 MBit/s +83%
Nokia 8.1 Adreno 616, SD 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash	300 (169^min - 367^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Adreno 512, SD 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	285 (249^min - 304^max) MBit/s -5%
iperf3 receive AX12
Sony Xperia XZ2 Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	669 MBit/s +114%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	654 MBit/s +110%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Adreno 512, SD 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	584 (557^min - 605^max) MBit/s +87%
Nokia 8.1 Adreno 616, SD 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash	312 (273^min - 341^max) MBit/s
Nokia 8 Sirocco Adreno 540, SD 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	278 MBit/s -11%

Nokia 8.1; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø311 (273-341)

Nokia 8.1; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø294 (169-367)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

Photo taken with the rear-facing camera with a narrower viewing angle

ColorChecker Passport: The lower half of each area of colour displays the reference colour


523 cd/m²	543 cd/m²	541 cd/m²
566 cd/m²	567 cd/m²	536 cd/m²
553 cd/m²	546 cd/m²	550 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 567 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 547.2 cd/m² Minimum: 4.88 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 567 cd/m²
Contraste: 930:1 (Preto: 0.61 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.39 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.248

	Nokia 8.1 IPS, 2246x1080, 6.2"	Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 OLED, 2220x1080, 6.3"	Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S IPS, 2160x1080, 6"	Sony Xperia XZ2 IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7"	Nokia 8 Sirocco P-OLED, 2560x1440, 5.5"
Screen		25%	4%	35%	-5%
Brightness middle	567	553 -2%	492 -13%	630 11%	576 2%
Brightness	547	553 1%	463 -15%	632 16%	597 9%
Brightness Distribution	92	96 4%	90 -2%	96 4%	85 -8%
Black Level *	0.61		0.59 3%	0.44 28%
Contrast	930		834 -10%	1432 54%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.39	2.2 50%	2.4 45%	1.5 66%	5 -14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.28	5.1 30%	6.2 15%	4.3 41%	8 -10%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.9	1.7 65%	4.5 8%	2.1 57%	5.4 -10%
Gamma	2.248 ^98%	2.06 ^107%	2.25 ^98%	2.17 ^101%	2.3 ^96%
CCT	7642 ^85%	6434 ^101%	6395 ^102%	6513 ^100%	7730 ^84%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

