Breve Análise do Conversível HP Pavilion x360 15 2019: Não compre esta configuração
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
72 % v7 (old) | 02/2020 | HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.9 kg | 20.6 mm | 15.60" | 1366x768 | |
78.9 % v6 (old) | 07/2018 | Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620 | 2.3 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.6 % v7 (old) | 12/2019 | Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE i5-8265U, GeForce MX230 | 2 kg | 20.5 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
80.1 % v6 (old) | 04/2018 | HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng R5 2500U, Vega 8 | 2.1 kg | 19.6 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
77.6 % v6 (old) | 06/2019 | Dell Inspiron 15 3585 (2300U, Vega 6) R3 2300U, Vega 6 | 1.9 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 3585 (2300U, Vega 6) (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 3585 (2300U, Vega 6) (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
|
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 195.7 cd/m²
Contraste: 288:1 (Preto: 0.68 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 11.99 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 4.63
ΔE Greyscale 12.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
57.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.93% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.65% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.15
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl BOE076E, TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768 | Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T AU Optronics B156HAN02.1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE BOE CQ NV156FHM-N48, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng Chi Mei CM15E9, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell Inspiron 15 3585 (2300U, Vega 6) BOE0802, TN, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD LQ156M1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | 0% | 7% | 1% | 70% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 38.65 | 39.19 1% | 39.05 1% | 41.36 7% | 39.22 1% | 66.5 72% |
sRGB Coverage | 58.2 | 58.9 1% | 57.3 -2% | 62.2 7% | 58.9 1% | 98 68% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 39.93 | 40.49 1% | 40.35 1% | 42.74 7% | 40.52 1% | 68.4 71% |
Response Times | -25% | -53% | 792% | -3% | -27% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 68.8 ? | 44 ? 36% | 57 ? 17% | 40 ? 42% | 39 ? 43% | 52.8 ? 23% |
Response Time Black / White * | 15.6 ? | 29 ? -86% | 33 ? -112% | 26 ? -67% | 12 ? 23% | 32 ? -105% |
PWM Frequency | 1000 ? | 352 ? -65% | 25000 ? 2400% | 250 ? -75% | 1020 ? 2% | |
Screen | 71% | 64% | 81% | 13% | 118% | |
Brightness middle | 195.7 | 229 17% | 266 36% | 221 13% | 225 15% | 588 200% |
Brightness | 186 | 221 19% | 251 35% | 207 11% | 213 15% | 555 198% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 76 -14% | 81 -8% | 87 -1% | 88 0% | 89 1% |
Black Level * | 0.68 | 0.15 78% | 0.165 76% | 0.15 78% | 0.535 21% | 0.4 41% |
Contrast | 288 | 1527 430% | 1612 460% | 1473 411% | 421 46% | 1470 410% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 11.99 | 5.03 58% | 6.33 47% | 4.35 64% | 10.37 14% | 2.5 79% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 21.31 | 8.89 58% | 21.03 1% | 8.98 58% | 19.75 7% | 6.3 70% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.63 | 5.23 -13% | 3.89 16% | 0.6 87% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 12.8 | 5.56 57% | 3.81 70% | 3.09 76% | 12.09 6% | 4.5 65% |
Gamma | 2.15 102% | 2.64 83% | 2.38 92% | 2.23 99% | 2.72 81% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 14252 46% | 7015 93% | 6057 107% | 6068 107% | 13335 49% | 6836 95% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 36.7 | 37 1% | 37 1% | 56 53% | 37 1% | 63.2 72% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 57.8 | 59 2% | 57 -1% | 86 49% | 59 2% | 98 70% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 16% /
44% | 4% /
32% | 293% /
201% | 4% /
8% | 54% /
84% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
15.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.2 ms rise | |
↘ 6.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
68.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 30 ms rise | |
↘ 38.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1000 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 1000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
MSI Modern 15 A10RB | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC | |
Average Intel Core i7-8565U (138.3 - 193, n=51) | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl | |
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US | |
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 | |
Dell Latitude 14 5495 | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE | |
Dell Latitude 13 3390 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
MSI Modern 15 A10RB | |
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
Dell Latitude 14 5495 | |
Average Intel Core i7-8565U (452 - 815, n=52) | |
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US | |
Dell Latitude 13 3390 | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE | |
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
Average Intel Core i7-8565U (13806 - 23118, n=16) | |
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
Average Intel Core i7-8565U (2682 - 8906, n=16) | |
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
Average Intel Core i7-8565U (263 - 420, n=7) | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3335 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5132 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3787 pontos | |
Ajuda |
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002 | Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831 | HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Dell Inspiron 15 3585 (2300U, Vega 6) Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G | Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | -60% | -35% | 19% | -73% | 70% | |
Seq Read | 1301 | 474.8 -64% | 1399 8% | 2465 89% | 1291 -1% | 2357 81% |
Seq Write | 931 | 229.3 -75% | 369.8 -60% | 1318 42% | 688 -26% | 1235 33% |
4K Read | 52.8 | 26.42 -50% | 40 -24% | 42.97 -19% | 21.87 -59% | 43.29 -18% |
4K Write | 127.5 | 49.85 -61% | 109.2 -14% | 81.9 -36% | 35.62 -72% | 99.7 -22% |
4K-64 Read | 323.4 | 364.5 13% | 264.3 -18% | 1025 217% | 632 95% | 1020 215% |
4K-64 Write | 667 | 93.2 -86% | 181.9 -73% | 338.6 -49% | 221.2 -67% | 1502 125% |
Access Time Read * | 0.048 | 0.13 -171% | 0.07 -46% | 0.077 -60% | 0.33 -588% | 0.07 -46% |
Access Time Write * | 0.136 | 0.088 35% | 0.041 70% | 0.046 66% | 0.234 -72% | 0.039 71% |
Score Read | 506 | 438 -13% | 444 -12% | 1314 160% | 783 55% | 1299 157% |
Score Write | 887 | 166 -81% | 328 -63% | 552 -38% | 326 -63% | 1726 95% |
Score Total | 1655 | 825 -50% | 963 -42% | 2488 50% | 1489 -10% | 3640 120% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 905 | 317.8 -65% | 265.8 -71% | 700 -23% | 432.6 -52% | 2145 137% |
Copy Program MB/s | 607 | 80.8 -87% | 158.7 -74% | 167.2 -72% | 95.6 -84% | 565 -7% |
Copy Game MB/s | 911 | 127.1 -86% | 216.8 -76% | 370.4 -59% | 263.4 -71% | 1320 45% |
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -39% | 4% | -39% | 32% | ||
Write 4K | 179 | 105 -41% | 116 -35% | 87.3 -51% | 93.6 -48% | |
Read 4K | 58.7 | 39.72 -32% | 42.73 -27% | 23.54 -60% | 41.87 -29% | |
Write Seq | 974 | 326.9 -66% | 1222 25% | 824 -15% | 1698 74% | |
Read Seq | 1614 | 1033 -36% | 1608 0% | 715 -56% | 1978 23% | |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 445.4 | 269.1 -40% | 280.1 -37% | 147.8 -67% | 383.1 -14% | |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 338.7 | 284.8 -16% | 333.6 -2% | 256.1 -24% | 326.9 -3% | |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 986 | 321 -67% | 1291 31% | 733 -26% | 2778 182% | |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 1824 | 1606 -12% | 3183 75% | 1525 -16% | 3119 71% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -60% /
-60% | -37% /
-37% | 12% /
14% | -56% /
-60% | 51% /
56% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 11 Performance | 1933 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 7819 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1008 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 427 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1280x720 Lowest Preset | |
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 3585 (2300U, Vega 6) | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (12 - 21.7, n=13) |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 49.1 | 30.5 | 24.7 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 16.8 | 10.5 | ||
Rocket League (2017) | 62.7 |
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002 | Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE GeForce MX230, i5-8265U, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831 | HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng Vega 8, R5 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Dell Inspiron 15 3585 (2300U, Vega 6) Vega 6, R3 2300U, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G | Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD UHD Graphics 630, i5-9300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -6% | -8% | -9% | -10% | -3% | |
off / environment * | 28.4 | 30.2 -6% | 30.3 -7% | 30.13 -6% | 30.6 -8% | 29.3 -3% |
Idle Minimum * | 28.4 | 30.9 -9% | 30.6 -8% | 30.13 -6% | 30.6 -8% | 29.3 -3% |
Idle Average * | 28.4 | 30.9 -9% | 30.6 -8% | 30.13 -6% | 30.6 -8% | 29.3 -3% |
Idle Maximum * | 28.4 | 30.9 -9% | 30.6 -8% | 30.13 -6% | 30.6 -8% | 29.8 -5% |
Load Average * | 31.5 | 34.2 -9% | 36.4 -16% | 38.8 -23% | 36.7 -17% | 32.4 -3% |
Load Maximum * | 37.4 | 34.2 9% | 36.8 2% | 38.8 -4% | 41.1 -10% | 37.2 1% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 28.4 / 28.4 / 28.4 dB |
Carga |
| 31.5 / 37.4 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.4 dB(A) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.9 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.8 °C / 85.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1 °C / -1.8 F).
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.7% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.17 / 0.8 Watt |
Ocioso | 3.6 / 5.4 / 6.5 Watt |
Carga |
26.7 / 28.8 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE i5-8265U, GeForce MX230, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng R5 2500U, Vega 8, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Inspiron 15 3585 (2300U, Vega 6) R3 2300U, Vega 6, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD i5-9300H, UHD Graphics 630, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -28% | -48% | -43% | -59% | -96% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.6 | 3.9 -8% | 3.23 10% | 4.8 -33% | 6.3 -75% | 3.79 -5% |
Idle Average * | 5.4 | 7.2 -33% | 6.3 -17% | 7 -30% | 9.2 -70% | 6.9 -28% |
Idle Maximum * | 6.5 | 9.5 -46% | 8 -23% | 9.5 -46% | 9.6 -48% | 9.2 -42% |
Load Average * | 26.7 | 36.8 -38% | 47 -76% | 40.8 -53% | 38 -42% | 62 -132% |
Load Maximum * | 28.8 | 33.1 -15% | 67.3 -134% | 44.3 -54% | 46 -60% | 108 -275% |
* ... smaller is better
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 41 Wh | Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE i5-8265U, GeForce MX230, 52.5 Wh | HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng R5 2500U, Vega 8, 55.8 Wh | Dell Inspiron 15 3585 (2300U, Vega 6) R3 2300U, Vega 6, 42 Wh | Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD i5-9300H, UHD Graphics 630, 97 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 39% | 100% | 66% | 3% | 123% | |
Reader / Idle | 737 | 440 -40% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 257 | 358 39% | 514 100% | 426 66% | 318 24% | 844 228% |
Load | 85 | 105 24% | 100 18% |
Pro
Contra
Os aspectos que resgatam o Pavilion x360 15 de 2019 são seus marcos estreitos, peso leve e pequenas dimensões em relação a outros conversíveis econômicos dessa categoria de tamanho. As opções de portas são respeitáveis e o ruído do ventilador é relativamente silencioso devido ao limitado Turbo Boost e às boas temperaturas do núcleo.
Infelizmente, quase todo o resto se desmorona. Por US$ 1.000, o Pavilion x360 15 oferece bateria de curta duração, um design fraco de chassi e uma das piores telas que você pode obter em um portátil com uma CPU Whiskey Lake-U. A tela é escura, o contraste é baixo, as cores são ruins e os ângulos de visão são estreitos por causa do painel TN, que nega quase completamente os benefícios de um formato 2 em 1. Uma configuração como essa nem deveria existir nessa faixa de preço.
Agora, o atual modelo Pavilion x360 15 não é ruim para um portátil econômico. As configurações de gama baixa custam cerca de US$ 500 para serem uma pílula mais fácil de engolir. No entanto, é altamente recomendável configurar qualquer SKU com o painel 1080p. Se o formato conversível não for um item obrigatório, então o Walmart Motile poderia ser uma alternativa que vale a pena.
Não vale o preço exorbitante de quatro dígitos do mercado. Se você estiver disposto a gastar US$ 1.000 em um portátil novo, considere o HP Envy ou o Spectre.
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
-
02/09/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo