Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Asus N550JK-CN109H
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
IPS tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 288 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 264.1 cd/m²iluminação: 80 %
iluminação com acumulador: 284 cd/m²
Contraste: 732:1 (Preto: 0.388 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.24 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 7.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
47% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
53.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
55.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.63
| Asus N550JK-CN109H GeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB | Samsung 870Z5G GeForce GT 750M, 4700HQ, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB | Dell Inspiron 15-7537 GeForce GT 750M, 4500U, Samsung SSD SM841 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 24% | 10% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 55.1 | 65.1 18% | 61.7 12% |
| sRGB Coverage | 71.8 | 92.5 29% | 78.9 10% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 53.2 | 66.7 25% | 57.3 8% |
| Screen | 22% | 12% | |
| Brightness middle | 284 | 294 4% | 271 -5% |
| Brightness | 264 | 289 9% | 267 1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 80 | 84 5% | 84 5% |
| Black Level * | 0.388 | 0.3 23% | 0.25 36% |
| Contrast | 732 | 980 34% | 1084 48% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.24 | 3.7 29% | 6.22 -19% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.7 | 4.75 38% | 6.72 13% |
| Gamma | 2.63 84% | 2.46 89% | 2.47 89% |
| CCT | 6119 106% | 6508 100% | 5736 113% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 47 | 61 30% | 55 17% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 23% /
22% | 11% /
11% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus N550JK-CN109H GeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB | Asus N550JV-CN201H GeForce GT 750M, 4700HQ, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680 | Samsung 870Z5G GeForce GT 750M, 4700HQ, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB | Dell Inspiron 15-7537 GeForce GT 750M, 4500U, Samsung SSD SM841 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cinebench R15 | 27% | -26% | ||
| CPU Single 64Bit | 130 | 134 3% | 105 -19% | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | 321 | 627 95% | 195 -39% | |
| OpenGL 64Bit | 74.1 | 61.1 -18% | 59.7 -19% | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | 33% | 29% | -25% | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | 1.47 | 1.52 3% | 1.5 2% | 1.09 -26% |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | 3.55 | 6.68 88% | 6.57 85% | 2.12 -40% |
| OpenGL 64Bit | 48.86 | 53.1 9% | 49.32 1% | 43.95 -10% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 33% /
33% | 28% /
28% | -26% /
-26% |
| Asus N550JK-CN109H GeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB | Dell Inspiron 15-7537 GeForce GT 750M, 4500U, Samsung SSD SM841 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV | Acer Aspire V7-582PG-74508G52tkk GeForce GT 750M, 4500U, Toshiba MQ01ABF050 | Acer Aspire R7-571G-53338G75ass GeForce GT 750M, 3337U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD7500BPVX-22JC3T0 | Samsung 870Z5G GeForce GT 750M, 4700HQ, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCMark 7 | 107% | 51% | -4% | ||
| Score | 2882 | 5454 89% | 4255 48% | 2764 -4% 2764 -4% | |
| System Storage | 1536 | 5596 264% | 3654 138% | ||
| Computation | 14339 | 19928 39% | 15985 11% | ||
| Creativity | 5562 | 10431 88% | 7313 31% | ||
| Productivity | 1732 | 2652 53% | 2235 29% | ||
| PCMark 8 | |||||
| Storage Score | 1959 | 4989 155% | 2788 42% | 2047 4% 2047 4% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 131% /
115% | 47% /
50% | 4% /
4% | -4% /
-4% |
| PCMark Vantage Result | 7185 pontos | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 2882 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3072 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4190 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3769 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Asus N550JK-CN109H GeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB | Dell Inspiron 15-7537 GeForce GT 750M, 4500U, Samsung SSD SM841 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV | Samsung 870Z5G GeForce GT 750M, 4700HQ, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB | Acer Aspire V7-582PG-74508G52tkk GeForce GT 750M, 4500U, Toshiba MQ01ABF050 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 6583% | 31% | 17% | |
| Read Seq | 87.3 | 536 514% | 92.4 6% | 104.4 20% |
| Write Seq | 83.5 | 505 505% | 74.4 -11% | 98.3 18% |
| Read 4k | 0.326 | 37.7 11464% | 0.389 19% | 0.34 4% |
| Write 4k | 0.641 | 89.4 13847% | 1.336 108% | 0.808 26% |
Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB
Velocidade de Transferência Mínima:
41.1 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Máxima:
106.3 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Média:
79.9 MB/s
Tempo de Acesso:
17.7 ms
Índice de Explosão:
268.3 MB/s
Uso da CPU:
3.4 %
| Asus N550JK-CN109H GeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB | MSI GE70-2PCi785 GeForce GTX 850M, 4700HQ, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPVX | Samsung 870Z5G GeForce GT 750M, 4700HQ, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB | Dell Inspiron 15-7537 GeForce GT 750M, 4500U, Samsung SSD SM841 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV | Acer Aspire V7-582PG-74508G52tkk GeForce GT 750M, 4500U, Toshiba MQ01ABF050 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark | 42% | -30% | -32% | -41% | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Score | 2697 | 3404 26% | 1450 -46% | 1756 -35% | 1377 -49% |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | 3085 | 3596 17% | 1509 -51% | 1877 -39% | 1483 -52% |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Physics | 4872 | 8817 81% | 8580 76% | 3394 -30% | 4056 -17% |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Combined | 1033 | 1468 42% | 2.66 -100% | 797 -23% | 545 -47% |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 18575 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4289 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 77250 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 9862 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2697 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Company of Heroes 2 - 1366x768 High AA:Medium (sort by value) | |
| Asus N550JK-CN109H | |
| Samsung 870Z5G | |
| Acer Aspire V7-582PG-74508G52tkk | |
| Total War: Rome II - 1366x768 High Preset (sort by value) | |
| Asus N550JK-CN109H | |
| Dell Inspiron 15-7537 | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| World of Warcraft (2005) | 86.9 | 45.3 | ||
| Resident Evil 5 (2009) | 95 | 79.5 | ||
| Battlefield: Bad Company 2 (2010) | 117.2 | 50.2 | ||
| Total War: Shogun 2 (2011) | 76.4 | 36.5 | ||
| Dirt 3 (2011) | 100.1 | 48.9 | ||
| Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011) | 130.2 | 61.2 | ||
| Battlefield 3 (2011) | 77.2 | 63.9 | 22 | |
| The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011) | 66.2 | 36.4 | ||
| Alan Wake (2012) | 53.1 | 27.3 | ||
| Dirt Showdown (2012) | 61.9 | 39 | ||
| Max Payne 3 (2012) | 52.8 | 39 | ||
| Ghost Recon: Future Soldier (2012) | 36.6 | 22.7 | ||
| Counter-Strike: GO (2012) | 98.9 | |||
| Dishonored (2012) | 109.2 | 66.1 | ||
| Medal of Honor: Warfighter (2012) | 85.8 | 73.3 | 24.9 | |
| Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 (2012) | 84.3 | 54.2 | ||
| Assassin´s Creed III (2012) | 49.4 | 21.4 | ||
| Dead Space 3 (2013) | 112.9 | 67.7 | ||
| SimCity (2013) | 87 | 56.3 | 28 | |
| StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013) | 85.1 | 68.9 | 35.7 | |
| Company of Heroes 2 (2013) | 37.58 | 29.7 | 12.68 | |
| Splinter Cell: Blacklist (2013) | 75.9 | 42.9 | 17.2 | |
| The Bureau: XCOM Declassified (2013) | 70.9 | 45.3 | 34.3 | |
| Total War: Rome II (2013) | 104.6 | 85 | 19.2 | |
| Fifa 14 (2013) | 142 | |||
| Batman: Arkham Origins (2013) | 57 | 29 | ||
| Need for Speed: Rivals (2013) | 30 | 30 | 30 | |
| Thief (2014) | 36.2 | 33.7 | 18.3 |
| Asus N550JK-CN109H GeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB | Dell Inspiron 15-7537 GeForce GT 750M, 4500U, Samsung SSD SM841 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV | Samsung 870Z5G GeForce GT 750M, 4700HQ, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB | Acer Aspire V7-582PG-74508G52tkk GeForce GT 750M, 4500U, Toshiba MQ01ABF050 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 10% | 8% | 5% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 33.8 | 29.5 13% | 30.9 9% | 30.4 10% |
| Idle Average * | 33.8 | 30.6 9% | 30.9 9% | 32.7 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 33.9 | 32.4 4% | 31 9% | 33 3% |
| Load Average * | 41.9 | 32.4 23% | 40.4 4% | 39.4 6% |
| Load Maximum * | 43.6 | 42.5 3% | 40.6 7% | 41.7 4% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 33.8 / 33.8 / 33.9 dB |
| HDD |
| 33.8 dB |
| DVD |
| 37.7 / dB |
| Carga |
| 41.9 / 43.6 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Voltcraft sl-320 (15 cm de distância) | ||
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.5 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.3 °C / 84.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-0.5 °C / -0.9 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.5 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.3 °C / 84.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-0.5 °C / -0.9 F).
| Asus N550JK-CN109H GeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB | Dell Inspiron 15-7537 GeForce GT 750M, 4500U, Samsung SSD SM841 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV | Samsung 870Z5G GeForce GT 750M, 4700HQ, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB | Asus N550JV-CN201H GeForce GT 750M, 4700HQ, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 50% | 41% | 33% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 17.6 | 5.4 69% | 6.5 63% | 8.9 49% |
| Idle Average * | 21.1 | 9.9 53% | 10 53% | 11.9 44% |
| Idle Maximum * | 24 | 9.9 59% | 10.2 57% | 12.1 50% |
| Load Average * | 83.5 | 59.6 29% | 75.4 10% | 93 -11% |
| Load Maximum * | 108.7 | 66.1 39% | 83.8 23% | 75.4 31% |
* ... smaller is better
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.1 / 0.4 Watt |
| Ocioso | 17.6 / 21.1 / 24 Watt |
| Carga |
83.5 / 108.7 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Voltcraft VC 960 | |
A Asus montou um aparelho multimídia atrativo com ambições de jogos, chamado N550JK-CN109H. É interessante porque ele tem uma GeForce GTX 850M nova em folha, que fornece 35 a 50% mais fotogramas que a GT 750M no Asus N550JV. Ambos os dispositivos custam quase o mesmo (1000 Euros; ~$1364), mas o último tem um quad-core Core i7 mais recente.
O elegante case de alumínio com dois tubos de calor e dois ventiladores somente se afoga no modo de bateria. Tanto a CPU quanto a GPU fornecem pontuações consistentes muito boas no modo CA. Embora o elegante case ainda tenha uma tampa flexível, a área de trabalho de alumínio, ótimo som com subwoofer external, tela IPS mate, e chassi resistente, compensam por isso.
Nos acostumamos rapidamente ao teclado, mas não ao ClickPad. Seu deslocamento é curto e o esforço necessário para clicar é muito alto, e rapidamente deixamos de clicar no pad. A falta de gestos multi-touch também contribuem a isso; o controlador não oferece opções exceto pela rodagem com dois dedos. Fora essa "deficiência", a única falha séria do N550JK é o seu alto consumo de energia no modo inativo.
Os compradores à procura de um aparelho poderoso, porém, com lomga duração de bateria estará em boas mãos com o Samsung 870Z5G. Além de um potente processador de 47-Watts, também tem uma muito boa tela IPS FHD.
O Dell Inspiron 15-7537 também oferece melhores durações de bateria junto com uma tela muito boa. Os geeks do desempenho, no entanto, não ficarão satisfeitos com o chip ULV. Por usa vez, o veloz SSD compensa por esta falha no desempenho de aplicativos.
Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.
