Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Poco X3 NFC - Campeão de equipamentos de gama média

Assassino de preços!

Com o Poco X3, a Xiaomi nos oferece boas especificações: uma tela de 120 Hz, um Snapdragon 732G, até 128 GB de armazenamento UFS, uma bateria enorme e tudo isso por menos de 230 Euros (~$ 272). Então, por que gastar mais ?!
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Poco X5 Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G 8 x 2.3 GHz, Kryo 470 Gold / Silver
Placa gráfica
Memória
6 GB 
, LPDDR4x
Pantalha
6.67 polegadas 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitiva, taxa de amostragem de toque de 240 Hz, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Brilhante: sim, HDR, 120 Hz
Disco rígido
64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 64 GB 
, 43.54 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio de 3,5 mm, USB Type-C, Card Reader: microSD (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de proximidade, sensor de aceleração, giroscópio, bússola eletrônica, Emissor IV, rádio FM
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (bandas 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE Cat. 15 (bandas 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.4 x 165.3 x 76.8
Bateria
5160 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix (IMX682, f/1.9, 1/1.73", 0.8 µm) + 13 MP (ultra wide-angle, f/2.2, 119˚, 1.0 µm) + 2 MP (macro, f/2.4) + 2 MP (depth sharpness, f/2.4), Camera2 API Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (f/2.2, 1/3.4", 0.8 µm)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: onscreen, Carregador (33 Watts), cabo USB, capa protetora, SIM tool, documentação, MIUI 12 para Poco (Poco Launcher 2.0), 12 Meses Garantia, IP53 certification, head SAR: 0.558 W/kg, body SAR: 0.986 W/kg, DRM Widevine L1, fanless
peso
215 g, Suprimento de energia: 112 g
Preço
230 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
81.8 %
v7 (old)
10/2020
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
SD 732G, Adreno 618
215 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080
80.7 %
v7 (old)
05/2020
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
SD 720G, Adreno 618
209 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080
82.9 %
v7 (old)
08/2020
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
SD 730G, Adreno 618
204 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.47"2340x1080
83.6 %
v7 (old)
09/2020
Google Pixel 4a
SD 730G, Adreno 618
143 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash5.80"2340x1080
85.2 %
v7 (old)
05/2020
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
148 g128 GB NVMe4.70"1334x750
81.3 %
v7 (old)
10/2020
Samsung Galaxy M51
SD 730, Adreno 618
213 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.70"2400x1080

Size Comparison

165.3 mm 76.8 mm 9.4 mm 215 g165.8 mm 76.7 mm 8.8 mm 209 g163.9 mm 76.3 mm 9.5 mm 213 g157.8 mm 74.2 mm 9.67 mm 204 g144 mm 69.4 mm 8.2 mm 143 g138.4 mm 67.3 mm 7.3 mm 148 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
818 (400min - 892max) MBit/s +29%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
633 (589min - 676max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 4a
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
620 (560min - 703max) MBit/s -2%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
325 (318min - 330max) MBit/s -49%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
324 (310min - 330max) MBit/s -49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
256 (247min - 263max) MBit/s -60%
iperf3 receive AX12
Google Pixel 4a
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
668 (592min - 685max) MBit/s +5%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
636 (500min - 675max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
618 (321min - 653max) MBit/s -3%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
341 (334min - 349max) MBit/s -46%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
337 (270min - 351max) MBit/s -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
286 (225min - 321max) MBit/s -55%
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630665Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø636 (500-675)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø633 (589-676)
Garmin Edge 500 - overview
Garmin Edge 500 - overview
Garmin Edge 500 - around the lake
Garmin Edge 500 - around the lake
Garmin Edge 500 - turning point
Garmin Edge 500 - turning point
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC - overview
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC - overview
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC - around the lake
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC - around the lake
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC - turning point
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC - turning point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