75.8 Hz

≤ 10 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 75.8 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 75.8 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 15 ms rise
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9 ms rise
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 27 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1799 Points
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1601 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2456 Points +37%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	2464 Points +37%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	1952 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (1799 - 1833, n=4)	1819 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5422 Points +201%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	5856 Points
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	5826 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8937 Points +53%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	8510 Points +45%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	6701 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (5754 - 5917, n=4)	5843 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	14892 Points +154%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	6813 Points
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	5542 Points -19%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	14362 Points +111%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	7865 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (6601 - 6813, n=4)	6714 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=57, last 2 years)	11924 Points +75%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	8309 Points
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	6338 Points -24%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	9179 Points +10%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	9319 Points +12%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	7925 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (7041 - 9345, n=6)	8137 Points -2%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	6887 Points
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	5789 Points -16%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8078 Points +17%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	8069 Points +17%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	7193 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (6453 - 7460, n=6)	6824 Points -1%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	28895 Points
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	25783 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	56913 Points +97%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	62926 Points +118%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	42040 Points +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (26967 - 31801, n=6)	28731 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	39655 Points
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	29065 Points -27%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	76078 Points +92%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	80233 Points +102%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	58018 Points +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (37157 - 40461, n=6)	39183 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	14820 Points
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	18523 Points +25%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	30245 Points +104%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	35856 Points +142%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	21407 Points +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (13595 - 18181, n=6)	14925 Points +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2691 Points
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2054 Points -24%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4540 Points +69%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	6378 Points +137%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	3709 Points +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (2490 - 2840, n=6)	2670 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2763 Points
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1918 Points -31%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6630 Points +140%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	8122 Points +194%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	4511 Points +63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (2725 - 2857, n=6)	2767 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2467 Points
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2741 Points +11%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2159 Points -12%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3642 Points +48%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	2287 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (1878 - 2780, n=6)	2410 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2772 Points
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1898 Points -32%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4054 Points +46%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	6359 Points +129%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	3608 Points +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (2544 - 2859, n=6)	2736 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=74, last 2 years)	11160 Points +303%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2855 Points
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1757 Points -38%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5228 Points +83%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	8233 Points +188%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	4514 Points +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (2841 - 2931, n=6)	2875 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=74, last 2 years)	19815 Points +594%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2516 Points
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2645 Points +5%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2270 Points -10%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3540 Points +41%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	2119 Points -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (1862 - 2634, n=6)	2362 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=74, last 2 years)	5009 Points +99%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1834 Points
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1354 Points -26%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4248 Points +132%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	4693 Points +156%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	3656 Points +99%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (1774 - 1927, n=6)	1837 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=74, last 2 years)	3077 Points +68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1702 Points
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1185 Points -30%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5181 Points +204%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	5122 Points +201%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	3926 Points +131%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (1698 - 1764, n=6)	1716 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=74, last 2 years)	3252 Points +91%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2514 Points
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2073 Points -18%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2606 Points +4%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3630 Points +44%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	2946 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (2054 - 2847, n=6)	2457 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=74, last 2 years)	3288 Points +31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1964 Points
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1433 Points -27%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3742 Points +91%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	5012 Points +155%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	3584 Points +82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (1867 - 2006, n=6)	1941 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7682 Points +291%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1845 Points
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1268 Points -31%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4621 Points +150%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	5690 Points +208%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	4187 Points +127%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (1842 - 1875, n=6)	1860 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11410 Points +518%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2534 Points
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2774 Points +9%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2246 Points -11%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3537 Points +40%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	2382 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (1840 - 2720, n=6)	2330 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4587 Points +81%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	57 fps
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	50 fps -12%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps +5%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	60 fps +5%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	60 fps +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (54 - 65, n=6)	57.3 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	85.7 fps +50%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	65 fps
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	46 fps -29%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	150 fps +131%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	150 fps +131%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	106 fps +63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (56 - 65, n=6)	63.5 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)	279 fps +329%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	31 fps
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	21 fps -32%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	59 fps +90%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	59 fps +90%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	37 fps +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (20 - 40, n=6)	29.7 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	75 fps +142%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	32 fps
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	23 fps -28%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	74 fps +131%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	82 fps +156%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	54 fps +69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (32 - 33, n=6)	32.3 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)	164.1 fps +413%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	22 fps
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	14 fps -36%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	55 fps +150%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	55 fps +150%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	24 fps +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (19 - 30, n=6)	22.3 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)	65.2 fps +196%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	23 fps
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	15 fps -35%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps +161%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	60 fps +161%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	41 fps +78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (23 - 23, n=6)	23 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)	116.5 fps +407%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	12 fps
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	8.3 fps -31%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	34 fps +183%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	33 fps +175%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	15 fps +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (11 - 16, n=6)	12.7 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years)	47.5 fps +296%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	13 fps
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	9.1 fps -30%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35 fps +169%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	35 fps +169%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	26 fps +100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (13 - 13, n=6)	13 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)	70.3 fps +441%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	13 fps
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	7.5 fps -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (11 - 17, n=6)	13 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=202, last 2 years)	49.3 fps +279%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	14 fps
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	8.6 fps -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (13 - 14, n=6)	13.8 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years)	79.4 fps +467%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	8.2 fps
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	4.8 fps -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (5.9 - 11, n=6)	8.03 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years)	37.1 fps +352%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	5 fps
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	3 fps -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (4.9 - 7.8, n=6)	5.53 fps +11%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years)	31.6 fps +532%

Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	13 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (11.4 - 13, n=3)	12.2 fps -6%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	12.1 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (10.1 - 12.1, n=2)	11.1 fps -8%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	14.3 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (14.3 - 15.5, n=3)	14.9 fps +4%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	169262 Points
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	140878 Points -17%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	266601 Points +58%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	266981 Points +58%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	209729 Points +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (155113 - 169262, n=4)	162553 Points -4%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	135848 Points
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	116969 Points -14%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	162183 Points +19%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	225663 Points +66%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	185487 Points +37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (135848 - 137693, n=3)	136892 Points +1%

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1681 Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (1681 - 1708, n=3)	1699 Score +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years)	5819 Score +246%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2731 Points
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2364 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3614 Points +32%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3738 Points +37%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	3416 Points +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (2731 - 2970, n=6)	2808 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)	6257 Points +129%
System (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	5681 Points
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	5063 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5792 Points +2%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	8402 Points +48%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	5888 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (5603 - 5813, n=6)	5698 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)	10131 Points +78%
Memory (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2947 Points
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2393 Points -19%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3012 Points +2%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	2193 Points -26%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	3162 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (2872 - 3575, n=6)	3138 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)	6714 Points +128%
Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	3086 Points
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2332 Points -24%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	7918 Points +157%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	7868 Points +155%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	6084 Points +97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (2906 - 3112, n=6)	3060 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)	16761 Points +443%
Web (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1077 Points
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1105 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1234 Points +15%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	1346 Points +25%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144	1202 Points +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (1070 - 1307, n=6)	1140 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)	1557 Points +45%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	482 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (479 - 488, n=3)	483 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=56, last 2 years)	2316 Points +380%

