Breve Análise do Workstation MSI WT72-6QME
MSI WT72-6QM (WT72 Serie)
Processador
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 4 x 2.8 - 3.7 GHz, Skylake
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M - 8 GB VRAM, 10.18.13.5396, manuell
Memória
32 GB
, DDR4
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, no, LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF1, IPS, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel CM236 (Skylake PCH-H)
Disco rígido
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, 256 GB
, 128GB*2 SSD (PCIe Gen3x4)
peso
3.852 kg, Suprimento de energia: 1.072 kg
Preço
5000 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 309 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 297.7 cd/m²iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 301 cd/m²
Contraste: 659:1 (Preto: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.77 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.87 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
85.27% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56.04% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
85.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.99
| MSI WT72-6QM 17.3", 1920x1080 | Bullman E-Klasse 5 17.3", 1920x1080 | Dell Precision M6800 17.3", 1920x1080 | HP ZBook 17 E9X11AA-ABA 17.3", 1920x1080 | SCHENKER XMG U705 17.3", 1920x1080 | Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015 17.3", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad P70 17.3", 3840x2160 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | 10% | 34% | -2% | 6% | 30% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 67.3 | 66.5 -1% | 71.8 7% | 85.7 27% | 66.3 -1% | 69.7 4% | 90.8 35% |
| sRGB Coverage | 85.4 | 84.5 -1% | 95.8 12% | 100 17% | 83.4 -2% | 90.4 6% | 100 17% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 62.5 | 61.8 -1% | 70.2 12% | 99.2 59% | 61 -2% | 66.8 7% | 85.4 37% |
| Response Times | 51% | ||||||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 42 ? | 44 ? -5% | |||||
| Response Time Black / White * | 26 ? | 27.6 ? -6% | |||||
| PWM Frequency | 86 ? | 228 ? 165% | |||||
| Screen | 14% | -39% | 29% | 14% | -45% | 15% | |
| Brightness middle | 303 | 355 17% | 250 -17% | 320 6% | 333 10% | 315.5 4% | 365 20% |
| Brightness | 298 | 335 12% | 247 -17% | 311 4% | 317 6% | 295 -1% | 341 14% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 89 -5% | 83 -12% | 88 -6% | 86 -9% | 87 -7% | 85 -10% |
| Black Level * | 0.46 | 0.44 4% | 0.477 -4% | 0.359 22% | 0.3 35% | 0.822 -79% | 0.4 13% |
| Contrast | 659 | 807 22% | 524 -20% | 891 35% | 1110 68% | 384 -42% | 913 39% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.77 | 3.73 35% | 11.4 -98% | 2.04 65% | 5.24 9% | 12.21 -112% | 3.8 34% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.87 | 2.84 42% | 12.97 -166% | 2.45 50% | 4.33 11% | 13.4 -175% | 6.09 -25% |
| Gamma | 1.99 111% | 2.12 104% | 2.65 83% | 2.28 96% | 2.14 103% | 2.39 92% | 2.3 96% |
| CCT | 7363 88% | 6457 101% | 18595 35% | 6518 100% | 6437 101% | 19530 33% | 6332 103% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 56.04 | 55.45 -1% | 68 21% | 93 66% | 55 -2% | 59 5% | 76.01 36% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 85.27 | 84.39 -1% | 100 17% | 83.3 -2% | 90.3 6% | 99.97 17% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 7% /
10% | -15% /
-26% | 32% /
30% | 6% /
10% | -20% /
-32% | 32% /
25% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 29 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 86 Hz | ≤ 10 % brightness setting |   |
| ≤ 15 cd/m² brightness | |||
The display backlight flickers at 86 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % (15 cd/m²) and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 86 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. As the flickering occurs only on very low brightness settings, it should not be an issue in typical office settings. Nonetheless, use in low light conditions may be straining to the eyes. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| MSI WT72-6QM | |
| HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET | |
| Bullman E-Klasse 5 | |
| Dell Precision M6800 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| MSI WT72-6QM | |
| HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET | |
| Bullman E-Klasse 5 | |
| Dell Precision M6800 | |
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| MSI WT72-6QM | |
| HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET | |
| Bullman E-Klasse 5 | |
| Dell Precision M6800 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| MSI WT72-6QM | |
| HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET | |
| Bullman E-Klasse 5 | |
| Dell Precision M6800 | |
| Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M (sort by value) | |
| MSI WT72-6QM | |
| Dell Precision M6800 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 7 Score | 6657 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4731 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5655 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
Velocidade de Transferência Mínima:
71.7 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Máxima:
153.4 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Média:
114.8 MB/s
Tempo de Acesso:
15.4 ms
Índice de Explosão:
309.7 MB/s
Uso da CPU:
3 %
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance (sort by value) | |
| MSI WT72-6QM | |
| HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET | |
| Bullman E-Klasse 5 | |
| Dell Precision M6800 | |
| MSI GT72S 6QF | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Score (sort by value) | |
| MSI WT72-6QM | |
| MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW | |
| HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET | |
| Bullman E-Klasse 5 | |
| Dell Precision M6800 | |
| MSI GT72S 6QF | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score (sort by value) | |
| MSI WT72-6QM | |
| MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW | |
| HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET | |
| Bullman E-Klasse 5 | |
| Dell Precision M6800 | |
| MSI GT72S 6QF | |
| 1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value) | |
| MSI WT72-6QM | |
| MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW | |
| HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET | |
| Bullman E-Klasse 5 | |
| Dell Precision M6800 | |
| MSI GT72S 6QF | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 29317 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 11110 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 137273 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 22786 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7979 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 4205 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| SPECviewperf 12 | |
| 1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03) (sort by value) | |
| MSI WT72-6QM | |
| MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW | |
| HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET | |
| Bullman E-Klasse 5 | |
| 1900x1060 Siemens NX (snx-02) (sort by value) | |
| MSI WT72-6QM | |
| MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW | |
| HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET | |
| Bullman E-Klasse 5 | |
| 1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01) (sort by value) | |
| MSI WT72-6QM | |
| MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW | |
| HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET | |
| Bullman E-Klasse 5 | |
| 1900x1060 Medical (medical-01) (sort by value) | |
| MSI WT72-6QM | |
| MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW | |
| HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET | |
| Bullman E-Klasse 5 | |
| 1900x1060 Maya (maya-04) (sort by value) | |
| MSI WT72-6QM | |
| MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW | |
| HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET | |
| Bullman E-Klasse 5 | |
| 1900x1060 Energy (energy-01) (sort by value) | |
| MSI WT72-6QM | |
| MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW | |
| HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET | |
| Bullman E-Klasse 5 | |
| 1900x1060 Creo (creo-01) (sort by value) | |
| MSI WT72-6QM | |
| MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW | |
| HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET | |
| Bullman E-Klasse 5 | |
| 1900x1060 Catia (catia-04) (sort by value) | |
| MSI WT72-6QM | |
| MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW | |
| HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET | |
| Bullman E-Klasse 5 | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dirt 3 (2011) | 211 | 202.7 | 171.4 | 158.2 |
| Hitman: Absolution (2012) | 83.5 | 75.9 | 67.2 | 50.3 |
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 406.8 | 319.6 | 227.9 | 107 |
| Metro: Last Light (2013) | 127.5 | 125.3 | 104.3 | 60.8 |
| GRID 2 (2013) | 176.3 | 145.6 | 134.5 | 102.7 |
| Company of Heroes 2 (2013) | 53.4 | 52 | 51.4 | 34.4 |
| Thief (2014) | 97.6 | 92.3 | 89.4 | 80.5 |
| Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014) | 167.8 | 143.2 | 87.4 | 63.6 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 33.3 / 33.4 / 33.5 dB |
| DVD |
| 34 / dB |
| Carga |
| 38.8 / 40.2 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1 Arta (15 cm de distância) | ||
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.4 °C / 79.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (+1.4 °C / 2.5 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.4 °C / 79.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (+1.4 °C / 2.5 F).
| MSI WT72-6QM 87 Wh | HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET 75 Wh | Bullman E-Klasse 5 83 Wh | Dell Precision M6800 97 Wh | SCHENKER XMG U705 82 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -49% | -30% | 9% | -24% | |
| Reader / Idle | 413 | 162 -61% | 166 -60% | 492 19% | 138 -67% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 245 | 144 -41% | |||
| Load | 76 | 49 -36% | 85 12% | 75 -1% | 91 20% |
| WiFi | 149 | 352 |
Pro
+ Muito bom desempenho geral e de CAD/3D
+ Excelente gerenciamento da temperatura
+ USB Tipo-C (Thunderbolt 3)
+ Fácil de manter com muitos slots e interfaces
+ Boa tela IPS
Contra
- Bastante caro
- Grande e pesado
- Alternação de GPU requer reinicialização
- Desempenho muito afogado com a bateria
- A cobertura do espaço de cores poderia ser melhor
- Baseado em plataforma de jogos
Com o workstation WT72-6QME, a MSI fornece uma atualização sólida para um produto que já era bom. Embora o desempenho da CPU Xeon E3-1505M não é inovador, oferece suporte para RAM ECC, que por sua vez aumenta a confiabilidade. Por falar em confiabilidade: embora um array RAID 0 posa fazer muito sentido para um portátil de jogos, ainda temos a dúvida de se não seria melhor incluir tolerância para falhas em um sistema onde a estabilidade e confiabilidade são peças chave. Originalmente projetado para jogos, o chassi tem uma solução de resfriamento bem projetada e inclusive é possível usar o aparelho o dia todo com uso intenso, sem afogamentos. No entanto, ativar o recurso "Cooler Boost" poderia incomodar os colegas de trabalho, dado que o nível de ruído é bastante substancial. A tela - usada em muitos sistemas de jogos de 17-polegadas - também é bom, embora desejaríamos uma melhor cobertura dos espaços de cor profissionais.
O workstation WT72 atualizado da MSI é mais uma vez uma opção sólida neste segmento - embora a configuração topo de linha pareça quase proibitivamente cara para um portátil de jogos modificado.
Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.
MSI WT72-6QM
- 03/17/2016 v5 (old)
Bernie Pechlaner
Workstation - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