WeitwinkelWeitwinkelUltraweitwinkelZoom (5-fach)Low-Light
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
7.2 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
3 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC: 5.35 ∆E min: 1.59 - max: 10.62 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
54.3 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
61.5 ∆E
53.3 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
63.5 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
75.8 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
42 ∆E
92.9 ∆E
71 ∆E
52 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC: 46.81 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 92.93 ∆E
Wide-angle
Wide-angle
Wide-angle
Macro
Wide-angle
Wide-angle (64 MP)
Wide-angle
Zoom (2x)
Zoom (5x)
Zoom (maximum, 10x)
Wide-angle
Wide-angle
Zoom (maximum, 10x)
Wide-angle
593
cd/m²
615
cd/m²
597
cd/m²
590
cd/m²
623
cd/m²
586
cd/m²
587
cd/m²
628
cd/m²
583
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 628 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 600.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.93 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 623 cd/m²
Contraste: 1154:1 (Preto: 0.54 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5"
Google Pixel 4a
OLED, 2340x1080, 5.8"
Apple iPhone SE 2020
IPS, 1334x750, 4.7"
Samsung Galaxy M51
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen
-27%
29%
34%
41%
-23%
Brightness middle
623
622
0%
605
-3%
705
13%
688
10%
626
0%
Brightness
600
612
2%
608
1%
707
18%
659
10%
632
5%
Brightness Distribution
93
94
1%
95
2%
96
3%
92
-1%
94
1%
Black Level *
0.54
0.56
-4%
0.28
48%
Contrast
1154
1111
-4%
2457
113%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.8
3.98
-121%
0.84
53%
0.9
50%
1
44%
2.88
-60%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.7
7.33
-56%
1.8
62%
1.9
60%
2.2
53%
4.97
-6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.3
4.5
-36%
1.3
61%
1.3
61%
1.7
48%
5.9
-79%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.206 100%
2.211 100%
2.26 97%
2.25 98%
3.441 64%
CCT
6712 97%
7361 88%
6310 103%
6576 99%
6790 96%
6415 101%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
114.9

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2358 Hz ≤ 40 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 40 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.6 ms rise
↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.6 ms rise
↘ 22.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
567 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
559 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
547 Points -4%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
549 Points -3%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
1336 Points +136%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
548 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (563 - 567, n=3)
565 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=173, last 2 years)
989 Points +74%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1787 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1690 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1690 Points -5%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1646 Points -8%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
3281 Points +84%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1780 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (1728 - 1792, n=3)
1769 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=173, last 2 years)
3298 Points +85%
Vulkan Score 5.5 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1090 Points
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1030 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1007 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (1030 - 1182, n=3)
1101 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (79 - 16883, n=43, last 2 years)
6769 Points +521%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1291 Points
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1149 Points -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (1211 - 1293, n=3)
1265 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (459 - 13578, n=37, last 2 years)
6909 Points +435%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2638 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2620 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (2594 - 2638, n=2)
2616 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)
5422 Points +106%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
7130 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6263 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (6943 - 7130, n=2)
7037 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)
14892 Points +109%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
8962 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (5492 - 8962, n=2)
7227 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5192 - 18534, n=57, last 2 years)
11924 Points +33%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
8773 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
9027 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
8941 Points +2%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
10200 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
9075 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (8543 - 8773, n=2)
8658 Points -1%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
8101 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
7673 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
7628 Points -6%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
8683 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
7913 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (8064 - 8688, n=3)
8284 Points +2%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
40955 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
38671 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
39491 Points -4%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
34678 Points -15%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
97290 Points +138%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
39944 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  ()
40955 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
56640 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
52700 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
53194 Points -6%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
53548 Points -5%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
209431 Points +270%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
52736 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  ()
56640 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
20797 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
20019 Points -4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
20767 Points 0%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
15527 Points -25%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
33851 Points +63%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
21603 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  ()
20797 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3784 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3501 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3594 Points -5%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3543 Points -6%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
6168 Points +63%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3547 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (3784 - 4021, n=3)
3908 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)
4204 Points +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3917 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3647 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3610 Points -8%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3629 Points -7%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
9218 Points +135%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3604 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (3917 - 4232, n=3)
4087 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)
4740 Points +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3382 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3070 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3294 Points -3%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3273 Points -3%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
2857 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3362 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (3365 - 3382, n=3)
3374 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)
3303 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3918 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3669 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3594 Points -8%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3647 Points -7%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
10699 Points +173%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3644 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (3887 - 3939, n=3)
3915 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 23024, n=74, last 2 years)
11160 Points +185%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4086 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3803 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3751 Points -8%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3750 Points -8%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
20135 Points +393%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3741 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (4038 - 4256, n=3)
4127 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (840 - 45492, n=74, last 2 years)
19815 Points +385%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3425 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3267 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3134 Points -8%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3329 Points -3%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
4052 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3339 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (3125 - 3425, n=3)
3307 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=74, last 2 years)
5009 Points +46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2713 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2507 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2459 Points -9%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2468 Points -9%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
4050 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2469 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (2713 - 2783, n=3)
2752 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 17553, n=74, last 2 years)
3077 Points +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2559 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2369 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2298 Points -10%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2310 Points -10%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
4573 Points +79%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2299 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (2559 - 2694, n=3)
2625 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 29890, n=74, last 2 years)
3252 Points +27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3436 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3152 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3257 Points -5%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3247 Points -6%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
2892 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3331 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (3372 - 3436, n=3)
3398 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 7180, n=74, last 2 years)
3288 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2865 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2680 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2577 Points -10%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2615 Points -9%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
5688 Points +99%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2619 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (2865 - 2938, n=3)
2913 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)
7682 Points +168%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2735 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2551 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2466 Points -10%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2467 Points -10%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
7847 Points +187%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2465 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (2735 - 2832, n=3)
2797 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)
11410 Points +317%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3438 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3256 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3058 Points -11%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3309 Points -4%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
2898 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3349 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (3311 - 3438, n=3)
3383 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)
4587 Points +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2506 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2353 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2244 Points -10%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2255 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2302 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (2506 - 2610, n=3)
2570 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (365 - 6635, n=73, last 2 years)
2841 Points +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2427 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2257 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2143 Points -12%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2150 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2180 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (2427 - 2562, n=3)
2508 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 8601, n=73, last 2 years)
3085 Points +27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2827 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2765 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2686 Points -5%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2720 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2862 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (2773 - 2828, n=3)
2809 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1667 - 4198, n=73, last 2 years)
2706 Points -4%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
59 fps -2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps 0%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
59 fps -2%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
55 fps -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (60 - 81, n=3)
74 fps +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)
85.7 fps +43%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
91 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
86 fps -5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
83 fps -9%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
84 fps -8%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
250 fps +175%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
67 fps -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (91 - 91, n=3)
91 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)
279 fps +207%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
34 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
37 fps +9%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
39 fps +15%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
38 fps +12%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps +76%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
31 fps -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (34 - 43, n=3)
39 fps +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)
75 fps +121%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
45 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
42 fps -7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps -9%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps -9%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
149 fps +231%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
34 fps -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (45 - 45, n=3)