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 3 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)	89.5 Points +36%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)	69.8 Points +6%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)	66 Points
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66)	62.2 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (50.5 - 66.6, n=6)	61.4 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)	51.8 Points -22%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)	36733 Points +189%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)	16774 Points +32%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)	14491 Points +14%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)	12717 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (9771 - 12802, n=6)	11817 Points -7%
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66)	11544 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)	10145 Points -20%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66)	4813 ms * -59%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)	3842 (1^min) ms * -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (3035 - 3800, n=6)	3370 ms * -11%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)	3035 ms *
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)	2868 ms * +6%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)	2394 ms * +21%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)	1583 ms * +48%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years)	147.1 Points +104%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	98 Points +36%
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66)	77 Points +7%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)	72 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (57 - 72, n=6)	66.2 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)	59 Points -18%
Sony Xperia XZ2	Points -100%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)	262 Points +25%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)	228 Points +9%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)	209 Points
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66)	204 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)	167 Points -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (166 - 209, n=6)	155.3 Points -26%

* ... smaller is better

	Nokia 8.1	Samsung Galaxy A9 2018	Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	Sony Xperia XZ2	Nokia 8 Sirocco	Average 64 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		46%	481%	47%	119%	50%	1401%
Sequential Read 256KB	279.3	426.6 53%	756 171%	679 143%	738 164%	274 ?(95.6 - 704, n=203) -2%	1834 ?(226 - 4512, n=193, last 2 years) 557%
Sequential Write 256KB	203.8	194.6 -5%	208.1 2%	198.7 -3%	211.6 4%	176.2 ?(40 - 274, n=203) -14%	1426 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=193, last 2 years) 600%
Random Read 4KB	69.9	116.8 67%	135.1 93%	149.4 114%	140.7 101%	59.4 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=203) -15%	278 ?(22.2 - 543, n=193, last 2 years) 298%
Random Write 4KB	7.3	19.79 171%	128.4 1659%	17 133%	22.4 207%	32 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=203) 338%	310 ?(9.4 - 753, n=193, last 2 years) 4147%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	84.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	73.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -13%		34.25 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -60%		77.4 ?(21.1 - 107.6, n=144) -9%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	58.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	59.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 2%		30.12 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -48%		58.3 ?(11.2 - 83.3, n=144) 0%

Asphalt 9: Legends
	Configurações	Valor
	High Quality	29 fps
	Standard / low	29 fps

Arena of Valor
	Configurações	Valor
	min	60 fps
	high HD	60 fps

Shadow Fight 3
	Configurações	Valor
	high	60 fps
	minimal	60 fps

PUBG Compare

Nokia 8.1 Adreno 616, SD 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Arena of Valor; min; 1.27.1.2: Ø59.9 (57-60)

Sony Xperia XZ2 Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Arena of Valor; min: Ø60 (58-61)

Nokia 8 Sirocco Adreno 540, SD 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Arena of Valor; min; 1.21.1.2: Ø59.7 (53-60)

Nokia 8.1 Adreno 616, SD 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.27.1.2: Ø59.6 (47-60)

Sony Xperia XZ2 Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Arena of Valor; high HD: Ø60 (56-61)

Nokia 8 Sirocco Adreno 540, SD 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.21.1.2: Ø59.8 (54-60)

Nokia 8.1 Adreno 616, SD 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.3.1a: Ø29.3 (28-31)

Nokia 8.1 Adreno 616, SD 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.3.1a: Ø28.9 (25-31)

Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Adreno 512, SD 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality: Ø27.7 (24-30)

Nokia 8.1 Adreno 616, SD 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Shadow Fight 3; minimal; 1.16.1: Ø59.5 (57-60)

Sony Xperia XZ2 Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Shadow Fight 3; minimal: Ø59.3 (53-61)

Nokia 8 Sirocco Adreno 540, SD 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Shadow Fight 3; minimal; 1.9.4: Ø59.5 (54-60)

Nokia 8.1 Adreno 616, SD 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Shadow Fight 3; high; 1.16.1: Ø59.1 (53-60)

Sony Xperia XZ2 Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Shadow Fight 3; high: Ø59.1 (53-61)

Nokia 8 Sirocco Adreno 540, SD 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Shadow Fight 3; high; 1.9.4: Ø59.5 (54-60)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


