Breve Análise do Poco X3 NFC - Campeão de equipamentos de gama média

Name: Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Brand: Xiaomi

Assassino de preços!

Com o Poco X3, a Xiaomi nos oferece boas especificações: uma tela de 120 Hz, um Snapdragon 732G, até 128 GB de armazenamento UFS, uma bateria enorme e tudo isso por menos de 230 Euros (~$ 272). Então, por que gastar mais ?!

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Notebookcheck), Published 10/16/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Deal Smartphone Touchscreen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Poco X5 Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G 8 x 2.3 GHz, Kryo 470 Gold / Silver

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 618

Memória

6 GB

, LPDDR4x

Pantalha

6.67 polegadas 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitiva, taxa de amostragem de toque de 240 Hz, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Brilhante: sim, HDR, 120 Hz

Disco rígido

64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 64 GB

, 43.54 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio de 3,5 mm, USB Type-C, Card Reader: microSD (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de proximidade, sensor de aceleração, giroscópio, bússola eletrônica, Emissor IV, rádio FM

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (bandas 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE Cat. 15 (bandas 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.4 x 165.3 x 76.8

Bateria

5160 mAh Lítio-Polímero

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Sistema Operativo

Android 10

Camera

Primary Camera: 64 MPix (IMX682, f/1.9, 1/1.73", 0.8 µm) + 13 MP (ultra wide-angle, f/2.2, 119˚, 1.0 µm) + 2 MP (macro, f/2.4) + 2 MP (depth sharpness, f/2.4), Camera2 API Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (f/2.2, 1/3.4", 0.8 µm)

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: onscreen, Carregador (33 Watts), cabo USB, capa protetora, SIM tool, documentação, MIUI 12 para Poco (Poco Launcher 2.0), 12 Meses Garantia, IP53 certification, head SAR: 0.558 W/kg, body SAR: 0.986 W/kg, DRM Widevine L1, fanless

peso

215 g, Suprimento de energia: 112 g

Preço

230 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Comparison Devices

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
81.8 % v7 ^(old)	10/2020	Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC SD 732G, Adreno 618	215 g	64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080
80.7 % v7 ^(old)	05/2020	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S SD 720G, Adreno 618	209 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080
82.9 % v7 ^(old)	08/2020	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite SD 730G, Adreno 618	204 g	64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.47"	2340x1080
83.6 % v7 ^(old)	09/2020	Google Pixel 4a SD 730G, Adreno 618	143 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	5.80"	2340x1080
85.2 % v7 ^(old)	05/2020	Apple iPhone SE 2020 A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU	148 g	128 GB NVMe	4.70"	1334x750
81.3 % v7 ^(old)	10/2020	Samsung Galaxy M51 SD 730, Adreno 618	213 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.70"	2400x1080

Size Comparison

Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Samsung Galaxy M51 Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Google Pixel 4a Apple iPhone SE 2020 DIN A6 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPhone SE 2020 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe	818 (400^min - 892^max) MBit/s +29%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Adreno 618, SD 732G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	633 (589^min - 676^max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 4a Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	620 (560^min - 703^max) MBit/s -2%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	325 (318^min - 330^max) MBit/s -49%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Adreno 618, SD 730G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	324 (310^min - 330^max) MBit/s -49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	256 (247^min - 263^max) MBit/s -60%
iperf3 receive AX12
Google Pixel 4a Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	668 (592^min - 685^max) MBit/s +5%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Adreno 618, SD 732G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	636 (500^min - 675^max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone SE 2020 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe	618 (321^min - 653^max) MBit/s -3%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Adreno 618, SD 730G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	341 (334^min - 349^max) MBit/s -46%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	337 (270^min - 351^max) MBit/s -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	286 (225^min - 321^max) MBit/s -55%

Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø636 (500-675)

Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø633 (589-676)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Weitwinkel Weitwinkel Ultraweitwinkel Zoom (5-fach)Low-Light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


593 cd/m²	615 cd/m²	597 cd/m²
590 cd/m²	623 cd/m²	586 cd/m²
587 cd/m²	628 cd/m²	583 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 628 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 600.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.93 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 623 cd/m²
Contraste: 1154:1 (Preto: 0.54 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26

	Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7"	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7"	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5"	Google Pixel 4a OLED, 2340x1080, 5.8"	Apple iPhone SE 2020 IPS, 1334x750, 4.7"	Samsung Galaxy M51 Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen		-27%	29%	34%	41%	-23%
Brightness middle	623	622 0%	605 -3%	705 13%	688 10%	626 0%
Brightness	600	612 2%	608 1%	707 18%	659 10%	632 5%
Brightness Distribution	93	94 1%	95 2%	96 3%	92 -1%	94 1%
Black Level *	0.54	0.56 -4%			0.28 48%
Contrast	1154	1111 -4%			2457 113%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.8	3.98 -121%	0.84 53%	0.9 50%	1 44%	2.88 -60%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.7	7.33 -56%	1.8 62%	1.9 60%	2.2 53%	4.97 -6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.3	4.5 -36%	1.3 61%	1.3 61%	1.7 48%	5.9 -79%
Gamma	2.26 ^97%	2.206 ^100%	2.211 ^100%	2.26 ^97%	2.25 ^98%	3.441 ^64%
CCT	6712 ^97%	7361 ^88%	6310 ^103%	6576 ^99%	6790 ^96%	6415 ^101%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		114.9

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

2358 Hz

≤ 40 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 40 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11.6 ms rise
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21.6 ms rise
44.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 22.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	567 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	559 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	547 Points -4%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	549 Points -3%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	1336 Points +136%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	548 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (563 - 567, n=3)	565 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)	995 Points +75%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	1787 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	1690 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1690 Points -5%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1646 Points -8%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	3281 Points +84%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	1780 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (1728 - 1792, n=3)	1769 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)	3312 Points +85%
Vulkan Score 5.5 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	1090 Points
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1030 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	1007 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (1030 - 1182, n=3)	1101 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (79 - 16883, n=42, last 2 years)	6763 Points +520%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	1291 Points
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	1149 Points -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (1211 - 1293, n=3)	1265 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (459 - 13578, n=35, last 2 years)	7074 Points +448%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2638 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2620 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (2594 - 2638, n=2)	2616 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5486 Points +108%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	7130 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	6263 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (6943 - 7130, n=2)	7037 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	15064 Points +111%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	8962 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (5492 - 8962, n=2)	7227 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)	11998 Points +34%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	8773 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	9027 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	8941 Points +2%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	10200 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	9075 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (8543 - 8773, n=2)	8658 Points -1%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	8101 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	7673 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	7628 Points -6%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	8683 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	7913 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (8064 - 8688, n=3)	8284 Points +2%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	40955 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	38671 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	39491 Points -4%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	34678 Points -15%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	97290 Points +138%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	39944 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G ()	40955 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	56640 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	52700 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	53194 Points -6%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	53548 Points -5%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	209431 Points +270%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	52736 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G ()	56640 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	20797 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	20019 Points -4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	20767 Points 0%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	15527 Points -25%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	33851 Points +63%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	21603 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G ()	20797 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3784 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3501 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3594 Points -5%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3543 Points -6%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	6168 Points +63%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3547 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (3784 - 4021, n=3)	3908 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3917 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3647 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3610 Points -8%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3629 Points -7%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	9218 Points +135%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3604 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (3917 - 4232, n=3)	4087 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3382 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3070 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3294 Points -3%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3273 Points -3%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	2857 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3362 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (3365 - 3382, n=3)	3374 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3918 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3669 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3594 Points -8%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3647 Points -7%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	10699 Points +173%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3644 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (3887 - 3939, n=3)	3915 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +184%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	4086 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3803 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3751 Points -8%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3750 Points -8%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	20135 Points +393%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3741 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (4038 - 4256, n=3)	4127 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +382%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3425 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3267 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3134 Points -8%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3329 Points -3%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	4052 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3339 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (3125 - 3425, n=3)	3307 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2713 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2507 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2459 Points -9%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2468 Points -9%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	4050 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2469 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (2713 - 2783, n=3)	2752 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2559 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2369 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2298 Points -10%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2310 Points -10%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	4573 Points +79%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2299 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (2559 - 2694, n=3)	2625 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points +28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3436 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3152 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3257 Points -5%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3247 Points -6%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	2892 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3331 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (3372 - 3436, n=3)	3398 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2865 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2680 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2577 Points -10%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2615 Points -9%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	5688 Points +99%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2619 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (2865 - 2938, n=3)	2913 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7767 Points +171%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2735 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2551 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2466 Points -10%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2467 Points -10%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	7847 Points +187%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2465 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (2735 - 2832, n=3)	2797 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11536 Points +322%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3438 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3256 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3058 Points -11%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3309 Points -4%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	2898 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3349 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (3311 - 3438, n=3)	3383 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4613 Points +34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2506 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2353 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2244 Points -10%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2255 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2302 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (2506 - 2610, n=3)	2570 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=72, last 2 years)	2846 Points +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2427 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2257 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2143 Points -12%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2150 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2180 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (2427 - 2562, n=3)	2508 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=72, last 2 years)	3095 Points +28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2827 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2765 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2686 Points -5%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2720 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2862 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (2773 - 2828, n=3)	2809 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=72, last 2 years)	2704 Points -4%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	60 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	59 fps -2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	60 fps 0%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	59 fps -2%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	60 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	55 fps -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (60 - 81, n=3)	74 fps +23%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	86.3 fps +44%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	91 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	86 fps -5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	83 fps -9%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	84 fps -8%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	250 fps +175%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	67 fps -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (91 - 91, n=3)	91 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)	280 fps +208%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	34 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	37 fps +9%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	39 fps +15%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	38 fps +12%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	60 fps +76%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	31 fps -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (34 - 43, n=3)	39 fps +15%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	75.5 fps +122%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	45 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	42 fps -7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	41 fps -9%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	41 fps -9%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	149 fps +231%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	34 fps -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (45 - 45, n=3)	45 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)	165.3 fps +267%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	28 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	27 fps -4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	29 fps +4%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	28 fps 0%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	60 fps +114%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	22 fps -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (28 - 32, n=3)	29.7 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)	65.7 fps +135%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	33 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	31 fps -6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	30 fps -9%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	30 fps -9%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	93 fps +182%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	24 fps -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (33 - 33, n=3)	33 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)	117.2 fps +255%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	16 fps -6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps 0%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	16 fps -6%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	60 fps +253%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	12 fps -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (17 - 18, n=3)	17.3 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years)	47.8 fps +181%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	19 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps -5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps -11%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps -11%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	59 fps +211%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	14 fps -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (19 - 19, n=3)	19 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)	70.6 fps +272%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps -6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps -6%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps -6%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	60 fps +233%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	13 fps -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (18 - 19, n=3)	18.3 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +175%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	20 fps
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps -10%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps -10%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	72 fps +260%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	15 fps -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (20 - 21, n=3)	20.3 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years)	79.8 fps +299%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	11 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	11 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	11 fps 0%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	11 fps 0%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	60 fps +445%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	8.3 fps -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (11 - 12, n=3)	11.3 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years)	37.4 fps +240%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	7.5 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	7 fps -7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	6.7 fps -11%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	6.6 fps -12%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	31 fps +313%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	5.4 fps -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (7.4 - 7.5, n=3)	7.43 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years)	32 fps +327%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	279048 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	275931 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	273255 Points -2%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	269238 Points -4%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	489463 Points +75%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	247877 Points -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (279048 - 292450, n=3)	286602 Points +3%

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2373 Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2416 Score +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (2373 - 2538, n=2)	2456 Score +3%
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years)	5819 Score +145%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3477 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3542 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3342 Points -4%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3512 Points +1%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3539 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (3365 - 3617, n=3)	3486 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)	6297 Points +81%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	6542 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	6828 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	6305 Points -4%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	6796 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	6606 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (5972 - 6752, n=3)	6422 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	10163 Points +55%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	4041 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	4295 Points +6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3752 Points -7%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	4544 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	4482 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (4041 - 4353, n=3)	4146 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6767 Points +67%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3960 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3807 Points -4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3864 Points -2%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3840 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3875 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (3960 - 4157, n=3)	4068 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	16908 Points +327%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	1395 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	1410 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1365 Points -2%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1283 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy M51 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	1366 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (1228 - 1401, n=3)	1341 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1564 Points +12%

AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	35458 Points
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	60807 Points +71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (4958 - 35458, n=3)	15145 Points -57%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)	139.7 Points +166%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)	120.4 Points +129%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)	52.6 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (49.5 - 53.4, n=3)	51.8 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85)	50.1 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)	48.53 Points -8%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)	47.8 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	46.15 Points -12%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)	278.6 Points +208%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (89.8 - 92.4, n=3)	90.9 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)	90.6 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)	89.5 Points -1%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)	87.7 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	82.3 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85)	66.3 Points -27%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)	158 runs/min +260%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	136.2 runs/min +210%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)	44.2 runs/min +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chome 81)	44.1 runs/min 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)	43.9 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (41.4 - 43.9, n=3)	42.8 runs/min -3%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chome 85)	41.3 runs/min -6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	40.4 runs/min -8%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +107%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)	146 Points +103%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)	72 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (71 - 73, n=3)	72 Points 0%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)	71 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	70 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)	69 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85)	69 Points -4%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)	48991 Points +182%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points +114%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)	17768 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (17293 - 17817, n=3)	17503 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)	17398 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)	17303 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85)	16399 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	16197 Points -7%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)	2950 ms * -10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	2941 ms * -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)	2794 ms * -5%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85)	2774 ms * -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (2673 - 2832, n=2)	2753 ms * -3%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)	2673 ms *
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * +41%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)	550 ms * +79%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite	Google Pixel 4a	Samsung Galaxy M51	Average 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		7%	11%	35%	3%	-6%	321%
Sequential Read 256KB	506	496.6 -2%	501 -1%	502 -1%	491.7 -3%	513 ?(272 - 687, n=18) 1%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 263%
Sequential Write 256KB	173.1	214.8 24%	213.2 23%	246.8 43%	189.8 10%	175.2 ?(80.4 - 251, n=18) 1%	1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 723%
Random Read 4KB	123.4	137 11%	134.6 9%	162.9 32%	123.6 0%	117.1 ?(60.6 - 167.2, n=18) -5%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years) 124%
Random Write 4KB	112.6	123.6 10%	125.8 12%	187.4 66%	114.5 2%	81.1 ?(13.6 - 195.8, n=18) -28%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 174%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	75.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	74.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%			74.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%	73.4 ?(36.8 - 85.4, n=10) -2%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	55.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	54.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%			59.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 7%	55.4 ?(33.3 - 65.3, n=10) 0%

Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC; PUBG Mobile; 1.0.0: Ø29.9 (14-31)

Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC; Armajet; 1.15.1: Ø73.9 (56-102)

Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC; Call of Duty Mobile; low; 1.0.16: Ø59.5 (52-62)

Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC; Call of Duty Mobile; high; 1.0.16: Ø58.3 (49-61)

Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC; Call of Duty Mobile; very high; 1.0.16: Ø56.5 (40-60)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


38.6 °C	39 °C	36.9 °C
38 °C	37.7 °C	38 °C
36.3 °C	37.1 °C	37.9 °C

Máximo: 39 °C
Médio: 37.7 °C


33.4 °C	36.7 °C	37.3 °C
33.8 °C	36.5 °C	36 °C
33.5 °C	35.6 °C	35.6 °C

Máximo: 37.3 °C
Médio: 35.4 °C

alimentação elétrica 25 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 64.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 64.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 64.7% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (119.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.02 / 0.28 Watt
Ocioso	0.93 / 2.47 / 2.51 Watt
Carga	5.62 / 6.93 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC 5160 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S 5020 mAh	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite 5260 mAh	Google Pixel 4a 3140 mAh	Apple iPhone SE 2020 1822 mAh	Samsung Galaxy M51 7000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-9%	29%	48%	45%	21%	11%	5%
Idle Minimum *	0.93	1.5 -61%	0.8 14%	0.49 47%	0.44 53%	0.8 14%	0.93 ?(0.81 - 1.05, n=3) -0%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) 4%
Idle Average *	2.47	2.1 15%	1.1 55%	0.96 61%	1.56 37%	1.3 47%	2.09 ?(1.8 - 2.47, n=3) 15%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) 41%
Idle Maximum *	2.51	2.5 -0%	1.8 28%	1 60%	1.63 35%	1.8 28%	2.13 ?(1.85 - 2.51, n=3) 15%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) 36%
Load Average *	5.62	5.2 7%	3.7 34%	3.11 45%	2.32 59%	4.8 15%	4.6 ?(3.97 - 5.62, n=3) 18%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -15%
Load Maximum *	6.93	7.5 -8%	6.1 12%	5.23 25%	4.12 41%	7 -1%	6.5 ?(6.27 - 6.93, n=3) 6%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -41%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		40h 27min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 85)		18h 36min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		19h 48min
Carga (máximo brilho)		4h 40min

	Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC 5160 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S 5020 mAh	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite 5260 mAh	Google Pixel 4a 3140 mAh	Apple iPhone SE 2020 1822 mAh	Samsung Galaxy M51 7000 mAh
Battery Runtime		2%	7%	-20%	-38%	29%
Reader / Idle	2427	2263 -7%	2249 -7%	2270 -6%	1938 -20%	2642 9%
H.264	1188	1269 7%	1370 15%	1045 -12%	681 -43%	1685 42%
WiFi v1.3	1116	1187 6%	1095 -2%	669 -40%	694 -38%	1508 35%
Load	280	279 0%	337 20%	225 -20%	143 -49%	365 30%

Pro

+ SoC moderno

+ Armazenamento expansível

+ Câmera decente de 64 MP

+ Longa duração da bateria

+ Boa porta de áudio

+ Bluetooth com todos os codecs de áudio habituais

+ Tela de 120 Hz ...

Contra

- ... com pequenas fraquezas e PWM

- Armazenamento mais lento do que o especificado

- Anúncios e muitos aplicativos de terceiros

- Fraquezas enquanto se localiza

- Apenas 12 meses de garantia

- Pesado

Veredicto - Uma forte relação preço-desempenho

O Poco X3 NFC oferece um equipamento excelente, principalmente quando se considera o preço baixo, já que o smartphone está normalmente disponível a partir de 230 euros (~$ 272) e à venda até às vezes abaixo de 200 euros (~$ 236).

Apesar do preço baixo, o smartphone Xiaomi se apresenta muito completo e ainda oferece características de equipamentos modernos como tela de 120 Hz e novo SoC. O equipamento da câmera também é exemplar nesta classe de preços, mas recebe sua parcela de reclamações neste teste. Embora o sistema de câmera quádrupla ofereça boas especificações no papel, as duas lentes adicionais de 2 MP não oferecem nenhum valor adicional específico.

O Poco X3 NFC oferece um equipamento muito completo a um preço acessível.

As restrições no modo de desenvolvedor e os anúncios no sistema são certamente irritantes e provavelmente não sem problemas para aqueles que se preocupam com a privacidade de dados. Mas a maioria dos usuários não terá nenhum interesse no modo de desenvolvedor. E isso não muda nada sobre o fato de que atualmente provavelmente não há smartphone melhor equipado nesta classe de preço do que o Poco X3.

Então, por que você ainda deve escolher um Pixel 4a ou um iPhone SE mais caro? Ambos oferecem uma melhor qualidade de câmera, mesmo que as funções sejam mais limitadas. E o longo suporte de atualização com o telefone do Google e da Apple também tornará essas soluções mais duradouras, já que apenas a atualização para o Android 11 é relativamente provável para o Poco neste momento. Porém, em termos de quantidade de funcionalidades, o Poco X3 é o vencedor claro.

Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC - 10/13/2020 v7 ^(old)
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento

85%

Teclado

67 / 75 → 89%

Mouse

94%

Conectividade

54 / 70 → 77%

Peso

88%

Bateria

92%

Pantalha

87%

Desempenho do jogos

31 / 64 → 49%

Desempenho da aplicação

69 / 86 → 80%

Temperatura

90%

Ruído

100%

Audio

74 / 90 → 82%

Camera

60%

Médio

76%

82%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 534 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Poco X3 NFC - Campeão de equipamentos de gama média

Daniel Schmidt, 2020-10-16 (Update: 2020-10-20)

Comparison Devices

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC audio analysis

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto - Uma forte relação preço-desempenho

More articles related to this device

Price comparison