45 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)
164.1 fps +265%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
28 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps -4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
29 fps +4%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
28 fps 0%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps +114%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
22 fps -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (28 - 32, n=3)
29.7 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)
65.2 fps +133%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
33 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
31 fps -6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps -9%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps -9%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
93 fps +182%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
24 fps -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (33 - 33, n=3)
33 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)
116.5 fps +253%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps -6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps 0%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps -6%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps +253%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
12 fps -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (17 - 18, n=3)
17.3 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years)
47.5 fps +179%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
19 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps -5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps -11%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps -11%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
59 fps +211%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
14 fps -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (19 - 19, n=3)
19 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)
70.3 fps +270%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps -6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps -6%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps -6%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps +233%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
13 fps -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (18 - 19, n=3)
18.3 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=202, last 2 years)
49.3 fps +174%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
20 fps
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps -10%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps -10%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
72 fps +260%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (20 - 21, n=3)
20.3 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years)
79.4 fps +297%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps 0%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps 0%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps +445%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
8.3 fps -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (11 - 12, n=3)
11.3 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years)
37.1 fps +237%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
7.5 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
7 fps -7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6.7 fps -11%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6.6 fps -12%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
31 fps +313%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
5.4 fps -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (7.4 - 7.5, n=3)
7.43 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years)
31.6 fps +321%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
279048 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
275931 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
273255 Points -2%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
269238 Points -4%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
489463 Points +75%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
247877 Points -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (279048 - 292450, n=3)
286602 Points +3%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2373 Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2416 Score +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (2373 - 2538, n=2)
2456 Score +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years)
5819 Score +145%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3477 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3542 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3342 Points -4%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3512 Points +1%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3539 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (3365 - 3617, n=3)
3486 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)
6257 Points +80%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
6542 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6828 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6305 Points -4%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6796 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6606 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (5972 - 6752, n=3)
6422 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)
10131 Points +55%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4041 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
4295 Points +6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3752 Points -7%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
4544 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
4482 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (4041 - 4353, n=3)
4146 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)
6714 Points +66%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3960 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3807 Points -4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3864 Points -2%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3840 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3875 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (3960 - 4157, n=3)
4068 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)
16761 Points +323%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1395 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1410 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1365 Points -2%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1283 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1366 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (1228 - 1401, n=3)
1341 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)
1557 Points +12%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
35458 Points
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60807 Points +71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (4958 - 35458, n=3)
15145 Points -57%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1043 - 7865, n=2, last 2 years)
4454 Points -87%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
139.7 Points +166%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=162, last 2 years)
119.3 Points +127%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
52.6 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (49.5 - 53.4, n=3)
51.8 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85)
50.1 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
48.53 Points -8%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
47.8 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
46.15 Points -12%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
278.6 Points +208%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (89.8 - 92.4, n=3)
90.9 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
90.6 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
89.5 Points -1%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
87.7 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
82.3 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85)
66.3 Points -27%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
158 runs/min +260%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=148, last 2 years)
133.6 runs/min +204%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
44.2 runs/min +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chome 81)
44.1 runs/min 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
43.9 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (41.4 - 43.9, n=3)
42.8 runs/min -3%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chome 85)
41.3 runs/min -6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
40.4 runs/min -8%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years)
147.1 Points +104%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
146 Points +103%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
72 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (71 - 73, n=3)
72 Points 0%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
71 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
70 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
69 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85)
69 Points -4%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
48991 Points +182%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)
36733 Points +111%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
17768 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (17293 - 17817, n=3)
17503 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
17398 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
17303 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85)
16399 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
16197 Points -7%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
2950 ms * -10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
2941 ms * -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
2794 ms * -5%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85)
2774 ms * -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (2673 - 2832, n=2)
2753 ms * -3%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
2673 ms *
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)
1583 ms * +41%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
550 ms * +79%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Poco X3 NFCXiaomi Redmi Note 9SXiaomi Mi Note 10 LiteGoogle Pixel 4aSamsung Galaxy M51Average 64 GB UFS 2.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
7%
11%
35%
3%
-6%
322%
Sequential Read 256KB
506
496.6
-2%
501
-1%
502
-1%
491.7
-3%
Sequential Write 256KB
173.1
214.8
24%
213.2
23%
246.8
43%
189.8
10%
Random Read 4KB
123.4
137
11%
134.6
9%
162.9
32%
123.6
0%
Random Write 4KB
112.6
123.6
10%
125.8
12%
187.4
66%
114.5
2%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
75.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
74.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
74.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
55.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
54.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
59.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC; PUBG Mobile; 1.0.0: Ø29.9 (14-31)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC; Armajet; 1.15.1: Ø73.9 (56-102)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC; Call of Duty Mobile; low; 1.0.16: Ø59.5 (52-62)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC; Call of Duty Mobile; high; 1.0.16: Ø58.3 (49-61)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC; Call of Duty Mobile; very high; 1.0.16: Ø56.5 (40-60)
Carga Máxima
 38.6 °C39 °C36.9 °C 
 38 °C37.7 °C38 °C 
 36.3 °C37.1 °C37.9 °C 
Máximo: 39 °C
Médio: 37.7 °C
33.4 °C36.7 °C37.3 °C
33.8 °C36.5 °C36 °C
33.5 °C35.6 °C35.6 °C
Máximo: 37.3 °C
Médio: 35.4 °C
alimentação elétrica  25 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.530.12521.326.53118.425.84022.5245020.328.16315.828.38015.728.610016.728.312515.133.11601550.420010.651.125014.155.431510.862.340010.962.450010.567.26308.8698001071.1100010.173.1125011.176.1160011.979.620001180.5250012.180.8315012.578400012.778.3500013.478.9630013.874.280001571.1100001467.81250014.162.81600014.162.4SPL24.489.2N0.574.8median 12.5median 71.1Delta29.132.430.53531.927.126.4262730.431.225.228.822.722.525.522.120.124.719.235.417.839.417.845.916.149.916.655.715.962.514.365.514.770.414.873.614.37114.165.116.369.114.472.313.868.713.970.414.264.414.559.114.666.41568.115.359.115.751.660.964.571.226.98113.817.725.60.948.4median 15median 64.4median 48.4median 13.9median 64.73.311.122.81316.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Poco X3 NFCXiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 64.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 64.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 64.7% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (119.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.02 / 0.28 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.93 / 2.47 / 2.51 Watt
Carga midlight 5.62 / 6.93 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
5160 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
5020 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
5260 mAh
Google Pixel 4a
3140 mAh
Apple iPhone SE 2020
1822 mAh
Samsung Galaxy M51
7000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-9%
29%
48%
45%
21%
11%
6%
Idle Minimum *
0.93
1.5
-61%
0.8
14%
0.49
47%
0.44
53%
0.8
14%
Idle Average *
2.47
2.1
15%
1.1
55%
0.96
61%
1.56
37%
1.3
47%
2.09 ?(1.8 - 2.47, n=3)
15%
Idle Maximum *
2.51
2.5
-0%
1.8
28%
1
60%
1.63
35%
1.8
28%
Load Average *
5.62
5.2
7%
3.7
34%
3.11
45%
2.32
59%
4.8
15%
Load Maximum *
6.93
7.5
-8%
6.1
12%
5.23
25%
4.12
41%
7
-1%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
40h 27min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 85)
18h 36min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
19h 48min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 40min
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
5160 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
5020 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
5260 mAh
Google Pixel 4a
3140 mAh
Apple iPhone SE 2020
1822 mAh
Samsung Galaxy M51
7000 mAh
Battery Runtime
2%
7%
-20%
-38%
29%
Reader / Idle
2427
2263
-7%
2249
-7%
2270
-6%
1938
-20%
2642
9%
H.264
1188
1269
7%
1370
15%
1045
-12%
681
-43%
1685
42%
WiFi v1.3
1116
1187
6%
1095
-2%
669
-40%
694
-38%
1508
35%
Load
280
279
0%
337
20%
225
-20%
143
-49%
365
30%

Pro

+ SoC moderno
+ Armazenamento expansível
+ Câmera decente de 64 MP
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Boa porta de áudio
+ Bluetooth com todos os codecs de áudio habituais
+ Tela de 120 Hz ...

Contra

- ... com pequenas fraquezas e PWM
- Armazenamento mais lento do que o especificado
- Anúncios e muitos aplicativos de terceiros
- Fraquezas enquanto se localiza
- Apenas 12 meses de garantia
- Pesado

Veredicto - Uma forte relação preço-desempenho

Testing the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Testing the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC

O Poco X3 NFC oferece um equipamento excelente, principalmente quando se considera o preço baixo, já que o smartphone está normalmente disponível a partir de 230 euros (~$ 272) e à venda até às vezes abaixo de 200 euros (~$ 236).

Apesar do preço baixo, o smartphone Xiaomi se apresenta muito completo e ainda oferece características de equipamentos modernos como tela de 120 Hz e novo SoC. O equipamento da câmera também é exemplar nesta classe de preços, mas recebe sua parcela de reclamações neste teste. Embora o sistema de câmera quádrupla ofereça boas especificações no papel, as duas lentes adicionais de 2 MP não oferecem nenhum valor adicional específico.

O Poco X3 NFC oferece um equipamento muito completo a um preço acessível.

As restrições no modo de desenvolvedor e os anúncios no sistema são certamente irritantes e provavelmente não sem problemas para aqueles que se preocupam com a privacidade de dados. Mas a maioria dos usuários não terá nenhum interesse no modo de desenvolvedor. E isso não muda nada sobre o fato de que atualmente provavelmente não há smartphone melhor equipado nesta classe de preço do que o Poco X3.

Então, por que você ainda deve escolher um Pixel 4a ou um iPhone SE mais caro? Ambos oferecem uma melhor qualidade de câmera, mesmo que as funções sejam mais limitadas. E o longo suporte de atualização com o telefone do Google e da Apple também tornará essas soluções mais duradouras, já que apenas a atualização para o Android 11 é relativamente provável para o Poco neste momento. Porém, em termos de quantidade de funcionalidades, o Poco X3 é o vencedor claro.

Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC - 10/13/2020 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento
85%
Teclado
67 / 75 → 89%
Mouse
94%
Conectividade
54 / 70 → 77%
Peso
88%
Bateria
92%
Pantalha
87%
Desempenho do jogos
31 / 64 → 49%
Desempenho da aplicação
69 / 86 → 80%
Temperatura
90%
Ruído
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 82%
Camera
60%
Médio
76%
82%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Poco X3 NFC - Campeão de equipamentos de gama média
Daniel Schmidt, 2020-10-16 (Update: 2020-10-20)