46.1 °C	41.4 °C	42.6 °C
44.6 °C	41.2 °C	42.8 °C
43.2 °C	40.8 °C	41.2 °C

Máximo: 46.1 °C
Médio: 42.7 °C


38.6 °C	39.6 °C	44.1 °C
38.6 °C	39.7 °C	43.8 °C
38.5 °C	40.3 °C	42.1 °C

Máximo: 44.1 °C
Médio: 40.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 44.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.1 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Nokia 8.1 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 62.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 62.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 62.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (120.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.05 / 0.3 Watt
Ocioso	0.8 / 1.5 / 1.8 Watt
Carga	3.2 / 5.4 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Nokia 8.1 3500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 3800 mAh	Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S 3400 mAh	Sony Xperia XZ2 3180 mAh	Nokia 8 Sirocco 3260 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-24%	-40%	-35%	-5%	0%	-35%
Idle Minimum *	0.8	1.06 -33%	0.75 6%	0.72 10%	0.78 2%	0.772 ?(0.7 - 0.8, n=5) 3%	0.895 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=153, last 2 years) -12%
Idle Average *	1.5	1.94 -29%	2.25 -50%	2.21 -47%	1.53 -2%	1.474 ?(1.2 - 2.07, n=5) 2%	1.447 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=153, last 2 years) 4%
Idle Maximum *	1.8	1.98 -10%	2.26 -26%	2.22 -23%	1.57 13%	1.882 ?(1.6 - 2.31, n=5) -5%	1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=153, last 2 years) 11%
Load Average *	3.2	3.56 -11%	4.89 -53%	4.6 -44%	3.49 -9%	3.33 ?(2.6 - 3.97, n=5) -4%	6.41 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=148, last 2 years) -100%
Load Maximum *	5.4	7.49 -39%	9.6 -78%	9.34 -73%	6.96 -29%	5.2 ?(4.5 - 5.82, n=5) 4%	9.61 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=148, last 2 years) -78%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		28h 02min
WiFi Websurfing		12h 18min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		14h 17min
Carga (máximo brilho)		4h 06min

	Nokia 8.1 3500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 3800 mAh	Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S 3400 mAh	Sony Xperia XZ2 3180 mAh	Nokia 8 Sirocco 3260 mAh
Battery Runtime		-0%	-6%	-19%	1%
Reader / Idle	1682	1780 6%	1678 0%	1402 -17%	1603 -5%
H.264	857	1005 17%	718 -16%	722 -16%	725 -15%
WiFi v1.3	738	689 -7%	716 -3%	679 -8%	693 -6%
Load	246	205 -17%	239 -3%	159 -35%	317 29%

Pro

+ Carcaça premium

+ Bom desempenho

+ Boas câmeras

+ Baixo consumo de energia

+ Duração da bateria sólida

+ Sem afogamentos sob uso intenso

+ Tela brilhante

Contra

- Suporte para apenas algumas bandas LTE

- Armazenamento interno baixo e lento

- Alto valor de preto da tela

The Nokia 8.1 smartphone review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.

A faixa de $450 para smartphones é um mercado difícil, que se tornou ainda mais competitivo com os carros-chefes do ano passado cujo preço agora está abaixando. No papel, parecia que o Nokia 8.1 poderia ter dificuldades contra de aparelhos como o Sony Xperia XZ2, mas a HMD Global fez um ótimo trabalho na criação de um smartphone muito completo que tem muito a oferecer.

O dispositivo tem um design elegante e premium, que até ameaça aos smartphones mais caros uma corrida pelo seu dinheiro. Além disso, seu SoC moderno pode competir com chips mais antigos e tem uma excelente duração de bateria. Sua tela é tão brilhante quanto as encontradas nos carros-chefe do ano passado, e será capturada sob a luz direta do sol. Além disso, suas câmeras nos impressionaram durante nossos testes, mesmo que não tenham alguns dos truques que muitos smartphones emblemáticos têm.

O Nokia 8.1 faz o básico bem e dispensa frivolidades para confundir as linhas entre os smartphones de gama média e topo de gama.

No entanto, o Nokia 8.1 tem suas desvantagens. A HMD Global equipou-o com armazenamento flash eMMC lento, e há menos bandas LTE do que gostaríamos de ver. Além disso, sua tela possui um valor de preto comparativamente alto e uma taxa de contraste fraca. No entanto, se você é um purista do Android e deseja uma experiência próxima à de um carro-chefe a um preço acessível, o Nokia 8.1 deve estar na lista de desejos do seu próximo smartphone.

Nokia 8.1 - 2019-02-06 02/06/2019 v6 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento

87%

Teclado

65 / 75 → 87%

Mouse

97%

Conectividade

42 / 60 → 70%

Peso

90%

Bateria

95%

Pantalha

86%

Desempenho do jogos

57 / 63 → 91%

Desempenho da aplicação

64 / 70 → 91%

Temperatura

86%

Ruído

100%

Audio

56 / 91 → 62%

Camera

73%

Médio

77%

87%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 11127 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 8.1

Florian Schmitt, 2019-02-12 (Update: 2019-02-12)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

PUBG Compare

Nokia 8.1 audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison